Review
Big GIS analytics framework for agriculture supply chains: A literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.10.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Use of technology supports data-driven decision making in agriculture.

  • Big GIS is a potential IT processing tool for spatial data analysis and management.

  • A review of 120 papers on applications of big GIS in agriculture is presented.

  • There exists a vast potential for big GIS data in leveraging the food supply chains.

  • A big GIS analytics framework and future perspectives are presented.

Abstract

The world population is estimated to reach nine billion by 2050. Many challenges are adding pressure on the current agriculture supply chains that include shrinking land sizes, ever increasing demand for natural resources and environmental issues. The agriculture systems need a major transformation from the traditional practices to precision agriculture or smart farming practices to overcome these challenges. Geographic information system (GIS) is one such technology that pushes the current methods to precision agriculture. In this paper, we present a systematic literature review (SLR) of 120 research papers on various applications of big GIS analytics (BGA) in agriculture. The selected papers are classified into two broad categories; the level of analytics and GIS applications in agriculture. The GIS applications viz., land suitability, site search and selection, resource allocation, impact assessment, land allocation, and knowledge-based systems are considered in this study. The outcome of this study is a proposed BGA framework for agriculture supply chain. This framework identifies big data analytics to play a significant role in improving the quality of GIS application in agriculture and provides the researchers, practitioners, and policymakers with guidelines on the successful management of big GIS data for improved agricultural productivity.

Introduction

As defined in the Agriculture Act, 1947, agriculture includes horticulture, fruit growing, seed growing, livestock breeding and keeping, and dairy farming. Agriculture also consists of the use of land for grazing, and woodlands for agricultural purposes (Bhavikatti, 2005). The main aim of agriculture is to maximize the land utilization and increase the profits. The modern technologies that contribute towards the improvement of agriculture productivity are focused on developing new breeds of the crop through hybridization offering improved resistance to pests and diseases, low response time to the fertilizers and low water consumption. With the world population expected to reach nine billion by 2050 (Gilpin, 2015) there will be an increased demand for food resources (Godfray et al., 2010). Majority of the people (one in seven) suffer from a deficiency of protein and energy and other form of micronutrient malnourishment (FAO, 2009). The increasing gap in demand and supply of food presents a set of new intersecting challenges adding pressure on the agriculture supply chain (Evans, 2009). The food producers are competing for land, water, and energy resources experiencing the need to restrict the adverse effects of food production on the environment (Tilman et al., 2001, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005). These changes have pushed the producers to move from the conventional agriculture (CA) to precision agriculture (PA). PA was introduced in the late 1990s with John Deere fitting their tractors and machinery with GPS sensors for information management. With the arrival of the Internet of Things (IoT) in the technological landscape, all devices are now connected and interact with each other (smart devices) via wireless network infrastructure (Wolfert et al., 2017, Porter and Heppelmann, 2014). PA is an extension of this development and is the primary driving force for big data analytics (BDA) in agriculture (Wolfert et al., 2017, Lesser, 2014, Poppe et al., 2015). The primary emphasis of PA is on the collection, management, and utilization of data to make decisions (Pham and Stack, 2018). PA requires a host of technologies which work in synchronization to enable data collection and analysis (CEMA, n.d., 2017). As shown in Fig. 1, these technologies include Geographic Positioning System (GPS), Geographic Information System (GIS), Remote Sensing (RS), Geo-mapping, sensors, electronic communication devices, and Variable Rate Technology (VRT).

GIS deals with spatial data and visualizes the collected information with patterns and relationships using computer-based tools. GIS includes the following components.

  • Storage of spatial data in digital form.

  • Management and integration of spatial data collected from different sources into the GIS system.

  • Retrieval and conversion of the spatial data in the required formats.

  • Performing data analytics to convert data into useful information.

  • Developing different models based on the information.

  • Display of information model and decision making.

GIS technology has grown exponentially over the past decades and today is considered as potential geographic based IT processing tool for spatial data analysis and management (Malczewski, 2006). GIS plays a significant role in managing the natural resources, environmental protection, regional and urban planning and development, and management of utilities (Jankowski, 1995, Abdelrahman et al., 2016, Montgomery et al., 2016). GIS is transforming the agriculture sector in incredible ways. The hyperspectral and multispectral images obtained through the geospatial data is found to be very useful for analyzing parameters such as crop health and soil moisture. The GIS supports high level of decision making for effective management of fertilizer and pesticides, stress mapping, and irrigation (Barnes and Baker, 2000, Barroso et al., 2008, Hinzman et al., 1986, Lelong et al., 1998, Pal and Mather, 2003, Singh et al., 2007, Tilling et al., 2007). Bio-physical attributes of crops and soils are used with GIS and RS technologies for radical improvement in the agricultural productivity (Liaghat and Balasundram, 2010).

Whilst there has been a significant body of research that focuses on GIS applications in agriculture, there is relatively less emphasis on the evaluation of factors such as land suitability, site search and selection, resource allocation, impact assessment, knowledge-based systems and GIS analytics (Li and Yan, 2012, Tayyebi et al., 2016, Ines et al., 2002, Wei et al., 2005, McKinion et al., 2010, Wachowiak et al., 2017, Neufeldt et al., 2006). Further, the spatial data sets that exceed the traditional computing capacity, referred to as big geospatial data is receiving high attention from the researchers (Lee and Kang, 2015). With the exponential increase in the amount of big geospatial data, the challenges for managing and analyzing the big data has also increased. Geospatial data represents a significant portion of big data in agriculture supply chains, with its size proliferating at least by twenty percent every year (Lee and Kang, 2015). There have been many studies concentrating on the applications of BDA in operations and supply chain management in different industries (Wang et al., 2016, Gandomi and Haider, 2015, Erevelles et al., 2016, Raghupathi and Raghupathi, 2014). However, the applications of big GIS analytics (BGA) in agriculture hasn’t received much attention.

The present review aims to draw on recent literature to examine the role of GIS applications in agriculture and identify the future perspectives on integrating the big data with GIS. While previous studies have focused on specific applications of GIS in agriculture, this paper holistically covers all the major applications and additionally uses the level of GIS analytics (predictive, descriptive and prescriptive) for classification of the selected papers. The outcome of the review is development of the BGA framework for agriculture.

The remaining of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents the review methodology. Section 3 discusses the findings of the review. A BGA framework is proposed in Section 4. Section 5 discusses the future perspectives, and Section 6 presents the conclusions and limitations of the study.

Section snippets

Review methodology

A systematic literature review (SLR) is used to examine the various GIS analytics applications in agriculture. The SLR was carried as per the guidelines given by Tranfield et al. (2003) in three stages:

  • i.

    Review planning

  • ii.

    Conducting the review

  • iii.

    Findings and dissemination.

The SLR stages are briefly discussed below.

Review discussions

The SLR of the selected 120 research papers is presented in Table 2.

Proposed BGA framework for agriculture supply chain

Presently there is an exponential rise in the generation of spatial data due to the propagation of cost-effective and pervasive positioning technologies, the evolution of high-resolution imaging technologies, and contribution from many community users (Aji et al., 2013). As 80% of the data is geographic (Morais, 2012) most of the data can be georeferenced highlighting the importance of big geospatial data (Li et al., 2016). Big data is often seen as a prime source of novelty, competition, and

Perspectives for future research

Over a period, GIS usage has seen a drastic evolution from traditional practices involving land use planning to modern day scientific applications. Big data, IoT, blockchain and other technological advancements have taken over the world with their accuracy and reliability. BGA is expected to play a significant role in shaping up the modern agriculture meeting the expectations of the stakeholders on three main dimensions viz., accuracy, accessibility, and accountability. However, to fully

Conclusions and limitations of the study

The present study is based on an SLR to investigate the current state of research in the area of big GIS data applications in agriculture and identify the future trends. The SLR was performed on 120 research articles, categorizing them in five categories that included the level of BGA, land suitability, site search and selection, resource allocation, impact assessment, land allocation, and knowledge-based systems. The result of this SLR indicates that GIS applications in agriculture are gaining

References (228)

  • V.M. Chowdary et al.

    Decision support framework for assessment of non-point-source pollution of groundwater in large irrigation projects

    Agric. Water Manage.

    (2005)
  • Y. Cohen et al.

    Analysis of convergent evidence in an evidential reasoning knowledge-based classification

    Remote Sens. Environ.

    (2005)
  • J.M. De Paz et al.

    Simulation of nitrate leaching for different nitrogen fertilization rates in a region of Valencia (Spain) using a GIS–GLEAMS system

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2004)
  • H. Demirkan et al.

    Leveraging the capabilities of service-oriented decision support systems: putting analytics and big data in cloud

    Decis. Support Syst.

    (2013)
  • R. Earl et al.

    The potential role of GIS in autonomous field operations

    Comput. Electron. Agric.

    (2000)
  • R. Elsheikh et al.

    Agriculture Land Suitability Evaluator (ALSE): a decision and planning support tool for tropical and subtropical crops

    Comput. Electron. Agric.

    (2013)
  • S. Erevelles et al.

    Big Data consumer analytics and the transformation of marketing

    J. Bus. Res.

    (2016)
  • A. Gandomi et al.

    Beyond the hype: big data concepts, methods, and analytics

    Int. J. Inf. Manage.

    (2015)
  • A.P. Gautam et al.

    Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a mountain watershed in Nepal

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2003)
  • H. Ge et al.

    Agricultural supply chain optimization and complexity: a comparison of analytic vs simulated solutions and policies

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2015)
  • R.M. Gonzalez

    Joint learning with GIS: multi-actor resource management

    Agric. Syst.

    (2002)
  • Y. Gorokhovich et al.

    Accuracy assessment of the processed SRTM-based elevation data by CGIAR using field data from USA and Thailand and its relation to the terrain characteristics

    Remote Sens. Environ.

    (2006)
  • P.V. Gorsevski et al.

    Integrating multi-criteria evaluation techniques with geographic information systems for landfill site selection: a case study using ordered weighted average

    Waste Manage.

    (2012)
  • P.A. Gutiérrez et al.

    Logistic regression product-unit neural networks for mapping Ridolfia segetum infestations in sunflower crop using multitemporal remote sensed data

    Comput. Electron. Agric.

    (2008)
  • L. He et al.

    Ecological vulnerability assessment for ecological conservation and environmental management

    J. Environ. Manage.

    (2018)
  • L. Hinojosa et al.

    The “mountain effect” in the abandonment of grasslands: insights from the French Southern Alps

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2016)
  • L.D. Hinzman et al.

    Effects of nitrogen fertilization on growth and reflectance characteristics of winter wheat

    Remote Sens. Environ.

    (1986)
  • M.S. Hossain et al.

    GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation to land suitability modelling for giant prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) farming in Companigonj Upazila of Noakhali, Bangladesh

    Comput. Electron. Agric.

    (2010)
  • P. Houfková et al.

    Origin and development of long-strip field patterns: a case study of an abandoned medieval village in the Czech Republic

    Catena

    (2015)
  • I.B. Huang et al.

    Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2011)
  • A.V. Ines et al.

    Application of GIS and crop growth models in estimating water productivity

    Agric. Water Manage.

    (2002)
  • J.S. Jeong et al.

    Optimizing the location of a biomass plant with a fuzzy-Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (F-DEMATEL) and multi-criteria spatial decision assessment for renewable energy management and long-term sustainability

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2018)
  • J.W. Jones et al.

    Toward a new generation of agricultural system data, models, and knowledge products: state of agricultural systems science

    Agric. Syst.

    (2017)
  • J.W. Jones et al.

    Potential benefits of climate forecasting to agriculture

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2000)
  • H. Kächele et al.

    An economic approach for a better understanding of conflicts between farmers and nature conservationists—An application of the decision support system MODAM to the Lower Odra Valley National Park

    Agric. Syst.

    (2002)
  • S. Kalogirou

    Expert systems and GIS: An application of land suitability evaluation

    Comput. Environ. Urban Syst.

    (2002)
  • P. Kayastha et al.

    Application of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study from the Tinau watershed, west Nepal

    Comput. Geosci.

    (2013)
  • H. Kazemi et al.

    A land use suitability model for rainfed farming by Multi-criteria Decision-making Analysis (MCDA) and Geographic Information System (GIS)

    Ecol. Eng.

    (2018)
  • J. Krois et al.

    GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation to identify potential sites for soil and water conservation techniques in the Ronquillo watershed, northern Peru

    Appl. Geogr.

    (2014)
  • P. Kubicek et al.

    Prototyping the visualization of geographic and sensor data for agriculture

    Comput. Electron. Agric.

    (2013)
  • A.Z. Abbasi et al.

    A review of wireless sensors and networks' applications in agriculture

    Comput. Standards Interfaces

    (2014)
  • A. Aji et al.

    Hadoop gis: a high-performance spatial data warehousing system over mapreduce

    Proc. VLDB Endowment

    (2013)
  • C. Akbulak

    Land use suitability analysis of the Upper Basin of the Kara Menderes River using analytical hierarchy process and geographical information systems

    J. Hum. Sci.

    (2010)
  • F. Amiri et al.

    Application of geographic information systems in land-use suitability evaluation for beekeeping: a case study of Vahregan watershed (Iran)

    Afr. J. Agric. Res.

    (2012)
  • K.D. Awasthi et al.

    Land-use change in two Nepalese watersheds: GIS and geomorphometric analysis

    Land Degrad. Dev.

    (2002)
  • S. Bandyopadhyay et al.

    Assessment of land suitability potentials for agriculture using a remote sensing and GIS based approach

    Int. J. Remote Sens.

    (2009)
  • E.M. Barnes et al.

    Multispectral data for mapping soil texture: possibilities and limitations

    Appl. Eng. Agric.

    (2000)
  • L.A.M. Barroso et al.

    Quantifying water stress on wheat using remote sensing in the Yaqui Valley, Sonora, Mexico

    Agric. Water Manage.

    (2008)
  • R.M. Bhagat et al.

    Land suitability analysis for cereal production in Himachal Pradesh (India) using Geographical Information System

    J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens.

    (2009)
  • S.S. Bhavikatti

    An Introduction to Agriculture and Agronomy

    (2005)
  • Cited by (97)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text