Elsevier

Computers in Human Behavior

Volume 76, November 2017, Pages 294-302
Computers in Human Behavior

Full length article
Are people willing to share their political opinions on Facebook? Exploring roles of self-presentational concern in spiral of silence

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.029Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Psychological processes of SNS users' political self-disclosure are examined.

  • An extended spiral of silence model with a self-presentation approach is proposed.

  • The opinion-congruence based mechanism argued by spiral of silence is confirmed.

  • Approval-based CSW and self-presentational concern explain online expression.

  • Two opposing dialectics of opinion expression on SNSs are discussed.

Abstract

Social networking sites such as Facebook have become a major platform for American political discussion. However, publicly expressing opinions on Facebook can make individuals perceived negatively by their Facebook friends, contributing to the spiral of silence. The purpose of this study is to extend the spiral of silence framework by integrating the perspective of online self-presentation to investigate the psychological processes of Facebook users' political self-disclosure through commenting, sharing and posting behaviors. Survey data from 283 Facebook users confirmed the opinion-congruence based mechanism argued by the classic spiral of silence theory, and found that Facebook users’ willingness of online engagement in controversial issues is also related to self-presentational concern and approval-based contingency of self-worth.

Introduction

The expression of opinion on public issues is important for democracy, as it is not only critical for democratic discourse but also essential to facilitate political engagement (Valenzuela, Kim, & Gil de Zúñiga, 2012). Facebook has become a major platform for political self-disclosure and public discussion. According to a Pew survey conducted in 2016, 49% of American Facebook users post about politics on Facebook (Pew, 2016a). However, publicly expressing political and social opinion on Facebook can expose individuals to judgment and even criticism from their Facebook friends, contributing to the spiral of silence.

Originally developed to understand the formation of public opinions, the spiral of silence theory suggests that when it comes to public issues, especially morally-implicated issues, individuals tend to stay silent when holding minority views to avoid social isolation (Noelle-Neumann, 1974). Spiral of silence studies have conceptualized public opinions in terms of political discussion and decision making in a democracy (Noelle-Neuman, 1995). Mass communication research has extensively employed this theory to understand how people use traditional media to evaluate opinion climate (see Scheufele & Moy, 2000 for a review). As Facebook becomes an increasingly popular platform worldwide for voicing political opinions, it is critical to understand how this platform affects users’ willingness to speak out on controversial issues. Although efforts of examining spiral of silence within the context of social networking sites (SNSs) is limited (Pang et al., 2016), current research found that rather than encouraging free self-disclosure of political opinion and facilitating public debate, SNSs like Facebook can silence user discussion about controversial issues (e.g., Hampton et al., 2014, Stoycheff, 2016). However, as Hampton et al. (2014) pointed out, existing research fails to “directly explore why people might remain silent if they felt that their opinions were in the minority” (p. 8). For both theoretical and practical perspectives, it is imperative to study the social-psychological process of political self-disclosure via Facebook.

Facebook has become a major source of news consumption. One Pew study (2016b) shows that 66% of American adults get their news from Facebook. Therefore, individuals may heavily rely on their exposure to political information exchanged via Facebook to form their opinions of the political climate. However, due to Facebook's visibility and persistence affordances, many interactions on Facebook could be exposed to a large audience and stored for a long time (Evans, Pearce, Vitak, & Treem, 2017). Consequently, Facebook users might be inhibited from voicing unpopular views, in order to avoid undesirable impressions or social isolation in their Facebook networks (Metzger, 2009), which largely overlap with their offline networks (Ellison, Steinfield, & Lampe, 2007). One possible reason is that political self-disclosure on SNSs is essentially a form of self-presentation (Eliasoph, 1990), which can impact users' accomplishment of relational and instrumental goals. Therefore, it is necessary to include self-presentational concern in the examination of individuals' political self-disclosure on Facebook and investigate the connection between Facebook technological affordances and users' self-presentational concern.

To fill the gap in current literature, this study aims to expand our understanding of individuals' willingness to express political opinions on Facebook. The purpose is to extend the theoretical framework of the spiral of silence by integrating the perspective of online self-presentation to investigate individuals' expression of political opinions via Facebook. Specifically, we propose that Facebook self-presentational concern (i.e. concerns about one's public image presented on Facebook) should exert its explanatory power in understanding Facebook users' willingness to speak out on controversial issues, a key focus of spiral of silence theory. This study is one of the first attempts to recognize the potential interplay effect of self-presentational concern and perceived opinion climates on political expression on SNSs. The findings of this study will not only contribute to our knowledge of SNSs users' political self-disclosure, but also provide practical implications for raising the awareness of SNSs' role in shaping public opinion.

Section snippets

The spiral of silence

The knowledge of public opinion formation is essential to understanding people's attitudes and behaviors (Donsbach & Traugott, 2008). Scholars have utilized theories such as agenda-setting theory (McCombs & Shaw, 1972), framing theory (Scheufele, 1999), and the third-person effect (Davison, 1983) to examine the formation of public opinion in modern societies. Among the classic theoretical frameworks, the spiral of silence is one theory that explains how public opinion is formed and how it can

Sample

Data were collected from survey participants on Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), an online crowdsourcing platform. An online survey was composed and hosted on Qualtrics. The survey link was then posted as a paid task on MTurk between October 19th and October 27th, 2016. For each completed survey, each participant was paid 1 US Dollar through the website.

A total of 296 valid responses were collected and subsequently included in the data analysis. Most participants checked Facebook daily (69.6%),

Descriptive statistics

Most participants perceived the scenario of engaging in a public debate on AA as highly realistic (M = 4.55, SD = 0.71). Participants' perception of their Facebook friends' attitude towards AA (M = 3.76, SD = 1.21) was significantly more favorable than their own attitude (M = 3.45, SD = 1.56, t (282) = 3.55, p < .001). With the opinion incongruence between participants and their friends (M = 1.06, SD = 1.09), participants are less likely to comment on the post (M = 2.31, SD = 1.26), share the

Discussion

Prior research has tested the spiral of silence theory on SNSs and lent empirical support to the theory. We extend the spiral of silence framework by introducing the self-presentation perspective and offering an additional explanation about why individuals stay silent when feeling that their opinion is in the minority. Based on the assumption that political self-disclosure contributes to one's public image on SNSs, we connected approval-based CSW and self-presentational concern with three

References (75)

  • J. Crocker et al.

    Contingencies of self-worth in college students: Theory and measurement

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2003)
  • J. Crocker et al.

    The costly pursuit of self-esteem

    Psychological Bulletin

    (2004)
  • J. Crocker et al.

    Contingencies of self-worth

    Psychological Review

    (2001)
  • W.P. Davison

    The third-person effect in communication

    Public Opinion Quarterly

    (1983)
  • V. Derlega et al.

    Self-disclosure and relationship development: An attributional analysis

  • W. Donsbach et al.

    The SAGE handbook of public opinion research

    (2008)
  • S. Duguay

    “He has a way gayer Facebook than I do”: Investigating sexual identity disclosure and context collapse on a social networking site

    New Media & Society

    (2014)
  • N. Eliasoph

    Political culture and the presentation of a political self: A study of the public sphere in the spirit of Erving Goffman

    Theory and Society

    (1990)
  • N.B. Ellison et al.

    The benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites

    Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

    (2007)
  • S.K. Evans et al.

    Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research

    Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

    (2017)
  • Facebook help community

    If I comment on someone elses post my comment is seen on my timeline how do I keep people from seeing my comments on my timeline to other people's post?

    (2013)
  • K. Forde-Mazrui

    Taking conservatives seriously: A moral justification for affirmative action and reputations

    California Law Review

    (2004)
  • J. Fox et al.

    Queer identity management and political self-expression on social networking sites: A co-cultural approach to the spiral of silence

    Journal of Communication

    (2015)
  • S. Gearhart et al.

    Gay bullying and online opinion expression: Testing spiral of silence in the social media environment

    Social Science Computer Review

    (2014)
  • E. Goffman

    The presentation of self in everyday life

    (1959)
  • M.C. Green

    Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism

    Discourse Processes

    (2004)
  • K.N. Hampton et al.

    Social media and the “spiral of silence.”

    (2014)
  • K.N. Hampton et al.

    Social media and political discussion: When online presence silences offline conversation

    Information, Communication & Society

    (2016)
  • A.F. Hayes

    Exploring the forms of self-censorship: On the spiral of silence and the use of opinion expression avoidance strategies

    Journal of Communication

    (2007)
  • B. Hogan

    The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online

    Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society

    (2010)
  • S.S. Ho et al.

    Social-psychological influences on opinion expression in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication

    Communication Research

    (2008)
  • L.T. Hu et al.

    Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

    Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal

    (1999)
  • S. Jaschik

    Poll: Public opposes affirmative action

    (2016)
  • N.A. John et al.

    “I don't like you any more”: Facebook unfriending by Israelis during the Israel-Gaza conflict of 2014

    Journal of Communication

    (2015)
  • A. Kamenetz

    Harvard rescinds admission of 10 students over obscene Facebook messages

    National Public Radio

    (2017, June 6)
  • S. Kiesler et al.

    Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication

    American Psychologist

    (1984)
  • S.H. Kim et al.

    Talking about genetically modified (GM) foods in South Korea: The role of the internet in the spiral of silence process

    Mass Communication and Society

    (2014)
  • Cited by (50)

    • Expression avoidance and privacy management as dissonance reduction in the face of online disagreement

      2022, Telematics and Informatics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Conformity is different from self-censorship when people hold off communication. Instead, although the discussion is going on, people are manipulating the contents of expression to conceal their true opinions, such as expressing uncertainty, diverting to another topic, using jokes or humor (Wells et al., 2017), talking about someone else’s opinion (Hayes, 2007), and pretending to agree with others (Liu et al., 2017; Gearhart and Zhang, 2018; Kwon et al., 2015). When the above strategies rely mainly on the user’s manipulation of the published contents, social media enables the engagement of more sophisticated methods—which are unlikely to take place in offline settings—to hide one’s genuine opinions (Thorson, 2014; Vraga et al., 2015).

    • Unpacking the complex interactions among customers in online fan pages

      2021, Journal of Business Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In terms of sufficiency and necessity of predictors, a synthesis of fsQCA and analysis of necessary conditions results indicated that perceived news informativeness and entertainment, brand femininity, and active participation are sufficient but unnecessary to stimulate brand love and attitudinal loyalty, whereas passive participation and brand masculinity are both sufficient and necessary to increase love and attitudinal loyalty to a brand. Such results are not surprising considering the unwillingness of people to engage online for fear of criticism (Liu et al., 2017) or harassment (Gearhart & Zhang, 2014), as evidenced in the case of female social media users (Chadha et al., 2020). For instance, users may be unwilling to like, share, or post in favor of brands that possess feminine attributes due to fears that they might be perceived by others accordingly.

    • Effects of the spiral of silence on minority groups in recommender systems

      2023, HT 2023 - The 34th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text