Who trusts social media?
Introduction
Trust has throughout history been an integral part of our private and business lives, both on and offline. Trust philosophically binds us together with an intoxicating energy (Lingis, 2004). Indeed, learning to trust others and being trusted yourself is as important as breathing fresh air every day: all relationships depend upon trust. Nevertheless, the psychological perspectives of digital trust and trustworthy behavior on the internet is a recently new phenomenon within human behavior research. As the use of social media has grown exponentially during the course of the last decade, people can access news on social media sites from almost any computer or hand held device wherever they are in the world. In fact, they would find it hard to imagine a life without it as information about what is going on in the world is at one's fingertips. Instead of waiting to read the newspaper or watch the news on television in order to catch up on current events, people can get instant updates by simply going online and looking at web and social media sites. Nevertheless, since there are hundreds of thousands of social media sites featuring different viewpoints on a variety of subjects, it can be hard to distinguish what information is deemed the most accurate and most trustworthy, and what information is not. Indeed, only 20% of our respondents believe they can unquestionably trust the news that they read on social media. This suggests that understanding who trusts social media newsfeeds will be critical for not only media houses but also for businesses and politics.
We live in an age where distrust is rife, hence it is imperative that we gain a better insight into how trust evolves and is maintained in a digital world. Against this backdrop we need more empirical insights into users and site managers' expectations of future trustworthiness and dis-trustworthiness. More studies are needed since digital technological advancements are ever evolving and will have increasing impact on how we communicate in both society and business.
To fill a gap in the literature relative to perception of trust in the context of social media and news feeds, we conducted an exploratory study combining five different validated measures of Integrity (Mayer & Davis, 1999), Competence and Benevolence (McKnight, Choudhury, & Kacmar, 2002), Concern, and Identification (Shockley-Zalabak, Ellis, & Cesaria, 2000), to investigate whether gender, age, or the amount of time spent using social media effects one's perception of trust. Our second contribution at a conceptual level is the development and validation of this five factor trust measurement scale. Extrapolating from research on trust and social media offered in our literature review, this study explores the question: who trusts news on social media? We focus on the following problem statement in order to better understand human behavior and perceptions of online trust.
RQ: Do social media users' perceptions of trust differ significantly with respect to their gender, age, social media usage and social media site preference for newsfeeds?
Section snippets
The concept of trust
Trust can be defined as an implicit set of beliefs that the other party will refrain from opportunistic behavior and will not take advantage of a situation (Ridings, Gefen, & Arinze, 2002). Trust is in fact one of the key determinants of performance in organizations (Kouzes & Posner, 1993). As a result, trust has been an important construct in the social sciences and has received increasing attention by organizational researchers, as in the absence of specific rules in organizations, trust is
Design & instrumentation
Research designs typically fall into one of two major categories: exploratory or conclusive (Hair et al., 2003, Malhotra, 2007). Exploratory research designs are more appropriate when the problem needs to be defined more precisely or when the theory has not yet been investigated in a new context (Bertsch, 2009), which is the case of this present study. Such studies often employ small sample sizes based on convenience (for recent examples, see González-González and Jiménez-Zarco (2015) where
Results and discussion
We followed typical data scrubbing techniques (e.g., identifying missing data and outliers) as those prescribed or followed in the literature (see, for example, Bertsch and Pham, 2012, Croarkin, 2011, Howell, 2012, Osborne and Overbay, 2004). These techniques allowed us to appropriately prepare the data for analysis. When keying the results into SPSS, we reversed scored each of the amalgamated Trust items, so that 1 = Strongly Disagree, and 5 = Strongly Agree, in line with previous studies
Discussion
The goal of this research was to explore whether social media users' perceptions and expectations of trust differ with respect to their gender, age, social media usage, and social media sites preference. Firstly, the results for the trust construct Benevolence, defined as “one [who] cares about the welfare of the other person and is therefore motivated to act in the other person's interest” (McKnight & Chervany, 1996, p. 33), showed that social media preference is a significant factor. From our
Conclusion
The unprecedented popularity of social media for gathering news raises a number of critical questions regarding who trusts news in social media and what sites we trust. This paper tries to answer some of these questions by looking to extant literature, and by presenting the quantitative results of a distributed questionnaire on trust and social media behavior with a sample of university students and faculty/staff. In a nutshell, the results of our study showed that younger, female, heavy users
References (102)
- et al.
Social network use and personality
Computers in Human Behavior
(2010) - et al.
Who interacts on the web? The intersection of users' personality and social media use
Computers in Human Behavior
(2010) - et al.
Gender comparison of online and land-based gamblers from a nationally representative sample: Does gambling online pose elevated risk?
Computers in Human Behavior
(2017) - et al.
Using learning methodologies and resources in the development of critical thinking competency: An exploratory study in a virtual learning environment
Computers in Human Behavior
(2015) - et al.
Explaining the adoption of social networks sites for sharing user-generated content: A revision of the UTAUT2
Computers in Human Behavior
(2017) - et al.
A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage
Computers in Human Behavior
(2012) - et al.
Investigating the moderating role of uncertainty avoidance cultural values on multidimensional online trust
Information & Management
(2012) - et al.
A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents
Decision Support Systems
(2008) - et al.
The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement
Personality and Individual Differences
(2011) - et al.
Do feelings matter? The effects of intrinsic benefits on individuals' commitment toward knowledge systems
Computers in Human Behavior
(2014)
Health information seeking in the Web 2.0 age: Trust in social media, uncertainty reduction, and self-disclosure
Computers in Human Behavior
Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use
Computers in Human Behavior
College students' social networking experiences on Facebook
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
Antecedents and consequences of trust in a social media brand: A cross-cultural study of Twitter
Computers in Human Behavior
Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities
The Journal of Strategic Information Systems
Fostering trust in virtual project teams: Towards a design framework grounded in a Trustworthiness Antecedents (TWAN) schema
International Journal of Human-computer Studies
Trust and trustworthiness across different age groups
Games and Economic Behavior
Facebook use, envy, and depression among college students: Is facebooking depressing?
Computers in Human Behavior
“Snapchat is more personal”: An exploratory study on Snapchat behaviors and young adult interpersonal relationships
Computers in Human Behavior
Understanding the effects of trust and risk on individual behavior toward social media platforms: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence
Computers in Human Behavior
Statistics for business & economics
A study of how social media impacts human relationships and family mediation
Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems
MIS Quarterly
Media analysis techniques
Exploring perceptions of values in U.S. Managers: Interstate cross-cultural differences and similarities within the U.S.A
A guide to research design and multivariate analysis in cross cultural research
Journal of International Doctoral Research
Identification as a trust generation mechanism in cooperatives
Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics
Social networks Sites: Definition, history, and scholarship
Journal of Computer-mediated Communication
Manager–subordinate trust relationships across cultures
Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance
Journal of Applied Psychology
Building trust in virtual teams
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications
Engineering statistics handbook
The Organizational trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation
Toddlers have a keen eye for spotting who to trust
The Times (United Kingdom)
Trust privacy concern within social networking: A comparing of Facebook and MySpace
Organizational identification: A conceptual and operational review
International Journal of Management Reviews
The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites
Journal of Computer-mediated Communication
Facebook and relationships: A study of how social media use is affecting long-term relationships
Identification as the basis for a theory of motivation
American Sociological Review
Can we trust
The breakup 2.0: Disconnecting over new media
GWI Social Summary. GlobalWebIndex's quarterly report on the latest trends in social networking
Economic action and social structure; the problem of embeddedness
American Journal of Sociology
Imagining Twitter as an imagined community
American Behavioral Scientist
Crisis informatics: Perspectives of trust – is social media a mixed blessing?
SLIS Student Research Journal
Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective
Essentials of business research methods
In your Facebook.com
Social psychology
Cited by (110)
Why do parents refuse to self-protect? Socio-cultural factors influencing the immediate response of the older generation to COVID-19 and their spatial heterogeneity in China
2024, International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionCynicism as strength: Privacy cynicism, satisfaction and trust among social media users
2023, Computers in Human BehaviorCitation Excerpt :When people in a social network have trust in one another's activities, knowledge, decency, and honesty, they are more likely to engage in and maintain social exchange activities (Nahapiet & Ghoshal, 1998). Consequently, this level of satisfaction is influenced by trust, which is a result of post-adoption beliefs (Venkatesh et al., 2011). Based on extant literature in this topic, it is logical to assume that when users' expectations about social media are consistent with their beliefs, such as perceived usefulness and confirmation of trust, they tend to also trust social media which then result in satisfaction with social media platforms.
The impact of support on behavioural intention in a customer-to-customer retail service context
2024, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management