Online platform’s corporate social responsibility for mitigating traffic risk: Dynamic games and governmental regulations in O2O food delivery industry

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108188Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A data-driven approach helps to formulate consumers’ order function.

  • Online platform’s fines decrease by information publicity of traffic violation.

  • Order volume determines usages of governmental regulating policies of CSR efforts.

Abstract

Online-to-offline food delivery becomes popular in recent years, but the continuous growth of food couriers’ dangerous driving behavior causes severe traffic risk. This study explores the underline reasons for courier’s dangerous driving behavior in food delivery and suggests governmental regulations to mitigate traffic risk. We consider a supply chain including a platform and consumers, where the platform employs couriers to deliver food from restaurants to consumers in a time window. To conduct the research, we formulate consumers’ demand for food with statistical analysis. We then consider a Stackberg game between the platform and the government. Referring to the practice in public traffic management, spot check and information sharing of traffic violations are two common policies in government regulations. We find government’s efforts of information publicity effective for reducing courier’s dangerous driving behavior, thus mitigating the traffic risk in food delivery. The effectiveness of efforts on spot checks is on the contrary. Therefore, we propose an optimal policy serial of spot check and information publicity respecting different decision situations. The numeral experiments indicate that the policy is effective.

Introduction

Modern service industries have been developed rapidly with the help of information and communication technologies in the past several decades. Online to offline (O2O) economics has become a popular business model, among which O2O food delivery develops fast in recent years. O2O food platforms provide people a new option to order a meal online. For example, Grubhub, as a leading global online food delivery marketplace, connects more than 33 million diners and features more than 300,000 restaurant partners in over 4,000 U.S. cities (Delivering, 2018). iiMedia Research (2018) stated that the compound annual growth rate of the O2O food industry was more than 40% from 2011 to 2018 in China. In China, almost 5 hundred million diners use O2O food delivery services in 2020 (Tencent News, 2021). To enhance advantages in competition by shortening the time in delivery, the O2O food delivery platforms commonly set limited time windows in delivery and exorbitant fines to couriers for overdue delivery (Hsu et al., 2007, Griesbach et al., 2019). Employing the modern data miner technologies and optimization algorithms, the time window generated is more accurate and continually shortening in recent years (Aziez et al., 2020). According to Lai(2020), time window in average set by the platform in 2019 is 22 min less than that of 2016 for an 3 km order, gradually approaching the limits of courier’s working capacity. At the same time, there are many unpredictable objective factors in deliveries (e.g., rains, traffic jams, traffic lights, conditions of vehicle, among others) and personal status of couriers (e.g., physical difference between gender, personal fatigue, driving skills, familiarity with the road, etc.), it is often challenging for food couriers to finish the delivery in the time windows.

Criminal economics theory claims that individual economic factors is an important factor to initiate people’s violations of regulations (Becker, 1968). As a result, food couriers exhaust to shorten the delivery time and thereby avoid fines, which often leads to dangerous driving in the delivery process, e.g. speeding, violating traffic controls, illegally changing lanes, and driving in the opposite direction(Richer & Bergeron, 2009), causing severe traffic risk. For example, in Shanghai, in the first half of 2019, at least two O2O food couriers were killed or injured in traffic every day, which is four times that of 2017 (People’s Daily Online, 2017). In August 2020, more than 12 thousand couriers were caught for dangerous driving in Shenzhen, accounting for more than 10% of non-motor vehicle violations (Xinhua Net, 2020). Not only in China (Qin et al., 2021), traffic risk in the O2O food delivery industry has become a social concerned problem worldwide, such as in America (Lee, 2018), South Korea (Kwak & Cho, 2020), and European countries (Papakostopoulos & Nathanael, 2021).

The International Labour Organization (ILO) estimates that about 2.3 million people around the world succumb to work-related accidents or diseases each year in recent decades. Thus, providing safe working circumstance is becoming one important aspects of CSR in many industries. Several decades of years ago, the corporate social responsibility (CSR) became to be a broad concept that helps a company to be socially accountable (Christie & Wald, 2019). Companies can be conscious of the morale impacts by practicing CSR programs, which can take many forms depending on the company, e.g. social donations, environmental protection, safety workplace, etc. (Carroll, 1991). Several decades ago, providing safety workplace has become an important corporate social responsibility to employers (Montero et al. 2009) and transportation safety in work is widely used to estimate the CSR performance of companies (Turoń 2016). However, the CSR initiatives by companies are either voluntary or legally mandated, voluntary initiative are often motivated by pressures of the mandatory regulations (Uchida and Ferraro 2007). Therefore, the governments all over the world are increasingly proactive to promoting and facilitating CSR initiatives through the public policies in the past several decades, e.g., financial disclosure of public companies, consumer protection measures, tax deduction or exemption for CSR programs (Liu et al., 2016). It is critically urgent to propose governmental regulations in order to facilitate O2O platform’s CSR efforts on driving safety in food delivery. This study tries to answer two questions, that is, how O2O platform’s fines on over-due deliveries affect the counters’ traffic risky behaviors? Since many consumers prefer to engage the brands that take CSR activities (Peasley et al. 2021), how the government’s information publicity of traffic violation in spot check indirectly affects O2O platform’s decisions on fines?

In order to answer the questions, we conduct the research with several methods, which include regressions, mathematical derivations and simulations. Since the online platform makes revenues by fulfilled market orders, we adopt a regression model with empirical data to explore its determinants. The regression results suggest that the fulfilled market orders are indirectly related to fines, based on which we formulated a demand function for orders by Equation (1). Considering the demand function, the study formulates the online platform’s profit function and the government’s utility function, respectively. Because the decisions of the online platform and the government follow a Stackelberg game, we solve the platform and government’s optimal decisions by analyzing the games between them. Finally, numerical simulations are adopted to prove the effectiveness of the proposed regulation strategies and the sensitiveness of parameters.

The remaining part of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we make a brief review of the existing literature regarding the workforces in the O2O economy and the corporate social responsibility in platform economy. In Section 3, we formulate the demand function based on empirical analysis. With the demand function, we derive the supply chain equilibrium decisions and governmental regulation optimal policies in Section 4. In Section 5, numerical study proves the analytical findings. Section 6 concludes this research and provide managerial insights, limitations and directions for future research.

Section snippets

Literature review

This study mainly aims to explore the optimal design of the regulation policies that help to mitigate traffic risk of couriers in O2O food delivery. In general, our work is based on numerous studies in two mainstreams, i.e., workforces and corporate social responsibility in platform economy.

Demand for foods in O2O food delivery platform

Traditional literature generally sets the demand function of certain goods in two manners, as an exogenous stochastic variable (Han & Dong, 2015) or influenced by price, service quality, safety preference, and so on (Ortega et al., 2011). However, the demand for online food is usually thought to have its unique characteristics and oriented by many factors (Morganosky & Cude, 2002). Therefore, we formulate the demand function through regression model and further build the utility functions of

Platforms efforts under government regulations

The online platform employ food couriers to fulfil orders of meals. Since the potential traffic violent, the government normally implies two regulation policies including spot check and information publicity of traffic violations (Nichols & Taylor, 2018). The government determines the regulation intensity basing on the severity of the problem (Hong et al., 2017). As a results, the online platform decides the CSR efforts on fines for overdue delivery. The sequence of events are illustrated by

Numerical study

In this section, we conduct several numerical studies to visually show how the government’s regulation strategy drives the platform to implement its CSR, thus impacting the utility of the platform and government. We consider three main scenarios, namely, the change in the social concern over traffic risk, the influence of information publicity intensity on optimal spot check rate and stakeholder’s utility.

In this group of simulations, we set the range of spot check rate θg from 0 to 1. The

Main findings

Employee’s safety in work is one of the voluntary corporate social responsibilities (CSR), this study aims to propose governmental regulations so as to reinforce online platform’s CSR efforts on couriers’ safety. Motivated by industrial practice, we consider a supply chain including a platform and consumers, where the platform employs couriers to deliver food from restaurants to consumers and fines for the overdue delivery. The government indirectly regulates the platform’s fines by spot check

Theoretical contributions

In many markets, market demand usually depends on the performance of the goods, e.g., price, qualities, influences from competitive goods and substitutes, etc (Ortega et al., 2011). However, the demand for online food is usually thought to have its unique characteristics and oriented by many factors (Morganosky & Cude, 2002). Since seldom study explore the determinants of demand for orders in O2O food delivery industry, we analyze the determinants of demand for orders by empirical analysis with

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Bo Fan: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation. Liyuan Lv: Data curation, Writing – original draft, Software. Guanghua Han: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

Bo Fan is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72134005, 71974128), and the Ministry of Education of China (19JZD022). Liyuan Lv is supported by the national key R & D plan project, entitled “Social Experimental Studies on the Comprehensive Impacts of Artificial Intelligence” (2020AAA0105400) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (71721002). Guanghua Han is supported by National Social Science Foundation of China (21BGL219), Humanities and Social Science

References (85)

  • J. Ji et al.

    Comparisons of initial carbon allowance allocation rules in an O2O retail supply chain with the cap-and-trade regulation

    International Journal of Production Economics

    (2017)
  • M.L. Kent et al.

    From Homo Economicus to Homo dialogicus: Rethinking social media use in CSR communication

    Public Relations Review

    (2016)
  • D. Ma et al.

    Big data empowering low-carbon smart tourism study on low-carbon tourism O2O supply chain considering consumer behaviors and corporate altruistic preferences

    Computers & Industrial Engineering

    (2021)
  • M.J. Montero et al.

    Occupational health and safety in the framework of corporate social responsibility

    Safety Science

    (2009)
  • B. Niu et al.

    Exclusive vs. competitive retailing: Overseas vaccine supplier’s channel selection considering profit and social responsibility objectives

    Computers & Industrial Engineering

    (2020)
  • D.L. Ortega et al.

    Modeling heterogeneity in consumer preferences for select food safety attributes in china

    Food Policy

    (2011)
  • S. Panda et al.

    Coordinating a socially responsible closed-loop supply chain with product recycling

    International Journal of Production Economics

    (2017)
  • B. Parguel et al.

    Sustainability of the sharing economy in question: When second-hand peer-to-peer platforms stimulate indulgent consumption

    Technological Forecasting and Social Change

    (2017)
  • V. Papakostopoulos et al.

    The Complex Interrelationship of Work-Related Factors Underlying Risky Driving Behavior of Food Delivery Riders in Athens, Greece[J]

    Safety and Health at Work

    (2021)
  • H. Qin et al.

    An observational study on the risk behaviors of electric bicycle riders performing meal delivery at urban intersections in China

    Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

    (2021)
  • I. Richer et al.

    Driving under the influence of cannabis: Links with dangerous driving, psychological predictors, and accident involvement

    Accident Analysis & Prevention

    (2009)
  • M. Škare et al.

    The impact of government CSR supporting policies on economic growth

    Journal of Policy Modeling

    (2014)
  • R. Yan et al.

    Return policies and O2O coordination in the e-tailing age

    Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

    (2019)
  • Y.W. Zhou et al.

    Contract selection for a multi-service sharing platform with self-scheduling capacity

    Omega

    (2019)
  • G. Alberti et al.

    In, against and beyond precarity: Work in insecure times

    Work, Employment and Society

    (2018)
  • D. Allen et al.

    The sharing economy

    (2014)
  • H. Aguinis et al.

    What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda

    Journal of Management

    (2012)
  • G.S. Becker

    Crime and punishment: An economic approach

    Journal of Political Economy

    (1968)
  • D. Belanche et al.

    The role of customers in the gig economy: How perceptions of working conditions and service quality influence the use and recommendation of food delivery services

    Service Business

    (2021)
  • A. Bhattacharya et al.

    Beyond warm glow: The risk-mitigating effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR)

    Journal of Business Ethics

    (2021)
  • J. Brower et al.

    Driven to be good: A stakeholder theory perspective on the drivers of corporate social performance

    Journal of Business Ethics

    (2013)
  • J.M. Buchanan

    Public finance and public choice

    National Tax Journal

    (1975)
  • A.B. Carroll et al.

    Business & Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management

    (2002)
  • P.K. Chintagunta et al.

    Investigating the effects of store-brand introduction on retailer demand and pricing behavior

    Management Science

    (2002)
  • J.M. Cruz

    Mitigating global supply chain risks through corporate social responsibility

    International Journal of Production Research

    (2013)
  • W.P. De Groen et al.

    The impact of the platform economy on job creation

    Intereconomics

    (2017)
  • V. De Stefano

    The rise of the just-in-time workforce: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig-economy

    Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal

    (2015)
  • M. Etter et al.

    Sharing economy, sharing responsibility? Corporate social responsibility in the digital age

    Journal of Business Ethics

    (2019)
  • T. Fabian

    Supply chain management in an era of social and environment accountability

    Sustainable Development International

    (2000)
  • M. Fatma et al.

    The sharing economy: The influence of perceived corporate social responsibility on brand commitment

    Journal of Product & Brand Management.

    (2020)
  • P. Fleming

    The human capital hoax: Work, debt and insecurity in the era of Uberization

    Organization Studies

    (2017)
  • C. Forde et al.

    Labour market regulation and the ‘competition state’: An analysis of the implementation of the Agency Working Regulations in the UK

    Work, Employment and society

    (2016)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text