Bulk modulus and volume variation measurement of the liver and the kidneys in vivo using abdominal kinetics during free breathing

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.03.003Get rights and content

Abstract

This article presents a method of predictive simulation, patient-dependant, in real time of the abdominal organ positions during free breathing. The method, that considers both influence of the abdominal breathing and thoracic breathing, needs a tracking of the patient skin and a model of the patient-specific modification of the diaphragm shape. From a measurement of the abdomen viscera kinematic during free breathing, we evaluate through a finite element analysis, the stress field sustained by the organs for a hyperelastic mechanical behaviour using large strain theory. From this analysis, we deduce an in vivo Poisson's ratio and a homogeneous bulk modulus of the liver and kidneys, and compare it to the ones in vitro available in the literature.

Introduction

Preoperative 3D CT images are used in many medical contexts. For some of them, the breathing motion is an issue that is taken into account but not compensated. For instance, in radiotherapy, the dosimetry computation is performed on a static preoperative CT image although the patient breathes freely during the irradiation. Then, the planned target volume is overestimated so as to totally irradiate the tumour. Consequently, healthy tissue irradiations are much more important than if the tumour position was perfectly known during the breathing.

Respiratory gating techniques [1], [2] are the first attempt to reduce the breathing influence. The patient is immobilized on the intervention table and his breathing is monitored to synchronize his lung volume to the one during the preoperative CT acquisition. These methods are however constraining: they lengthen the intervention, they are uncomfortable for the patient and the repositioning accuracy, of 1.5 mm on average, can sometimes exceed 5 mm [3] if the patient is not intubated.

Therefore, a predictive method to simulate the abdomen and thorax breathing motions would be a great improvement for the previous reported application. Internal motion during a quiet breathing being between 10 and 35 mm [4], and practitioners estimate that prediction accuracy within 4 mm would bring a significant improvement to the current protocol in radiotherapy.

Solutions to simulate organ deformations and interactions are numerous [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], however they require the rheological parameters of the patient organs to provide predictive results, which is currently difficult to evaluate in vivo. Furthermore, in most cases, the computation time is not compatible with a real time simulation. Consequently, the methods that were developed for realistic simulation of surgical interventions are not adapted to intra-operative applications in the operating room.

Meier et al. [10] present a list of deformable models for organs simulation with their advantages and disadvantages. Although these models present interests for medical applications such as surgery, they still need a fair amount of development for everyday use.

Sarrut et al. [11] propose to simulate an artificial 3D + t CT image during a breathing cycle from two CT images acquired at inhale and exhale breath-hold. Simulated 3D + t images are built by a vector field interpolation between both CT images. Although this interesting method provides a simulated CT image, it assumes that the breathing is perfectly reproducible and cyclical. Therefore, this method is limited to patients who are under general anaesthesia and intubated. Furthermore, the abdominal organs’ sliding against the peritonea or the pleura is not taken into account.

Our purpose is to compute a displacement field that take the motion of the abdominal organs (such as liver, kidneys, pancreas or spleen) into account in order to provide in real time simulated CT and mesh images during free breathing, using a tracking of the skin position and a modelling of the diaphragm motion.

In previous papers [12], [13], [14], we have highlighted the link between skin variations and abdominal organs positions and presented a method that only considered the cranio-caudal motion. In the new model presented in this paper, the lateral and anterior–posterior motions are integrated, due to a better analysis of the diaphragm motion. This upgrade [15] completely modifies the previous modelling.

In this paper, we present the whole method that describes qualitatively each key point and the major steps. We provide an evaluation on two human clinical data showing that our simulation can be computed at 50 Hz with a prediction accuracy between 2 and 3 mm. The complete maximum displacement field is then extracted from the real time analysis and used as an input in the finite element analysis. The local strain and stress fields are calculated through a large strain hyperelastic analysis. Finally, from the obtained Von Mises equivalent stress and using the experimental volume variation measurement, we evaluate a homogeneous equivalent Poisson's ratio and bulk modulus for the liver and the kidneys in vivo.

Section snippets

Real time analysis: modelling of the abdomen movement

Our method needs two CT acquisitions in both inspired and expired positions. One of them has to be an entire thoraco-abdominal acquisition, whereas the second one can be limited to the diaphragm zone. From the first acquisition, we extract the meshes that will allow us to provide the prediction of the organ position.

The second one is required to model the inhomogeneous and patient-dependant motion of the diaphragm during breathing. These medical images are acquired in the context of a usual

Finite element analysis: geometry, organ kinematics and model definition

The finite element mechanical analysis requires the extraction of geometry and positions of the abdominal organs. These are obtained from the real time analysis using medical CT scans. Once the geometry, positions (Fig. 6) and displacements are known, it is then straightforward to use these inputs in the finite element analysis to extract mechanical results.

Two geometries were analysed respectively the liver and the left kidney. We decided to limit our study to these two organs because they are

Real time analysis

In order to evaluate the computation time needed by our simulation model and its prediction accuracy, we used the clinical data of two human patients (an agreement form has been signed to participate to the experiments). A complete thoraco-abdominal CT acquisition was performed in inspiration. A second acquisition limited to diaphragmatic region was acquired, in inspiration, in order to make our modelling of the diaphragm. Then a third acquisition was acquired in expiration position in order to

Conclusion

In this paper, we provide a new model to simulate and predict the movement of the abdominal organs due to breathing motion. We showed that it is possible to estimate the displacement of the main abdominal organs from a real time tracking of patient skin and a modelling of the diaphragmatic boundary that take the abdominal and the thoracic motion influence into account. We proposed an original method to compute a deformation field from skin position and a modelling of the diaphragm motion and we

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References (28)

  • M.A. Clifford et al.

    Assessment of hepatic motion secondary to respiration for computer assisted interventions

    Comput. Aided Surg.

    (2002)
  • S. Cotin et al.

    A hybrid elastic model allowing real-time cutting, deformations and force—feedback for surgery training and simulation

    The Visual Comput.

    (2000)
  • H Delingette et al.

    Efficient linear elastic models of soft tissues for real-time surgery simulation

  • T.W. Secomb et al.

    A theoretical model for the elastic properties of very soft tissues

    Biorheology

    (2001)
  • Cited by (40)

    • A study of the sensitivity of biomechanical models of the spine for scoliosis brace design

      2021, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Song et al. [47] studied the elasticity of the living abdominal wall in laparoscopic surgery. Hostettler et al. [26] measured the Bulk modulus and volume variation of the liver and the kidneys in vivo. McKee et al. [35] compared the reported values of Young’s modulus obtained from indentation and tensile deformations of soft biological tissues.

    • An anisotropic micro-ellipsoid constitutive model based on a microstructural description of fibrous soft tissues

      2019, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, these models derive from purely phenomenological functions of strain energy, considered isotropic (Chagnon et al., 2015; Wex et al., 2015): they are used as a first approach and because of their ease of implementation. Hostettler et al. (2010), Abraham et al. (2011) and Silva et al. (2017) used a Mooney–Rivlin or a Yeoh model to characterize the mechanical properties of the liver, the pelvic floor and the meniscal attachment while a Ogden model was used to characterize the skin (Lapeer et al., 2010), the brain (Kaster et al., 2011), the liver (Lister et al., 2011) and the bladder and rectum (Boubaker et al., 2015). Human connective tissues are heterogeneous, composed of an intertwining of collagen and elastin fibers.

    • A new algorithm for volume mesh refinement on merging geometries: Application to liver and vascularisation

      2018, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the FEM computation time being related to the number of model elements, an increase of the precision (i.e. increase in the number of elements) leads inevitably to a direct increase of the computation time, hence reducing the interest for the application. With the rise of augmented reality medical applications in real-time [5–8], several evolutions were proposed to improve biomedical FEM, like the condensation technique [9,10] or implicitly solved finite element system [11–14] to reduce the time dependence with the amount of elements in the mesh. However, even if the improvement introduced allows reducing the computation time of the FEM resolution, it does not even reach linearity with the increasing number of elements in the mesh.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text