The validation of the E-Victimisation Scale (E-VS) and the E-Bullying Scale (E-BS) for adolescents
Introduction
Bullying has first been formally defined as a wilful behaviour with a conscious desire of someone to hurt or put another person under stress (Tattum & Tattum, 1992). As the definition evolved through time, additional characteristics have been included to describe the behaviour. These included: repeated actions; systematic manner; a desire to harm; an imbalance of power or an abuse of power; enjoyed by the aggressor; and victim feels oppressed (Farrington, 1993, Rigby, 2002, Smith et al., 2002, Smith and Sharp, 1994). With advancements of information technologies bullying behaviour, particularly among young people, has been manifested not just face-to-face but also through the cyber space. As a result, the new terms “Cyber-bullying” and “E-bullying” have been evolved (Patchin & Hinduja, 2006). In general, E-bullying is defined as threatening, intimidating, and harassing behaviour targeting others using the Internet and other digital devices such as emailing, texting, or instant messaging (Kowalski, Limber, & Agatston, 2008).
It has been suggested that bullying in young people should be considered a public health issue because of its immediate effects and long-term sequelae on the mental health of the victim (Feder, 2007). A growing number of studies suggesting the detrimental effects of bullying on the mental health of young people have been identified in the literature (Allison et al., 2009, Arseneault et al., 2010, Fitzpatrick et al., 2010, Luukkonen et al., 2010, McMahon et al., 2010, Rivers and Noret, 2010, Stassen Berger, 2007, Tharp-Taylor et al., 2009, Undheim and Sund, 2010). These studies found that victims of bullying were more susceptible to physical ill-health, severe mental health problems including depression, self-harm, and violent behaviour (Arseneault et al., 2010, Fitzpatrick et al., 2010, Luukkonen et al., 2010, McMahon et al., 2010). Young people victimised by psychological and physical bullying were also more likely to be involved in substance abuse (Tharp-Taylor, Haviland, & D’Amico, 2009). The effect of victimisation during childhood and adolescence might also be long-lasting and would impact on the health and quality of life later on in adulthood (Allison et al., 2009). Similarly, it has also been demonstrated that E-bullying has the same detrimental effect on the mental health of young people (Hinduja and Patchin, 2007, Wolak and Finkelhor, 2006, Ybarra, 2004).
In terms of the prevalence of E-bullying among children and adolescents, a growing wealth of knowledge has been accumulating in developed countries (Ybarra, 2004, Ybarra and Mitchell, 2007). In the national study on health behaviour in school-aged children in the US, it was found that about 14% of the surveyed grade 6–10 children had experienced bullying electronically (Wang, Iannotti, & Nansel, 2009). In another recent survey study among middle and high school students in Canada, it was revealed that about half (49.5%) had been bullied online and nearly 34% had involved in online bullying behaviour (Mishna, Cook, Gadalla, Daciuk, & Solomon, 2010). However, in these studies information was elicited not using a standardised and validated tool. In fact, little information on well-designed and validated E-Bullying Scale has been provided from the literature.
In terms of developing countries, such as China, information on E-bullying is scarce. According to the most recent report by the China Internet Network Information Centre (CNNIC) CNNIC, 2010, there were 420 million net-citizens who are Chinese citizen at the age of 6 or above and had used the Internet in the first half year in 2010. Of these about 30.7% were young people still studying in high schools or universities (CNNIC, 2010). For the application of mobile Internet access, instant messaging has been identified as the most popular use of cyber technologies for all ages (CNNIC, 2010). This was followed by mobile search and music downloads. In terms of the magnitude and means of E-bullying among adolescents in China, little information has been revealed from the literature. Li (2006) reported that about 33% of children had experienced bullying through the digital media and a smaller percentage had engaged in E-bullying behaviour. A later study by the same author also suggested that most students experienced E-bullying through multiple digital sources with chatroom and text messaging being the most common means (Li, 2008).
One reason for the limited information is the lack of a suitable measuring instrument that has been properly developed and validated for assessing E-bullying and victimisation in the Chinese youth population. This results in a lack of systematic data collection in this important area of adolescent health. Moreover, a lack of proper assessment in the exposure to bullying or involvement in bullying behaviour posts a significant limitation on the possibility of good epidemiological studies on the aetiology, effects, and potential intervention of bullying behaviour. Furthermore, it renders international comparisons of results impossible. Hence, there is an urgent need for the development and validation of a measuring instrument for E-bullying and victimisation in the Chinese language.
This study aims to examine the psychometric properties, including the factor structure, reliability and validity, of the E-Victimisation Scale (E-VS) and the E-Bullying Scale (E-BS) developed for adolescents in the Chinese population.
Section snippets
Sample and procedure
The sample was generated using a two-stage random clustering sampling technique. First, 5 different high schools were randomly selected from the list of high schools in the city of Kaifeng located in the Henan Province. Second, one or two classes were selected randomly from each school with all students in the class recruited in the sample. As a result, a sample of 484 adolescents aged between 11–16 years was included in this validation study. The sample consisted of 244 (50.4%) males and 240
Results
The experimental sample consisted of 231 young people with 113 (49%) males and 118 (51%) females and a mean age of 13.5 years (s.d. = 0.9). Results obtained on Barlett’s test indicated a chi-squared value of 1365.62, df = 15 (p < 0.001) and a KMO value of 0.824 suggesting the items were suitable for Factor Analysis. Two EFA were conducted on items for the two separate scales. The results obtained from the EFA for the E-VS suggested a single-factor structure based on the Scree Plot methods in
Discussion
This study aims to examine the psychometric properties of the E-Victimisation Scale and the E-Bullying Scale developed to be used in the Chinese adolescent population. This is one of the few reports on the validation of a newly developed instrument for the measurement of the Cyber bullying. Hence, comparisons on the psychometric properties between different studies are difficult. The only study found in the English literature that reported on the psychometric validation of an instrument
Conclusion
The validated E-VS and E-BS can make a positive contribution in providing a standardised instrument for the assessment of cyber bullying and victimisation among Chinese young people. These measurements are crucial in the identification of E-bullying and victimisation so that prevalence can be assessed precisely and, in turn, prevention strategies can be developed to tackle such public health problem.
References (35)
- et al.
And STUDY-70 Workgroup, Bullying behavior in relation to psychiatric disorders and physical health among adolescents: a clinical cohort of 508 underage inpatient adolescents in Northern Finland
Psychiatry Research
(2010) - et al.
Bullying victimisation, self harm and associated factors in Irish adolescent boys
Social Science and Medicine
(2010) Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten?
Developmental Review
(2007)- et al.
Victimization from mental and physical bullying and substance use in early adolescence
Addictive Behaviors
(2009) - et al.
The Revised Cyber Bullying Inventory (RCNI): Validity and reliability studies
Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences
(2010) - et al.
School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber
Journal of Adolescent Health
(2009) - et al.
Prevalence and frequency of Internet harassment instigation: implications for adolescent health
Journal of Adolescent Health
(2007) - et al.
Does school bullying affect adult health? Population survey of health-related quality of life and past victimization
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
(2009) - et al.
Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: ‘much ado about nothing’?
Psychological Medicine
(2010) - CNNIC, Statistical Report on Internet Development in China. July, 2010....
Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences
Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Understanding and preventing bullying
Bullying as a public health issue
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
Bullying and depressive symptomatology among low-income, African-American youth
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Offline consequences of online victimization: school violence and delinquency
Journal of School Violence
Cited by (65)
Parental conflict and cyberbullying among Chinese adolescents: A moderated mediation analysis
2023, Children and Youth Services ReviewDevelopment and validation of an internet unethical behavior scale
2022, Library and Information Science ResearchThe Role of Self-Esteem in Protecting Against Cyber-Victimization and Gaming Disorder Symptoms Among Adolescents: A Temporal Dynamics Analysis
2024, Journal of Youth and AdolescenceSerial Multiple Mediation of Anxiety and Hostile Attribution Bias in the Relationship Between Need for Uniqueness and Adolescents’ Cyberbullying Perpetration: A Two-Wave Study
2024, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction