Software for symptom association analysis in pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease
Introduction
Physicians have agreed to define gastroesophageal reflux (GER) as ‘the passage of gastric contents into the esophagus with or without regurgitation and vomiting’ [1]. It is a physiological condition that occurs in healthy adults and children [1], [2]. However, if it is associated with symptoms and complications then it turns into a pathology known as GER disease (GERD). According to Tsoukali and Sifrim [3], GERD is the most expensive gastrointestinal disease. It affects approximately 20% of the western population and there are 5 in 1000 new cases every year [4]. In pediatric patients it seems to be a growing problem [2] and in some occasions, it may be behind infant sudden death [5]: the gastric content may block the upper airways or trigger central apneas via vagal reflex mechanisms [1], [6], [7].
Silny et al. [8] proposed the intraluminal impedance method to monitor the esophageal motility. It is, along with pH monitoring, the gold standard for the diagnosis of GERD. Combined multiple intraluminal impedance and pH (MII-pH) allows detecting acid and non acid GER episodes and is recommended for the evaluation of symptom association in pediatric patients with cardiorespiratory (CR) symptoms [1]. In particular, the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepathology and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepathology and Nutrition suggest performing synchronized 24-h CR and MII-pH monitoring in children with apnea or apparent life-threatening events. This methodology allows identifying accurately all GER and CR events. Once identified the onset of GER and acute extra-digestive symptoms, there are three different estimators to evaluate a possible temporal relationship: the symptom index (SI) [9], the symptom sensitivity index (SSI) [10] and the symptom association probability (SAP) [11]. Note there is no agreement between these indices [12], [13] and generally, caregivers prefer to contrast the results of at least two of them before making decisions. Symptoms are considered to be related if they occur within a given time interval around the onset of a reflux episode. This is known as the window of association. As there is currently no consensus about the optimal width of the window of association, several studies have considered different window lengths, in particular comprised between 15 and 600 s [14], [15], [16], [17].
Physicians are demanding software applications able to show a synchronized representation of esophageal and CR monitoring. Commercial applications do not provide a solution for this problem so that clinicians end of calculating complex parameters by hand or following inappropriate definitions [17]. This paper presents a description of a computer program for the evaluation of symptom association in newborn patients with CR symptoms. It is a complete and flexible tool that considers the three main symptom association estimators. It allows varying the window of association and analyzing the existence of a temporal relationship between different events: acid, non-acid and/or pH-only reflux episodes on the one hand, and bradycardia, oxygen desaturation and/or apnea on the other.
Section snippets
Background
The application of biological impedance measurement has been used for two decades in the diagnosis of GERD [8]. Since the first prototype appeared there have been many researchers eulogizing the technique [18], [19], [20]. This method is currently the gold standard to assess the relationship between CR problems and GER in pediatric patients [1]. However, the market has not provided a solution for the study of synchronized MII-pH and CR monitoring yet. This represents a limitation in the
Design considerations
A total of ten signals are normally recorded during 24 h when evaluating CR–GER association. Six of these biosignals correspond to intraluminal impedance, one represents the esophageal pH and the remaining three signals are the heart rate (HR), the respiratory rate (RR) and the oxygen saturation (SpO2). However, wireless technology is promising to increase monitoring time from 24 h to more than 96 [22], [23]. Therefore, if one wants the software to be scalable should consider the possibility to
Software description
Two main data structures are the leitmotiv of the computer tool. BIOMED_SIGNAL contains the original version of a given signal and four scaled versions to speed up signal display. Each version was downsampled by a factor of four (L1, L4, L16, L64 and L256). On the other hand, EVENT defines any of the subtypes of GER and CR events. It contains the start and end times of the event, the event type descriptor, a text field for comments about the event and a marker object to show in the plot the
Sample of a typical program run
The first step in the evaluation of symptom association is to obtain the biomedical signals as shown in the flow diagram of Fig. 3. Once the esophageal and the CR monitoring are finished, all the signals must be imported by the system. In particular, GER monitoring is carried out using the MMS Omega impedance-pH meter whereas the CR signals are obtained by means of the patient monitor Philips® MP60. A first semi-automatic identification of GER and CR events should be performed by the system.
Discussion
The software presented in this paper implements an easy, simple and clear computer tool for the evaluation of symptom association in newborn patients. It displays all the signals in one screen facilitating care givers to determine the occurrence of GER and CR events. Thus, the authors suggest to turn the computer screen upright and to use it this way to improve visualization. It is recommended to be run on a PC with at least 1GB of RAM memory. Programming was done on a Linux environment,
Acknowledgements
This project (PI-0434-2010) was supported by the Department of Health of the Regional Government of Andalusia, Spain.
References (36)
Disease definition, clinical manifestations, epidemiology and natural history of gerd
Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology
(2010)Facts and fantasies in extra-oesophageal symptoms in gord
Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology
(2010)- et al.
Caution about overinterpretation of symptom indexes in reflux monitoring for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
(2011) - et al.
Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and ph-metry: an evolving technique to measure type and proximal extent of gastroesophageal reflux
The American Journal of Medicine
(2001) An iterative procedure for the polygonal approximation of plane curves
Computer Graphics and Image Processing
(1972)- et al.
Procedure for the semi-automatic detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux patterns in intraluminal impedance measurements in infants
Medical Engineering & Physics
(1999) - et al.
The sensitivity of multichannel intraluminal impedance and the ph probe in the evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux in children
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
(2006) - et al.
The symptom-association probability: an improved method for symptom analysis of 24-h esophageal pH data
Gastroenterology
(1994) - et al.
Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux clinical practice guidelines: joint recommendations of the north american society for pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the european society for pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition (ESPGHAN)
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
(2009) - et al.
The role of weakly acidic reflux in proton pump inhibitor failure, has dust settled?
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
(2010)