Brain tumor detection using statistical and machine learning method

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.05.015Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The method is proposed for lesion enhancement using Weiner filter with different wavelet bands and different statistical methods are utilized for brain tumor segmentation.

  • The results of segmentation are analyzed in term of pixel and features based. In pixel-based to classify the foreground, background, error rate, quality (Q) and are compared with ground truth annotation.

  • In features based, local binary pattern (LBP) and Gabor wavelet transform (GWF) are extracted from each segmented image. Moreover, both texture features are fused for accurate classification.

Abstract

Background and Objective

Brain tumor occurs because of anomalous development of cells. It is one of the major reasons of death in adults around the globe. Millions of deaths can be prevented through early detection of brain tumor. Earlier brain tumor detection using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) may increase patient's survival rate. In MRI, tumor is shown more clearly that helps in the process of further treatment. This work aims to detect tumor at an early phase.

Methods

In this manuscript, Weiner filter with different wavelet bands is used to de-noise and enhance the input slices. Subsets of tumor pixels are found with Potential Field (PF) clustering. Furthermore, global threshold and different mathematical morphology operations are used to isolate the tumor region in Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (Flair) and T2 MRI. For accurate classification, Local Binary Pattern (LBP) and Gabor Wavelet Transform (GWT) features are fused.

Results

The proposed approach is evaluated in terms of peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR), mean squared error (MSE) and structured similarity index (SSIM) yielding results as 76.38, 0.037 and 0.98 on T2 and 76.2, 0.039 and 0.98 on Flair respectively. The segmentation results have been evaluated based on pixels, individual features and fused features. At pixels level, the comparison of proposed approach is done with ground truth slices and also validated in terms of foreground (FG) pixels, background (BG) pixels, error region (ER) and pixel quality (Q). The approach achieved 0.93 FG and 0.98 BG precision and 0.010 ER on a local dataset. On multimodal brain tumor segmentation challenge dataset BRATS 2013, 0.93 FG and 0.99 BG precision and 0.005 ER are acquired. Similarly on BRATS 2015, 0.97 FG and 0.98 BG precision and 0.015 ER are obtained. In terms of quality, the average Q value and deviation are 0.88 and 0.017. At the fused feature based level, specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, area under the curve (AUC) and dice similarity coefficient (DSC) are 1.00, 0.92, 0.93, 0.96 and 0.96 on BRATS 2013, 0.90, 1.00, 0.97, 0.98 and 0.98 on BRATS 2015 and 0.90, 0.91, 0.90, 0.77 and 0.95 on local dataset respectively.

Conclusion

The presented approach outperformed as compared to existing approaches.

Introduction

The brain is a complex human body organ and works through billions of cells. Brain tumors are caused due to the uncontrolled growth of cells. These cells might affect normal brain activities and also destroy normal cells [1], [2]. Gliomas are a primary type of brain tumors. It contains IV grades (I, II: High Grade (HG) and III, IV: Low Grade (LG)) [3]. Despite major developments in the medical field like surgical procedure, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, still malignant brain tumor cases are untreatable. According to reports, brain tumor is the 5th primary reason for the death of women from twenty to thirty nine years [4].

MRI is particularly helpful to validate gliomas because it gives detailed structure about the human brain [5]. For the brain analysis, T1c, Tl, Flair and T2 are the most commonly used MRI sequences. These sequences provide different information related to the brain tumor. MRI test is based on radio frequency (RF) in which time of repetition (TR) and time of echo (TE) is calculated. T1c and T1 MRI are produced through short TR and TE time and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is dark in these sequences. CSF is colorless found in brain/ spinal cord. T2 MRI is produced by larger TR and TE time; therefore, CSF is bright in this modality. Flair is produced through very large TR and TE time; hence abnormal region remains bright and CSF is dark [6]. T2 is more sensitive to water content and more suitable for the abnormal region where water accumulates inside tissues of the brain. Flair provides more clear differentiation between the abnormal region and CSF as compared to other modalities (Fig. 1).

For brain tumor detection, accurate segmentation is a crucial process. The manual segmentation is time consuming for the radiologist [7] and hence, automated/ semi-automated techniques are required for precise tumor detection [8], [9]. Nowadays fully automated methods [10] for classification between the tumor and non-tumor MRI [11] are common for clinical and research studies. These methods can provide more help to analyze the tumor region [12] and are developed rapidly in the last ten years [13]. Therefore, radiologists assume that computerized methods can improve their diagnosis abilities on the basis of automated machine learning methods [14], [15], [16], [17]. Despite more efforts and promising outcomes in medical images analysis, still reproducible and correct segmentation along with abnormalities characterization is a challenging task of brain tumor detection because of its variability in location, shape and size [18], [19]. Presenting an automated method to increase tumor detection performance is a motivation of this work. The contributions are as follows:

  • 1.

    Lesion enhancement: Weiner Filter in wavelet domain is employed for noise removal and to enhance lesion region.

  • 2.

    Lesion segmentation: PF clustering method is applied to find out the subset of tumor pixels. Moreover, the global threshold method is used for lesion segmentation. Finally, mathematical morphology is applied for refining the tumor segmentation results.

  • 3.

    Feature extraction: In this phase, GWT and LBP features are obtained through every segmented image and then both texture features are fused to improve discrimination results.

The paper is organized into different sections. Existing work for brain lesions is discussed in Section 2. The presented approach for tumor detection is presented in Section 3 and 4 shows the achieved outcomes. The conclusion of the presented work is defined in Section 5.

Section snippets

Related work

In the past, many approaches are proposed for the detection of tumor using MRI. Abbasi and Tajeripour [20] suggested a method in which preprocessing is performed using histogram matching and bias field correction. Various machine learning techniques are also used for tumor detection using MRI [21], [22] including k-means, Fuzzy C-Means (FCM), thresholding, kernel extreme learning machine (KELM) and level set methods. Yamamoto et al. [23] proposed rule based and level set methods for tumor

Proposed methodology

The presented method for tumor detection is shown in Fig. 2. Weiner filter with different wavelet bands is used for noise reduction and to enhance the region of interest (ROI), PF clustering is applied for segmentation purpose. In addition, an optimal gray level thresholding method is also used. Different texture features are obtained from each segmented slice. Furthermore, multiple classifiers are utilized for separation of MR slices.

Experiments and results

The presented technique is checked on two publicly accessible datasets and one locally collected dataset. The local dataset contains 86 images, where 49 tumor and 37 non-tumor images were collected from Nishtar Hospital Multan, Pakistan. BRATS 2013 challenge dataset consists of thirty cases with ground truth annotations in which 20 belong to HG and 10 to LG tumors. BRATS 2015 has 273 cases in which 54 LG and 220 HG gliomas are included. Two modalities (Flair and T2) of each case are utilized

Conclusion

Detection at an early stage of brain tumor is presented in this article. The major contribution of this research work is an in-depth focus on enhancement, segmentation and features fusion process. The proposed hybrid texture features from each segmented slice are supplied to multiple classifiers for the classification of tumor /non-tumor MR slices. On the basis of detailed performance evaluation, it is confirmed that features fusion and KNN outperform as compared to other classifiers. The

Conflict of interest

None.

References (44)

  • I. Cabria et al.

    MRI segmentation fusion for brain tumor detection

    Inf. Fusion

    (2017)
  • A. Vishnuvarthanan et al.

    An automated hybrid approach using clustering and nature inspired optimization technique for improved tumor and tissue segmentation in magnetic resonance brain images

    Appl. Soft Comput.

    (2017)
  • L. Liu et al.

    Local binary features for texture classification: taxonomy and experimental study

    Pattern Recognit.

    (2017)
  • N. Nabizadeh et al.

    Brain tumors detection and segmentation in MR images: gabor wavelet vs. statistical features

    Comput. Electr. Eng.

    (2015)
  • M. Sharif et al.

    Detection and classification of citrus diseases in agriculture based on optimized weighted segmentation and feature selection

    Comput. Electron. Agric.

    (2018)
  • N. Gupta et al.

    Glioma detection on brain MRIs using texture and morphological features with ensemble learning

    Biomed. Signal Process. Control

    (2019)
  • A. Pinto et al.

    Hierarchical brain tumour segmentation using extremely randomized trees

    Pattern Recognit.

    (2018)
  • M. Havaei

    Brain tumor segmentation with deep neural networks

    Medical Image Anal.

    (2017)
  • K. Kamnitsas

    Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation

    Med. image Anal.

    (2017)
  • X. Zhao et al.

    A deep learning model integrating FCNNs and CRFs for brain tumor segmentation

    Medical Image Anal.

    (2018)
  • S. Chen et al.

    Dual-force convolutional neural networks for accurate brain tumor segmentation

    Pattern Recognit.

    (2019)
  • A. Kavitha et al.

    Brain tumor segmentation using genetic algorithm with SVM classifier

    Int. J. Adv. Res. Electr. Electron. Instrum. Eng.

    (2016)
  • Cited by (179)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text