“Maybe you don’t want to face it” – College students’ perspectives on cyberbullying
Introduction
Cyberbullying is a growing phenomenon in our society with the technological advances that are occurring. While cyberbullying has been defined as repeated, unwanted harassment using digital technologies (Adams and Lawrence, 2011, Kraft and Wang, 2010), there are several other definitions discussed in the literature focusing on threats of physical harm to online aggression to the use of specific technology such as web cams (Sabella, Patchin, & Hinduja, 2013). Although better consensus is needed for a clear definition, cyberbullying can have potentially long-lasting effects on victims and further research is needed to understand the context in which it occurs. Traditional bullying is often contained to the schoolyard; however, cyberbullying can occur at all hours via text message, email, or social networking sites. The frequency of victimization may be greater given the fact that our lives are intricately connected to technology and the permanency of what is written is an added consequence.
Cyberbullying victims have reported effects such as emotional distress, anxiety, and isolation (Hinduja and Patchin, 2010, Kaminski and Fang, 2009, Roland, 2002, Schenk and Fremouw, 2012). Unfortunately, suicide has occurred among some cybervictims and the media has highlighted certain cases, such as Tyler Clementi and Jessica Logan. For instance, Tyler’s college roommate recorded his sexual encounter with another man and this was streamed live on the Internet. Tyler subsequently committed suicide three days later (Foderaro, 2010). Similarly, Jessica Logan was cyberbullied via text message when her ex-boyfriend disseminated a nude picture of her to hundreds of adolescents. Jessica endured a great deal of harassment and name-calling before she ended her life (Wells, 2012). The fact that these lives were tragically impacted by the inappropriate use of technology warrants more data on why students are engaging in this type of behavior. Furthermore, given that these specific instances occurred among college-age students, this raises the important question of how older students are affected by cyberbullying.
Because cyberbullying occurs in high school (Hinduja and Patchin, 2007, Hinduja and Patchin, 2010, Kaminski and Fang, 2009, Patchin and Hinduja, 2010, Roland, 2002), as well as in the workplace (Privitera and Campbell, 2009, Science Daily, 2012), it is logical to infer that college students also face these challenges. One study indicated that cyberbullying in high school may also lead to further cyberbullying in college (Kraft & Wang, 2010). The prevalence of college-level cyberbullying ranges from 8% to 21% (Kraft and Wang, 2010, McDonald and Roberts-Pittman, 2010, Schenk and Fremouw, 2012) and may include receiving threatening text messages, sexually harassing messages, spreading rumors, and faking someone’s identity (Walker, Sockman, & Koehn, 2011).
To what extent are college students really impacted by cyberbullying, especially given their age and experience? Researchers have sought to describe the ramifications of college-level cyberbullying to better understand the mental health outcomes. In a recent study, the psychological state of college cybervictims was characterized by interpersonal sensitivity, depression, hostility, and psychotic behaviors when compared to controls (Schenk & Fremouw, 2012). On a behavioral basis, cybervictims became less trusting of people and avoided certain situations (Crosslin and Crosslin, 2014, Schenk and Fremouw, 2012). Cybervictims were not the only ones affected, but cyberbullies themselves also displayed psychological effects as a result of the victimization. Interestingly, cyberbullies manifested many of the same symptoms as victims, but also reported increased aggression levels, violence, and drug crimes compared to controls (Schenk, Fremouw, & Keelan, 2013).
Given the psychological states of students involved in cyberbullying, it is crucial to learn more about how this phenomenon is affecting the social and learning environments in college. When cyberbullying occurs in high school or in the work place, there are trusted people who can assist with these situations (e.g., parents, counselors, supervisors); however, college students may not have many resources at their disposal, particularly at a time when independence and autonomy is reinforced. Previous research has largely been quantitative to better describe the scope of the problem. Nevertheless, there are very few qualitative studies in the published literature about how college students perceive cyberbullying. Qualitative approaches are crucial to glean more in-depth descriptions of cyberbullying and to determine whether college students view cyberbullying as an issue.
Furthermore, prevention programs are more effective when the social context is understood instead of relying solely on individual skills (Page & Page, 2011). Prevention requires understanding the factors that lead to cyberbullying, and the interplay of factors in social environments is often explained well with the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) (Centers for Disease Control & Prevention [CDC], 2013). This includes levels of influence (i.e., individual, organizational, community, and policy) that impact cyberbullying attitudes and behaviors in college students. By applying the SEM, salient factors may be identified to guide multi-level interventions to prevent cyberbullying. The purpose of this study was to assess undergraduate students’ perceptions of cyberbullying by conducting several focus groups. Additionally, the authors sought to determine acceptable interventions to reduce cyberbullying in this population by applying the SEM.
Section snippets
Participants
First and second-year students at a southern university were recruited to participate in this study. Students in their first years of college were sought because they are more likely to live on campus and in a community with other students where cyberbullying may be more pervasive.
Potential participants were informed of the study using various channels, such as announcement in undergraduate classes, an invitation to participate using a campus-wide information board, and through the psychology
Results
In Fig. 1, the themes and sub-themes are aligned with the research questions to illustrate the natural flow of data and how the researchers embodied the findings. The following themes were identified: Reflections on cyberbullying; Reasons for cyberbullying; Perceptions of cyberbullying terminology; Pertaining to college students; and Awareness & education. The authors have listed salient quotes below to provide a rich context illustrating the participants’ perspectives on cyberbullying.
Discussion
The first goal of this study was to examine undergraduate students’ perceptions of cyberbullying. The results confirmed what others have reported that cyberbullying continues from secondary schools into the college setting (Adams and Lawrence, 2011, CDC, 2011, Zalaquett and Chatters, 2014). Additionally, this study provided new insight into how college students may not seek help regarding a cyberbullying situation, relying more on their own resources for a solution.
Limitations
The researchers utilized a convenience sample of students from the psychology department at a public, southern university. Therefore, the results may not be generalizable to the general public. In addition, it is possible that only those students that had experience with or an interest in cyberbullying chose to participate in the study. However, the results from this study aligned closely with other studies in the literature.
Conclusion and future research recommendations
This was one of the first qualitative studies that sought to identify how college students view cyberbullying in a social context. In-depth data, such as this, is very useful in generating theories and these results can be applied to future interventions to reduce cyberbullying in college students. Future recommendations include follow-up surveys with college level administrators at a variety of universities to gain further knowledge about their perceptions of cyberbullying and their view of
Funding source
This study was funded by the College of Health Sciences Dean’s fund at Texas Woman’s University.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Mr. Matt Crosslin for his expertise and assistance with the design of the figure. Also, the authors thank Dr. Jody Terrell for contributing to this study in the area of data collection. We thank all of the students who participated in this research project.
References (31)
- et al.
Cyberbullying in social networking sites: An adolescent victims’ perspective
Computers in Human Behavior
(2014) - et al.
Victimization by peers and adolescent suicide in three U.S. samples
Journal of Pediatrics
(2009) - et al.
Cyberbullying myths and realities
Computers in Human Behavior
(2013) - et al.
Characteristics of college cyberbullies
Computers in Human Behavior
(2013) - et al.
The nature of cyberbullying and strategies for prevention
Computers in Human Behavior
(2013) - et al.
Bullying victims: The effects last into college
American Secondary Education
(2011) - et al.
A survey on bullying: Some reflections on the findings
NASCD News & Notes
(2008) - et al.
Predicting undergraduates’ self-reported engagement in traditional and cyberbullying from attitudes
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
(2012) - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (2011). Bullying among middle...
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] (2013). The social–ecological model: A framework for prevention...
Cyberbullying at a Texas university ∼ A mixed-methods approach to examining online aggression
Texas Public Health Journal
Predictors of cyberbullying perpetration among college students: An application of the theory of reasoned action
Computers in Human Behavior
College bullies – Precursors to campus violence: What should universities and college administrators know about the law?
Villanova Law Review
Cited by (69)
Who would respond to A troll? A social network analysis of reactions to trolls in online communities
2021, Computers in Human BehaviorChasing spammers: Using the Internet protocol address for detection
2024, Psychology and MarketingPattern of Facebook use by university students during the COVID-19 pandemic: relations with loneliness and resilience
2023, Social Network Analysis and MiningCyberbullying and cyber victimization: examining mediating roles of empathy and resilience
2023, Current Psychology