Propagation dynamics of an epidemic model with infective media connecting two separated networks of populations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.04.023Get rights and content

Highlights

  • An epidemic model based on two contact-networks is proposed, where cross network infection occurs via vectors.

  • The basic reproduction number for this system is calculated and global stability is proven.

  • The effect of animal–animal interactions and contact with vectors can induce endemic states for even low infection rates.

  • Increased heterogeneity in either of the networks can exacerbate epidemic spreading.

Abstract

Based on the fact that most human pathogens originate from animals, this paper attempts to illustrate the propagation dynamics of some zoonotic infections, which spread in two separated networks of populations (human network I and animal network II) and cross-species (vectors, or infective media). An epidemic time-evolution model is proposed via mean-field approximation and its global dynamics are investigated. It is found that the basic reproduction number in terms of epidemiological parameters and the network structure is the threshold condition determining the propagation dynamics. Further, the influences of various infection rates and contact patterns are verified. Numerical results show that the heterogeneity in connection patterns and inner infection in network I can easily trigger endemic dynamics, but when a pathogen, such as H7N9, has weak infectivity in humans, the effects of animal–animal interactions and the contacts with vectors tend to induce endemic states and enhance the prevalence in all the populations.

Introduction

Infectious diseases are always serious threats to mankind’s health and life, and the recent outbreaks of endemic and pandemic events (such as AIDS, SARS, H1N1 and currently H7N9) signify that the danger does not go away [1]. As an analytical approach in epidemiology, mathematical modeling, which might be traced back to as early as 1927 [2], can help predict epidemic dynamics (including the propagation process, the outbreak time and place, the final state, and so on) and thus suggests effective measures to mitigate and prevent the spread of the diseases.

After nearly a century of development in epidemic modeling, mathematical epidemiologists now pay much more attention to meticulous and practical details of different diseases, and focus more on individual-based analysis. In the last decade, spurred by the availability of real data and the maturation of the complex networks theory [3], [4], a bridge between epidemiology and network science has emerged. The connections among individuals that allow an epidemic to propagate naturally form a network, which can provide many new insights into the epidemiological dynamics [5], [7], [6]. In a contact network, for example, each node represents an individual and each link describes the direct contact between two of them. Network modeling usually rejects the over-simplified homogeneous-mixing assumption and explicitly captures the diverse patterns of interactions that underly disease transmission [8], [9]. Many network-based models, such as the networked SIS [5], [10], SIR [11], [12] and SI [13] models, have been built to study the effects of network structures on infection mechanisms [14], [15], [16]. For a structurally homogenous network, the epidemic threshold is the reciprocal of the average degree of the network. For a scale-free network however, it was formulated that the epidemic threshold is near zero and thus the infection could always persist [5], [11], [12], [13]. Further, it was verified that the leading role of hub and the innermost dense core is the main activation mechanism [17]. Generally speaking, the topological fluctuation of the contact network exacerbates the outbreak of a disease [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16].

On the other hand, a recent survey reveals that over half of human pathogens are zoonotic [18], and almost all of them are either zoonotic or originated as zoonoses before affecting humans [19]. For example, the three most devastating pandemic diseases in human history, namely, Black Death, Spanish Influenza and AIDS, were caused by zoonoses [20]. Moreover, many diseases like black plague, dengue, malaria and yellow fever, are transmitted through vectors (i.e., infective media) such as mice and mosquitoes [1]. These underlying patterns of complex multi-host ecology of zoonotic infections are widespread challenges to public health, which also accelerate environmental and anthropogenic changes today. They as well alter the rate and nature of contact between human and animal populations [21]. Recently, several epidemic models have been built with human-animal interface based on complex contact networks. Particularly, a new networked SIS model with infective media was proposed [22], in which the disease spreads by contacts among individuals (considered as an scale-free network) and also between individuals and vectors (considered to be homogeneous). Lately, the model was further improved and its global behaviors were investigated [23], [24].

Noticeably, the dynamics of most zoonoses involve multiple phases: propagation in the animal reservoir, spillover propagation into humans, and sustained propagation among humans [21], [20]. A typical example is the Black Death, which came from mice and then reached people through fleas. Here, the fleas work as a cross-specie connecting humans and mice, but humans and mice do not have direct contact.

In this paper, we propose a new epidemic model, where humans form a complex network through contact and the animals form another one, while the vectors can interact with animals and humans respectively thus transmitting diseases from one network to another. The whole contact patterns can be seen as a layered network. In Section 2, we describe the model in detail. In Section 3, we investigate the global dynamics of this new model. In Section 4, we report some numerical simulations and sensitivity analysis. Finally, we present a brief conclusion in the last section.

Section snippets

Model formulation

First, the interaction framework is specified. There exist two separated networks, I and II. Network I consists of humans, where each node represents an individual and each link between two individuals indicates direct contact between them. Network II is composed of animals such as mice, where the links are the contacts connecting them. Assume that there is no direct contact between network I (humans) and network II (mice). The vectors (fleas) can move freely between networks I and II. A

Global dynamics of the model

In this section, the global behavior of the new model (2.1) will be discussed qualitatively. To guarantee the positivity and boundedness of the model, the following lemma is established. Let ρk(t)=yk(t) for k=1,2,,n, ηl(t)=yn+l(t) for l=1,2,,m, ϑ(t)=yn+m+1(t), and denoteΓ={(y1,,yn+m+1)|0yi1,i=1,,n+m+1}.

Lemma 1

The set Γ is positive invariant for model (2.1).

Imposing the right-hand side of (2.1) to be zero, one can obtain the steady states of the dynamical equations. It is clear that Θ1=Θ2=ρ=η=ϑ=0

Sensitivity analysis

From the expression of model (2.1), one can see that only the infection rates λi,μi,γi (i=1,2) and the network structures affect the dynamical behavior of the disease. So, in this section, to further explore the epidemic dynamics and to find better disease-control measures, we perform some sensitivity analysis in terms of the model parameters.

Since human’s contact pattern is heterogeneous but animal’s interaction is relatively uniform, in the following analysis, network I is set to be a BA

Conclusions

Many pathogens originate from animals and are then transmitted to humans. Bubonic plague, malaria and influenza are just a few of such classic examples of zoonotic infections. To model their propagation dynamics, we have extracted two separated contact networks, network I (consisting of humans) and network II (consisting of animals), which interact through some cross-species (vectors). We have then mathematically analyzed the global dynamics of the new model. To that end, we have established a

Acknowledgments

This research was jointly supported by the China NSFC Grants 11331009, 11162004, 61164020, Shanghai Univ. Leading Academic Discipline Project (A.13-0101-12-004), the Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (No. 2012GXNSFAA053006), and a grant of “The First-class Discipline of Universities in Shanghai”, as well as Hong Kong GRF Grant CityU 1109/12E. Also, G. H. Zhu would like to thank Prof. Lansun Chen for his support and encouragement.

References (27)

  • A.L. Barabási et al.

    Emergence of scaling in random networks

    Science

    (1999)
  • R. Pastor-satorras et al.

    Epidemic spreading in scale free networks

    Phys Rev Lett

    (2001)
  • M.E.J. Newmann

    The structure and function of complex networks

    SIAM Rev

    (2003)
  • Cited by (15)

    • Research on adaptive transmission and controls of COVID-19 on the basis of a complex network

      2021, Computers and Industrial Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      Weeden and Cornwell (2020) investigated small-world networks to reveal the characteristics of epidemic transmission. Zhu et al. (2015) explored the application of a scale-free network for an epidemic transmission. Marquioni and de Aguiar (2020) and Wang and Peng (2020) presented extensive research.

    • An SIS epidemic model with vaccination in a dynamical contact network of mobile individuals with heterogeneous spatial constraints

      2019, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
      Citation Excerpt :

      A large body of investigations on network epidemiology have focused on static networks, where the topological structure of network is fixed in time during the process of disease transmission [22–31], thus ignoring the impact of motions of individuals.

    • The propagation-weighted priority immunization strategy based on propagation tree

      2017, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals
      Citation Excerpt :

      What's more, a great deal of studies showed that the topology structure and the statistical characteristics are closely related to the propagation behavior in the network. In recent years, the study of evaluation about the propagation influence of the node attracted a lot of attention in the network [1–12]. For example, the Hub node in the computer network, the key point in the electric power network, and the key figure in the scientific research cooperation network, they all play the particular role in their own networks.

    • Mean-field modeling approach for understanding epidemic dynamics in interconnected networks

      2015, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals
      Citation Excerpt :

      The interactions among these populations can be viewed as interconnected networks. Recently, complex contact networks have been deployed to describe the human–animal interface in epidemic models [29–31]. Specifically, Shi et al. [30] use network theory to analyze a vector-borne disease model, and we also proposed a network-based epidemic model, in which humans and animals are homogeneously connected by vectors [31].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text