Elsevier

Computers & Geosciences

Volume 31, Issue 8, October 2005, Pages 1059-1070
Computers & Geosciences

Iterative direct inversion: An exact complementary solution for inverting fault-slip data to obtain palaeostresses

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2005.02.012Get rights and content

Abstract

The present study shows that reconstructing the reduced stress tensor (RST) from the measurable fault-slip data (FSD) and the immeasurable shear stress magnitudes (SSM) is a typical iteration problem. The result of direct inversion of FSD presented by Angelier [1990. Geophysical Journal International 103, 363–376] is considered as a starting point (zero step iteration) where all SSM are assigned constant value (λ=3/2). By iteration, the SSM and RST update each other until they converge to fixed values. Angelier [1990. Geophysical Journal International 103, 363–376] designed the function upsilon (υ) and the two estimators: relative upsilon (RUP) and (ANG) to express the divergence between the measured and calculated shear stresses.

Plotting individual faults’ RUP at successive iteration steps shows that they tend to zero (simulated data) or to fixed values (real data) at a rate depending on the orientation and homogeneity of the data. FSD of related origin tend to aggregate in clusters. Plots of the estimators ANG versus RUP show that by iteration, labeled data points are disposed in clusters about a straight line. These two new plots form the basis of a technique for separating FSD into homogeneous clusters.

Introduction

Recent literature clearly demonstrates the utility of palaeostress estimation to a wide range of fields, e.g. structural geology (Guiraud et al., 1989; Hwang et al., 1991), geodynamical studies (Pollard, 2000), foundation engineering (Amadei and Stephansson, 1997) and to study subsurface fluid flow (Nelson, 1985; Mandl, 2000).

The reconstruction of palaeostresses from microstructures has been discussed by Dunne and Hancock (1994). There is a wide range of such techniques: those which are mainly based on the orientation of faults and their associated slip indicators are by far the most popular. Also, there are several methods for inverting measured fault-slip data (FSD) to reconstruct the incomplete tensor which consists of the orientation and relative magnitudes of the principal stresses (PSA). Those methods are either analytical or based on a searching strategy.

The 4-D exploration method adopted by Angelier, 1975, Angelier, 1979, Angelier, 1984, Angelier, 1991 is an example of a grid search technique and consists of considering numerous tensors and selected the one that minimizes a simple function of the angles between the computed shear stresses on the fault planes and the actual slip vectors. Hardcastle and Hills (1991) also present an objective and non-elegant method for such an inversion. Thousands of tensor configurations are tested against a collection of data in the light of Mohr–Coulomb yield criteria.

The analytical methods are due to the work of Angelier, 1990, Angelier, 1994, Huang and Angelier (1989), Angelier et al. (1982) and Fry (1999).

Several recent works question the validity of inversion methods. Yamaji (2003) questions the correctness of the solutions of stress inversion. He displays graphically, using a special stereogram, the two object functions of Angelier, 1979, Angelier, 1990. These functions measure the angular misfit between the observed and calculated striations on the fault planes. The object function (F) is evaluated in terms of the stress ratio ϕ and σ1 at different points of the net which also represent the location of σ3. ϕ varies from zero to one in steps of 0.1, whereas σ1 rotates about σ3 from 0–180° in steps of 18°. Finally, these three values F, ϕ and σ1 are displayed on a stereogram using a color code and different degrees of color saturation and hue. The location of the extreme value of F allows the estimation of the stress tensor. Yamaji (2003) adds that heterogeneous FSD display several extrema. Accordingly, the method can be used for the analysis of polyphase data. Needless to say the discussed method is highly complicated, difficult to apply and the analysis of the data set KAM (Angelier, 1990) seems to be a rather qualitative.

Tobore and Lisle (2003) numerically process palaeostress results to overcome the incomplete information about the stress tensor. Pollard et al. (1993) criticize the assumptions on which stress inversion is based.

The direct inversion of FSD presented by Angelier (1990) is a reliable solution, and will be considered in the present study and briefly discussed in the next section. For details of the inversion technique, refer to Angelier (1990, Appendices I and II).

Section snippets

Brief discussion of Angelier's (1990) inversion method

Angelier (1990) estimates the unknown reduced stress tensor (RST) from measurements of FSD. The adopted RST T has a particular deviatoric form discussed by Angelier et al. (1982) and summarized in Appendix A. The general assumptions discussed by Angelier (1990), pertain to faults as if they move independently of each other without modification of the applied stress due to slippage. Besides, it is assumed that one is dealing with a more or less homogeneous fault population.

The geometry of

Simulation

Simulation in rock deformation enables some critical situations that have not been experimentally studied yet to be investigated. In the present study, fault-slip simulation under a known stress field was originally intended to code Angelier's (1990) equations and check calculations. Unfortunately, it was soon discovered that the inversion of simulated data sets does not revert exactly to the assumed stress fields. The need for visual processing of data led to the development of the present

Computation

Reconstructing palaeostresses from the measurable FSD and the immeasurable SSM has been formulated as a typical iteration problem where each step consists of two processes:

  • a.

    Application of SSM with FSD to obtain RST (inverse process),

  • b.

    Application of RST with FSD to obtain SSM (forward process).

In the present study, the result of direct inversion of FSD obtained by Angelier's (1990) method is treated as a starting point (zero-step inverse process) with all SSM assigned a constant value (λ=0.87).

Discussion

The present technique was applied to three data sets which were simulated from different known stress states. The datasets FS1, FS2, FS3 represent normal, reverse and mixed fault-slip striations (Fig. 2). For such homogeneous data sets, the PSA and calculated striations migrate by iteration. The measured and calculated striations coincide at the FSI.

Figs. 3a–c show plots of the individual RUP with successive iterations for the same data sets (Fig. 2). In general, the RUP of different faults

Separation of heterogeneous FSD sets

In the present study, the plot of individual RUP with successive iteration (Figs. 5a–c) show how different faults are clustered together. The same clustering has also been observed from the labeled plot of the two estimators ANG and RUP (Fig. 6b). These two new types of plots led to the development of a new technique called here ‘Invert, Iterate and Remove Anomalous Fault’ (IIRAF) for separating the FSD set into homogeneous clusters.

The technique starts by inverting FSD and then iterates the

Programming

The program ANGEL is a Windows application written in Visual Basic (VB6). The traditional part of the program is to code the Angelier (1990) equations. The other more laborious part is the graphical visualization of the result. ANGEL is provided with options for visually simulating and inverting FSD sets that are synthesized at different orientations and stress ratios. The program visually applies the “IIRAF” technique on FSD for possible fault separation. The program and documentation are

Acknowledgements

The author greatly acknowledges three anonymous referees for their valuable comments and critical questions which greatly improved the paper.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (13)

  • Hard classification of polyphase fault-slip data: Improvement and application

    2021, Journal of Structural Geology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The first expression gives a non-linear equation for a given fault-slip datum that comprises the fault plane orientation, the slip line orientation and the slip sense. A majority of existing stress inversion methods simultaneously solve a set of non-linear equations for a population of fault-slip data in various ways (Angelier, 1979; Armijo et al., 1982; Huang, 1988; Etchecopar et al., 1991; Fleischmann and Nemcok, 1991; Hardcastle and Hills, 1991; Will and Powell, 1991; Nemcok and Lisle, 1995; Mostafa, 2005; Žalohar and Vrabec, 2007; Thakur et al., 2017, 2020). On the other hand, Fry (1999) made a new approach by choosing the second expression of the hypothesis to separate the inversion into two steps: to calculate the best-fitting hyperplane from the single-phase datum vectors in stress space and then to use the slip senses to determine whether the hyperplane-perpendicular stress solution is on the right or left side of the hyperplane.

  • Present-day structural frame of the Santander Massif and Pamplona Wedge: The interaction of the Northern Andes

    2020, Journal of Structural Geology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Regional geologic cross-sections were also constructed to understand and explain deformation in the SM and surrounding zones. Computation of current stress tensors is based primarily on the Wallace-Bott assumption (Wallace, 1951; Bott, 1959), which has been implemented in different inversion methodologies proposed so far (e.g., Etchecopar et al., 1981; Angelier, 1984, 1990; Casas et al., 1990; Mostafa, 2005). This assumption considers the underlying mechanical conditions of Anderson (1951).

  • Forty years of paleostress analysis: has it attained maturity?

    2019, Journal of Structural Geology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The first one is dividing the overall data set into homogeneous subsets prior to formal stress inversion, by e.g. statistical techniques of cluster analysis (Angelier and Manoussis, 1980; Nemcok and Lisle, 1995; Shan and Fry, 2005), or using compatibility criteria documented by field inspection (Sperner et al., 1993). The second one is simultaneous stress inversion and data sorting, using (i) iterative techniques in which both processes work in a try–and–error sequence (e.g. Etchecopar et al., 1981; Mostafa, 2005) or (ii) managing the four target parameters in a four-dimensional parameter space in which significant solutions are identified as clusters (e.g. multi-inverse method of Yamaji, 2000). Moreover, based on the sigma space concept proposed by Fry (1999), the inversion technique can be developed within a 5D or 6D space whose geometric representation provides visual appreciation of girdles or pole clustering that permits identification of the finest stress solutions (Fry, 1999; Shan et al., 2004; Sato and Yamaji, 2006a,b).

  • Is the Monte Carlo search method efficient for a paleostress analysis of natural heterogeneous fault-slip data? An example from the Kraishte area, SW Bulgaria

    2018, Journal of Structural Geology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Firstly, those dividing the overall dataset into homogeneous groups prior to the use of any stress inversion (Nemcok and Lisle, 1995; Shan and Fry, 2006; Tranos, 2015). Secondly, those using stress inversion and data sorting, using (i) iterative techniques in which both processes work in a trial and error sequence (e.g. Etchecopar et al., 1981; Mostafa, 2005) or (ii) managing the four target parameters in a four-dimensional parameter space in which significant solutions are identified as clusters (e.g. multi-inverse method of Yamaji, 2000). Despite this considerable effort, Liesa and Lisle (2004) tested several automatic separation methods and came to the conclusion that a fully automatic separation procedure is not reasonable.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Code available from server at http://www.iamg.org/CGEditor/index.htm

View full text