Elsevier

Computers & Education

Volume 57, Issue 3, November 2011, Pages 2011-2024
Computers & Education

Fostering positive attitude in probability learning using graphing calculator

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Although a plethora of research evidence highlights positive and significant outcomes of the incorporation of the Graphing Calculator (GC) in mathematics education, its use in the teaching and learning process appears to be limited. The obvious need to revisit the teaching and learning of Probability has resulted in this study, i.e. to incorporate GC in the teaching and learning of Probability, specifically on the issue of attitudes towards learning probability. The objective is to examine the effectiveness of GC interactive learning, particularly on students’ attitudes towards Probability. A total of 65 foundation students participated in this study; 32 students in the experimental group and 33 in the control group. The teaching approaches varied between the groups. While the experimental group experienced the GC approach, the control group encountered the conventional teaching approach of chalk and talk. Students’ attitude towards learning probability was assessed using the Probability Attitude Inventory (PAI), was administered prior to and after the study. The results show significantly difference in the improved attitude towards Probability between the groups, particularly in terms of usefulness of Probability, interest in Probability and self-concept in Probability. This study provides evidence that learning Probability with GCs benefits students.

Highlights

► We examine the effectiveness of GC interactive learning, particularly on students’ attitudes towards Probability. ► Significantly improved attitude towards Probability when students use GC in Probability learning. ► The improved attitude in the aspects of the usefulness of Probability, interest in Probability and self-concept in Probability. ► We conclude that learning Probability with GCs benefits students.

Introduction

Over the decades, two of the main concerns of the mathematics educators around the world, among others include Thailand (Prakitipong & Nakamura, 2006), Chile (Ramirez, 2005), United States (Fields, 2005) are the unsatisfactory performance in Mathematics and negative attitudes towards Mathematics.

Numerous studies (Almeqdadi, 2005, Noraini, 2006, Utts et al., 2003) have been conducted to address these issues and examine the difficulties students face in mathematics (Jones, 2000, Wisenbaker et al., 1999). Different teaching and learning methods have been experimented to motivate and increase students’ interest towards Mathematics. Among the methods adopted include, such as adopting cooperative learning and peer interaction (Jones, 2000, Magel, 1998), learning via videos (Esteban, Gonzalez, & Tejero, 2000), Internet-based instruction (Utts et al., 2003), geometer’s sketchpad (Almeqdadi, 2005) and graphing calculator (GC) (Ellington, 2003; Forster, 2004; Noraini, 2006).

Although research evidence highlights positive and significant outcomes of the use of the GC in education, there appears to be limited studies of its use in teaching and learning Mathematics. Most of the research is in the teaching and learning of Algebra, Graphs and Functions, Straight Lines, Geometry, Trigonometry, Statistics and Calculus (Arnold, 2008, Horton et al., 2004, Jones, 1995, Thompson and Senk, 2001, Waits and Demana, 1999b). However, research on Probability learning with GC appears to be limited.

The obvious need to revisit the teaching and learning of Probability has resulted in this study, i.e. to address the issue of unfavourable attitude towards learning Probability. It is aimed at developing positive attitudes and behaviours towards learning Probability among undergraduates. The two research questions of interest are:

  • (1)

    To what extend did the incorporation of GC change the students’ attitude towards Probability?

  • (2)

    Are there significant differences in the students’ a) perceived usefulness of Probability, b) interest in Probability and c) self-concept of Probability between the experimental and control groups?

Section snippets

Literature review

The conventional approach of talk-and-chalk obviously does not promote much interaction and students appear to be passive learners (Duatepe-Paksu and Ubuz, 2009, Neo, Unpublished, Rosnaini et al., 2009). The limited or hardly any interaction and discussions sessions make the learning process appear boring or mundane. There is no opportunity to discuss or actively explore concepts that students do not understand. They may eventually not be able to understand the teaching materials and/or retain

Participants

The target population of this study comprised foundation/pre-university students at a university in Malaysia. 65 students participated in this study; 32 students in the experimental group (24 males and 8 females) and 33 students in the control group (29 males and 4 females); age ranged from 17 to 21 years old. An independent sample t-test on students’ performance of the previous trimester’s mathematics subject was conducted to verify similarity of the two samples. The Levine’s test for equality

Instrument validation

All data of this study was analyzed to determine the reliability and validity of the measurement scales. A reliable instrument is one that gives consistent results (Fraenkel & Wallen, 2010). The instrument is considered reliable if the reliability coefficient is greater or equal to .7 (Fraenkel & Wallen, 2010). The Alpha coefficients as shown in Table 2, which ranging from .8648 to .9741, i.e. more than .7, implies that the instruments exhibited acceptable reliability.

The 31 statements were

Discussions and implications

As a conclusive result, both groups recorded significant differences before and after the study, and between groups in their attitudes towards Probability after the study. The experimental group showed significant improvement in attitudes towards Probability, and significantly better attitude than the control group at the end of the study. On the other hand, the control group had significantly less positive attitude and interest towards Probability after the study than before the study. The

Conclusion

In concluding, learning Probability with GC has clearly benefited students in this study. It has proven to be a powerful learning tool in solving mathematical problems and has transformed students’ attitude towards learning Probability. It provides great opportunities to foster positive attitudes towards mathematics, in general, and Probability, in particular. This is a clear indication that students who use GC in their learning positively, perceive the usefulness of Probability in lives,

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank StatWorks (M) Sdn Bhd for the GC loan, the Foundation Center for the permission of conducting this study to foundation students, Rochester Institute of Technology, and all the respondents.

References (52)

  • Abd Rahim, A. S. (2008). Application of geometer’s sketchpad software aids in improving secondary school students’...
  • Acelajado, M. J. (2005). Use of graphing calculators in college algebra: cognitive and noncognitive gains in...
  • F. Almeqdadi

    The effects of using the geometer’s sketchpad (GSP) on Jordanian students’ understanding some geometrical concepts

    International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning

    (2005)
  • Anis, S. B. A. B. (2008). Program ‘Calculator Idol’ Dalam Mengagalakkan Penggunaan Kalkulator Grafik Dalam P-P...
  • Arnold, S. (2008). Making algebra meaningful with technology. Paper presented at the 3rd national conference of...
  • T. Dick

    Supercalculators: implication for calculus curriculum, instruction, and assessment

  • A. Duatepe-Paksu et al.

    Effects of drama-based geometry instruction on student achievement, attitudes, and thinking levels

    The Journal of Educational Research

    (2009)
  • A.J. Ellington

    A meta-analysis of the effects of calculators on students’ achievement and attitude levels in precollege mathematics classes

    National Council of Teachers of Mathematics

    (2003)
  • Esteban, S., Gonzalez, M. P., & Tejero, L. J. (2000). Videos as a learning support to improve mathematics education. I....
  • V. Fields

    Teacher levels of technology implementation and students achievement in reading and mathematics

  • P.A. Forster

    Efficient use of graphics calculators in high school calculus

    International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education

    (2004)
  • J.R. Fraenkel et al.

    How to design and evaluate research in education

    (2010)
  • E. Graham et al.

    An investigation into whether student use of graphics calculators matches their teacher’s expectations

    International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology

    (2008)
  • T.Y. Ha

    Technology-integrated mathematics eductaion (TIME): A study of integrations between teachers and students in technology-integrated secondary mathematics classrooms

    (2008)
  • Hasan, H., Azizan, M., & Kassim, S. (2005). The use of graphic calculators in Malaysia secondary schools: students...
  • B.B. Honeycutt et al.

    Illustrating probability in genetics with hands-on learning: making the math real

    The American Biology Teacher

    (2007)
  • R.M. Horton et al.

    The graphing calculators as an aid to teaching algebra

    Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education

    (2004)
  • P. Jones

    Realising the educational potential of the graphic calculator

  • T. Jones

    Instructional approaches to teaching problem solving in mathematics: integrating theories of learning and technology

    (2000)
  • Khairiree, K. (2003). Dispelling the myths on using graphing calculator and examination. Paper presented at the 1st...
  • Kor, L. K. (2008). Calculator mediated learning in a heterogeneous mathematics classrooms. Paper presented at the 3rd...
  • R.C. Magel

    Using cooperative learning in a large introductory statistics class

    Journal of Statistics Education

    (1998)
  • E. Milou

    The graphing calculator: a survey of classroom usage

    School Science and Mathematics

    (1999)
  • A.F. Mohd Ayub et al.

    A comparison of Malaysian secondary students perceived ease of use and usefulness of dynamic mathematical software

    International Journal of Education and Information Technologies

    (2008)
  • Munawir, A., & Raihan, H. (2008). Penggunaan Kalkulator Grafik Dalam Matematik: Topik Garis Lurus Dan Impak Pelaksanaan...
  • G.Y. Nasari

    The effect of graphing calculator embedded materials on college students’ conceptual understanding and achievement in a calculus in course

    (2008)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Complexities of digital technology use and the teaching and learning of function

      2015, Computers and Education
      Citation Excerpt :

      This detailed identification of affordances allowed subsequent analysis to determine the environmental factors that promoted, enabled, or hindered perception of these particular affordances. Tan, Harji, and Lau (2011) note that whilst there is research evidence highlighting “positive and significant outcomes … [using handheld technologies] there appears to be limited studies of its use in teaching and learning mathematics” (p. 2011). The study reported here is attempting to address this perceived gap in the literature.

    • Prospective Primary School Teachers’ Attitudes towards Probability and its Teaching

      2020, International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text