Some generalized aggregating operators with linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making☆
Introduction
Multiple attribute decision making (MADM) is a usual task in human activities (Merigó, 2010, Merigó and Casanovas, 2009, Merigó and Casanovas, 2010, Merigó et al., 2010, Merigó and Gil-Lafuente, 2010, Wei, 2008, Wei, 2009a, Wei, 2009b, Wei, 2010a, Wei, 2010b, Wei, 2010c, Wei, 2010d, Wei, Lin, Zhao et al., 2010, Wei, Zhao, Lin, 2010, Wei, Zhao, Wang et al., 2010, Xu, 2009, Wang et al., 2007). It consists of finding the most desirable alternative(s) from a given alternative set. However, under many conditions, for the real multiple attribute decision making problems, the decision information about alternatives is usually uncertain or fuzzy due to the increasing complexity of the socio-economic environment and the vagueness of inherent subjective nature of human thinking, thus, numerical values are inadequate or insufficient to model real-life decision problems. Indeed, human judgments including preference information may be stated in linguistic terms. Several methods have been proposed for dealing with linguistic information.
- •
The approximative computational model based on the Extension Principle (Degani & Bortolan, 1988). This model transforms linguistic assessment information into fuzzy numbers and uses fuzzy arithmetic to make computations over these fuzzy numbers. The use of fuzzy arithmetic increases the vagueness. The results obtained by the fuzzy arithmetic are fuzzy numbers that usually do not match any linguistic term in the initial term set.
- •
The ordinal linguistic computational model (Delgado, Verdegay, & Vila, 1993). This model is also called symbolic model which makes direct computations on labels using the ordinal structure of the linguistic term sets. But symbolic method easily results in a loss of information caused by the use of the round operator.
- •
The 2-tuple linguistic computational model (Herrera and Martínez, 2000a, Herrera and Martínez, 2000b, Herrera and Martínez, 2001, Herrera et al., 2005). This model uses the 2-tuple linguistic representation and computational model to make linguistic computations.
Thus, multiple attribute decision making problems under 2-linguistic environment is an interesting research topic having received more and more attention from researchers during the last several years. Herrera and Martínez (1991) show 2-tuple linguistic information processing manner can effectively avoid the loss and distortion of information. It has a distinct advantage over other linguistic processing methods in accuracy and reliability. Herrera and Martínez (2000a) developed 2-tuple arithmetic average (TAA) operator, 2-tuple weighted average (TWA) operator, 2-tuple ordered weighted average (TOWA) operator and extended 2-tuple weighted average (ET-WA) operator. Jiang and Fan (2003) proposed the 2-tuple ordered weighted geometric (TOWG) operator. Wang and Fan (2003) proposed a Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method for solving multiple attribute group decision making problems with linguistic assessment information. Herrera-Viedma, Martinez, Mata, and Chiclana (2005) presented a model of consensus support system to assist the experts in all phases of the consensus reaching process of group decision making problems with multi-granular linguistic preference relations. Herrera et al. (2005) presented a group decision making process for managing non-homogeneous information. The non-homogeneous information can be represented as values belonging to domains with different nature as linguistic, numerical and interval valued or can be values assessed in label sets with different granularity, multi-granular linguistic information. Liao, Li, and Lu (2007) presented a model for selecting an ERP system based on linguistic information processing. Herrera, Herrera-Viedma, and Martínez (2008) proposed a fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets. Jiang, Fan, and Ma (2008) developed a method for group decision making with multi-granularity linguistic assessment information. Tai and Chen (2009) developed a evaluation model for intellectual capital based on computing with linguistic variable. Wang (2009) presented a 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic computing approach to deal with heterogeneous information and information loss problems during the processes of subjective evaluation integration which is based on the group decision-making scenario to assist business managers to measure the performance of New Product Development (NPD) manipulates the heterogeneous integration processes and avoids the information loss effectively. Zhang and Chu (2009) developed fuzzy group decision making for multi-format and multi-granularity linguistic judgments in quality function deployment. Fan, Feng, Sun, and Ou (2009) evaluated knowledge management capability of organizations by using a fuzzy linguistic method. Fan and Liu (2010) developed a method for group decision making based on multi-granularity uncertain linguistic information. Wei (2010a) extended Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method to 2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete weight information. Wei (2010b) proposed some extended geometric aggregating operators with 2-tuple linguistic information. Chang and Wen (2010) developed a approach for Design Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (DFMEA) combining 2-tuple and the OWA operator.
The traditional generalized aggregating operators and induced generalized aggregating operators are generally suitable for aggregating the information taking the form of numerical values, and yet they will fail in dealing with linguistic information. The aim of this paper is to extend the traditional generalized aggregating operators to linguistic environment and develop three new generalized aggregation operators: generalized 2-tuple weighted average (G-2TWA) operator, generalized 2-tuple ordered weighted average (G-2TOWA) operator and induced generalized 2-tuple ordered weighted average (IG-2TOWA) operator. Furthermore, a method based on the IG-2TOWA and G-2TWA operators for multiple attribute group decision making is presented. In this approach, alternative appraisal values are calculated by the aggregation of 2-tuple linguistic information. Thus, the ranking of alternative or selection of the most desirable alternative(s) is obtained by the comparison of 2-tuple linguistic information. In doing so, the remainder of this paper is set out as follows. In the next section, we introduce some basic concepts and operational laws of 2-tuple linguistic variables. In Section 3 we develop some generalized weighted average operator with linguistic assessment information. In Section 4 we develop some generalized ordered weighted average operator with linguistic assessment information. In Section 5 we develop some induced generalized ordered weighted average operator with linguistic assessment information. In Section 6 we apply the IG-2TOWA and G-2TWA operator to multiple attribute group decision making with linguistic assessment information. In Section 7, we give an illustrative example about risk analysis to verify the developed approach and to demonstrate its feasibility and practicality. In Section 8 we conclude the paper and give some remarks.
Section snippets
Preliminaries
Let be a linguistic term set with odd cardinality. Any label, si represents a possible value for a linguistic variable, and it should satisfy the following characteristics (Herrera and Martínez, 2000a, Herrera and Martínez, 2000b, Herrera and Martínez, 2001):
(1) The set is ordered: si > sj, if i > j; (2) Max operator: max(si, sj) = si, if ; (3) Min operator: min (si, sj) = si, if .
For example, S can be defined as
Generalized weighted average operator with linguistic information
Zhao, Xu, Ni, and Liu (2010) proposed the generalized weighted average (GWA) operator which is the generalization of the WA operator. Definition 5 A GWA operator of dimension n is a mapping GWA: Rn → R, such that
It’s obvious that GWA operator include a wide range of aggregation operators such as the WA, the weighted geometric (WG) operator, the weighted harmonic
Generalized ordered weighted average operator with linguistic information
The GOWA operator (Yager, 2004) is a generalization of the OWA operator (Yager, 1988, Yager, 2007a, Yager, 2007b, Chen et al., 2004, Liu, 2006a, Liu, 2006b, Liu, 2007, Wu et al., 2009) by using generalized means. It can be defined as follows. Definition 7 A GOWA operator of dimension n is a mapping GOWA: Rn → R that has an associated weight vector w = (w1, w2, … , wn)T such that wj > 0 and . Furthermore,
Induced generalized ordered weighted average operator with linguistic information
The induced generalized OWA (IGOWA) operator was introduced by Merigó and Gil-Lafuente (2009) and it represents an extension of the GOWA operator, with the difference that the reordering step of the IGOWA operator is not defined by the values of the arguments ai, but rather by order-inducing variables ui, where the ordered position of the arguments ai depends upon the values of the ui. It can be defined as follows: Definition 9 An IGOWA operator of dimension n is a mapping IGOWA: Rn → R defined by an
An approach to multiple attribute group decision making with linguistic assessment information
Let A = {A1, A2, … , Am} be a discrete set of alternatives, and G = {G1, G2, … , Gn} be the set of attributes, ω = (ω1, ω2, … , ωn) is the weighting vector of the attributes Gj(j = 1, 2, … , n), where ωj ϵ [0, 1], . Let D = {D1, D2, … , Dt} be the set of decision makers, and ν = (ν1, ν2, … , νt) be the weight vector of decision makers, where νk ϵ [0, 1], . Suppose that is the decision matrix, where is a preference value, which takes the form of linguistic variables, given by the decision
Illustrative example
Let us suppose there is an investment company, which wants to invest a sum of money in the best option (adapted from Herrera and Martínez (2000b)). There is a panel with five possible alternatives to invest the money: A1 is a car company; A2 is a food company; A3 is a computer company; A4 is an arms company; A5 is a TV company. The investment company must take a decision according to the following six attributes: G1 is the financial risk; G2 is the technical risk; G3 is the production
Conclusion
The traditional generalized aggregation operators and induced generalized aggregation operators are generally suitable for aggregating the information taking the form of numerical values, and yet they will fail in dealing with linguistic information. In this paper, with respect to multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems in which both the attribute weights and the expert weights take the form of real numbers, attribute values take the form of linguistic variables, some new
Acknowledgment
This research was supported by the Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China under Grant No. 09XJA630010 and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant 20100480269.
References (51)
- et al.
A novel efficient approach for DFMEA combining 2-tuple and the OWA operator
Expert Systems with Applications
(2010) - et al.
The problem of linguistic approximation in clinical decision making
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
(1988) - et al.
Evaluating knowledge management capability of organizations: A fuzzy linguistic method
Expert Systems with Applications
(2009) - et al.
A method for group decision-making based on multi-granularity uncertain linguistic information
Expert Systems with Applications
(2010) - et al.
Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making
European Journal of Operational Research
(2005) - et al.
A method for group decision making with multi-granularity linguistic assessment information
Information Sciences
(2008) - et al.
A model for selecting an ERP system based on linguistic information processing
Information Systems
(2007) On the properties of equidifferent OWA operator
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
(2006)The solution equivalence of minimax disparity and minimum variance problems for OWA operators
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
(2007)Fuzzy decision making with immediate probabilities
Computers & Industrial Engineering
(2010)
The induced generalized OWA operator
Information Sciences
New decision-making techniques and their application in the selection of financial products
Information Sciences
A new evaluation model for intellectual capital based on computing with linguistic variable
Expert Systems with Applications
Evaluating new product development performance by fuzzy linguistic computing
Expert Systems with Applications
Method for group decision making based on 2-tuple linguistic information processing
Journal of Management Science in China
Two new models for determining OWA operator weights
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Maximizing deviation method for multiple attribute decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy setting
Knowledge-Based Systems
A method for multiple attribute group decision making based on the ET-WG and ET-OWG operators with 2-tuple linguistic information
Expert Systems with Applications
Some induced geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to group decision making
Applied Soft Computing
GRA method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in intuitionistic fuzzy setting
Knowledge-based Systems
The induced continuous ordered weighted geometric operators and their application in group decision making
Computers & Industrial Engineering
An automatic approach to reaching consensus in multiple attribute group decision making
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Fuzzy group decision-making for multi-format and multi-granularity linguistic judgments in quality function deployment
Expert Systems with Applications
Induced ordered weighted harmonic averaging (IOWHA) operator and its application to combination forecasting method
Chinese Journal of Management Science
Cited by (187)
Evaluating Students Satisfaction in Online Postgraduate Courses Through a Fuzzy Linguistic Approach
2022, International Journal of e-CollaborationA new group decision-making framework based on 2-tuple linguistic complex q-rung picture fuzzy sets
2022, Mathematical Biosciences and EngineeringA New 2-Tuple Linguistic Approach for Unbalanced Linguistic Term Sets
2021, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy SystemsMatrix games with 2-tuple linguistic information
2020, Annals of Operations ResearchA Novel Multicriteria Group Decision-Making Approach with Hesitant Picture Fuzzy Linguistic Information
2020, Mathematical Problems in Engineering
- ☆
This manuscript was processed by area editor Imed Kacem.