Customer-oriented product design using an integrated neutrosophic AHP & DEMATEL & QFD methodology
Introduction
After the second half of the 19th century, enterprises tried to gain superiority against their competitors by developing their products based on the quality strategy because of the drastic increase in the competitive environment among enterprises. Today, enterprises try to gain superiority over their competitors in the market by making a significant difference in their products with a customer-oriented product development strategy as well as a quality strategy. In particular, the rapid developments and growth in technology have increased the speed of offering products to the market. Nevertheless, this shortened the life cycle of the products in the market. For this reason, businesses should provide their product to the market in a short time by understanding customer expectations well, and these expectations should be quickly transferred to the technical characteristics of the product during the new product development stages. QFD has been proposed to literature by Akao et al. [1], [2] in order to develop products by adapting customers’ requirements into the technical characteristics of the products [2]. QFD methodology is represented by a scheme called the house of quality (HoQ). The HoQ consists of six main parts, which define
- •
Customer Requirements (CRs)
- •
Technical Characteristics (TCs)
- •
Relationship matrix among TCs
- •
Relationship matrix between TCs and customer requirements
- •
Marketing matrix
- •
Design targets
Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is one of the most commonly used methods in order to provide a customer-oriented product design. In the literature, there are lots of studies that present applications of QFD on product development [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Furthermore, some researchers present some modifications and extensions to develop the performance of QFD by improving the data representation and reflecting parts of HoQ. When the mentioned extensions are reviewed, the reason for these new versions is mainly based on the different kinds of uncertainties in the data set. Since the data set may consist of vagueness, impreciseness, indeterminant and hesitant information, different types of fuzzy set extensions are used to handle the uncertainty. In the traditional set theory, an element can belong to a set or not; in optimization, a solution is either feasible or not; and in Boolean logic, a statement can be true or false, but nothing in between [12]. But in real-life conditions, almost nothing is precise and everything is a matter of degree and cannot be defined by the traditional logic. In order to deal with this kind of uncertainty, Zadeh introduced the fuzzy sets theory [13]. Since its first introduction in 1965, it has been extended in various forms. Type-2 fuzzy sets, again, were introduced by Zadeh to enhance the representation of impreciseness of the data in the mathematical operations [14]. Then, in 1986, Atanassov introduced intuitionistic fuzzy sets, which is a concept that corporates membership and non-membership degrees simultaneously [15]. Then, neutrosophic sets are presented by Smarandache, which offers a domain area that consists of three independent subsets to represent types of uncertainties [16]. Neutrosophic sets are defined as the sets where each element of the universe has a degree of truthiness, indeterminacy, and falsity, which are between 0 and 1, and these degrees are subsets of the neutrosophic sets which are independent of each other [16]. In the neutrosophic sets, impreciseness is represented as truth and falsity functions where degrees of belongingness and non-belongingness and distinguish of absoluteness and relativeness is represented by indeterminacy function. With this notation, neutrosophic sets handle the uncertainty of the system and reduce the indecisiveness of inconsistent information. Therefore, this capability can be said as the most important advantage of the neutrosophic sets among the other types of fuzzy extensions. Using these three functions, neutrosophic sets provide a domain area, which enables the conduct of different types of uncertainties in the mathematical operations independently.
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), proposed by Saaty [17], is a well-known method for handling complex problems by dividing them into sub-problems and then putting the solutions of these sub-problems together. In this method, which is based on pairwise comparisons of experts, ensuring the consistency of the evaluations has an important place. DEcision MAking Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method, introduced by Fontela and Gabus [18], is one of the widely used decision making methods when there is dependency among decision criteria. AHP and DEMATEL have been widely used in the literature as standard methods [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], so their application steps are not provided in this study. As different from the literature, a new methodology consisting of AHP, DEMATEL, and QFD extended by interval-valued neutrosophic sets is proposed. Even though customer requirements, TCs and competitor assessment are taken into account in classical QFD, to the best of our knowledge, there is no study calculating the weights of customer requirements and the coefficient of competitor assessment with neutrosophic AHP which can represent uncertainty of customers based on three parameters. Moreover, neutrosophic DEMATEL has not been used to model the relationship between TCs when considering uncertainty. With the proposed approach, uncertainty in the assessment of customer requirements and the relations between TCs and customer requirements, and the dependecies between TCs might be represented more precisely. In this way, it is expected to reflect the voice of customer into the design process by better associating the customers requirements with the TCs. The representation of the proposed methodology is given in Fig. 1.
As in Fig. 1, AHP is used to determine the weights of the customer requirements for the decision-making process with a hierarchical structure in Phase 1. For the direct comparison of the design with the competitor, AHP is conducted to find the differences in Phase 2. Moreover, the DEMATEL technique is conducted to determine the interrelations of the TCs based on the assigned linguistic terms in Phase 3. The assumption for these hierarchical structures is based on no dependency or feedback between the requirements. In Phase 4, TCs are evaluated by the decision-makers with respect to customer requirements. Finally, by aggregating the outputs of these phases, final weights and the importance of the TCs are obtained in Phase 5. For demonstrating robustness, a one-at-a-time sensitivity analysis based on different cases is conducted. Moreover, for the validation of the results and verification of the given decisions, comparative analyses are applied. Through the results of the application and analyses, theoretical and managerial implications have been discussed.
The rest of the study is organized as follows: Section 2 provides a literature analysis both for neutrosophic studies and emerging trends of the QFD method. Section 3 presents the proposed approach together with its preliminaries. Section 4 illustrates the application consisting of problem definitions, calculation and results, sensitivity, and comparative analyses for the design of automobile seat. Section 5 introduces the discussion about theoretical and managerial implications. Finally, in Section 6, concluding remarks and suggestions for further studies are given.
Section snippets
Literature analysis
In this section, the MCDM studies extended with neutrosophic concept, and QFD methods integrated with other techniques and the research gap have been presented. In the following sub-section, analyses for the mentioned ones are presented, respectively.
Methodology
In this study, a decision-making approach consists of neutrosophic DEMATEL and neutrosophic AHP is used to construct a novel QFD methodology by considering multi-expert judgments. Before presenting the phases of the proposed methodology, the essentials of the conducted techniques are presented with all their details.
Application
In the following sub-sections, the environment of the problem, steps of the application, sensitivity analysis, and comparative analysis have been introduced, respectively.
Discussion
Based on the outputs of the proposed methodology and applied analyses, discussions concerning theoretical and managerial aspects have been carried out in the following sub-sections.
Conclusions
The rapid developments in technology and industry have increased the speed of product release to the market. Increasing product variety required companies to produce more successful products than competitors’ products in order to maintain their success. In order to achieve this goal, companies should not only understand customer expectations and their position among their competitors but also integrate their findings into design process. Therefore, in this study, a new approach based on QFD,
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Ali Karasan: Participation in the concept, Design, Analysis, Writing, and revision of the manuscript. Esra Ilbahar: Participation in the concept, Design, Analysis, Writing, and revision of the manuscript. Selcuk Cebi: Participation in the concept, Design, Analysis, Writing, and revision of the manuscript. Cengiz Kahraman: Participation in the concept, Design, Analysis, Writing, and revision of the manuscript.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References (84)
- et al.
A multi-phase QFD-based hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for performance evaluation: A case of smart bike-sharing programs in Changsha
J. Cleaner Prod.
(2018) - et al.
A function combined baby stroller design method developed by fusing Kano, QFD and FAST methodologies
Int. J. Ind. Ergon.
(2020) - et al.
Quality function deployment: A literature review
European J. Oper. Res.
(2002) - et al.
A novel spherical fuzzy QFD method and its application to the linear delta robot technology development
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.
(2020) Fuzzy sets
Inf. Control
(1965)The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III
Inform. Sci.
(1975)Intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
(1986)The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used
Math. Model.
(1987)- et al.
DEMATEL: Progress achieved
Futures
(1974) - et al.
Assessing relative importance and mutual influence of barriers for CCS deployment of the ROAD project using AHP and DEMATEL methods
Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control
(2015)
An integrated approach using AHP and DEMATEL for evaluating climate change mitigation strategies of the Indian cement manufacturing industry
Environ. Pollut.
A two level interval valued neutrosophic AHP integrated TOPSIS methodology for post-earthquake fire risk assessment: An application for Istanbul
Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
Neutrosophic multi-criteria evaluation of sustainable alternatives for the structure of single-family homes
Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
Evaluation of sustainable hydrogen production options using an advanced hybrid MCDM approach: A case study
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
A leanness assessment methodology based on neutrosophic DEMATEL
J. Manuf. Syst.
Development of a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for sustainability evaluation of bioenergy production technologies: A case study
J. Cleaner Prod.
A hybrid Neutrosophic multiple criteria group decision making approach for project selection
Cogn. Syst. Res.
Internet of Things (IoT) and its impact on supply chain: A framework for building smart, secure and efficient systems
Future Gener. Comput. Syst.
Comparison of municipalities considering environmental sustainability via neutrosophic DEMATEL based TOPSIS
Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci.
Incorporating the concept of systematic innovation into quality function deployment for developing multi-functional smart phones
Comput. Ind. Eng.
Using integrated quality function deployment and theory of innovation problem solving approach for ergonomic product design
Comput. Ind. Eng.
Integration of ECQFD, TRIZ, and AHP for innovative and sustainable product development
Appl. Math. Model.
Quantification and integration of an improved Kano model into QFD based on multi-population adaptive genetic algorithm
Comput. Ind. Eng.
Evaluating the strategic design parameters of airports in Thailand to meet service expectations of Low-Cost Airlines using the Fuzzy-based QFD method
J. Air Transp. Manage.
Identification of product’s design characteristics for remanufacturing using failure modes feedback and quality function deployment
J. Cleaner Prod.
Integration of green quality function deployment and fuzzy theory: a case study on green mobile phone design
J. Cleaner Prod.
An integrated green management model to improve environmental performance of textile industry towards sustainability
J. Cleaner Prod.
Real-time location systems selection by using a fuzzy MCDM approach: An application in humanitarian relief logistics
Appl. Soft Comput.
A construction of sound semantic linguistic scales using 4-tuple representation of term semantics
Internat. J. Approx. Reason.
New product development and quality assurance–quality deployment system
Stand. Qual.
Quality deployment including cost, reliability, and technology
Quality
Benchmark product features using the Kano-QFD approach: a case study
Benchmarking
Integrating evaluation grid method and fuzzy quality function deployment to new product development
Math. Probl. Eng.
Sustainable design of open molds with QFD and TRIZ combination
J. Ind. Prod. Eng.
An innovative and integrated approach based on SERVQUAL, QFD and FMEA for service quality improvement: A case study
Kybernetes
Evaluation of design parameters for vessel engine room by using a modified QFD technique
J. Mult.-Valued Logic Soft Comput.
Fuzzy Set Theory—and its Applications
A unifying field in logics: Neutrosophic logic
An integrated approach of AHP and DEMATEL methods in evaluating the criteria of auto spare parts industry
Internat. J. Systems Sci.
A combined approach using AHP and DEMATEL for evaluating success factors in implementation of green supply chain management in Indian manufacturing industries
Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl.
Application of AHP and DEMATEL methods in choosing and analysing the measures for the distribution of goods in szczecin region
Sustainability
Providing hierarchical approach for measuring supply chain performance using AHP and DEMATEL methodologies
Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput.
Cited by (70)
Large-scale group hierarchical DEMATEL method with automatic consensus reaching
2024, Information FusionAn integrated QFD and FMEA method under the co-opetitional relationship for product upgrading
2024, Information SciencesA scenario-driven sustainable product and service system design for elderly nursing based on QFD
2024, Advanced Engineering InformaticsA holistic decision-making approach to assessing service quality in higher education institutions
2024, Socio-Economic Planning SciencesSpherical fuzzy bipartite graph based QFD methodology (SFBG-QFD): Assistive products design application
2024, Expert Systems with Applications