Elsevier

Automatica

Volume 71, September 2016, Pages 222-228
Automatica

Brief paper
Output feedback negative imaginary synthesis under structural constraints

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2016.04.046Get rights and content

Abstract

The negative imaginary property is a property that many practical systems exhibit. This paper is concerned with the negative imaginary synthesis problem for linear time-invariant systems by output feedback control. Sufficient conditions are developed for the design of static output feedback controllers, dynamic output feedback controllers and observer-based feedback controllers. Based on the design conditions, a numerical algorithm is suggested to find the desired controllers. Structural constraints can be imposed on the controllers to reflect the practical system constraints. Also, the separation principle is shown to be valid for the observer-based design. Finally, three numerical examples are presented to illustrate the efficiency of the developed theory.

Introduction

The study of negative imaginary systems has attracted much attention in recent years (Cai and Hagen, 2010, Ferrante and Ntogramatzidis, 2013, Lanzon and Petersen, 2008, Mabrok et al., 2015, Mabrok et al., 2014, Wang et al., 2015a, Wang et al., 2015b, Xiong et al., 2012). By appropriately choosing the system input and output, many practical dynamic systems can be modelled as negative imaginary systems. Examples could be found in active vibration control systems (Das et al., 2015, Fanson and Caughey, 1990, Moheimani et al., 2006, Petersen and Lanzon, 2010) and circuit systems (Petersen & Lanzon, 2010). An important class of results for negative imaginary systems is the stability results developed in  Lanzon and Petersen (2008), Xiong, Petersen, and Lanzon (2010), Mabrok et al. (2014), Liu and Xiong (2015). For positive-feedback interconnected negative imaginary systems, necessary and sufficient conditions are established to test the system stability. These results can be considered as a generalization of the positive position control results in  Moheimani et al. (2006), Fanson and Caughey (1990), and depend only on the system gains at zero and infinite frequencies. In other words, the interconnected systems might have large control gains over other frequencies. In contrast, the small gain theorem requires that the control gains be small over all frequencies. An important application of the results is to robust control problems, where system uncertainty can be modelled by a negative imaginary system. Then, the closed-loop system will be stable as long as the controller is negative imaginary and satisfies the gain conditions. An illustrative example can be found in  Xiong et al. (2010), where the uncertainty parameter is allowed to be arbitrarily large. Therefore, the results in  Lanzon and Petersen (2008), Xiong et al. (2010), Mabrok et al. (2014), Liu and Xiong (2015) provide an attractive tool for robust control.

The underlying motivation of this study is to extend the application areas of negative imaginary systems theory. Consider the case that the uncertainty part in a system is negative imaginary while the remaining part of the system is not. The stability results in  Lanzon and Petersen (2008), Xiong et al. (2010), Mabrok et al. (2014), Liu and Xiong (2015) will not be applicable. To make them applicable, one has to design controllers such that the remaining part of the system is negative imaginary; see examples in  Petersen and Lanzon (2010), Song, Lanzon, Patra, and Petersen (2012), Mabrok et al. (2015). The problem of designing controllers for non-negative imaginary systems such that the resulting closed-loop systems become negative imaginary is called the negative imaginary synthesis problem, and the designed controllers are called negative imaginary controllers. When the full system state is available, state feedback negative imaginary controllers can be designed, and the corresponding design conditions have been established in  Petersen and Lanzon (2010), Song et al. (2012), Mabrok et al. (2015) for both minimal and nonminimal state-space realizations. However, in practice, the system state is often not available and only measurement output can be used when designing controllers. Also in many cases, the desired controllers have to meet structural constraints in the system design (Lin et al., 2011, Rubió-Massegú et al., 2013, Siljak, 1991, Zečević and Šiljak, 2008). For example, the controllers have to be of a block diagonal structure in the decentralized control of large-scale systems. Therefore, the design of output feedback negative imaginary controllers with structural constraints is an appealing practice use of the stability results in negative imaginary systems theory. The design of output feedback controllers has been recognized as a hard problem in general (Abbaszadeh and Marquez, 2009, Dinh et al., 2012, Shu et al., 2010, Syrmos et al., 1997).

This paper studies the negative imaginary synthesis problem when designing output feedback controllers. Firstly, the design of static output feedback controllers is considered. A sufficient condition is established in terms of a linear matrix inequality and a linear matrix equality. For the established design condition, an arbitrarily structural constraint can be readily imposed on the controller to meet practical requirements. It deserves mentioning that the solvability of the condition depends on the choice of the right inverse of the measurement matrix. An iterative algorithm is proposed to search for an approximate right inverse. When the measurement output equals to the system state, our result recovers the available ones in  Petersen and Lanzon (2010), Song et al. (2012). Then, the design condition is extended to design dynamic output feedback controllers and observer-based state feedback controllers. In particular, for observer-based control, the separation principle is shown to hold. Finally, three numerical examples are used to demonstrate the developed design theory. The first example demonstrates the application of the results to a robust stabilization problem where the uncertainty is modelled by a strictly negative imaginary system. The conservatism of the developed design condition is studied via the first example. The second example validates the applicability of the results to MIMO systems. The third example illustrates how structural constraints are imposed on the designed controllers. The designed controller is a decentralized reduced-order dynamic output feedback controller. In all, the contribution of this paper is that a systematic design theory for output feedback negative imaginary controllers is developed and controller structural constraints can be enforced.

Notation: Let Rm×n and Rm×n denote the set of m×n real matrices and real-rational proper transfer function matrices, respectively. AT and A denotes the transpose and the complex conjugate transpose of a complex matrix A, respectively. [] is the real part of a complex number. The notation X>0 or X0, where X is a real symmetric matrix, means that the matrix X is positive definite or positive semidefinite, respectively.

Section snippets

Problem formulation

Consider a linear time-invariant system {ẋ(t)=Ax(t)+B1w(t)+B2u(t),z(t)=C1x(t),y(t)=C2x(t), where x(t)Rn is the system state, u(t)Rp is the control input, y(t)Rq is the measurement output, w(t)Rm is the system input, z(t)Rm is the system output. The matrices ARn×n, B1Rn×m, B2Rn×p, C1Rm×n and C2Rq×n are known constant matrices. The measurement output matrix C2 is assumed to be of full row rank without loss of generality. The system is chosen to be strictly proper to keep the results

Static output feedback control design

A static output feedback controller is of the form u(t)=Fy(t), where FRp×q is the control gain to be determined. The resulting closed-loop system is {ẋ(t)=(A+B2FC2)x(t)+B1w(t),z(t)=C1x(t). The transfer function of the system  (3) is given by R(s)=C1(sIAB2FC2)1B1. According to Lemma 1, R(s) is negative imaginary if and only if the matrix A+B2FC2 is invertible, and there exists a matrix YRn×n, Y=YT>0, such that (A+B2FC2)Y+Y(A+B2FC2)T0B1+(A+B2FC2)YC1T=0. The following result gives a

Dynamic output feedback control design

In this section, instead of designing the static feedback controller (2), we are interested in the design of dynamic output feedback controllers. A dynamic output feedback controller is of the form {ẋF(t)=AFxF(t)+BFy(t),u(t)=CFxF(t)+DFy(t), where xF(t)RnF is the state of the controller. The matrices AFRnF×nF, BFRnF×q, CFRp×nF and DFRp×q are to be designed.

The resulting closed-loop system of plant (1) controlled by (10) is given by {x¯̇(t)=A¯x¯(t)+B˜1w(t),z(t)=C˜1x¯(t), where x¯(t)[x(t)xF(

Observer-based state feedback control design

In this section, observer-based state feedback controllers are to be designed for the output feedback negative imaginary synthesis problem. Consider a typical observer-based state feedback controller of the form {x̂̇(t)=Ax̂(t)+B2u(t)+L(y(t)C2x̂(t)),u(t)=Kx̂(t), where LRn×q and KRp×n are the observer gain matrix and the state feedback gain matrix, respectively. The matrices L and K are to be determined.

Let x¯(t)=[x(t)x̂(t)]. The closed-loop system of plant  (1) under control of (15) is given

Illustrative examples

Three examples are provided in this section. The first example demonstrates the application of the developed theory to a robust stabilization problem. The conservatism of the results in the paper is studied in the first example. The second example validates the applicability of the results to MIMO systems. The third example illustrates the design of structured controllers.

Example 1 Robust Stabilization

Consider the uncertain system in  Petersen and Lanzon, 2010, Song et al., 2012. A state-space realization of the uncertain

Conclusions

This paper studied the output feedback negative imaginary synthesis problem. Sufficient conditions have been established for static output feedback control design, dynamic output feedback control design and observer-based control design, respectively. For the design conditions, arbitrarily structural constraints can be readily imposed on the designed controllers. The efficiency of these conditions has been illustrated by three numerical examples. The conservatism of the conditions has also been

Junlin Xiong received his B.Eng. and M.Sci. degrees from Northeastern University, China, and his Ph.D. degree from the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, in 2000, 2003 and 2007, respectively. From November 2007 to February 2010, he was a research associate at the University of New South Wales at the Australian Defence Force Academy, Australia. In March 2010, he joined the University of Science and Technology of China where he is currently a professor in the Department of Automation. His

References (25)

  • M. Abbaszadeh et al.

    LMI optimization approach to robust H observer design and static output feedback stabilization for discrete-time nonlinear uncertain systems

    International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control

    (2009)
  • C. Cai et al.

    Stability analysis for a string of coupled stable subsystems with negative imaginary frequency response

    IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

    (2010)
  • Cited by (47)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Junlin Xiong received his B.Eng. and M.Sci. degrees from Northeastern University, China, and his Ph.D. degree from the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, in 2000, 2003 and 2007, respectively. From November 2007 to February 2010, he was a research associate at the University of New South Wales at the Australian Defence Force Academy, Australia. In March 2010, he joined the University of Science and Technology of China where he is currently a professor in the Department of Automation. His current research interests are in the fields of negative imaginary systems, large-scale systems and networked control systems.

    Professor J. Lam received a B.Sc. (1st Hons.) degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Manchester, and was awarded the Ashbury Scholarship, the A.H. Gibson Prize, and the H. Wright Baker Prize for his academic performance. He obtained the M.Phil. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Cambridge. He is a recipient of the Croucher Foundation Scholarship and Fellowship, the Outstanding Researcher Award of the University of Hong Kong, and the Distinguished Visiting Fellowship of the Royal Academy of Engineering. He is a Cheung Kong Chair Professor, Ministry of Education, China. Prior to joining the University of Hong Kong in 1993 where he is now Chair Professor of Control Engineering, Professor Lam held lectureships at the City University of Hong Kong and the University of Melbourne.

    Professor Lam is a Chartered Mathematician, Chartered Scientist, Chartered Engineer, Fellow of Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Fellow of Institution of Engineering and Technology, Fellow of Institute of Mathematics and Its Applications, and Fellow of Institution of Mechanical Engineers. He is Editor-in-Chief of IET Control Theory and Applications and Journal of The Franklin Institute, Subject Editor of Journal of Sound and Vibration, Editor of Asian Journal of Control, Senior Editor of Cogent Engineering, Associate Editor of Automatica, International Journal of Systems Science, Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, and Proc. IMechE Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering. He is a member of the IFAC Technical Committee on Networked Systems, and Engineering Panel (Joint Research Schemes), Research Grant Council, HKSAR. His research interests include model reduction, robust synthesis, delay, singular systems, stochastic systems, multidimensional systems, positive systems, networked control systems and vibration control. He is a Highly Cited Researcher in Engineering (Thomson Reuters, 2014, 2015) and Computer Science (Thomson Reuters, 2015).

    Ian R. Petersen was born in Victoria, Australia. He received a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering in 1984 from the University of Rochester. From 1983 to 1985 he was a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Australian National University. In 1985 he joined UNSW Canberra where he is currently Scientia Professor and an Australian Research Council Laureate Fellow in the School of Engineering and Information Technology. He has served as an Associate Editor for the IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Systems and Control Letters, Automatica, and SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization. Currently he is an Editor for Automatica and an Associate Editor for the IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology. He is a fellow of IFAC, the IEEE and the Australian Academy of Science. His main research interests are in robust control theory, quantum control theory and stochastic control theory.

    This work was financially supported by the NSFC under grant number 61374026, HKU CRCG   201211159055 and the Australian Research Council (ARC) under grant number DP160101121. The material in this paper was not presented at any conference. This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Associate Editor Tong Zhou under the direction of Editor Richard Middleton.

    View full text