Elsevier

Computers in Human Behavior

Volume 81, April 2018, Pages 303-315
Computers in Human Behavior

Who trusts social media?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.026Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Extant literature on social media and trust is synthesized.

  • Research on social media use and trust are presented, analyzed and discussed.

  • Theoretical and practical implications are presented.

  • Applied and future research suggestions for social media use and trust are offered.

Abstract

Trust is the foundation of all communication, yet a profound question in business today is how can we psychologically understand trust behaviors in our new digital landscape? Earlier studies in internet and human behavior have shown a significant connection between social media use and user personality (Hughes, Rowe, Batey, & Lee, 2012). Still, the connection between type of online user and their trust values is an under researched area. Today, millions of people globally read newsfeeds and information via their digital networks, but we do not know enough about human behavior related to which specific users of social media actually trust the news they read online. In this study we apply items from five different validated scales to measure trust to investigate to what degree a users' perception of trust varies depending on their gender, age, or amount of time spent using social media. Using a convenience population sample (n = 214) significant differences in levels of trusting behavior were found across gender, age, social media newsfeed preferences and extent of social media use. The findings suggest that women and younger users have the highest expectations for integrity, trusting others and expecting others to show empathy and goodwill. Implications of the results are discussed.

Introduction

Trust has throughout history been an integral part of our private and business lives, both on and offline. Trust philosophically binds us together with an intoxicating energy (Lingis, 2004). Indeed, learning to trust others and being trusted yourself is as important as breathing fresh air every day: all relationships depend upon trust. Nevertheless, the psychological perspectives of digital trust and trustworthy behavior on the internet is a recently new phenomenon within human behavior research. As the use of social media has grown exponentially during the course of the last decade, people can access news on social media sites from almost any computer or hand held device wherever they are in the world. In fact, they would find it hard to imagine a life without it as information about what is going on in the world is at one's fingertips. Instead of waiting to read the newspaper or watch the news on television in order to catch up on current events, people can get instant updates by simply going online and looking at web and social media sites. Nevertheless, since there are hundreds of thousands of social media sites featuring different viewpoints on a variety of subjects, it can be hard to distinguish what information is deemed the most accurate and most trustworthy, and what information is not. Indeed, only 20% of our respondents believe they can unquestionably trust the news that they read on social media. This suggests that understanding who trusts social media newsfeeds will be critical for not only media houses but also for businesses and politics.

We live in an age where distrust is rife, hence it is imperative that we gain a better insight into how trust evolves and is maintained in a digital world. Against this backdrop we need more empirical insights into users and site managers' expectations of future trustworthiness and dis-trustworthiness. More studies are needed since digital technological advancements are ever evolving and will have increasing impact on how we communicate in both society and business.

To fill a gap in the literature relative to perception of trust in the context of social media and news feeds, we conducted an exploratory study combining five different validated measures of Integrity (Mayer & Davis, 1999), Competence and Benevolence (McKnight, Choudhury, & Kacmar, 2002), Concern, and Identification (Shockley-Zalabak, Ellis, & Cesaria, 2000), to investigate whether gender, age, or the amount of time spent using social media effects one's perception of trust. Our second contribution at a conceptual level is the development and validation of this five factor trust measurement scale. Extrapolating from research on trust and social media offered in our literature review, this study explores the question: who trusts news on social media? We focus on the following problem statement in order to better understand human behavior and perceptions of online trust.

  • RQ: Do social media users' perceptions of trust differ significantly with respect to their gender, age, social media usage and social media site preference for newsfeeds?

Section snippets

The concept of trust

Trust can be defined as an implicit set of beliefs that the other party will refrain from opportunistic behavior and will not take advantage of a situation (Ridings, Gefen, & Arinze, 2002). Trust is in fact one of the key determinants of performance in organizations (Kouzes & Posner, 1993). As a result, trust has been an important construct in the social sciences and has received increasing attention by organizational researchers, as in the absence of specific rules in organizations, trust is

Design & instrumentation

Research designs typically fall into one of two major categories: exploratory or conclusive (Hair et al., 2003, Malhotra, 2007). Exploratory research designs are more appropriate when the problem needs to be defined more precisely or when the theory has not yet been investigated in a new context (Bertsch, 2009), which is the case of this present study. Such studies often employ small sample sizes based on convenience (for recent examples, see González-González and Jiménez-Zarco (2015) where

Results and discussion

We followed typical data scrubbing techniques (e.g., identifying missing data and outliers) as those prescribed or followed in the literature (see, for example, Bertsch and Pham, 2012, Croarkin, 2011, Howell, 2012, Osborne and Overbay, 2004). These techniques allowed us to appropriately prepare the data for analysis. When keying the results into SPSS, we reversed scored each of the amalgamated Trust items, so that 1 = Strongly Disagree, and 5 = Strongly Agree, in line with previous studies

Discussion

The goal of this research was to explore whether social media users' perceptions and expectations of trust differ with respect to their gender, age, social media usage, and social media sites preference. Firstly, the results for the trust construct Benevolence, defined as “one [who] cares about the welfare of the other person and is therefore motivated to act in the other person's interest” (McKnight & Chervany, 1996, p. 33), showed that social media preference is a significant factor. From our

Conclusion

The unprecedented popularity of social media for gathering news raises a number of critical questions regarding who trusts news in social media and what sites we trust. This paper tries to answer some of these questions by looking to extant literature, and by presenting the quantitative results of a distributed questionnaire on trust and social media behavior with a sample of university students and faculty/staff. In a nutshell, the results of our study showed that younger, female, heavy users

References (102)

  • W.Y. Lin et al.

    Health information seeking in the Web 2.0 age: Trust in social media, uncertainty reduction, and self-disclosure

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2016)
  • N.L. Muscanell et al.

    Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2012)
  • T.A. Pempek et al.

    College students' social networking experiences on Facebook

    Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

    (2009)
  • I. Pentina et al.

    Antecedents and consequences of trust in a social media brand: A cross-cultural study of Twitter

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2013)
  • C.M. Ridings et al.

    Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities

    The Journal of Strategic Information Systems

    (2002)
  • E. Rusman et al.

    Fostering trust in virtual project teams: Towards a design framework grounded in a Trustworthiness Antecedents (TWAN) schema

    International Journal of Human-computer Studies

    (2010)
  • M. Sutter et al.

    Trust and trustworthiness across different age groups

    Games and Economic Behavior

    (2007)
  • E.C. Tandoc et al.

    Facebook use, envy, and depression among college students: Is facebooking depressing?

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2015)
  • J.M. Vaterlaus et al.

    “Snapchat is more personal”: An exploratory study on Snapchat behaviors and young adult interpersonal relationships

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2016)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Understanding the effects of trust and risk on individual behavior toward social media platforms: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2016)
  • D.R. Anderson et al.

    Statistics for business & economics

    (2016)
  • N. Augar et al.

    A study of how social media impacts human relationships and family mediation

    (2014)
  • F. Bélanger et al.

    Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems

    MIS Quarterly

    (2011)
  • A.A. Berger

    Media analysis techniques

    (2014)
  • A. Bertsch

    Exploring perceptions of values in U.S. Managers: Interstate cross-cultural differences and similarities within the U.S.A

    (2009)
  • A. Bertsch et al.

    A guide to research design and multivariate analysis in cross cultural research

    Journal of International Doctoral Research

    (2012)
  • O.S. Borgen

    Identification as a trust generation mechanism in cooperatives

    Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics

    (2001)
  • M.D. Boyd et al.

    Social networks Sites: Definition, history, and scholarship

    Journal of Computer-mediated Communication

    (2007)
  • P.B. Cardona et al.

    Manager–subordinate trust relationships across cultures

  • M.S. Clark et al.

    Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1979)
  • J.A. Colquitt et al.

    Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (2007)
  • N. Coppola et al.

    Building trust in virtual teams

    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications

    (2004)
  • C. Croarkin

    Engineering statistics handbook

    (2011)
  • L.L. Cummings et al.

    The Organizational trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation

  • H. Devlin

    Toddlers have a keen eye for spotting who to trust

    The Times (United Kingdom)

    (2014)
  • C. Dwyer et al.

    Trust privacy concern within social networking: A comparing of Facebook and MySpace

  • M. Edwards

    Organizational identification: A conceptual and operational review

    International Journal of Management Reviews

    (2005)
  • N.B. Ellison et al.

    The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites

    Journal of Computer-mediated Communication

    (2007)
  • R.C. Farrugia

    Facebook and relationships: A study of how social media use is affecting long-term relationships

    (2013)
  • N.N. Foote

    Identification as the basis for a theory of motivation

    American Sociological Review

    (1951)
  • D. Gambetta

    Can we trust

  • I. Gershon

    The breakup 2.0: Disconnecting over new media

    (2011)
  • GlobalWebIndex

    GWI Social Summary. GlobalWebIndex's quarterly report on the latest trends in social networking

    (2016)
  • M.S. Granovetter

    Economic action and social structure; the problem of embeddedness

    American Journal of Sociology

    (1985)
  • A. Gruzd et al.

    Imagining Twitter as an imagined community

    American Behavioral Scientist

    (2011)
  • C. Hagar

    Crisis informatics: Perspectives of trust – is social media a mixed blessing?

    SLIS Student Research Journal

    (2013)
  • J.F. Hair et al.

    Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective

    (2010)
  • J.F. Hair et al.

    Essentials of business research methods

    (2003)
  • N. Hass

    In your Facebook.com

    (January 8, 2006)
  • M.A. Hogg et al.

    Social psychology

    (2011)
  • Cited by (110)

    • Cynicism as strength: Privacy cynicism, satisfaction and trust among social media users

      2023, Computers in Human Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      When people in a social network have trust in one another's activities, knowledge, decency, and honesty, they are more likely to engage in and maintain social exchange activities (Nahapiet & Ghoshal, 1998). Consequently, this level of satisfaction is influenced by trust, which is a result of post-adoption beliefs (Venkatesh et al., 2011). Based on extant literature in this topic, it is logical to assume that when users' expectations about social media are consistent with their beliefs, such as perceived usefulness and confirmation of trust, they tend to also trust social media which then result in satisfaction with social media platforms.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text