Elsevier

Automatica

Volume 85, November 2017, Pages 362-373
Automatica

Compensation of input delay that depends on delayed input

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2017.07.069Get rights and content

Abstract

For nonlinear systems, we develop a PDE-based predictor-feedback control design, which compensates actuator dynamics, governed by a transport PDE with outlet boundary-value-dependent propagation velocity. Global asymptotic stability under the predictor-feedback control law is established assuming spatially uniform strictly positive transport velocity. The stability proof is based on a Lyapunov-like argument and employs an infinite-dimensional backstepping transformation that is introduced. An equivalent representation of the transport PDE/nonlinear ODE cascade via a nonlinear system with an input delay that is defined implicitly through an integral of the past input is also provided and the equivalent predictor-feedback control design for the delay system is presented. The validity of the proposed controller is illustrated applying a predictor-feedback “bang–bang” boundary control law to a PDE model of a production system with a queue. Consistent simulation results are provided that support the theoretical developments.

Introduction

Cascades of partial and ordinary differential equations are widely used for modeling of complex dynamics in various engineering applications, such as screw extrusion processes in 3D printing (Diagne & Krstic, 2015), metal cutting processes (Otto & Radons, 2013), moisture in convective flows (Bresch-Pietri & Coulon, 2015), populations (Smith, 1993), transport phenomena in gasoline engines Bresch-Pietri et al. (2014), Detwiler and Wang (2006), Guzzella and Onder (2009), Jankovic and Magner (2011), Kahveci and Jankovic (2010), crushing-mills (Richard, 2003), production of commercial fuels by blending (Chebre, Creff, & Petit, 2010), and of stick–slip instabilities during oil drilling Bekiaris-Liberis and Krstic (2014), Cai and Krstic (2015), Cai and Krstic (2016), Krstic (2009), to name only a few. Depending on the application, the PDE state may evolve on a time-varying domain Cai and Krstic (2015), Cai and Krstic (2016), Diagne and Krstic (2015), Diagne et al. (2016a), Diagne et al. (2016b) or its transport coefficient may vary with time Bresch-Pietri et al. (2014), Otto and Radons (2013).

The nonlinear predictor-feedback concept, which enables one to design efficient feedback laws that compensate constant input delays arising in nonlinear systems was originally introduced in Krstic (2010a), Krstic (2010c) where the PDE backstepping methodology combined with a Lyapunov analysis was exploited to establish stability results. For nonlinear systems with time-varying and state-dependent delays, the analogous control design methodology was developed in Bekiaris-Liberis, Jankovic, and Krstic (2012) and Bekiaris-Liberis and Krstic (2012), Bekiaris-Liberis and Krstic (2013a), Bekiaris-Liberis and Krstic (2013b), . For linear systems Karafyllis, Malisoff, de Queiroz, Krstic and Yang (2015) and Mazenc and Malisoff (2015) proposed alternative prediction-based approaches. Later, the method was extended to deal with the stabilization problem of nonlinear systems with actuator dynamics governed by a wave PDE with moving boundary that depends on the ODE state Cai and Krstic (2015), Cai and Krstic (2016).

However, the problem of design of predictor-feedback controllers for compensation of input delays that depend on the control input itself is left out in most of the existing contributions. As described in Richard (2003), the design of delay-compensating control laws for such systems of transport PDE/ODE cascades with input-dependent transport coefficient (that appear for example when describing the dynamics of crushing-mill processes (Richard, 2003), recycling CSTR (Albertos & Garcia, 2012), and single-phase marine cooling systems (Hansen, Stoustrup, & Bendtsen, 2013)) remains an open problem. To our knowledge, the result in Bresch-Pietri et al. (2014), which is motivated by the dynamical model of fuel to air ratio (FAR) in gasoline engines, is perhaps the only contribution that covers this particular subject on delay compensation. Due to the dependency of the prediction horizon on the future input values a design that completely compensate the input delay does not seem possible.

The present work deals with the problem of compensation of transport PDE actuator dynamics with boundary-value-dependent propagation speed in nonlinear systems. Equivalently, the nonlinear ODE’s actuator dynamics are described as a  delayed-input-dependent input delay. Here, the delay function is implicitly given by an integral equation, similarly to Bresch-Pietri et al. (2014), but is dependent on the delayed rather than the current input.

The predictor-feedback control law for both the PDE and the delay system representations of the PDE–ODEcascade system is developed. Our contribution stands as the first one in which actual compensation of a delayed-input-dependent input delay is achieved. A global stability result of the closed-loop system is established. The designed compensator is employed for control of PDE models of production systems with a finite buffer size at the end of the production chain Borsche et al. (2010), Herty et al. (2007), Sun and Dong (2008).

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 the general problem is described and the main result together with a global stability proof, based on a PDE representation of the predictor-feedback control law, is presented in Section 3. An alternative representation of the actuator dynamics as an implicitly defined delayed-input-dependent input delay and the associated delay compensator are given in Section 4. Section 5 is dedicated to the application of the designed control law to a PDE model of production systems enabling a delay-compensating “bang–bang” feedback law. Concluding remarks are stated in Section 7.

Section snippets

Problem statement and controller design

We consider the transport PDE/nonlinear ODE cascade system with boundary-value-dependent propagation speed defined as Ẋ(t)=fX(t),u(0,t),tu(x,t)=vu(0,t)xu(x,t),x(0,D),u(D,t)=U(t).where XRn, f:Rn×RRn is continuously differentiable with f(0,0)=0, and v:RR+ is continuously differentiable with respect to its argument. Eq. (2) represents the actuation path for the plant (1), located at the boundary x=0, with an actuation device acting at the boundary x=D. The initial condition along the

Main result and stability proof

Theorem 1

Consider system (1)–(3)together with the control law (5), (6). Under Assumption 1–3, there exists a class KL function 0 such that for all initial conditions for which u0(x) is locally Lipschitz on [0,D] and which satisfy the compatibility condition u0(D)=κp(D,0), there exists a unique solution to the closed-loop system with X(t)C1[0,) and u(x,t) locally Lipschitz on [0,D]×[0,), and the following holds for all t0 |X(t)|+supx[0,D]|u(x,t)|0|X(0)

Relation to a nonlinear system with delayed-input-dependent input delay

An alternative representationof the cascade system (1)–(3), which incorporates a boundary-value-dependent propagation speed is offered in this section. We recast the original problem into a delay system framework by solving the transport PDE (2), (3) with the method of characteristics. The resulting system is a delayed-input-dependent input delay system, which can be explained by the fact that the propagation speed of the PDE, namely, v(u(0,t)) is itself dependent on the delayed boundary input U

Motivation: Control of a PDE model of a network of suppliers

Production and distribution systems, which convey a large number of parts, are often used in various manufacturing and logistics processes such as electronic and automobile industries. A crucial factor in supply chain networks is the ability to produce uniformly, high-quality final parts at a high rate while avoiding machine break-down and operation variations that may impose a reconfiguration of the entire process. The dynamic nature of such systems depends strongly on the work in progress

Simulation results

Simulations are performed in order to stabilize the queue buffer occupancy to a setpoint value Q=0.4 whereas the maximum capacity is set to μ=0.8 and the process time to P=0.25. The maximum capacity of the queue is set to Qmax=1 and the maximum value of the input to Bmax=0.6 with a distribution coefficient α=0.5. Physically, the queue is located at the stage x=0 and the supplier device at the stage x=2. The factory starts with zero parts density, ρ0(x)=0, at the initial time. In order to

Concluding remarks

In this paper, we develop an infinite-dimensional predictor-feedback control law which enables one to compensate, for nonlinear systems, actuator dynamics governed by a transport PDE with boundary-value-dependent propagation velocity. In particular, the actuator dynamics depend on the boundary value of the actuator state anti-collocated to the actuation or sensing mechanism introducing a delay that depends on the delayed input signal. Our predictor-feedback controller guarantees a global

Mamadou Diagne received the Ph.D. degree in 2013 at Laboratoire d’Automatique et du Génie des Procédés, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I. He has been a postdoctoral fellow at the Cymer Center for Control Systems and Dynamics of University of California San Diego from 2013 to 2015 and at the Department of Mechanical Engineering of the University of Michigan from 2015 to 2016. He is currently an Assistant Professor at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. His research interests concern the modeling

References (46)

  • SmithH.L.

    Reduction of structured population models to threshold-type delay equations and functional differential equations: a case study

    Math. Bio.

    (1993)
  • SontagE.

    On characterizations of the input-to-state stability property

    Systems & Control Letters

    (1995)
  • SunS. et al.

    Continuum modeling of supply chain networks using discontinuous Galerkin methods

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

    (2008)
  • TakoA.A. et al.

    The application of discrete event simulation and system dynamics in the logistics and supply chain context

    Decision Support Systems

    (2012)
  • TerziS. et al.

    Simulation in the supply chain context: a survey

    Computers in Industry

    (2004)
  • AlbertosP. et al.

    Control of multi delayed plants: Recycling CSTR

  • ArmbrusterD. et al.

    A model for the dynamics of large queuing networks and supply chains

    SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics

    (2006)
  • Bekiaris-LiberisN. et al.

    Compensation of time-varying input and state delays for nonlinear systems

    Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control

    (2012)
  • Bekiaris-LiberisN. et al.

    Compensation of state-dependent input delay for nonlinear systems

    IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

    (2013)
  • Bekiaris-LiberisN. et al.

    Compensation of wave actuator dynamics for nonlinear systems

    IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

    (2014)
  • BorscheR. et al.

    On the coupling of systems of hyperbolic conservation laws with ordinary differential equations

    Nonlinearity

    (2010)
  • Bresch-PietriD. et al.

    Prediction-based stabilization of linear systems subject to input-dependent input delay of integral-type

    IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

    (2014)
  • Bresch-PietriD. et al.

    Prediction-based control of moisture in a convective flow

  • Cited by (0)

    Mamadou Diagne received the Ph.D. degree in 2013 at Laboratoire d’Automatique et du Génie des Procédés, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I. He has been a postdoctoral fellow at the Cymer Center for Control Systems and Dynamics of University of California San Diego from 2013 to 2015 and at the Department of Mechanical Engineering of the University of Michigan from 2015 to 2016. He is currently an Assistant Professor at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. His research interests concern the modeling and the control of heat and mass transport phenomena, production/manufacturing systems and additive manufacturing processes described by partial differential equations and delay systems.

    Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis received the Ph.D. degree from the University of California, San Diego, in 2013. From 2013 to 2014 he was a postdoctoral researcher at the University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Bekiaris-Liberis is currently a postdoctoral researcher at the Dynamic Systems & Simulation Laboratory, Technical University of Crete, Greece. He has coauthored the SIAM book Nonlinear Control under Nonconstant Delays. His interests are in delay systems, distributed parameter systems, nonlinear control, and their applications. Dr. Bekiaris-Liberis was a finalist for the student best paper award at the 2010 ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference and at the 2013 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. He received the Chancellors Dissertation Medal in Engineering from the University of California, San Diego, in 2014. Dr. Bekiaris-Liberis received the best paper award in the 2015 International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies.

    Miroslav Krstic holds the Alspach endowed chair and is the founding director of the Cymer Center for Control Systems and Dynamics at UC San Diego. He also serves as Associate Vice Chancellor for Research at UCSD. As a graduate student, Krstic won the UC Santa Barbara best dissertation award and student best paper awards at CDC and ACC. Krstic is Fellow of IEEE, IFAC, ASME, SIAM, and IET (UK), Associate Fellow of AIAA, and foreign member of the Academy of Engineering of Serbia. He has received the PECASE, NSF Career, and ONRYoung Investigator awards, the Axelby and Schuck paper prizes, the Chestnut textbook prize, the ASME Nyquist Lecture Prize, and the first UCSD Research Award given to an engineer. Krstic has also been awarded the Springer Visiting Professorship at UC Berkeley, the Distinguished Visiting Fellowship of the Royal Academy of Engineering, the Invitation Fellowship of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and the Honorary Professorships from the Northeastern University (Shenyang), Chongqing University, and Donghua University, China. He serves as Senior Editor in IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control and Automatica, as editor of two Springer book series, and has served as Vice President for Technical Activities of the IEEE Control Systems Society and as chair of the IEEE CSS Fellow Committee. Krstic has coauthored eleven books on adaptive, nonlinear, and stochastic control, extremum seeking, control of PDE systems including turbulent flows, and control of delay systems.

    The material in this paper was partially presented at the 2017 American Control Conference, May 24–26, 2017, Seattle, WA, USA. This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Associate Editor Hiroshi Ito under the direction of Editor Daniel Liberzon.

    View full text