Original papersImprovement of feedlot operations through statistical learning and business analytics tools
Introduction
Livestock management in developing countries have traditionally relied on the expertise of its workers for tactical and operational decisions, especially in places that lack access to sophisticated technologies. In this environment of work, the lack of analytics systems capable of transforming data into actionable items limits planning capabilities. Access to better analytics systems, such as predictive and decision-making tools, can help livestock management systems improve standardization practices, which in turn increases process efficiencies and enhances the ability to capitalizable profitable opportunities. For example, in 2010, it was estimated that in the United States there were about 14 million cattle heads on over 75,000 feedlots (USDA, 2011). In recent years, the use of advanced analytics within agricultural processes has risen due in part to better access to information technologies and increased focus on data-driven decisions. The same trends are observable in the cattle industry as access to cheaper data collection system has opened new questions on how to transform this data into useful information and effective decision-making (Gebbers and Adamchuk, 2010). In this paper, we introduce an integrated framework that incorporates machine learning and forecasting tools into tactical level planning for commercial feedlots for beef cattle. As part of this work, we present a decision-support modeling tool that can forecast individual cattle growth based on a low dimensional dataset at the start of the feeding process. Access to this tool allows operators to create homogenous cattle groups based on individual predicted growth patterns, which in turn enables the implementation of more efficient batch-based systems. In this paper, we discuss a decision framework that allows feedlot operators identify optimal time periods for slaughtering individual animals based on defined revenue and cost functions. Overall, our goal is to promote the use of modern analytical tools in cattle management systems that operate with limited access to sophisticated information technologies. In order to put the problem at hand within the proper perspective we give a general description of the beef-cattle feedlot operations next.
This section presents a brief introduction to the set of activities performed within commercial feedlots for beef cattle and gives an overview of operational aspects relevant to this paper. For a more detailed description of a feedlot operations the reader is referred to other sources such the USDA’s Beef Feedlot Industry Manual (USDA, 2011). This paper is based on intensive cattle feedlot operations. Typically, each feedlot is divided into multiple pens to which cattle are confined and given diets tailored to each pen. The number of animals in these pens may vary but a typical number is approximately 60. Thus, a feedlot with 10,000 cattle head would be comprised of an estimated 150 pens.
In simple terms, the main purpose of the feedlot is to efficiently transform cattle feed to weight gain. In a typical operation, feedlot cattle are received from different suppliers where they often have been raised in open range conditions and fed with grass and other forage. Once cattle arrive to the feedlot, they are temporarily assigned to a pen where they will stay until it is deemed necessary to move them to a homogenous group. During this time, feedlot operators decide how to homogenize cattle population based on weight and rate of development, from which then a feeding plan is constructed. Reassigning cattle to different pens is usually an expensive process, hence feedlot operators try to minimize this procedure. Thus, the initial and subsequent assignments of cattle to feed pens is a key decision in any feedlot operation. Fig. 1 presents a flow chart with the main sorting/pen assignment decisions made during a cattle’s feedlot process, which shows the points of the process in which cattle are assigned and reassigned to different pens.
The importance of pen assignment/transportation decisions in a feedlot has been previously documented and addressed from different perspectives (e.g. Dror and Leung, 1998, Basarab et al., 1999, Kononoff et al., 2015). One of the key factors in minimizing cattle pen movement and maximizing profit is the ability to construct growth-homogenous groups within individual pens. This allows operators to have similar feed requirements and meat quality per pen, as well as reduce the need for cattle reassignments during the weight gain process. The main factor used for this set of decisions is the animal’s weight measurement at different times during the feedlot process. However, other factors used in sorting the cattle into different groups include backfat and marbling estimates, genotype, and hide color (Kononoff et al., 2015).
Within sophisticated cattle management systems, feedlot operators have access to specific information regarding the breed and type of cattle that enter the system. With this information, operators can use widely available cattle growth models to accurately estimate future weight patterns. However, when this level of data granularity does not exist, the use of these cattle growth models become less adequate, and the system becomes more reliant on the expertise of its feedlot operators. Although in some cases these systems still may perform well, lack of accuracy on growth pattern predictions increases process variability and hinders efforts to standardize the feeding process. For example, inaccurate growth projections lead to non-homogenous cattle groupings and prevents the implementation of more efficient batch systems. Moreover, cattle in this type of livestock operations is usually acquired from breeders with different production practices and feeding systems (Kilpatrick and Steen, 1999), which adds further variability to initial growth predictions. Thus, the development of growth prediction models tailored to operating environments with limited background information on cattle is key to efficient and standardized feeding processes.
Another problem in feedlot operations within low information environments is a lack of access to continuous weight monitoring systems. In these cases, weight information is typically collected at three distinct points during its feedlot process: (1) an initial measurement when cattle is received, (2) measurements after a short observation period during which initial growth is assessed, and (3) final weight measurements before being sacrificed. Based on these three pieces of information, as well as their own previous work experience, operators estimate each animal’s future growth and segment individual animals into homogenous groups. For example, cattle expected to show higher gain weight during its feeding process, or better performance, will be grouped with other high-performing animals. This enables batch operational planning rather than working on a per-animal basis. However, as cattle operations expand and the number of breeders increase, cattle characteristics become more heterogeneous making this type of decision-making more difficult, especially when access to additional experienced feedlot operators is limited. Moreover, even under the availability of reliable human expertise, sudden changes in cattle characteristics may be difficult to identify without the proper decision support tools in place.
In this study, we address these problems by developing an integrated decision-making framework that focuses on three different aspects of the cattle feeding process. The first component of this work is the development of a predictive modeling tool that can project future cattle growth by leveraging on information typically available to low-to-mid scale operations. The second component details a clustering method that groups cattle according to individual forecasted growth curves at the beginning of the process. Lastly, the third component formulates a method of identifying suggested optimal times at which each animal should be slaughtered with the goal of maximizing expected profit margins. It should be noted that these tools do not seek to replace feedlot operator expertise but would serve as a decision-support tool aimed at facilitating decision-making tasks.
Overall, the objective of this framework is the development of an automated decision-making tool implementable within low-information environments. Thus, the integrated framework is developed under an open-source platform able to interact with different technology environments. To validate the different techniques within this framework, a case-study is implemented for a mid-scale, operation in the state of Sonora, in Mexico. Available datasets are used to create a fully-integrated decision support tool for feedlot operators to provide individual sets of decision suggestions for each animal at the start of the feeding process. Finally, given that the framework is fully automated, the decision-making system has the flexibility to adapt to changing data characteristics.
In the following few sections, a review of literature is presented that highlights current work related to cattle growth modeling and applications of statistical tools in feedlot operations. The third section details our methodology framework, including brief theoretical background into its different components. In the fourth and fifth sections, the results of our case-study are presented and future work is discussed, respectively.
Section snippets
Review of literature
In this section, we present a review of works that seek to apply analytical tools in beef production management. In our review, focus is given to works related to prediction modeling techniques for projecting future cattle growth. As part of this section, traditional metrics used to gauge animal performance are presented. Also, this section outlines the different types of statistical tools currently used to predict cattle growth, including random regression, machine learning, and
Development of an integrated framework for feedlot operations
The goal of this paper is to develop an integrated decision support framework for efficient feedlot operations in low-information environments. As part of this framework we demonstrate the applicability of statistical machine learning tools to individual cattle management decisions. As mentioned earlier, feedlot operators in small-to-mid scale operations rely heavily on operator expertise to drive decision-making. Through this work, a case is made for the application of automated machine
Results
As mentioned before, the case-study is based on a mid-size scale feedlot operation in the northwestern Mexican state of Sonora. This operation involves buying cattle from a set of regional breeders, feeding the animal, slaughtering it, and finally commercializing its beef within different regional markets. Using information from their feedlot operation, we apply the different techniques detailed in earlier sections as part of an integrated decision-making framework. First, the overall
Discussion
The development of analytical tools aimed at improving support tools in cattle feedlot decision-making can have great impact on the profitability of small-to-midscale operations. This is especially true within environments that lack the information technology infrastructure to collect background information on cattle breed and type, and thus, depend heavily on operator expertise and experience. Access to statistical machine learning tools that require minimal user-interaction can enhance the
Conclusions
The main purpose of this work was to demonstrate the adaptation of tools being used in other industries, such as machine learning and forecasting techniques, to tactical and operational planning within the cattle feedlot industry. This kind of tools are especially useful in settings where the level of information available to feedlot operators regarding cattle breed and type is limited. In this study, we have demonstrated that one can still produce reliable cattle growth projections even when
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank CONACYT (National Council for Science and Technology of Mexico) for their support through the PEI program (Program to incentivize research, technological development and innovation), Project 231341.
References (33)
- et al.
Improved estimation of bovine weight trajectories using Support Vector Machine Classification
Comput. Electron. Agric.
(2015) - et al.
Duration of performance tests for growth rate, feed intake and feed efficiency in four biological types of beef cattle
Livest. Prod. Sci.
(2000) - et al.
Evaluation of four simulation models of cattle growth and body composition: Part I—Comparison and characterization of the models
Agric. Syst.
(1991) - et al.
Evaluation of four simulation models of cattle growth and body composition: Part II—Simulation and comparison with experimental growth data
Agric. Syst.
(1991) - et al.
Development and evaluation of a pastoral simulation model that predicts dairy cattle performance based on animal genotype and environmental sensitivity information
Agric. Syst.
(2008) - et al.
A simulation model of grazing sheep: II. Whole farm model
Agric. Syst.
(1995) - et al.
A simulation model of grazing sheep: I. Animal growth and intake
Agric. Syst.
(1995) - et al.
Description of lamb growth using random regression on field data
Livest. Prod. Sci.
(2004) - et al.
A predictive model for beef cattle growth and carcass composition
Agric. Syst.
(1999) Estimates of genetic parameters for mature weight of Australian beef cows and its relationship to early growth and skeletal measures
Livest. Prod. Sci.
(1995)
Application of random regression models in animal breeding
Livest. Prod. Sci.
Prediction of insemination outcomes in Holstein dairy cattle using alternative machine learning algorithms
J. Dairy Sci.
A decision support system to improve individual cattle management. 1. A mechanistic, dynamic model for animal growth
Agric. Syst.
Long-term stochastic simulation of mountain beef cattle herds under diverse management strategies
Agric. Syst.
Sorting feeder cattle with a system that integrates ultrasound backfat and marbling estimates with a model that maximizes feedlot profitability in value-based marketing
Can. J. Anim. Sci.
The combination of forecasts
OR
Cited by (3)
HR Process Automation: A Bibliometric Analysis
2021, Library Philosophy and PracticePerception of consultants, feedlot owners, and packers regarding the optimal economic slaughter endpoint in feedlots: A national survey in Brazil (Part I)
2020, Canadian Journal of Animal Science