Recognizing and measuring self-regulated learning in a mobile learning environment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.019Get rights and content

Abstract

With the realization that more research is needed to explore external factors (e.g., pedagogy, parental involvement in the context of K-12 learning) and internal factors (e.g., prior knowledge, motivation) underlying student-centered mobile learning, the present study conceptually and empirically explores how the theories and methodologies of self-regulated learning (SRL) can help us analyze and understand the processes of mobile learning. The empirical data collected from two elementary science classes in Singapore indicates that the analytical SRL model of mobile learning proposed in this study can illuminate the relationships between three aspects of mobile learning: students’ self-reports of psychological processes, patterns of online learning behavior in the mobile learning environment (MLE), and learning achievement. Statistical analyses produce three main findings. First, student motivation in this case can account for whether and to what degree the students can actively engage in mobile learning activities metacognitively, motivationally, and behaviorally. Second, the effect of students’ self-reported motivation on their learning achievement is mediated by their behavioral engagement in a pre-designed activity in the MLE. Third, students’ perception of parental autonomy support is not only associated with their motivation in school learning, but also associated with their actual behaviors in self-regulating their learning.

Highlights

SRL provides conceptual framework for understanding mobile learning. ► Our model reveals the relations among personal factors, behavior, and attainment. ► Motivation and SRL are associated with perceived parental autonomy support.

Introduction

Mobile technologies forge ubiquitous learning spaces and experiences across different scenarios or contexts (Sharples et al., 2005, Sharples et al., 2007). They have led us into a new phase in the evolution of technology-enhanced learning (TEL). Ubiquity, the most significant feature of wireless and mobile technologies, creates possibilities for learners to learn the right thing at the right time at the right place (Peng, Su, Chou, & Tsai, 2009). In their words, ubiquity “refers not to the idea of ‘anytime, anywhere’ but to ‘widespread’, ‘just-in-time’, and ‘when-needed’ computing power for learners” (p. 175). It is increasingly believed that this feature enables educators to facilitate and scaffold student-centered learning activities that encompass both formal and informal settings (Frohberg et al., 2009, Looi et al., 2011, Zhang et al., 2010).

Although mobile learning is becoming popular in educational research and practices, there is under-theorization about the nature, process, and outcome of mobile learning (Sharples et al., 2005, Sharples et al., 2007, Wali et al., 2008). This is one of the main challenges facing mobile learning research. Many existing studies (Liaw et al., 2010, Wali et al., 2008, Waycott et al., 2005, Zurita and Nussbaum, 2007) grounded and conceptualized the application of mobile technologies to learning in the framework of activity theory. Although those studies attached importance to the role of the learner in effective mobile learning, further research is still needed to unpack the roles of learner characteristics such as motivation in understanding and analyzing the mechanisms and processes of mobile learning. Specifically, more research is needed to explore external factors (e.g., pedagogy, parental involvement in the context of K-12 learning) and internal factors (e.g., prior knowledge, learning goals, and strategies) that underlie student-centered mobile learning. Student-centered learning logically assumes that students are the agents (masters) of their own learning in some manner. Mobile learning environments provide a means by which students can exercise agency to manage their own learning. This assumes that handheld computers can not only be used as cognitive tools (Chen, Tan, Looi, Zhang, & Seow, 2008), but also as metacognitive tools.

The intent of the present study is to exemplify how the theories and methodology of self-regulated learning (SRL), an active area in contemporary educational psychology (cf. Zimmerman and Schunk, 2001a, Zimmerman and Schunk, 2011), can help to explicate and understand the mechanism and processes of mobile learning. Approaching this aim will lead to significant implications for addressing these challenges in the theorizing of mobile learning.

From a broader perspective, Azevedo (2005) explored how self-regulated learning can be used as a guiding theoretical framework to examine learning with advanced computer technologies that presumably include mobile technologies. According to Azevedo, our knowledge of the mechanisms underlying students’ learning with technologies is lacking when compared with the technological advances which have made such technologies prevalent in homes, school, and at work. Thus, more research is needed to use multiple theoretical lens and multiple methods for better understanding the complex nature of learning with technology-advanced learning environments, in particular, mobile learning environments. These views are aligned with and support the current attempt to investigate mobile learning processes from the perspective of SRL.

In the following sections, the notion of self-regulated learning (SRL), its main components, and a phase model of SRL will be briefly reviewed. Based on this, an analytic SRL model of mobile learning for theoretically interpreting and analyzing mobile learning processes will be introduced. This model will be empirically substantiated by the measurement and statistical analyses of students’ cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational processes in the context of a mobile learning intervention involving two elementary science classes in Singapore. Finally, the empirical findings, and theoretical and practical inferences for further research in both mobile learning and SRL will be interpreted and discussed.

Section snippets

What is self-regulated learning?

Human behavior is conceived of as the product of an internal guidance system that inherently is organized; thus, the mechanism underlying human behavior is a system of self-regulation (Carver & Scheier, 1998). Self-regulation refers to a complex, super-ordinate set of functions located at the junction of several psychological areas including research on cognition, metacognition, problem solving, motivation, and so on (Boekaerts & Corno, 2005). The construct of self-regulated learning (SRL) is

Background of the present study

In the three-year project, a Primary (Grade) 3 and 4 science curriculum was transformed for delivery by means of mobile technologies, and a teacher enacted the lessons over the 2009 and 2010 academic year in a primary class in Singapore. This class of students had a total of more than 40 weeks of the mobilized lessons in science, which were co-designed by teachers and researchers. Another class of students taught by another science teacher participated in the research in the 2010 academic year.

Specific research questions

The above conceptual analyses essentially bring about a significant hypothesis – working with the KWL questions plays a specific role in fostering and analyzing students’ SRL in the mobile learning environment. However, a central issue has not been solved yet: are there any empirical evidences validating this hypothesis? This fundamental issue can be unpacked to several specific questions or relies on other empirical measures on students’ cognition, metacognition, and motivation. For example,

Discussion

The theoretical and empirical analyses help us establish two basic conclusions. First, theoretically, SRL does provide a conceptual framework for qualitatively understanding the nature of mobile learning as well as the analysis of the student-centered mobile learning processes. Second, empirically, according to our analytic SRL model of mobile learning, the quantitative measurement and analyses reveal the relationships between the three profiles of student learning occurring in the mobile

Acknowledgements

This study is funded by a grant from the National Research Foundation, Singapore (Grant #: NRF2007IDMIDM005-021). We are grateful to Gean Chia for her work in empirical data collection.

References (45)

  • S.-S. Liaw et al.

    Investigating acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: Based on activity theory approach

    Computers & Education

    (2010)
  • B.H. Zhang et al.

    Deconstructing and reconstructing: Transforming primary science learning via a mobilized curriculum

    Computers & Education

    (2010)
  • A.M. Agina

    Towards understanding self-organisation: How self-regulation contributes to self-organization?

    International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning

    (2008)
  • R. Azevedo

    Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning

    Educational Psychologist

    (2005)
  • A. Bandura

    Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognition theory

    (1986)
  • A. Bandura

    Social-cognitive theory: An agentic perspective

    Annual Review of Psychology

    (2001)
  • M. Boekaerts et al.

    Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention

    Applied Psychology: An International Review

    (2005)
  • D. Butler et al.

    Feedback as self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis

    Review of Educational Research

    (1995)
  • C.S. Carver et al.

    On the self-regulation of behavior

    (1998)
  • W. Chen et al.

    Handheld computers as cognitive tools: Technology-enhanced environmental learning

    Research & Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning

    (2008)
  • T.G. Duncan et al.

    The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire

    Educational Psychologist

    (2005)
  • D. Frohberg et al.

    Mobile learning projects – A critical analysis of the state of the art

    Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

    (2009)
  • E. Fulton et al.

    Students’ academic motivation: Relations with parental warmth, autonomy granting, and supervision

    Educational Psychology

    (2008)
  • A. Koriat

    Metacognition and consciousness

  • E.A. Linnenbrink et al.

    The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom

    Reading & Writing Quarterly

    (2003)
  • C.K. Looi et al.

    1:1 mobile inquiry learning experience for primary science students – A study of learning effectiveness

    Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

    (2011)
  • J. Martin

    Self-regulated learning, social cognitive theory, and agency

    Educational Psychologist

    (2004)
  • T.O. Nelson

    Cognition versus metacognition

  • Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2008). Getting mobile handhelds help bring k-12 classrooms into the 21st century. District...
  • H. Peng et al.

    Ubiquitous knowledge construction: Mobile learning re-defined and a conceptual framework

    Innovations in Education & Teaching International

    (2009)
  • N.E. Perry et al.

    Learning from Learning Kits: gStudy traces of students’ self-regulated engagements with computerized content

    Educational Psychology Review

    (2006)
  • P.R. Pintrich et al.

    Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)

    Educational and Psychological Measurement

    (1993)
  • Cited by (109)

    • In-service teachers' conceptions of mobile technology-integrated instruction: Tendency towards student-centered learning

      2021, Computers and Education
      Citation Excerpt :

      These views can be good references for exploring teachers' conceptions of mobile technology-integrated instruction. A variety of definitions of mobile learning have been provided, such as “learning anytime and anywhere,” and “learning through mobile devices” (Sha, Looi, Chen, Seow, & Wong, 2012). A widely accepted definition of mobile learning is “using mobile technologies to facilitate learning” (Hwang & Tsai, 2011, p. E65).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text