Elsevier

Computers & Education

Volume 58, Issue 4, May 2012, Pages 1339-1350
Computers & Education

ICT policy planning in a context of curriculum reform: Disentanglement of ICT policy domains and artifacts

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Researchers and policy makers around the world are increasingly acknowledging the importance of developing a school-based ICT policy plan to facilitate the integration of information and communication technology (ICT) in education. Despite this interest, not much is known about how schools can develop their local ICT policy capacity and how to establish an ICT policy plan. In order to fill the gap in research on ICT policy planning, a multiple case study analysis with a mixed-method design was carried out with three Flemish primary schools. Primary schools in Flanders are encouraged by the government to develop local ICT policy planning in a context of ICT curriculum reform. Data from multiple sources (e.g. interviews with school leaders and ICT coordinators, focus group interviews with teachers, school policy document analysis, and a teacher questionnaire) were gathered and analyzed. The results indicate that ICT policy planning in schools should be considered as a multifaceted phenomenon grounded in school culture. ICT policy consists of different policy domains: vision development, financial policy, infrastructural policy, continuing professional development policy, and curriculum policy. Each policy domain can be described in terms of policy artifacts (tools, routines, and structures), and differences exist between schools concerning the involvement of teachers in the policy planning process and in the distribution of management tasks. As such, the study illustrates a distributed leadership perspective on ICT school policy planning. The results are of particular importance for school leaders, ICT coordinators and professional development trainers, and illustrates that ICT school policy is as much about developing shared meanings among stakeholders for ICT, and coordinating their relations and interactions in keeping with the school’s culture as it is about content related decisions.

Highlights

► ICT policy planning is as a multifaceted phenomenon grounded in school culture. ► ICT policy consists of five different policy domains. ► The policy domains can be described in terms of tools, routines, and structures. ► ICT school policy planning is a distributed leadership practice.

Introduction

One of the central activities of researchers in the field of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is the quest for conditions that support the integration of ICT into classrooms. In this pursuit, researchers have described supporting conditions situated at both the teacher and school level. A review of the literature reveals that one of the conditions situated at the school level is “having a shared vision and ICT policy plan” (Hew & Brush, 2007). This condition – described here as ICT policy planning – has recently gained attention from both a research perspective (e.g. Fishman & Zhang, 2003) and a policy perspective (e.g. Zhao & Conway, 2001) because of how it might influence teachers’ classroom integration. Far less often discussed is how leadership for ICT creates supportive school-level conditions in general, and nearly never the creation of ICT policy plans in particular (McLeod & Richardson, 2011).

Leadership has been empirically associated with better outcomes for teachers’ professional conditions (Hallinger, 2003), as well as students’ learning (Robinson, Lloyd, & Rowe, 2008). To establish such linkages this research increasingly investigates leadership practice – what leaders actually do – and specifically how this creates particular school level conditions and influences teachers’ instructional practices. For example, a distributed leadership perspective (Spillane, 2006) builds upon situated cognition and activity theory to examine leadership activities as embedded in context. It emphasizes the examination of leadership practices, particularly the tools, routines, and structures, that are used to accomplish the leadership and/or management practices that organize the work of the leaders and followers. Here we apply such a perspective to ICT policy planning to illustrate ICT policy planning in terms of leadership practices to contribute descriptive detail of how leaders and followers go about this work and organize aspects of their situation to support it. Through case studies we investigate leadership practices for ICT policy planning in three schools where previous research (Vanderlinde & van Braak, 2011) showed teachers have very high and favorable perceptions of the ICT curriculum. While this descriptive research cannot establish that the school level conditions of ICT policy planning leadership practices led to this outcome, it contributes insights in this little understood area that are conceptually aligned with relationships found in leadership studies and upon which further ICT research can build.

This is especially the case in Flanders, the Dutch speaking part of Belgium, were schools are strongly encouraged by the government to develop local ICT policy capacity and to create a school-based ICT policy plan. This encouragement is strongly linked with the implementation of a compulsory ICT curriculum for primary education (Vandenbroucke, 2007). Besides, school-based management literature (e.g. Fullan & Watson, 2000) teaches us that school-based management initiatives have the greatest chance of being successful when focused on curriculum reform. The Flemish curriculum is structured in terms of ICT attainment targets, defined as minimum objectives regarding the ICT knowledge, skills and attitudes viewed by the government as necessary for and attainable by all students in compulsory education. The ICT attainment targets do not focus on technical skills, but emphasize the integrated use of ICT within the teaching and learning process. Since 2007, primary schools in Flanders have a clear understanding of what the government expects when it comes to ICT integration, and they must all put the ICT curriculum into practice (Vanderlinde, van Braak, & Hermans, 2009). Given the decentralized educational policy nature of Flanders, schools are given strong autonomy and are responsible for implementing and translating the ICT curriculum into concrete teaching and learning activities. Within this context, ICT policy planning is encouraged, and seen as a lever that facilitates both the process of ICT integration and the realization of the Flemish ICT curriculum (Vanderlinde et al., 2009).

Within the context of the Flemish ICT curriculum reform, this study explores how primary schools develop local ICT policy capacity through a lens focused on leadership practices.

Section snippets

Leadership studies and ICT policy planning

In this analysis we take a distributed leadership perspective (Spillane, 2006), which emphasizes, as described above, the examination of leadership practices. Such a perspective attends to the details of tools, routines, and structures—or artifacts—in a situation and how these both shape and are shaped by the interactions among leaders, and followers. From such a perspective, a document such as the school’s ICT policy plan is an artifact (Halverson, 2003, Halverson, 2005, Halverson and

Research purpose

The study reported in this article is part of a broader case-study research project on the implementation of the new Flemish ICT curriculum. The purpose of this project was to validate the previously developed ‘e-capacity framework’ (Vanderlinde & van Braak, 2010a) through qualitative research data. The e-capacity framework is a statistical measurement model developed to examine the complex process of integrating ICT for instructional purposes. The model is situated within a school improvement

Data collection and analysis

A multiple case study research design (Yin, 1989) was used to investigate ICT policy planning processes in three case study schools. The study is considered as a mixed method design (Leech & Onwuegbuzie, 2009), meaning that in these three schools quantitative and qualitative data were collected, analyzed and interpreted to investigate the underlying phenomenon of ICT policy planning. More concretely, a convergent parallel design (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2011) was chosen as the quantitative and

Findings

When systematically comparing (Miles & Huberman, 1994) the interpretative research data of the three case study schools, by using the method of ‘constant comparative analysis’ (Strauss & Corbin, 1998), we found little differences between them on the conditions (teachers’ actual use of ICT, ICT related teacher conditions, ICT related school conditions, and school improvement conditions) of the e-capacity framework (see Table 1). This means that, for instance, all three schools had a clear vision

Conclusion

This study adds to the ICT integration literature in several respects by illustrating that the concept of school ICT policy should be considered as one that is multifaceted and related to the school’s culture and climate.

First, ICT policy planning is further operationalized by delineating five different ICT policy domains: ICT vision development, financial ICT policy, ICT infrastructural policy, ICT continuing professional development policy, and ICT curriculum policy.

Second, in addition to

References (49)

  • B.J. Fishman et al.

    Planning for technology: the link between intentions and use

    Educational Technology

    (2003)
  • M. Frazier et al.

    The technology coordinator’s handbook

    (2004)
  • M. Fullan et al.

    School-based management: reconceptualizing to improve learning outcomes

    School Effectiveness and School Improvement

    (2000)
  • F. Geijsel et al.

    Conditions fostering the implementation of large-scale innovation programs in schools: teachers’ perspectives

    Educational Administration Quarterly

    (2001)
  • F.P. Geijsel et al.

    The effect of teacher psychological, school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in schools

    The Elementary School Journal

    (2009)
  • Y. Gülbahar

    Technology planning: a roadmap to successful technology integration in schools

    Computers & Education

    (2007)
  • P. Hallinger

    Leading educational change: reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership

    Cambridge Journal of Education

    (2003)
  • R. Halverson

    Systems of practice: how leaders use artifacts to create professional community in schools

    Education Policy Analysis Archives

    (2003)
  • R. Halverson

    A distributed leadership perspective on how leaders use artifacts to create professional community in schools

    (2005)
  • R. Halverson et al.

    Evaluation in the wild: A distributed cognition perspective on teacher assessment

    (2003)
  • K.F. Hew et al.

    Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research

    Educational Technology Research and Development

    (2007)
  • D. Hopkins

    School improvement for real

    (2001)
  • W.K. Hoy et al.

    Administrators solving the problems of practice: Decision-making cases, concepts and consequences

    (1995)
  • W.K. Hoy et al.

    The road to open and healthy schools: A handbook for change

    (1997)
  • Cited by (59)

    • A structural equation model for determinants of instructors’ educational ICT use in higher education in developing countries: Evidence from Ethiopia

      2022, Computers and Education
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the ICT vision and plan were noted to have a positive influence on infrastructure, support, and professional development. UNESCO (2004), as well as Vanderlinde et al. (2012), reported that educators are more likely to perceive their context as an enabling environment for ICT usage when their institution has implemented measures at the managerial level. Furthermore, while professional development seems to influence ICT attitude directly, its impact on ICT competence is mediated by ICT attitude.

    • Capturing schools' digital capacity: Psychometric analyses of the SELFIE self-reflection tool

      2021, Computers and Education
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this sense, it can be argued that education systems in general, and schools in particular, are on average not fully leveraging the potential of digital technologies to enhance teaching and learning and the development of digital competence of students and teachers. Many schools lack a school-based digital policy plan and/or a shared vision on the use and integration of digital technologies, which have been identified by the literature as key conditions for improving the digital capacity of schools (Vanderlinde & van Braak, 2010; Vanderlinde, van Braak, & Dexter, 2012). Research also shows that innovative and effective use of digital technologies is mainly bottom-up (e.g., Jeladze & Pata, 2018) and that the shared vision can also be established in this way (Vanderlinde et al., 2012) if the dialogue and conditions are adequate.

    • Activity-based costing (ABC) and its implication for open innovation

      2021, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
    • Detecting latent topics and trends in educational technologies over four decades using structural topic modeling: A retrospective of all volumes of Computers & Education

      2020, Computers and Education
      Citation Excerpt :

      ICT interactive applications like blog and blackboard had contributed greatly to the success of e-learning systems (Hernandez, Montaner, Sese, & Urquizu, 2011). Furthermore, scholars as well as policy-makers demonstrated increasingly more awareness of the importance of ICT policy plans for educational purposes (Vanderlinde, van Braak, & Dexter, 2012). The third topic was Experiments and methodologies (6.01%).

    • Connecting rural schools to quality education: Rural teachers’ use of digital educational resources

      2019, Computers in Human Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      The model of the structure of concentric circles developed by Veenstra (1999) classified school-level factors that may be of influence on technology use into two categories: 1) contextual characteristics (e.g., ICT infrastructure, software) and 2) cultural characteristics (e.g., school leadership, school ICT policy). Studies indicated that both cultural characteristics such as openness to change and school ICT policy (Tondeur et al., 2008; Vanderlinde, Van Braak, & Dexter, 2012), and contextual variables such as ICT-equipment availability (Akbulut, Kesim, & Odabasi, 2007; K. T. Lee, 2002; Tallent-Runnels et al., 2006) and presence of ICT in the curriculum (Akbulut, 2009) are related to ICT use. For the current study on the usage of DERs in rural schools in China, two school-level variables might be relevant.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text