Original papersFractional PID controller in an active image stabilization system for mitigating vibration effects in agricultural tractors
Introduction
In several agricultural applications, mechanical vibrations are frequently inconvenient due to oscillations that can significantly affect the desired outcome. Machine vision applications in agriculture are heavily dependent on the quality of acquired images in activities such as non-destructive measurements, visual navigation and behavioral surveillance (Barbedo, 2016, McCarthy et al., 2010). Occasionally, vibrating parts of the machinery that support the image acquiring sensor can blur images, which negatively affects the accuracy of machine vision systems (McCarthy et al., 2010). In addition, the development of autonomous agricultural vehicles and mobile agricultural robots requires more precise and advanced techniques to mitigate the effects of disturbances (Bayar et al., 2015, Mousazadeh, 2013, Reina et al., 2016, Zhang et al., 2016). Continuous vibrations can affect the outcome of applications as well as damage the mechanical and electronic components of those systems (Paraforos et al., 2014).
Novel civil and military vehicles require active suspension systems (ASS) for attenuating excitations caused by tire-soil interactions and engines. The active image stabilization system (AISS) is a type of ASS that applies techniques to eliminate, or reduce, unwanted fluctuations from mechanisms that apply movements in opposing vibrations of the vehicle where the image acquisition system is mounted (Zhao et al., 2015). In these systems, inertial sensors identify the vibrations and a controller drives an active stabilizing mechanism. The study of different control methods for design and deployment of controllers for AISS has been the focus of recent research (Gasteratos, 2009, Marichal et al., 2013, Zhao et al., 2015).
Some methods have been investigated to assess agricultural machinery properties in terms of vibrations to understand the effects on fatigue life (Paraforos et al., 2016) and operator safety (Cutini et al., 2016). Two types of approaches can be identified in these studies. One approach seeks to develop experimental methods to determine vibration characteristics and uses analysis parameters such as tire pressure, type of soil, type of agricultural operation, operation speed and type of agricultural machinery (Cuong et al., 2013, Cutini et al., 2016, Kang and Kaizu, 2011, Paraforos et al., 2016, Paraforos et al., 2014, Scarlett et al., 2007, Servadio et al., 2007). The other approach uses the analysis of numerical simulations based on dynamic models of agricultural vehicles to estimate vibration characteristics before real implementation, which avoids the cost of multiple prototypes (Melzi et al., 2014, Rabbani et al., 2011).
In addition to the studies to evaluate the effects of vibration on agricultural machineries, there are also proposals to diminish the damaging effects of vibrations. Bruce et al. (2001) performed experiments with a tractor equipped with a hydraulic active front axle suspension and an active three-point linkage shock absorber. The comparative analysis of the global acceleration transmitted through the tractor driving seat showed substantial attenuation for the tractor-implement system with an active vibration suppressor compared to the same system without the suppressor. De Temmerman et al. (2004) developed a model of a passive cab suspension for a self-propelled agricultural machine based on Lagrange’s equation. The model was evaluated by comparing the eigenfrequencies and vertical displacements for different vibration signals applied to the model and with an experimental test rig. Shamshiri and Ismail (2013) modeled and simulated a full-state feedback controller for a tractor electro-hydraulic active suspension. The simulations showed attenuation of the vertical displacements within a significantly shorter period of time compared to the uncontrolled system for step and sinusoidal disturbance inputs. However, among the different approaches, there are no specific investigations of the design of AISS for agricultural machinery, and significant challenges havenot been resolved before identifying reliable technologies for image acquisition, primarily for autonomous and robotic vehicles (Mousazadeh, 2013, Reina et al., 2016).
A promising methodology based on fractional order control has obtained positive results for the design of ASS. This methodology is based on fractional calculus (FC), which applies concepts of differential and integral calculus of non-integer order. Although FC dates back to the beginning of calculus theory, the usefulness of FC has been shown only in the last two decades, after the development of computers and numerical simulations. In recent years, FC has been shown to be useful in several applications, with control algorithms receiving considerable attention (Özbay et al., 2012, Silva and Machado, 2006, Tan et al., 2016).
The success of fractional algorithms in control engineering and the lack of studies in AISS for agriculture problems inspired this work, in which the performances of integer order (PID) and fractional order (FrPID) controllers are compared for an AISS operating on an agricultural machine. The investigation was performed using modeling and simulation to design and evaluate the performance of the controllers considering common vibration disturbances from agricultural machinery. The simulation of the model using PID and FrPID controllers generated results that are compared and discussed.
This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 describes how the AISS proposed in this work was modeled and simulated; Section 3 outlines the results obtained from the simulations, with the main aspects being presented and analyzed; and Section 4 states the main conclusions obtained from this study.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The AISS was designed and evaluated in three steps. The first step was the development of adynamic model based on an active oscillatory mechanical platform that can be used as an AISS for supporting machine vision systems based on devices such as a camera, spectroradiometer, or scanner laser, mounted on the cab of agricultural machines (Section 2.1). The second step isthe modeling and tuning of the classical PID and FrPID controllers for the AISS (Section 2.2). In the third step, experimental
Results and discussion
First, the closed-loop system was simulated without any type of controller with the parameters listed in Table 1. The responses indicated very low performance. Assuming null disturbance, the steady-state error (offset) was 99.98% of the reference input 0.1 m, even though the response obtained was stable. Assuming null input reference, very low performance was observed for a sinusoidal disturbance input with an amplitude of 0.1 m and frequency of 4 Hz, indicating no rejection of the typical
Conclusion
A methodology was proposed to design a FrPID controller for an AISS that compensates undesirable displacements and acceleration vibrations in agricultural machinery. ITAE criteria was applied for tuning of a robust controller and finding optimum parameters and arbitrary orders for FrPID controller. Evaluation of the model was performed by comparing the response performance between the AISS with the FrPID and classical PID controllers. Using common signal excitations applied to a dynamic model,
Acknowledgments
Funding for this study was provided by Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), grant number 2014/02041-9, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. All mistakes are the authors‘ responsibility.
References (33)
A review on the main challenges in automatic plant disease identification based on visible range images
Biosyst. Eng.
(2016)- et al.
Localization and control of an autonomous orchard vehicle
Comput. Electron. Agri.
(2015) - et al.
PM—Power and Machinery: Threshability of Shatter-resistant Seed Pods in Oilseed Rape
J. Agric. Eng. Res.
(2001) - et al.
Effects of tyre inflation pressure and forward speed on vibration of an unsuspended tractor
J. Terramech.
(2013) - et al.
Development of a simplified method for evaluating agricultural tractor’s operator whole body vibration
J. Terramech.
(2016) - et al.
Conceptual cab suspension system for a self-propelled agricultural machine, part 1: Development of a linear mathematical model
Biosyst. Eng.
(2004) - et al.
Vibration analysis during grass harvesting according to ISO vibration standards
Comput. Electron. Agric.
(2011) - et al.
Numerical analysis of the effect of tire characteristics, soil response and suspensions tuning on the comfort of an agricultural vehicle
J. Terramech.
(2014) - et al.
Systems & Control Letters PID controller design for fractional-order systems with time delays
Syst. Control Lett.
(2012) - et al.
Country road and field surface profiles acquisition, modelling and synthetic realisation for evaluating fatigue life of agricultural machinery
J. Terramech.
(2016)
Fatigue life assessment of a four-rotor swather based on rainflow cycle counting
Biosyst. Eng.
Prediction of the vibration characteristics of half-track tractor considering a three-dimensional dynamic model
Biosyst. Eng.
Whole-body vibration: evaluation of emission and exposure levels arising from agricultural tractors
J. Terramech.
Analysis of driving seat vibrations in high forward speed tractors
Biosyst. Eng.
Notes on integral performance indices in fractional-order control systems
J. Process Control
Leader–follower system using two robot tractors to improve work efficiency
Comput. Electron. Agric.
Cited by (23)
Internet of agriculture: Analyzing and predicting tractor ride comfort through supervised machine learning
2023, Engineering Applications of Artificial IntelligencePath tracking of unmanned agricultural tractors based on a novel adaptive second-order sliding mode control
2023, Journal of the Franklin InstituteComposite SOSM controller for path tracking control of agricultural tractors subject to wheel slip
2022, ISA TransactionsCitation Excerpt :In [19,20], the traditional path tracking control methods, mainly including the line-of-sight and the pure tracking strategies, have been extended and shown their effectiveness. Other advanced path tracking control strategies, such as proportional–integral–derivative control [21], fuzzy control [22], neural network control [23] and model predictive control [24], etc., have also been applied to tackle the path following problem of agricultural vehicles. However, most of these control methods are proposed based on linear systems or they do not depend on models, and the unknown disturbances and uncertainties have not been adequately solved.
On multistep tumor growth models of fractional variable-order
2021, BioSystemsCitation Excerpt :Fractional calculus expands standard ODE to deal with complex behavior (Oldham and Spanier, 1974; Herrmann, 2014; David et al., 2011; Sales Teodoro et al., 2019; Machado et al., 2011). This pivotal characteristic allows fractional models to describe phenomena such as long-term memory, non-locality and spatial heterogeneity (West, 2014), encouraging their application in signal processing (Miljković et al., 2017), thermoacoustics (Valentim et al., 2018), economy (David et al., 2018), robotics (Leyden and Goodwine, 2016), viscoelasticity (David and Katayama, 2013), electromagnetism (Mescia et al., 2019), control (David et al., 2016), among other areas (David et al., 2020; David and Rabi, 2020; Mainardi, 2018; Ionescu et al., 2017). In fact, fractional mathematical oncology increasingly figures as a potential successful alternative approach for cancer-related topics such as treatment optimization (Ucar et al., 2019; Akman Yıldız et al., 2018; Farayola et al., 2020; Khajanchi and Nieto, 2019) and control in invasion systems (Manimaran et al., 2019; Dai and Liu, 2019; Sowndarrajan et al., 2019).
Can fractional calculus help improve tumor growth models?
2020, Journal of Computational and Applied MathematicsCitation Excerpt :Moreover, fractional calculus has inherent attributes that may improve ODE-based tumor models such as describing complex phenomena as long-term memory and/or spatial heterogeneity [27]. For their many remarkable characteristics, fractional models have been increasingly chosen and successfully applied in signal processing [28], thermoacoustics [29], economy [30], robotics [31], viscoelasticity [32], chemical kinetics [33], electromagnetism [34], agricultural computing [35], traffic control [36], among other areas [37–40]. In fact, what could be coined as “fractional mathematical oncology” already exists, with many recent studies deploying non-integer calculus to deal with cancer-related topics including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and immunotherapy dynamics [41–44], numerical solution and control for invasion systems [45,46], bioengineering [47], and tumor growth [48,49,49–51].
Design of an interval type-2 fractional order fuzzy controller for a tractor active suspension system
2019, Computers and Electronics in AgricultureCitation Excerpt :The advantages of the proposed controller have provided an attractive topic for researchers to probe the feasible usage of this technique. In David et al. (2016), the authors designed an FOFPID controller in an image stabilization system which was mounted on agricultural tractors. Besides, in comparison with FOPID, FPID, and PI/PID controllers, the FOFPID controller had superior outcomes.