Elsevier

Applied Soft Computing

Volume 36, November 2015, Pages 383-391
Applied Soft Computing

Some interesting properties of the fuzzy linguistic model based on discrete fuzzy numbers to manage hesitant fuzzy linguistic information

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.07.022Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Properties of the fuzzy linguistic model based on discrete fuzzy numbers are analysed.

  • This model is used to handle hesitant fuzzy linguistic information.

  • This model includes the hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets model.

  • Some advantages of the model based on discrete fuzzy numbers are pointed out.

  • A fuzzy decision making model based on discrete fuzzy numbers is proposed.

Abstract

The management of hesitant fuzzy information is a topic of special interest in fuzzy decision making. In this paper, we focus on the use and properties of the fuzzy linguistic modelling based on discrete fuzzy numbers to manage hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Among these properties, we can highlight the existence of aggregation functions with no need of transformations or the possibility of a greater flexibilization of the opinions of the experts, even using different linguistic chains (multigranularity). Furthermore, based on these properties we perform a comparison between this model and the one based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, showing the advantages of the former with respect to the latter. Finally, a fuzzy decision making model based on discrete fuzzy numbers is proposed.

Introduction

The presence of uncertainty is a common feature that characterizes a wide range of real problems related to decision making. Thus, for instance, a group of experts should decide the feasibility of a financial transaction from information which is often vague or incomplete, or similarly, when a medical team must make a diagnosis based on preliminary tests. Frequently, the uncertainty appears when we use assessments not necessarily quantitative but we deal with terms or qualitative information when making the decision. For this reason, the fuzzy linguistic approximations have emerged as a tool which allow to properly handle the qualitative information. In this sense, we highlight the symbolic linguistic model based on ordinal scales (wherein an order is considered among the different linguistic labels) [11], [14]; the linguistic 2-tuples model [15], which introduces the symbolic translation to the linguistic representation; the linguistic model based on type-2 fuzzy sets representation [32], which represents the semantics of the linguistic terms using type-2 fuzzy membership functions; the proportional 2-tuple model [34], which extends the 2-tuple model by using two linguistic terms with their proportion to model the information, or the linguistic model based on PSO and granular computing of linguistic information [2], which proposes to model the linguistic information like expressed in terms of information granules defined as sets, among many others. A common feature of many of these models is that experts should express their valuations choosing a single linguistic level associated with the linguistic variable. This kind of information is usually interpreted using a linguistic scale like this,L={EB,VB,B,F,G,VG,EG}where the linguistic terms correspond to the expressions “Extremely Bad”, “Very Bad”, “Bad”, “Fair”, “Good”, “Very Good” and “Extremely Good” respectively. However in many cases the experts’ opinions do not correspond exactly to a particular linguistic term. On the contrary, expressions like “better than good” or “between fair and very good” or, even more complex ones, are commonly used by experts in order to make their opinions. Recently, V. Torra [31] introduced the hesitant fuzzy sets as a possible generalization of the classical fuzzy sets. Based on this idea, different authors [29], [30], [36], [37] have proposed a computational linguistic model based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, allowing that the expert could consider several possible linguistic values or richer expressions than a single term for an indicator, alternative, variable, etc; increasing the richness of linguistic elicitation based on fuzzy linguistic approach. Several methods based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for group decision-making have been recently proposed (see [6], [17], [18], [35], [40]). On the other hand, the authors [4], [5], [21], [26], [27], [28] have considered another linguistic computational model based on discrete fuzzy numbers [33], which allows to interpret the qualitative information in a more flexible way and also enables to aggregate the information they expressed using this type of fuzzy subsets directly. Although at a first glance the two models seems to be different, they are in fact quite connected. As we will prove, the hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets used by the first model can be interpreted as particular cases of discrete fuzzy numbers and although the aggregation functions used in the aggregation phase presented in the original articles (see [29] for the hesitant fuzzy sets based one and [21] for the discrete fuzzy numbers based one) are different (as it is the exploitation phase), if both models used the adequate aggregation functions and the same exploitation method, the results would coincide.

In this article we want to make a step further and the main goal will be to show the advantages of using the model based on discrete fuzzy numbers with respect to the hesitant fuzzy sets based one. These advantages are related to the existence of aggregation functions on the set of discrete fuzzy numbers which allow us to aggregate the opinions without any transformation or loss of information, to the possibility of a greater flexibilization of the opinions given by the experts and finally, to the possibility of the experts to evaluate using different linguistic chains (multigranularity [23]). We will also present an example of a multi-criteria decision making problem using the linguistic model based on discrete fuzzy numbers, showing the commented advantages of this method.

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we make a brief review of discrete fuzzy numbers and hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. In Section 3, we explain the main characteristics of the fuzzy linguistic model based on discrete fuzzy numbers, comparing this method with the model based on hesitant fuzzy linguist term sets. Throughout the process, we prove that the discrete fuzzy numbers allow a greater flexibilization and an easier management of the opinions given by the experts. In Section 4, we propose a multi-criteria decision making approach based on these particular fuzzy subsets using extensions of two well known discrete parametric compensatory aggregation functions [8], [20]. The last section is devoted to give some conclusions and the future work that we want to develop.

Section snippets

Preliminaries

In this section, we recall some definitions and results about aggregation functions and discrete fuzzy numbers which will be used later. We also recall the notion of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and some operations related to this concept.

Linguistic model based on discrete fuzzy numbers

In this section we present the fuzzy linguistic model based on discrete fuzzy numbers whose support is an interval of the finite chain Ln = {0, 1, ⋯ , n}. Moreover, we will compare this linguistic model with the model based on HFLTS and we will prove that the latter can be interpreted as a particular case of the one based on discrete fuzzy numbers. Moreover, in this last model, a greater flexibilization and an easier management of the opinions given by the experts is possible.

First of all, note

Multicriteria linguistic decision-making problem with linguistic expressions based on subjective evaluations

In [29], [30] a linguistic computational model for multi-criteria decision making based on symbolic computational models that allows the experts to express its assessments through comparative linguistic expressions or simple linguistic terms is presented. Similarly, in this section we present a model based on subjective evaluations.

Following the ideas presented in [30], our proposed model has the following phases:

  • 1.

    Transformation phase: Fixed a linguistic scale L, each expert assesses using

Conclusions and future work

In this paper, we have analysed and compared both linguistic computational models, one based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and another based on discrete fuzzy numbers. Since the hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets can be interpreted as particular cases of discrete fuzzy numbers whose support coincides with their core, with the appropriate aggregation functions and exploitation method, both methods agree in their final decision. However, we should point out that the model based on

Acknowledgments

This paper has been partially supported by the Spanish Grants MTM2009-10320, MTM2009-10962 and TIN2013-42795-P with FEDER support also with the nancing of FEDER funds in FUZZYLING-II Project TIN2010-17876, Andalusian Excellence Projects TIC-05299 and TIC-5991.

References (40)

Cited by (62)

  • Expertise-based bid evaluation for construction-contractor selection with generalized comparative linguistic ELECTRE III

    2021, Automation in Construction
    Citation Excerpt :

    In particular, multi-granularity linguistic-term sets with more elaborate cardinalities are used by experts for assessing those criteria that require thorough evaluations on a high granular level and that can be evaluated in a clear-cut and in-depth manner, whereas multi-granularity linguistic-term sets with smaller cardinalities serve for those criteria that are exposed to experts that are more vague in articulating their evaluations (i.e., the experts can provide only rough estimates). Numerous approaches have been explored to manage hesitant fuzzy linguistic information, such as the fuzzy envelope method [31] and discrete fuzzy numbers [32]. Wu and Xu [33] introduced the possibility-distribution concept to manage hesitant fuzzy linguistic information as an alternative, which facilitates the understanding and computation of HFLTSs and provides a different perspective to explain hesitant fuzzy linguistic information.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text