Coronary artery disease detection using artificial intelligence techniques: A survey of trends, geographical differences and diagnostic features 1991–2020

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104095Get rights and content

Highlights

  • This research gives a comprehensive insight to the researchers of this field.

  • The researchers can find the algorithms or feature categories that have been less investigated.

  • It shows that in which countries this field was more interested for researchers.

  • The importance of features according to the published papers is also reported in this research.

  • It shows the importance of different features in various countries.

Abstract

While coronary angiography is the gold standard diagnostic tool for coronary artery disease (CAD), but it is associated with procedural risk, it is an invasive technique requiring arterial puncture, and it subjects the patient to radiation and iodinated contrast exposure. Artificial intelligence (AI) can provide a pretest probability of disease that can be used to triage patients for angiography. This review comprehensively investigates published papers in the domain of CAD detection using different AI techniques from 1991 to 2020, in order to discern broad trends and geographical differences. Moreover, key decision factors affecting CAD diagnosis are identified for different parts of the world by aggregating the results from different studies. In this study, all datasets that have been used for the studies for CAD detection, their properties, and achieved performances using various AI techniques, are presented, compared, and analyzed. In particular, the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques to diagnose and predict CAD are reviewed. From PubMed, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, and Google Scholar search, 500 papers were selected to be investigated. Among these selected papers, 256 papers met our criteria and hence were included in this study. Our findings demonstrate that AI-based techniques have been increasingly applied for the detection of CAD since 2008. AI-based techniques that utilized electrocardiography (ECG), demographic characteristics, symptoms, physical examination findings, and heart rate signals, reported high accuracy for the detection of CAD. In these papers, the authors ranked the features based on their assessed clinical importance with ML techniques. The results demonstrate that the attribution of the relative importance of ML features for CAD diagnosis is different among countries. More recently, DL methods have yielded high CAD detection performance using ECG signals, which drives its burgeoning adoption.

Introduction

The most common cardiovascular disease (CVD) is coronary artery disease (CAD), in which atherosclerosis causes narrowing of the artery lumen, resulting in diminished blood flow being supplied to the distal myocardium, i.e. ischemia. It is the leading cause of death worldwide and its prevalence has increased in low- and middle-income countries in recent years [1,2]. The reference standard for CAD diagnosis is invasive coronary angiography. The presence of a 50% or more diameter stenosis of the coronary artery lumen on angiography is generally defined as “significant” or “clinically important” stenosis, i.e. significant CAD [3]. While this anatomical threshold may not adequately characterize the functional state of ischemia of the myocardium supplied by the coronary artery, it is nonetheless widely accepted [4]. Invasive coronary angiography is associated with procedural risks, radiation, and potentially nephrotoxic iodinated contrast exposure. Therefore, accurate, reliable, noninvasive, and cost-effective methods for CAD diagnosis are highly sought by healthcare services payers in order to reduce the need for the number of negative invasive coronary angiography tests.

In the last three decades, artificial intelligence (AI) applications have been increasingly incorporated into clinical diagnostic tools to improve their accuracy [5,6]. In the same period, AI algorithms have also been widely applied to CVD datasets for data-driven decision-making [[7], [8], [9]]. AI-based systems can help to facilitate decision-making by automating and standardizing the interpretation, and inference processes, as well as improving the diagnostic accuracy [6]. The clinical utility of these advanced technologies depends on the skill of individuals who acquire, analyze, and interpret the data [10]. It is important to note that the type of raw data can intimately impact the quality and performance of AI methods. Therefore, to increase the quality of diagnosis, close collaboration between AI developers and clinical experts is essential. A brief overview of AI methods, advantages and disadvantages of CAD detection are presented in the supplementary information Fig. s2. Recently Alizadehsani et al. [11] published a review of the application of machine learning techniques for the automated detection of CAD using ECG signals. This current work is a review of secular trends from 1991 to 2020 as well as geographical differences in the use of AI techniques for CAD diagnosis, and focuses in particular on the dominant CAD features being employed in published works of AI methods. In our survey, the investigated features and the level of importance assigned to common features used for CAD prediction are diverse and vary significantly among countries. In addition, the performances of AI, which encompasses machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), are compared and discussed. It should be noted that in this research, we are describing trends. The reader can be referred to other publications for an in-depth discussion of ML and DL [12].

The value of the work lies in the extensive overview of the literature and the comprehensive survey of publication trends, geographical differences, and dissection into different features and their significance.

Section snippets

Material and methods

The present review aims to study the application of AI techniques for CAD detection, so as to identify issues that require attention to further advance the field. Accordingly, we performed a comprehensive review of the relevant AI literature. The strengths and weaknesses of previous studies are highlighted, thus serving as a base on which future studies can select as well as build upon AI techniques to improve CAD detection. The search criteria are discussed in the next sub-section.

We performed

Results

In this section, the statistical analysis of the papers published is reported. Important features and their categories are analyzed. Each category has a set of features extracted by a specific method. Some of the common categories are demographic characteristics, laboratory results, ECG, and echocardiographic findings.

Fig. 2a shows the number of articles published per year on CAD detection. The number has increased sharply from 2012 compared to the period from 1991 to 2011. Moreover, Fig. 2b

Discussion

In this research, our goal was the investigation of papers that used AI for CAD detection. More than 500 papers related to this goal are identified on initial screening. Among them, 256 papers are selected based on their relevance to the desired topic and quality of results. Our results indicate that most studies on CAD detection by ML algorithms were conducted in 2019 followed by 2017. According to Fig. 2a, it is obvious that most studies are conducted in these two years. More importantly, the

Conclusions

This paper reviewed publications on CAD detection using AI techniques over the last 30 years. Although AI-based methods cannot fully replace coronary angiography, they can be used as reliable, fast, and economical adjunctive screening tools for improving the diagnostic process. These tools can facilitate and expedite the referral of patients for invasive diagnostic coronary angiography while reducing the number of patients with no significant CAD undergoing expensive and risky invasive tests.

Contributors

RA, MR, MA, and FK had a continuation to prepare the first draft and NS, SN, AK, RP, AB, RB, MP, URA, RST, and SK contributed to edit the final draft. RA, RP, SK, MA, AK, AS, RST, and MP contributed to all analysis of the data and produced the outcomes accordingly. RA and MR found the papers and then extracted data. NS provided overall guidance and managed the project.

Patient consent for publication

Not required.

Funding

The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

References (38)

  • R. Lozano et al.

    Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Lancet

    (2012)
  • K. Turk-Adawi et al.

    Cardiovascular disease in the Eastern Mediterranean region: epidemiology and risk factor burden

    Nat. Rev. Cardiol.

    (2017)
  • P.W. Serruys et al.

    Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease, new England

    J. Med.

    (2009)
  • A. Abidov et al.

    Integration of automatically measured transient ischemic dilation ratio into interpretation of adenosine stress myocardial perfusion SPECT for detection of severe and extensive CAD

    J. Nucl. Med.

    (2004)
  • L. Oakden-Rayner et al.

    Precision Radiology: predicting longevity using feature engineering and deep learning methods in a radiomics framework

    Sci. Rep.

    (2017)
  • F.S. Collins et al.

    A new initiative on precision medicine

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2015)
  • C. Krittanawong et al.

    Artificial intelligence in precision cardiovascular medicine

    J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.

    (2017)
  • E. Butun et al.

    One dimensional deep capsule networks for coronary artery disease detection using ECG signals

    Phys. Med.

    (2020)
  • U.R. Acharya et al.

    Entropies for automated detection of coronary artery disease using ECG signals: a review

    Biocybern. Biomed. Eng.

    (2018)
  • S. Narula et al.

    Machine-learning algorithms to automate morphological and functional assessments in 2D echocardiography

    J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.

    (2016)
  • R. Alizadehsani et al.

    Machine learning-based coronary artery disease diagnosis: a comprehensive review

    Comput. Biol. Med.

    (2019)
  • S. Raschka et al.

    Python Machine Learning

    (2017)
  • E. Nasarian et al.

    Association between work-related features and coronary artery disease: a heterogeneous hybrid feature selection integrated with balancing approach

    Pattern Recogn. Lett.

    (2020)
  • R. Alizadehsani et al.

    Model uncertainty quantification for diagnosis of each main coronary artery stenosis

    Soft Comput.

    (2020)
  • R. Alizadehsani et al.

    A database for using machine learning and data mining techniques for coronary artery disease diagnosis

    Sci. Data

    (2019)
  • R. Alizadehsani et al.

    Hybrid genetic-discretized algorithm to handle data uncertainty in diagnosing stenosis of coronary arteries

    Expet Syst.

    (2020)
  • S.M.J. Jalali et al.

    Parsimonious evolutionary-based model development for detecting artery disease

  • D. Dicker et al.

    Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality and life expectancy, 1950–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017

    Lancet

    (2018)
  • D.P. Zipes

    Braunwald's Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine

    (2018)
  • Cited by (75)

    • A literature embedding model for cardiovascular disease prediction using risk factors, symptoms, and genotype information

      2023, Expert Systems with Applications
      Citation Excerpt :

      Hence, the performance of feature selection differs by the data set chosen as reported in (Alizadehsani et al., 2019). The limitations of the previous cohort data-based CVD risk factor identification methods have been detailed (Alizadehsani et al., 2019, 2021). Previous methods can be categorized as: (1) cohort-based CVD risk factor identification (Ambale-Venkatesh et al., 2017; Knowles & Ashley, 2018; Nakanishi et al., 2018; Vrablik et al., 2021), and (2) literature-based CVD risk factor identification and information management (Alizadehsani et al., 2019, 2021).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text