The influence of leads on cognitive load and learning in a hypertext environment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.014Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of leads (or hypertext node previews) on cognitive load and learning. Leads provided a brief summary of information in the linked node, which helped orient the reader to the linked information. Dependent variables included measures of cognitive load: self-report of mental effort, reading time, and event-related desynchronization percentage of alpha, beta and theta brain wave rhythms; and learning performance: a recall task, and tests of domain and structural knowledge. Results indicated that use of leads reduced brain wave activity that may reflect split attention and extraneous cognitive load, and improved domain and structural knowledge acquisition. Further, findings provide insights into differentiating the types of cognitive load apparent in hypertext-assisted learning environments. Use of EEG measures allowed examination of instantaneous cognitive load, which showed that leads may be influencing germane load—reducing mental burden associated with creating coherence between two linked node. The self-report of mental effort measure appears more closely associated with overall and intrinsic load.

Introduction

Hypertext systems, like the World Wide Web, provide a linked computer-based information storage and retrieval system, in which massive amounts of information are organized into a vast semantic network (Rada, 1989). Since its very inception, psychologists and educators have been enthusiastic about the potential of hypertext to serve as an intellectual partner for the reader (e.g., Jonassen, 2000), thereby enriching the learning experience. The unique characteristics of hypertext provide a mechanism for elaborating topics via hyperlinks, leading researchers to believe that this format of text presentation requires learners to take a more active approach to reading by interacting more directly with the content (Landow, 1992), enhances conceptual and structural knowledge acquisition (Jonassen & Wang, 1993), and results in more flexible knowledge representations that enhance transfer of learning (Spiro, Vispoel, Schmitz, Samarapungavan, & Boerger, 1987). However, despite initial hopes that using hypertext would enhance learning, little empirical evidence exists to supports these claims, and the cognitive consequences of hypertext-assisted learning continue to be debated (Calandra and Barron, 2005, DeStefano and LeFevre, 2007).

Section snippets

Theoretical framework

Reading hypertext is a task of exploration. Unlike print text, that is typically read in a sequence prescribed by the author, hypertext is presented in brief nodes that contain one or more concise expository paragraphs, for which the reader determines access sequence. Each node must be self-contained because hypertext authors cannot make assumptions about which nodes have already been read. The unique characteristics of hypertext allow hypertext authors to create connections to other related

Subjects

The initial subject pool included 22 teacher education students from a large Midwestern university. An invitation to participate was e-mailed to all undergraduate education majors (n = 687). Fifteen dollars and an opportunity to win an iPod Nano™ served as incentives. The first 22 respondents who met the study criteria were enrolled as subjects in the study; however, two subjects did not complete one or more of the experimental tasks and were dropped from the study, yielding a final subject pool

Results

We employed a repeated measures design, enabling each subject to serve as her own experimental control. This design, however, obviated the use of covariance to control for systematic between-subject differences. We used subject selection (as described in the Section 3) to help control some differences, and report here variance associated with prior domain knowledge (M = 0.91, SD = 0.08), reading ability (M = 0.40, SD = 0.07), and metacognitive awareness (M = 0.74, SD = 0.11)—three interpersonal factors

Discussion

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of leads on cognitive load and learning in hypertext. The study produced several important findings. First, EEG-based cognitive load measures showed that subjects’ brain wave activity was less intense when they were accessing hypertext nodes via leads. Conversely, the self-report of mental effort measure did not detect significant differences in cognitive load between the two experimental conditions, and subjects tended to spend more time

Conclusion

Results of this study have led us to argue that single-attribute cognitive load assessment, such as the widely used practice of measuring overall load with self-reports may not be adequate for systematically describing the causes and effects of cognitive load. Instead, cognitive load should be conceptualized as a dynamic process and assessed using a comprehensive analytical framework that integrates measures to target both the temporal dimensions of cognitive load like instantaneous load, peak

References (65)

  • D.P. Ausubel

    The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material

    Journal of Educational Psychology

    (1960)
  • D. Ausubel

    In defense of advance organizers: A reply to the critics

    Review of Educational Research

    (1978)
  • R. Azevedo et al.

    Advances in scaffolding learning with hypertext and hypermedia: a summary and critical analysis

    Educational Technology Research and Development

    (2008)
  • S.A. Barab et al.

    The effects of navigational and generative activities in hypertext learning on problem solving and comprehension

    International Journal of Instructional Media

    (1999)
  • E. Basar

    Memory and brain dynamics: Oscillations integrating attention, perception, learning and memory

    (2004)
  • L.D. Bendixen et al.

    Successful learning with hypermedia: The role of epistemological beliefs and metacognitive awareness

    Journal of Educational Computing Research

    (2003)
  • W. Benjamin

    The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction

  • M. Betrancourt et al.

    Integrating textual and pictorial information via pop-up windows: An experimental study

    Behavior and Information Technology

    (1998)
  • P.M. Boechler et al.

    The effects of navigation tool information on hypertext navigation behavior: A configural analysis of page-transition data

    Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia

    (2002)
  • O. Bratfisch et al.

    Perceived item-difficulty in three tests of intellectual performance capacity

    (1972)
  • J.I. Brown et al.

    The Nelson Denny reading test (form E)

    (1981)
  • B. Calandra et al.

    A preliminary investigation of advance organizers for a complex educational website

    Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia

    (2005)
  • P. Chandler et al.

    The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction

    British Journal of Educational Psychology

    (1992)
  • D. Charney

    The effect of hypertext on processes of reading and writing

  • U. Cress et al.

    Previews in hypertext: effects on navigation and knowledge acquisition

    Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning

    (2003)
  • K. DeLeeuw et al.

    A comparison of three measures of cognitive load: Evidence for separable measures of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load

    Journal of Educational Psychology

    (2009)
  • P. Dias et al.

    Understanding navigation and disorientation in hypermedia learning environments

    Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia

    (1997)
  • W.P. Eveland et al.

    How web site organization influences free recall, factual knowledge, and knowledge structure density

    Human Communication Research

    (2004)
  • B. Fisch

    Fisch and Spehlmann’s EEG primer: Basic principles of digital and analog EEG

    (1999)
  • R. Flesch

    A new readability yardstick

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1948)
  • A. Gevins et al.

    Monitoring working memory load during computer-based tasks with EEG pattern recognition methods

    Human Factors

    (1998)
  • H.A. Jasper

    The ten–twenty system of the International Federation

    Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology

    (1958)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text