Elsevier

Automatica

Volume 46, Issue 5, May 2010, Pages 945-948
Automatica

Technical communique
A note on fractional-order derivatives of periodic functions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2010.02.023Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper, it is shown that the fractional-order derivatives of a periodic function with a specific period cannot be a periodic function with the same period. The fractional-order derivative considered here can be obtained based on each of the well-known definitions Grunwald–Letnikov definition, Riemann–Liouville definition and Caputo definition. This concluded point confirms the result of a recently published work proving the non-existence of periodic solutions in a class of fractional-order models. Also, based on this point it can be easily proved the absence of periodic responses in a wider class of fractional-order models. Finally, some examples are presented to show the applicability of the paper achievements in the solution analysis of fractional-order systems.

Introduction

Nowadays, fractional-order dynamics, which are defined based on fractional-order differential equations (Podlubny, 1999), play a significant role in different control applications. For example, these dynamics have been extensively used in design and practical implementation of controllers (Feliu-Batlle et al., 2009, Monje et al., 2008, Tavazoei et al., 2008), in modeling of real-world phenomena (Ding and Ye, 2009, Fitt et al., 2009, Oldham, 2010, Reyes-Melo et al., 2008), and in identification of physical systems (Aoun et al., 2007, Hartley and Lorenzo, 2003, Poinot and Trigeassou, 2004). Due to the growing interest of fractional-order dynamics to be applied in different control applications, it seems analysis of this type of system is of great importance. This problem, i.e. analysis of fractional-order systems, is a motivation for some recent research works. In one of these works, the non-existence of periodic solutions in a class of fractional-order systems defined based on Caputo definition has been proved (Tavazoei & Haeri, 2009a). By using the proof given in Tavazoei and Haeri (2009a), a remarkable property for fractional-order derivatives of periodic functions is presented in this paper. Based on this property, the absence of periodic solutions in a wider class of fractional-order models can be proved. More precisely, in Tavazoei and Haeri (2009a) it has been proved that autonomous fractional-order systems described by state-space like forms containing Caputo derivatives cannot have non-constant periodic solutions. In the present work, the absence of periodic solutions is shown for autonomous fractional-order systems whose differential equations contain only a fractional-order derivative defined based on Grunwald–Letnikov definition, Riemann–Liouville definition, or Caputo definition. Also, the validity of the main result of Tavazoei and Haeri (2009a) is shown for autonomous fractional-order systems described by state-space like forms containing Grunwald–Letnikov or Riemann–Liouville derivatives.

The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 devotes to presenting a proof for the following claim: “The fractional-order derivatives of a periodic function with a specific period cannot be a periodic function with the same period”. Based on the achievements of Section 2, some results are concluded in Section 3 which may be useful in the solution analysis of fractional-order systems. In Section 4, some examples are presented to show the applicability of the paper outcomes. Finally, the paper is concluded in Section 5.

Section snippets

Fractional-order derivatives of periodic functions

The fractional-order derivative has been defined by extending the concept of integer-order derivative. Three commonly used definitions for fractional-order derivative are Grunwald–Letnikov definition, Riemann–Liouville definition and Caputo definition (Podlubny, 1999). When 0<αN, the αth order derivative of function g(t) with respect to t and the terminal value 0 is given as follows.

Grunwald–Letnikov definition: 0GLDtαg(t)=limh0nh=thαr=0n(1)r(αr)g(trh) where (αr)=Γ(α+1)r!Γ(αr+1).

Absence of periodic solutions in a class of fractional-order systems

The results of Theorem 1, Theorem 2, which are effective in solution analysis of fractional-order systems, are given in this section. From Theorem 1, Theorem 2, the following corollaries are resulted. In these corollaries, the operator 0Dtα can be each of the three operators 0GLDtα, 0RLDtα, and 0CDtα.

Corollary 1

A differential equation of fractional-order in the form0Dtαf(t)+Ψ(f(t),f(1)(t),,f(n)(t))=0,where0<αN, cannot have any non-constant smooth periodic solution.

Proof

Suppose that f̃(t) is a solution for

Some examples

In this section, some examples are provided to show the applicability of the analytical achievements of the paper. These examples are brought in the rest.

Example 1

The Laplace transform of fractional-order derivative of Sine function is given as L(0RLDtαsin(t))=sαs2+1 where 0<α<1. The inverse Laplace transform of right hand side of Eq. (29) is obtained as 0RLDtαsin(t)=t1αE2,2α(t2), where Eα,β(z) denotes two-parameter function of Mittag–Leffler (Li et al., 2009, Podlubny, 1999). This function is

Conclusion

In this paper, it was proved that the fractional-order derivatives (obtained based on the Grunwald–Letnikov definition, Riemann–Liouville definition, or Caputo definition) of a periodic function with a specific period cannot be a periodic function with the same period. Based on this proved statement, it was concluded that the existence of periodic solutions in autonomous fractional-order systems defined in the form (26) or form (28) is impossible. This point specifies one of the basic

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (116)

  • Collective behaviors of fractional-order FithzHugh–Nagumo network

    2024, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
  • Steady-state solutions of the Whittaker–Hill equation of fractional order

    2024, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
View all citing articles on Scopus

The material in this paper was not presented at any conference. This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Associate Editor Mayuresh V. Kothare under the direction of Editor André L. Tits.

View full text