Elsevier

Computers & Geosciences

Volume 167, October 2022, 105139
Computers & Geosciences

Research paper
Computing dip-angle gathers using Poynting vector for elastic reverse time migration in 2D transversely isotropic media

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105139Get rights and content

Highlights

  • An efficient algorithm based on the Poynting vector is proposed to obtain the dip-angle gathers for elastic reverse time migration.

  • We use the optical flow method to improve the stability of the proposed algorithm.

  • We use the dip-angle gathers to improve the imaging quality for anisotropic elastic reverse time migration.

Abstract

Angle-domain common-image gathers (ADCIGs) have wide applications in seismic imaging. For isotropic elastic reverse time migration (ERTM), we can produce dip-angle ADCIGs by using conventional Poynting vectors. Seismic anisotropy widely occurrs in Earth materials, such as in the shales and fractured reservoirs. ERTM based on the isotropic elastic wave equation is unable to accurately image anisotropic structures, leading to noise, discontinuous reflection events and mispositioning in migration results. Hence, conducting ERTM and generating dip-angle ADCIGs for anisotropic media require solving the anisotropic elastic wave equation. However, it is challenging to compute the gathers using the conventional Poynting vector for anisotropic elastic media. In this study, we derive the group and phase Poynting vectors, in which we use the optical flow method to stabilize the phase-related Poynting vectors. This approach admits efficient calculation of dip-angle ADCIG in anisotropic media. It also suppresses noise in anisotropic ERTM. The results of numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Introduction

Angle-domain common-imaging gathers (ADCIGs) have become an important tool for seismic interpretation, velocity modeling, and amplitude variation with angle analysis (Sava and Alkhalifah, 2013, Dafni and Symes, 2016a, Liu, 2019). In recent years, scattering-angle ADCIGs, which have crucial applications in seismic imaging, and dip-angle ADCIGs, also got increasing attention, which can be used to enhance image quality for Kirchhoff migration (Dafni and Reshef, 2014) and implement stationary-phase procedures for prestack time migration (PSTM) (Xu and Zhang, 2017). Furthermore, the dip-angle ADCIGs are used to identify the seismic diffractions and reflections by their distinct responses (Moser and Howard, 2008, Klokov and Fomel, 2012). Moreover, incorporating information about the dip-angle and scattering-angle gathers presents significant advantages in the postmigration seismic process (Dafni and Reshef, 2014, Dafni and Reshef, 2015). For wave-equation migration, Dafni and Symes (2016b) computed the dip-angle ADCIGs by using Radon transform operators for a subsurface-offset extended image. They devised a specularity filter to obtain high-quality images by suppressing noise and non-specular signals in the dip domain. However, the computational cost is high for estimating gathers using the subsurface-offset gathers. To improve efficiency, Liu (2019) proposed to compute the dip-angle ADCIGs using the Poynting vector for isotropic ERTM. He used the specular filter of Dafni and Symes (2016b) to suppress migration artifacts for the ERTM images. These studies are examples of important applications of dip-angle ADCIGs in seismic migration.

Existing dip-angle ADCIGs calculation methods for wave-equation migration were developed for the case of isotropic media, whereas few studies have been conducted on dip-angle ADCIGs for anisotropic media. Anisotropy is present in a wide range of crustal rocks (Thomsen, 1986), including sedimentary rock sequences. Over the past several years, a lot of research has been conducted on acoustic RTM, in which pure P-waves are propagated using the pseudoacoustic equations in transversely isotropic (TI) media (Alkhalifah, 1998, Alkhalifah, 2000, Alkhalifah, 2014, Zhang and Zhang, 2008, Fletcher et al., 2009, Du et al., 2010, Duveneck and Bakker, 2011, Zhang et al., 2011, Li et al., 2017). In recent years, the increased use of the multi-component acquisition techniques, has lead to developments in elastic reverse-time migration (ERTM). A lot of research has been focused on ERTM (Yan and Sava, 2008, Duan and Sava, 2015, Wang and McMechan, 2015, Du et al., 2017, Li et al., 2018, Yu et al., 2018). Actually, anisotropy is an elastic feature prevalent in solids, requiring information not associated with the P-waves alone (Kazei and Alkhalifah, 2019, Wang et al., 2019), and the accuracy of imaging and inversion will improve with considering the elastic nature of the Earth (Oh and Alkhalifah, 2016). Therefore, this study investigates the implementation of ERTM using the anisotropic elastic wave equation (Yu et al., 2016, Wang et al., 2016, Hu et al., 2018, Wang et al., 2019) along with dip-angle ADCIGs, which are also needed for accurate computation of anisotropic ERTM.

Here, we employ the Poynting vector to generate the dip-angle ADCIGs due to its straightforward computation during wavefield extrapolation. However, the calculation of the dip-angle gathers for isotropic ERTM (Liu, 2019) cannot be extended directly to the anisotropic case. In isotropic media, the phase-velocity and group-velocity directions coincide with each other, whereas they differ in anisotropic media (Tsvankin, 2001, Yan and Dickens, 2016, Lu et al., 2019). Because of the reflection characteristics follow Snell’s law in the form of phase-velocity angle (Yan and Dickens, 2016), this angle must be used to compute the scattering and dip angles and to generate ADCIGs. The group-velocity angle may be used to compute ADCIGs for isotropic ERTM. However, we cannot estimate the Poynting vectors using ray (energy) components of the wave in anisotropic media, like in isotropic media. In this case, if the elastic Poynting vectors (Červený, 2000) correspond to the group-velocity direction, we need to transform the angles from group-velocity to the phase-velocity (Yan and Dickens, 2016, Lu et al., 2019) in order to generate ADCIGs. However, the process of relation between the group and phase velocities is complex (Yan and Dickens, 2016, Lu et al., 2019). To address this problem in computing dip gathers in anisotropic media, we develop a method that uses the estimated phase-related Poynting vectors to generate dip-angle ADCIGs. However, the Poynting vector method is often unstable to compute the wave propagation directions. To stabilize the Poynting vector directions, we adopt the optical flow (Zhang, 2014, Zhang et al., 2018) method to efficiently and accurately calculate dip-angle ADCIGs.

The main contents of this paper include the following aspects. First, we derive the group-related and phase-related Poynting vectors from the anisotropic elastic wave equation, and analyze their difference. Then, we apply the optical flow algorithm to stabilize the Poynting vector calculations, and effectively generate the dip-angle ADCIGs for anisotropic ERTM. Next, we perform several numerical tests on the developed scheme. Finally, we share our conclusions of the study.

Section snippets

The Poynting vectors in the anisotropic elastic wave equation

In anisotropic media, the stress–velocity elastic wave equations have the following forms ρvit=τijxj,τijt=12cijklvkxl+vlxk,i,j,k,l=1,,3,where ρ denotes the density, vi denote the components of the particle velocity vector V, t denotes the time, τij denote the components of stress tensor and cijkl denote the components of stiffness tensor, x denote the Cartesian coordinates.

For elastic-wave propagation, the Poynting vectors are defined as (Červený, 2000) Si=τijvj,where Si denote the

Numerical examples

We performed three numerical tests to verify the proposed method. First, a homogeneous model is employed to demonstrate the difference between group and phase angles. Then, we verify the effectiveness of the approach in a two layered model. Finally, we use the 2D Hess model from the Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG) to validate the proposed method for complex structures. We employed a 2D finite-difference method to solve the anisotropic elastic wave equations. The elastic

Conclusions

The Poynting vector can be easily evaluated to produce ADCIGs during wavefield extrapolation. In this study, we derived two types of Poynting vectors for the anisotropic elastic wave equation. We first demonstrated the group and phase angle difference in a homogeneous anisotropic model. In the second numerical example, we used a layered model to further analyze the use of the phase angle rather than the group angle to produce the dip-angle ADCIGs. In the Hess model, we demonstrated the

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Yongming Lu: Designed the algorithm, Developed the code, Wrote the paper. Xiaoyi Wang: Tested the numerical examples, Developed the code, Analyzed the data. Tao Lei: Tested the numerical examples.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Natural Science Fund of China (under grant 42104119 and 41904051) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002858] (under grant 2019M652196) for supporting this work.

Computer code availability

The manuscript developed an algorithm to generate dip-angle gathers using the Poynting vector for 2D anisotropic elastic reverse time migration. The code is developed by Yongming Lu and Xiaoyi Wang. One can obtain the data by the e-mail: [email protected]. We developed the

References (51)

  • DafniR. et al.

    Image enhancement by multi-parameter characterization of common image gathers

    Geophys. Prospect.

    (2014)
  • DafniR. et al.

    Multidip tomography formulation for migration velocity analysis

    Geophysics

    (2015)
  • DafniR. et al.

    Kinematic artifacts in the subsurface-offset extended image and their elimination by a dip-domain specularity filter

    Geophysics

    (2016)
  • DafniR. et al.

    Scattering and dip angle decomposition based on subsurface offset extended wave-equation migration

    Geophysics

    (2016)
  • DuX. et al.

    Anisotropic reverse-time migration for tilted TI media

    Geophys. Prospect.

    (2010)
  • DuQ. et al.

    Vector-based elastic reverse time migration based on scalar imaging condition

    Geophysics

    (2017)
  • DuQ. et al.

    Polarity reversal correction for elastic reverse time migration

    Geophysics

    (2012)
  • DuanY. et al.

    Scalar imaging condition for elastic reverse time migration

    Geophysics

    (2015)
  • DuveneckE. et al.

    Stable P-wave modeling for reverse-time migration in tilted TI media

    Geophysics

    (2011)
  • FletcherR.P. et al.

    Reverse time migration in tilted transversely isotropic (TTI) media

    Geophysics

    (2009)
  • HuW. et al.

    Efficient wave-mode separation on staggered grid for TTI elastic reverse time migration

  • JiangW. et al.

    Diffraction imaging using reverse time migration with poynting vectors

  • KazeiV. et al.

    Scattering radiation pattern atlas: What anisotropic elastic properties can body waves resolve?

    J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth

    (2019)
  • KlokovA. et al.

    Separation and imaging of seismic diffractions using migrated dip-angle gathers

    Geophysics

    (2012)
  • LiY. et al.

    Elastic reverse time migration using acoustic propagators

    Geophysics

    (2018)
  • View full text