Analysis of the smallest detectable leakage flow rate of negative pressure wave-based leak detection systems for liquid pipelines

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.08.011Get rights and content

Abstract

One of the most concerned performance indices of leak detection and location systems is the smallest detectable leakage flow rate (SDLFR). Based on the physical model of pipeline, mathematical description for the amplitude change of negative pressure wave (NPW) and its attenuation traveling along the pipeline have been deduced. On the basis of mathematical description, the methods for evaluating SDLFR and determining the sensitive point of the pipeline have been proposed. Further study shows that factors such as leakage position, pressures at inlet and outlet, flow rate, density, wave speed in the pipeline, precision of the instruments and noise will have influences on SDLFR. And the results are of great significance to evaluate the performance of the systems based on NPW method.

Introduction

Pipelines are of great importance to chemical and petrochemical industries. For safety and environmental reasons, pipeline leakage surveillance is becoming more and more important in the management of pipeline and many kinds of leak detection and location systems have been developed and widely used in this area (Zhang, Wang, Liu, & Chang, 2001). In these systems the most prevalent method is based on negative pressure wave (NPW) for its relatively low cost, easy implementation, acceptable detection sensitivity and location precision. Nowadays more and more attention has been attracted to improve the performance of the systems and new demands have been proposed concerning the performance indices such as the smallest detectable leakage flow rate (SDLFR), false alarm rate and miss alarm rate.

In this paper mathematical description of the amplitude change and its attenuation of the NPW traveling along the pipeline has been deduced based on the physical model of the pipeline. On the basis of the mathematical description, the calculation method of SDLFR and sensitive point of pipeline have been proposed. Further study has been carried on the influences of factors on the SDLFR. And simulation results have been presented for illustration.

Section snippets

Mathematical model of the pipeline

The physical model of pipeline consists of two equations, namely momentum equation and continuity equation (Wylie, Streeter, & Suo, 1993; Yan, 1986):Pxρ+VVx+Vt+gsina+fV|V|2D=0VPx+Pt+ρa2Vx=0where the subscript x and t denote partial differentiation, for example Vx denotes the partial differentiation of V to x. Let P denote the pressure, ρ the density of the fluid, V the velocity of the fluid, g the acceleration due to gravity, α the angle of the pipeline inclined with the horizontal, f the

Calculation of pressure change and leakage flow rate at leakage site

Let P¯0 and P¯LPdenote the steady pressures at inlet and outlet of the pipeline, Lp denotes the length of the pipeline, l denotes the distance of the leakage site from the inlet, P¯l denotes the pressure at distance l before leaking. According to the pressure gradient of the pipeline we have:P¯0P¯ll=P¯0P¯LPLPso,P¯l=P¯0lLP(P¯0P¯LP)After a leakage happened at l, the leakage flow rate Ql satisfies the orifice equation:Ql=CkAk2ρ(PlPg)where Ck and Ak are the discharge coefficient and area of

Attenuation of the NPW traveling along the pipeline

In Section 3 the mathematical descriptions for the amplitude change of the NPW and the leakage flow rate are given. In order to determine the SDLFR, the mathematical description for the attenuation of the NPW traveling to the inlet and outlet must be deduced.

In pipelines convective terms are ignorable, thus Eqs. (1) and (2) can be written asPx+QtA+ρgsina+fQ|Q|2DρA2=0Pt+a2QxA=0where Q is the mass flow rate.

The pressure P and mass flow rate Q of the pipeline can be expressed asP=P¯+p,Q=Q¯+q

Calculation of the SDLFR

Assume that pressure sensors are mounted only at the inlet and outlet of the pipeline. The necessary condition for a leakage detectable is that the pressure change caused by the leaking exceeds the threshold (the least valid pressure change) determined by the precision of the pressure sensor and the noises. So the SDLFR problem is converted to detect the smallest valid pressure changes of inlet |p0| and outlet |pLP|, i.e.|p0|>hu=λ0h02+σ02|pLp|>hd=λLphLP2+σLP2where h0 and hLp denote the errors

Conclusion

Based on the physical model of the pipeline, mathematical description of the amplitude change of the NPW and its attenuation traveling along the pipeline has been funded and on the basis of these description, methods for determining the SDLFR and sensitive point of a pipeline are proposed. The results are of significant for the performance evaluation of the leak detection and location systems.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National 863 Program of China (program No. 2006AA04Z428) and Honeywell (China) Ltd.

References (8)

  • M. Drago et al.

    Models of pipelines in transient mode

    Mathematical and Computer Modeling of Dynamical Systems

    (2002)
  • M. Drago et al.

    Pipeline simulation technique

    Mathematics and Computers in Simulation

    (2000)
  • M. Drago et al.

    Verification of various pipeline models

    Mathematics and Computers in Simulation

    (2000)
  • M. Drago et al.

    Modeling of the pipeline as a lumped parameter system

    Atutomatika

    (2001)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (102)

  • Sparse representation of acoustic emission signals and its application in pipeline leak location

    2023, Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation
  • Two-parameter method for identification and location of leaks based on weak FBG for steam pipelines

    2022, Optical Fiber Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Leaking or broken pipelines can cause irreversible losses to the fluid and gas industries [2]. Various methods are used for pipeline leak detection, such as manual inspection [3], acoustic emission [4–7], negative pressure wave [8–10], and volume or mass balance methods [11,12]. On the one hand, manual inspection methods for monitoring pipeline leaks are direct but inefficient.

  • Numerical study on automatic repair inside the pipeline for the small leakage gas pipeline by using fibrous particles

    2022, Powder Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the face of a complex pipeline system, it is in fact very difficult to accurately locate the leak point, and hence, the relevant researches have never stopped. So far, various pipeline leak detection techniques, such as visual inspection [8], mass/volume balance [9], transient method [10], negative pressure wave [11], dynamic simulation [12], and acoustic method [13], have been proposed and developed. Although their applications have made brilliant achievements, they will lose detection capability in the presence of tiny leaks whose consequences, if these tiny leaks grow larger, can include increased loss and eventually catastrophic and expensive pipeline breaks.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text