A priori and a posteriori error estimates of the weak Galerkin finite element method for parabolic problems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2021.08.002Get rights and content

Abstract

We derive the priori and a posteriori error estimates of the weak Galerkin finite element method with the Crank-Nicolson time discretization for the parabolic equation in this paper. The priori error estimates are deduced based on existing priori error results of the corresponding elliptic projection problem. For the a posteriori error estimates, the elliptic reconstruction technique is introduced to decompose the true error into elliptic error and parabolic error. Then the elliptic part is bounded by the a posteriori error estimates of the auxiliary elliptic reconstruction problem. The a posteriori error estimator is further used to develop the temporal and spatial adaptive algorithm. Numerical results in the uniform and adaptive meshes are provided to validate the proposed estimators.

Introduction

The weak Galerkin (WG) finite element method [30] is a generalization of the standard finite element method for numerically solving partial differential equations in which classical differential operators (such as gradient, divergence, curl) are approximated in weak sense. The WG method was initially introduced to solve elliptic equations [24], [30], [31]. Over the past decade, it has attracted much attention for its simplicity of the form and flexibility of the applicability in polygonal meshes. Now, it has been used to solve more complex equations, such as parabolic problems [13], [19], [25], biharmonic equations [28], Navier-Stokes equations [20], Maxwell's equations [27], eigenvalue problems [35], Helmholtz equations [8], elliptic Cauchy problems [29] and so on. At the same time, the superconvergence [15], [16], [34], the a posteriori error estimation [1], [5], [22], [23], [32], [36] and other research results involving the WG method are increasingly appearing.

Based on the reliable and efficient a posteriori error estimate, which provides a sound mathematical tool for the adaptive mesh refinement, adaptive finite element methods have been the object of intense study because of their ability to efficiently resolve problems with singularities and other rapid local variations. Since early 1990s [10], [11], in the context of parabolic equations, the a posteriori error estimates have been studied in the standard continuous finite element method [7], [17], [18], [21], [26], the discontinuous Galerkin finite element method (DG) [2], [3], [12], [14] and other numerical methods. The theory of a posteriori error estimates in the standard finite element and DG methods for parabolic equations is rather mature by now. However, it is known to us at least that there is no literature giving detailed analysis on it for the WG method. In this paper, we will give an available posteriori error estimates of the WG method for parabolic equations.

For parabolic equations, the elliptic reconstruction introduced in [21] for the semi-discrete finite element approximations and [17] for the fully discrete linear parabolic problems is the key tool in the process of deriving the a posteriori error estimates. It allows us to neatly separate the time error from the spatial one, and has expanded to the nonconforming methods for its general application. For the parabolic equation, u denotes its exact solution and uh denotes its numerical solution. In fact, the elliptic reconstruction w=Ruh of uh is the continuous solution of the elliptic problem whose numerical solution is uh. The error e=uhu can be divided as e=(wu)(wuh)=ρϵ, where ρ=wu is the parabolic error, and ϵ=wuh is the elliptic error. Different from obtaining a posteriori error estimates directly for each single method at hand, we can virtually use any a posteriori error estimates for elliptic equations to control the main part of the spatial error ϵ as long as it is reliable and efficient for the auxiliary elliptic problem. It is quite convenient for us to introduce the elliptic reconstruction ω in our analysis because it does not appear in the resulting a posteriori bounds.

For the WG scheme of parabolic problems in this paper, with the solving space [Pk(K),Pk1(K),[Pk1(K)]2], no existing work gives results of the priori error estimates. We deduce the priori error estimates first, which will conduct us to analyze the subsequent numerical performance.

The framework of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce the Crank-Nicolson WG finite element algorithm for the parabolic problem. In Section 3, we present the priori error analysis of the energy norm based on the elliptic projection. In Section 4, using the elliptic reconstruction, we derive the a posteriori error estimates. In Section 5, some numerical experiments are provided to verify the reliability and efficiency of the estimates in uniform meshes. The adaptive algorithm and corresponding numerical performances in adaptive meshes are shown in Section 6.

Section snippets

Model problem

In a given bounded polygonal domain ΩR2 with Lipschitz boundary ∂Ω, we consider the following linear parabolic problemutΔu=f(x,t),inΩ×(0,T],u(x,t)=0,onΩ×(0,T],u(,0)=u0(x),inΩ, where the real number T>0, the source term f(x,t)L(0,T;L2(Ω)), and the initial value u0(x)H2(Ω).

Let B be any open and bounded domain with Lipschitz continuous boundary. The notation Hs(B)(s0) denotes the usual Sobolev space on B, and the associated inner product, norm, and semi-norm are denoted by (,)s,B, s,B

Optimal order of the error estimation in energy norm

To analyze the optimal convergence property of the fully discrete numerical solution, following from the Wheeler's projection in [33], we introduce the elliptic projection operator Eh.

For any vHk+2(k0) satisfying the elliptic problemΔv=H,inΩv=G,onΩ. The elliptic projection EhvVh is defined by the following equationas(Ehv,z)=(Δv,z),zVh0. It can be found that Ehv is also the WG finite element approximation of v. The priori error estimates about the elliptic problem (3.1) deduced in [24]

The a posteriori error analysis of the fully discrete WG scheme

In this section, we discuss the a posteriori error estimates for the modified fully discrete WG scheme with the Crank-Nicolson method. The elliptic reconstruction in [17], [21] is used in the process of the provement.

Numerical experiments on uniform meshes

In this section, we shall provide some tests to validate the proposed estimators. We take the polynomial space pair [P1(K),P0(K),[P0(K)]2] as the solving space. Some codes refers to the MATLAB software package iFEM [4].

Numerical experiments on adaptive meshes

The proposed estimators are used to develop the temporal and spatial adaptive algorithm. The procedure of the adaptive algorithm and numerical results are presented in this section.

Conclusions

In this paper, we focus on the error estimates of linear parabolic equations for the weak Galerkin finite element method. The priori and a posteriori error estimates are derived based on the elliptic projection and elliptic reconstruction techniques, respectively. Then the temporal and spatial adaptive algorithm based on the error equidistribution criterion is developed. A series of numerical experiment results illustrate that the estimators can capture the singularity of the solution and

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11971386) and the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2020YFA0713603).

References (36)

  • C. Wang et al.

    An efficient numerical scheme for the biharmonic equation by weak Galerkin finite element methods on polygonal or polyhedral meshes

    Comput. Math. Appl.

    (2014)
  • C. Wang et al.

    Primal-dual weak Galerkin finite element methods for elliptic Cauchy problems

    Comput. Math. Appl.

    (2020)
  • J. Wang et al.

    A weak Galerkin finite element method for second-order elliptic problems

    J. Comput. Appl. Math.

    (2013)
  • R. Wang et al.

    Polynomial preserving recovery for a class of weak Galerkin finite element methods

    J. Comput. Appl. Math.

    (2019)
  • A. Cangiani et al.

    hp-version space-time discontinuous Galerkin methods for parabolic problems on prismatic meshes

    SIAM J. Sci. Comput.

    (2017)
  • A. Cangiani et al.

    A posteriori error analysis for implicit-explicit hp-discontinuous Galerkin timestepping methods for semilinear parabolic problems

    J. Sci. Comput.

    (2020)
  • L. Chen

    iFEM: an integrated finite element methods package in MATLAB

  • L. Chen et al.

    A posteriori error estimates for weak Galerkin finite element methods for second order elliptic problems

    J. Sci. Comput.

    (2014)
  • Cited by (7)

    • A recovery-based a posteriori error estimator of the weak Galerkin finite element method for elliptic problems

      2022, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the past decade, WG methods have developed rapidly, expanding from solving elliptic equations [1,4–7] to more complex problems, such as Stokes equations [8,9], Navier–Stokes equations [10], Burgers’ equations [11], linear elasticity problems [12] and so on. Moreover, the superconvergence [13–16] and the a posteriori error estimates [17–22] have been studied as well for the WG method. The adaptive finite element method [23,24] was proposed by Babuška based on the average distribution of errors.

    • A Quadratic Finite Volume Method for Parabolic Problems

      2023, Advances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text