Elsevier

Applied Soft Computing

Volume 52, March 2017, Pages 53-63
Applied Soft Computing

Performance analysis of simplified Fuzzy ARTMAP and Probabilistic Neural Networks for identifying structural damage growth

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.12.020Get rights and content

Highlights

  • An unprecedented comparative performance analysis between Fuzzy ARTMAP and Probabilistic Neural networks applied to identifying structural damage.

  • The fuzzy ARTMAP method is better suited to the problem of damage growth in regard to success and training/testing times.

  • The suitable damage prognosis method can lead to an increase in safety and reduce maintenance costs in a variety of applications.

  • It contributes to helping researchers choose more effective approaches for structural damage growth.

Abstract

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) has been advancing worldwide as evidenced by recent papers and practical applications. SHM systems increase safety and reduce maintenance costs in a variety of applications contributing significantly to prevent structural failures. Studies focusing on the structural damage identification have been proposed in literature by using methods based on Probabilistic Neural Networks (PNN). Although Fuzzy based methods are recurrent in SHM approaches, the Simplified Fuzzy ARTMAP Network (SFAN) has not been explored for analyzing structural damage. Furthermore, there is no evidence of comparative studies of these two methods when applied to the problem of progressing structural damage. Thus, this paper presents a comparative analysis of these two methods in the context of identifying structural damage growth. The comparison is made based on the factors of success rate and training/testing times. Additionally, this approach has carried out the performance analysis of suitable parameters setup for SFAN: choice parameter, training rate and vigilance parameter. As a practical case study, both methods were applied to a unidirectional composite plate containing four PZT (Lead Zirconate Titanate) patches where the damage growth scenarios were also simulated by loosening bolts for three different levels. In addition, the repaired structural condition was also considered by retightening bolts. The results have shown that both methods are suitable for the problem of damage growth, particularly to supporting decisions about the structural damage assessment. In short, the comparative analysis has shown that the SFAN method is better suited to the problem of damage growth especially in regard to training and testing times. Thus, this comparative study contributes to helping researchers and industrialist in choosing more effective approaches for structural damage growth.

Introduction

The world commercial aircrafts fleet has increased on average 1.8% during 2010 reaching more than 25,000 new aircrafts in operation [1]. Furthermore, there are many old aircraft that are still operating in the global air space [2]. Likewise, advanced composite materials such as used in new projects of modern aircraft have become an interesting field of development and research for both academia and industry. For example, Airbus designed the A350XWB using 53% of its structure made up of composite materials becoming a landmark in the history of commercial aircraft due to transcending the barrier of the 50% in using composite materials [3]. However, all those aforementioned structures are also susceptible to structural failure especially after a long time in operation. Hence, Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) and damage detection have been advancing worldwide as evidenced by recent papers and practical applications. In particular, Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) methods allow for detecting a variety of structural damage such as delamination, cracks, rivets or screws loosened and others. Also, new techniques and methods for structural failures prognosis and identification reduce cost and enable more efficient maintenance [4].

Within this context, Electromechanical Impedance (EMI) based methods have received attention. The method uses small and lightweight piezoelectric wafers as active sensor attached to the structure to be monitored. Piezoelectric/piezocomposite sensor system has been used as a useful tool for assessment of structural damage applied to different kinds of structures. However, methods based on EMI when applied to composite structures are challenging due to increased damping in the impedance signatures (resonant/antiresonant peaks) [5]. PZT (Lead Zirconate Titanate) patches cover a small sensing area, around 0.4 m (radius), when applied to aluminum structures [6]. Yet the coverage area of the PZT may be drastically reduced for structure made up of composite by using higher frequencies (EMI-based methods) [5]. Thus, new approaches exploring EMI methods have been proposed for damage prognosis in composite structures to overcome the aforementioned issues [7], [8], [9].

Currently, there is a vast literature about SHM approaches focusing on Artificial Neural Network (ANN) along with EMI methods, applied to structural damage identification [10], [11], [12]. Lately, new methods based on Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN) have been proposed [13] for predicting structural damage. Therein, damage was simulated drilling holes to the glass fiber plate in different positions. According to [13], methods based on PNN have a faster training procedure and are easier than backpropagation. Also, their damage classifier is guaranteed to converge as the size of the representative training set increases. In [14], authors developed a method based on the EMI for detecting and locating damage applied to a carbon reinforced fiber composites. The localization process was based on PNN, where inputs were derived from the principal components obtained from damage metrics. A method based on EMI along with PNN and Fuzzy cluster analysis for identification, location, and classification of structural damage was proposed in [15]. Therein, damage was simulated by loosening a rivet in an aluminum panel.

Methods based on Fuzzy systems have been proposed in literature for damage identification in structures [15], [16]. However, methods based on Fuzzy ARTMAP Network (FAN) applied to structural damage identification have not been explored in literature. On the other hand, FAN based methods have been applied successfully in different fields such as electrical power system forecasting [17], [18], computer network intrusion detection [19], image recognition systems [20] and medical/biomedical applications [21]. The exception is [22], where the authors proposed identification of flaws in aircraft structures using an ARTMAP-Fuzzy-Wavelet artificial neural network. Signals obtained from a numerical model (finite elements) of an aluminum beam were used as input for FAN. Failure was simulated in wear levels 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30%. Those results showed a success of 100% for failure identification, thereby promising an excellent tool for identifying the progress of structural damage.

The purpose of the research presented here is to evaluate the performance of the Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN) and Simplified Fuzzy ARTMAP Network (SFAN) applied to the progression of structural damage. The comparison was made based on several factors: success rate and training/testing times. Furthermore, this approach has carried out the performance analysis for the parameters setup of SFAN: choice parameter, training rate and vigilance parameter. In order to evaluate the performance, both methods were applied to a unidirectional composite plate with four PZT patches attached. The damage growth scenarios were simulated by loosening bolts to three different levels. Additionally, the repaired structural condition was also considered by retightening bolts. The experimental setup was carried out based on the EMI technique, in the time domain, along with Euclidean distance. A performance analysis for the comparative study showed that both methods can be useful for identifying the growth of structural damage making it an excellent approach for SHM applications.

The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: a brief review of EMI technique applied to SHM application; the main concepts about Fuzzy ARTMAP; and Probabilistic neural networks. Next, test scenarios and experimental case study based on the EMI method are shown followed by the results for both SFAN and PNN. Finally, the paper concludes highlighting advantages and remarks of the proposed approach.

Section snippets

Electromechanical impedance

The technique based on the Electromechanical Impedance (EMI) applied to SHM was introduced by [23] and improved by several other authors [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]. EMI methods are considered an important technique of NDE which is based on the Frequency Response Function (FRF). The EMI based methods have received a lot of attention lately by using small and lightweight piezoelectric wafer active sensor attached to the structure to be monitored.

Experimental case study

Experimental tests were conducted by using the acquisition system proposed by [27]. Their system was developed on the LabVIEW® platform and makes use of a National Instruments Data Acquisition (DAQ) device, model USB-6259 (Fig. 4). In this system, the DAQ provides the signals x[n] and y[n] in discrete forms. Furthermore, the DAC (digital to analog converter) and the ADC (analog to digital convertor), which are integrated into the DAQ device, are synchronized ensuring for each sample n generated

Results and discussion

In this section an EMI-based experimental setup is used as a case study to evaluate the performance of identifying the progress of structural damage by using both ED/SFAN and ED/PNN. All analysis is carried out in a real composite structure shown in Fig. 5.

Conclusions

This work evaluated the performance of two methods: Simplified Fuzzy ARTMAP Network (SFAN) and Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN) applied to identifying structural damage growth by exploiting the electromechanical impedance technique. In order to test both methods, experiments on a unidirectional composite plate with four PZT patches attached were performed. The best performance for damage identification based on the SFAN, in terms of success rate was obtained when using the choice parameter

Funding

The authors would like to thank the CNPq, Brazilian Research Agency (Grant 248665/2013-8), and the University of Michigan through the Kelly Johnson Collegiate Chair fund.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to the reviewers for their careful and meticulous reading as well as their contributions which helped to improve the manuscript. The authors also acknowledge the useful help and the support during the experiments provided by Dr Jared Hobeck.

References (43)

  • C.G. Gonsalez et al.

    Structural damage detection in an aeronautical panel using analysis of variance

    Mech. Syst. Sig. Process.

    (2015)
  • D.K. Morrow et al.

    World airliner census

    (2011)
  • C. Boller

    Ways and options for aircraft structural health management

    Smart Mater. Struct.

    (2001)
  • T. Chady

    Airbus Versus Boeing − Composite Materials: The Sky’s the Limit…

    (2013)
  • K. Worden et al.

    Overview of intelligent fault detection in system and structures

    Struct. Health Monit.

    (2004)
  • G. Park et al.

    Overview of piezoelectric impedance-based health monitoring and path forward

    Shock Vib. Digest

    (2003)
  • M. Gresil et al.

    Predictive modeling of electromechanical impedance spectroscopy for composite materials

    Struct. Health Monit.

    (2012)
  • V. Lopes et al.

    Impedance-Based structural healthy with artificial neural networks

    J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct.

    (2000)
  • L.V. Palomino et al.

    Probabilistic neural network and fuzzy cluster analysis methods applied to impedance-based SHM for damage classification

    Shock Vib.

    (2014)
  • S. Silva et al.

    Structural damage detection by fuzzy clustering

    Mech. Syst. Sig. Process.

    (2008)
  • N. Araújo et al.

    Performance evaluation of the fuzzy ARTMAP for network intrusion detection

  • Cited by (31)

    • State-of-the-art review on advancements of data mining in structural health monitoring

      2022, Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation
    • Integrated electromechanical impedance technique with convolutional neural network for concrete structural damage quantification under varied temperatures

      2021, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, accurate quantification of structural damage severity under varied temperatures still necessitates more effective and intelligent approaches, on account of the complexity in solving such multivariate problems. Belonging to the second category, machine learning methods, such as ANN, probabilistic neural network (PNN) or Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) are regarded as a powerful tool to solve complex issue of damage classification by learning the representations of monitoring data [17,26,27]. Previous studies have examined the superiority of neural networks (NNs) approach for estimation of structural damage type and severity due to the versatility in dealing with various types of inputs and outputs and a quick diagnosis capability after training of the NN was completed [28].

    • An anthropomorphic fuzzy model for the time-spatial assessment of sandstone seepage damage

      2020, Automation in Construction
      Citation Excerpt :

      The most likely moisture content can be obtained using fuzzy calculation. The anthropomorphic fuzzy model can realize the depth location of seepage damage and moisture content real-time assessment [9,11]. AE data is acquired in real time through sensor arrays.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text