Elsevier

Computer Communications

Volume 33, Issue 8, 17 May 2010, Pages 1005-1012
Computer Communications

A survey of survivability in multi-domain optical networks

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2010.02.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Network survivability is becoming an important issue and a topical subject in WDM optical mesh networks. Many works have studied network survivability. However, few works have focused on survivability in multi-domain optical networks. This paper reviews the literature on survivability against failures in multi-domain optical networks. The main objective of this study is to evaluate and analyze existing solutions and to compare their performance in terms of different criteria: resource utilization, ratio of rejected connections and recovery time.

Introduction

The development of Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) technologies has increased enormously the transmission capacity of optical networks. However, any failure in the network can result in huge data loss and a lot of traffic being blocked. For this reason, operators must incorporate survivability considerations during the network design process. Survivability means that the network has the ability to maintain an acceptable level of service even after a failure within the network. This requirement becomes more critical as the size and usage of networks increase.

The literature offers a wide range of protection mechanisms against various types of failure [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. However these works are generally addressed at single-domain protection, because they assume that each node in the network has complete vision of the physical topology of the entire network. Such an assumption is not realistic in the case of large networks like multi-domain networks. A multi-domain network is a network composed of several single-domain networks, interconnected by inter-domain links. Each single-domain can be regarded as an independent network that has its own local rules of operation and management to provide services [4]. Due to scalability constraints and domain management policies, the internal topological details of a domain are usually not shared externally. As a result, no node in a multi-domain network can have complete information on the multi-domain network. For instance, complete information would correspond to the detailed states of wavelength usage on each link of the multi-domain optical network. Thus, the protection of multi-domain networks is more difficult than that of single-domain networks.

Although survivability in multi-domain optical networks is very important, only a few studies have been proposed in the literature. In this paper, we first introduce general concepts and elements related to survivability. We then survey current research on survivability in multi-domain optical networks, discussing their capabilities and performance. Many of these proposals are designed to handle the most frequent failure in optical networks, which is a single link/node failure. Moreover, these works have been proposed for protecting connections at the light-path level. Basically, all these works try to find a trade-off between different concurrent goals: efficient use of backup resources and fast recovery time. To evaluate these works, we have considered different comparison criteria: resource utilization, recovery time and ratio of rejected connection.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Sections 2 Survivability in WDM optical networks, 3 Characteristics of multi-domain networks, we present some concepts on survivability in WDM networks and elements related to multi-domain optical networks. In Section 4, we describe the main solutions proposed in the literature addressed at survivability in multi-domain networks, we also analyze the advantages and drawbacks of each solution. The numerical results and conclusion are presented in Sections 5 Analysis and simulation results, 6 Conclusion.

Section snippets

Survivability in WDM optical networks

Networks are subject to a number of component failures, such as links, nodes and wavelength channels . A single network failure may seriously damage end-user applications and interrupt network services. Therefore, it is imperative to incorporate survivability mechanisms in the network to guarantee network services.

Survivability can be provided on different layers of the network [24], such as the IP, MPLS, SONET/SDH and WDM layers. Although each of the higher layers may have its own recovery

Network model

A multi-domain optical network composed of M connected domains can be represented by a graph G=(Di,E) for i=1,2,,M, where Di and E represent, respectively, the graph of domain number i and the set of inter-domain links (links that connect two border nodes in different domains). The domain i is denoted as Di=(GNi,INi,ILi)(1iM), where GNi,INi and ILi represent the set of border nodes, the set of interior nodes and the set of intra-domain links in domain i, respectively. An intra-domain link

State-of-the-art

This section reviews the various solutions proposed to solve the challenges of survivability in multi-domain optical networks. Moreover, this section analyzes these solutions and shows their advantages and disadvantages.

Simulation model

In this section, we present a qualitative and quantitative evaluation in order to compare the performance of the various solutions described. First, we make a quantitative comparison between the solutions which consider a generic model of multi-domain network topology (topology composed of domains interconnected via inter-domain links) and dynamic traffic (ESPP, LSSP, ELSSP and SSPP).

The solutions which have a particular network such as RSM, SPSFR and LBDDR are not considered in this

Conclusion

In this paper, we have addressed survivability in multi-domain optical networks. The main objective of this study is to survey and analyze the various existing solutions proposed for survivability in multi-domain optical networks. Among the solutions presented, a few (SPSFR, LBDDR) assume that the domains are connected directly together at border nodes. Some (LSSP, ELSSP) do not consider the protection of inter-domain links or border nodes in their proposal. According to this study, we can see

References (24)

  • W.D. Grover, D. Stamatelakis, Cycle oriented distributed preconfiguration: ring-like speed with mesh-like capacity for...
  • B. Awaebuch, Y. Shavitt, Topology aggregation for directed graphs, in: Presented at IEEE Symposium on Computers and...
  • Cited by (27)

    • An optimization approach for survivable lightpath provisioning in multi-domain optical networks

      2016, Optical Switching and Networking
      Citation Excerpt :

      Survivability is a key design issue in optical networks due to the huge loss of data and revenue once a failure occurs. For multi-domain optical networks, many existing survivability studies have focused on survivability issues under various conditions [1]. In general, these studies can be classified along the traditional lines of pre-configured protection and post-fault restoration.

    • An efficient mechanism for dynamic survivable multicast traffic grooming

      2015, Optical Fiber Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      While restoration is reactive with efficient resource utilization, protection is proactive and recovers more quickly after the failures. In high-speed WDM backbone networks, protection is usually regarded as a more favorable option as it guarantees full recovery and faster restoration speed [12]. A number of multicast protection mechanisms have been proposed in literature [13–19].

    • Multicast protection algorithms based on aggregated logical topology in survivable multi-domain optical networks

      2012, Optik
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, the inter-domain routing in multi-domain networks is based on the aggregated multi-domain logical topology [4]. Since the information in multi-domain logical topology is not full, the survivability in multi-domain optical networks is more challenging than that in single-domain optical networks [5]. Based on multi-domain logical topology, current works have proposed several protection algorithms, such as local segment shared protection algorithm [6], inter-domain end-to-end protection algorithm [7], graph partition protection algorithm [8], domain-by-domain protection algorithm [9], and so on.

    • Hybrid protection algorithms based on game theory in multi-domain optical networks

      2011, Optical Fiber Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      At the same time, with the network size increasing, the current optical backbone actually is divided into multiple domains and each domain has its own network operator and management policy for independent routing and failure recovery. Since the development of multi-domain optical networks is the trend of next-generation intelligent optical networks, the survivability in multi-domain optical networks becomes an important and challenging issue [7,8]. Compared to single-domain network, the survivability in multi-domain network is more difficult since the network information of multi-domains is not accurate for searching the primary and backup resources.

    • Efficient cluster based protection strategy to improve survivability in optical networks

      2021, Proceedings - 2021 International Conference on Control, Automation, Power and Signal Processing, CAPS 2021
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Principal corresponding author.

    View full text