Planning optimal paths: A simple assessment of survey spatial knowledge in virtual environments
Introduction
Virtual reality-based environments offer an interesting opportunity for the study of spatial cognition (Morganti, 2003, Péruch and Gaunet, 1998, Tlauka and Wilson, 1996). Flexibility is one of the major virtues of this type of synthetic environment: the layout of the environment can be systematically manipulated and different kinds of interactions can be designed in order to create suitable experimental conditions. Furthermore, virtual environments allow monitoring and recording the behaviours through which an explorer gains spatial knowledge for further evaluation.
Moreover subjective involvement at a personal level in a highly interactive system, such as a virtual environment, allows people to experience the cycles of perception and movement that are the basis for the construction of mental representations of space. In fact, being active has been acknowledged as a key factor for spatial learning in ecological conditions.
Like many studies carried out in natural and virtual environments, it is necessary to control the influence of individual differences in the ability to orientate themselves in space (Lawton et al., 1996, Malinowski and Gillespie, 2001). In particular, there is evidence that variability between subjects in spatial task performance is higher in virtual than in natural spaces (Bliss et al., 1997, Klatzy et al., 1998, Waller et al., 1998, Witmer et al., 1996). By comparing exploration in natural and virtual environments, studies have concluded that most of the abilities involved in learning in a natural world, are also needed for learning in a virtual world, but the latter presents additional demands. Consequently, the need to create an evaluation tool specific for virtual environment application is deeply felt in order to get reliable data (Belingard and Péruch, 2000, Richardson et al., 1999, Waller, 2000, Waller, 2005).
Up to now several different methodological approaches have been used in the assessment of an individual’s navigational abilities and different tools have been developed, such as auto-evaluation questionnaires (Lawton, 1994, Pazzaglia and De Beni, 2001), evaluation of general cognitive level (Juan-Espinosa, Abad, Colom, & Truchaud, 2000), mental rotation tasks (Just and Carpenter, 1985, Casey, 1996) or specifically suited visual-spatial tasks (Colom et al., 2003, De Vega, 1994, Denis, 1996, Poli, 2000, Shah and Miyake, 1996). Given the moderate correlation shown between the results of these kinds of evaluation tools and the navigational ability in a virtual environment, the problem in designing an effective assessment tool is still open (Bailey, 1994, Darken, 1995, Richardson et al., 1999, Waller, 2000).
Even if the specific factors investigated in the previously mentioned studies can be considered very influential in spatial performance, if taken one by one they do not allow for the definition and prediction of global ability to perform complex spatial tasks. In our opinion, a more promising way could be to derive navigational ability from the types of spatial representations that an individual is able to produce in order to adaptively interact with space within a given activity. Our methodological proposal is therefore primarily based on a conceptual framework about spatial representations.
It is a largely shared opinion that spatial knowledge of large-scale environments is organised in two types of mental representations or cognitive maps, route and survey maps (Chown et al., 1995, Golledge, 1990, Golledge, 1999, Kitchin and Freundschuh, 2000). The characterisation of these maps has been debated, but it is generally agreed that in route maps the environment is represented in a viewer-centred, egocentric frame of reference that reflects the person’s navigational experiences, while in survey maps distant places are linked together to form an integrated global overview of the entire environment.
Cognitive maps are useful for a wide variety of purposes, but fundamentally for wayfinding. In this activity, the representations serve to aid navigation within the mapped environment in order to reach a target. In contrast with route maps, survey maps are more flexible and effective, as they offer the choice of alternative paths to connect distant places, for example in the creation of shortcuts.
In order to predict how an individual will be able to perform a spatial task, it is therefore interesting to discover if, when needed, they are able to organise information in a survey representation.
From an experimental point of view it is possible to investigate survey knowledge by using typical spatial tasks, such as sketch maps, pointing and wayfinding tasks.
Sketch map tasks are considered effective for externalising survey maps, as they require the production of an external representation based on a birds-eye perspective (Billinghurst & Weghorst, 1994). Some difficulties arise in that sketching maps requires drawing abilities and it is difficult to interpret the results. Another drawback of sketch map tests depends on how difficult it is to quantitatively evaluate the drawings. A distinction has to be made between distortions that result from limited knowledge and ones that depend on difficulties in producing externalisation (Foreman & Gillet, 1997). To avoid these problems, another distinctive feature of survey maps, hierarchical organisation, can be used. Different studies have shown that knowledge about large-scale environments is represented in terms of macro-regions, defined by anchor points (Golledge, 1987), or “centroids”, reciprocally linked by spatial relationships, containing in turn other connected micro-regions, according to a part-whole relation. Thus, the primary elements of the representations are portions of space limited by visual barriers and gateways (Chown et al., 1995); examples include walls and doors of buildings or hills and paths in a valley. In a building, a significant part of the hierarchy is a cluster of rooms connected with corridors that give access to the cluster itself. Aggregates of clusters constitute the layout of the building. Accordingly we have decided to consider hierarchies as a main factor to be reflected in sketch maps.
Pointing is another task extensively used in spatial knowledge evaluation. Participants are generally asked to indicate, by lines in the air, the position of an unseen distant target point, usually from different vantage positions. According to several authors only external pointing trials are able to highlight survey knowledge (Carassa et al., 2002, Gaunet et al., 2001). This kind of pointing requires an explorer moving along a route pointing towards a target, that is not located along the travelled route. Pointing performance appears to become easier through repeated exploration sessions; corroborating the hypothesis that performance depends on the gradual creation of survey knowledge (Ruddle, Payne, & Jones, 1997). Even though pointing in virtual reality with a restricted visual angle might be considered a sound survey task, the latter could greatly jeopardise the ability of assessing directions (see for example Montello, Richardson, Hegarty, & Provenza, 1999).
Finally, a wayfinding task can be used to investigate the capacity of organising knowledge in a survey map, under specific conditions. For example, if the individual is asked to find the shortest route to a target point, not previously travelled, a wayfinding task constitutes the most ecologically valid spatial task. Not all wayfinding tasks necessarily require a survey ability; the easier they are the more likely it is for them to be correctly executed by simply resorting to a type of route representation. In wayfinding behaviour surveys representation allows two fundamental spatial activities; on one hand subjects can check their position within the entire environment during navigation (Chen and Stanney, 1999, Darken, 1995, Heth et al., 1997, Thorndyke and Goldin, 1983); on the other hand it allows planning in advance new paths, (shortcuts included) connecting distant landmarks especially if they are not visible at the same time (Carassa & Geminiani, 2002). Several studies showed that a fairly good knowledge of the environment is necessary in order to get a good survey representation which is normally obtained after a long stage of familiarisation or, within the experimental field, through an intensive exploration of the whole environment.
In conclusion, all these standard survey representation tests appear to be quite difficult to achieve at experimental level, even in virtual reality environments.
For these reasons we chose to introduce a new task, to specifically investigate the individual capacity of organising spatial information in a survey map through quick exploration of a virtual environment. In particular, we have designed a task able to investigate survey representation: planning in advance. This method evaluates the capacity to plan in advance new shortcuts connecting distant landmarks (planning optimal paths). The experimental hypothesis is that the capacity of planning in advance optimal paths is related to classical survey tasks performance, i.e., wayfinding, pointing and sketch map tasks.
If this proves to be sound from the experimental viewpoint, the planning in advance task will thus become a quicker and more effective test to experimentally evaluate survey maps.
Section snippets
Methods
Three different virtual environments were employed in this study.
A small virtual environment was used in training, which has the same architectural and interactive features of the virtual environments used in the experiment.
Two virtual environments were used for the experimental work. The first was designed to assess the ability of planning in advance optimal paths. The second was aimed at evaluating performances in three survey tasks (wayfinding, pointing, and sketch map). This environment was
Results
The score of all tasks is depicted in Table 1.
In the planning in advance task, the mean score was 4.52 (SD = 2.34). The frequency of distribution of the scores is depicted in Fig. 4.
The score analysis in the planning in advance task revealed that the first and second planning sessions are significantly correlated (Spearman’s Rho = 0.352, p = 0.026).
In the sketch map task, 14 participants out of 40 sketched a clustered map.
In the wayfinding task the average score was 3.3 (SD = 1.89). The frequency of
Discussion
The aim of the experimental work presented was to investigate the planning in advance as a spatial task that makes it possible to evaluate the survey-type organisational ability of spatial data of a previously explored environment. In our view, given the distinctive features of survey maps, the ability to plan in advance new paths – shortcuts in particular – is only possible with the survey-type competence offered by this kind of representation.
The theoretical assumption for our experimental
Acknowledgments
The present work was funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR), Cofin 2003 prot. 200311 9035. The authors express their gratitude to Mr. Diego Varotto and Mr. Massimiliano Martinelli from the University of Padua for the technical support provided in the development of virtual environments.
References (44)
Understanding individual differences in spatial ability within females: a nature/nurture interactionist framework
Developmental Review
(1996)- et al.
Prototypes, location and associative networks (PLAN): towards a unified theory of cognitive mapping
Cognitive Science
(1995) - et al.
Active, passive and snapshot exploration in a virtual environment: influence on scene memory, reorientation and path memory
Cognitive Brain Research
(2001) - et al.
Differential use of landmarks by 8- and 12-year-old children during route reversal
Journal of Environmental Psychology
(1997) - et al.
Individual differences in large-space orientation: g and beyond?
Personality and Individual Differences
(2000) - et al.
Individual differences in performance on a large-scale, real world wayfinding task
Journal of Environmental Psychology
(2001) - et al.
Effects of early mobility on shortcut performance in a simulated maze
Behavioural Brain Research
(2002) The WALKABOUT: using virtual environments to assess large-scale spatial abilities
Computers in Human Behavior
(2005)- et al.
Virtual spaces and real world places: transfer of route knowledge
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
(1996) Spatial knowledge acquisition in a virtual environment (Doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida, 1994)
Dissertation Abstracts International
(1994)
Mental representation and the spatial structure of virtual environments
Environment and Behavior
The effectiveness of virtual reality for administering spatial navigation training to firefighters
Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments
Route and survey descriptions of paths: the effect of experience of a large-scale environment [special issue on Spatial Cognition]
Bulletin of People-Environment Studies
Active and passive spatial learning in a complex virtual environment: the effect of the efficient exploration
Cognitive Processing – International Quarterly of Cognitive Sciences
A theoretical model of wayfinding in virtual environments: proposed strategies for navigational aiding
Presence
The assessment of spatial ability with a single computerized test
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Wayfinding in large-scale virtual world
Conference Companion ACM, SGCHI ’95
Character and their perspectives in narratives describing spatial environments
Psychological Research
Imagery and the description of spatial configurations
Distance underestimation in virtual space is sensitive to gender but not activity–passivity or mode of interaction
Cyberpsychology and Behavior
Cited by (38)
A feasibility study of using virtual reality as a pre-occupancy evaluation tool for the elderly
2022, Automation in ConstructionCitation Excerpt :However, the informative accuracy that the viewer collected such as colour, size, and other details have not been comprehensively compared between these environments. Noticeably, cognitive factors should be analysed to determine the basis of the ability to organise the spatial knowledge into survey maps [23]. In other words, the understanding of the presented environment could be researched by matching with the capability of spatial organisation.
Do people follow the crowd in building emergency evacuation? A cross-cultural immersive virtual reality-based study
2020, Advanced Engineering InformaticsCitation Excerpt :With the fast development of virtual reality (VR) technology in recent years, VR-based experiments have been introduced as an alternative method to study human behavior during building emergencies [27]. A number of studies have tested this method in wayfinding-related experiments and repeatedly confirmed its efficacy [30,31]. VR-based experiments have also been proven effective in arousing people’s mental stress by immersing them in high-fidelity virtual immersive environments (IVEs), and evoking their behavioral responses to virtual emergencies, providing the opportunity for collecting virtual evacuation behavior data with relatively high ecological validity [32,33].
A virtual reality based study of indoor fire evacuation after active or passive spatial exploration
2019, Computers in Human BehaviorCitation Excerpt :Prior studies have showed that there are similarities in the spatial knowledge acquired in real and virtual environments (Jacobs, Thomas, Laurance, & Nadel, 1998; Ruddle, Payne, & Jones, 1997). A large number of studies, ranging in domains from cognitive psychology to neurosciences and psychophysiology, have tested IVE in wayfinding-related experiments and repeatedly reported its effectiveness (Bosco, Picucci, Caffò, Lancioni, & Gyselinck, 2008; Morganti, Carassa, & Geminiani, 2007). The value of using IVEs in wayfinding behavior studies is further highlighted by its capability of creating stressful environment, such as building fire emergency scenarios, without any short- or long-term harm to the participants.
Signage visibility analysis and optimization system using BIM-enabled virtual reality (VR) environments
2017, Advanced Engineering Informatics