Digital competencies: A review of the literature and applications in the workplace

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103752Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Integrate perspectives from science and practice on digital competencies at work.

  • Combine findings from extensive literature review and semi-structured interviews.

  • Postulate a definition of digital competencies at work to foster understanding.

  • Propose comprehensive framework with 25 dimensions of digital competencies at work.

Abstract

In today's organisations and politics, there is a growing awareness of the gap between existing and needed digital competencies of the workforce to master the challenges of the digitalised future at work. Nevertheless, no comprehensive framework or definition of digital competencies at work has been proposed so far. Our aim is to offer a holistic view and broaden the scope of the concept of digital competencies, thereby focussing on applications at work. We combine diverse methods to integrate different perspectives on digital competencies. By conducting an extensive literature review about definitions and frameworks of digital competencies that might be applicable at work, we provide an overview of the current state of the art in research on digital competencies. Additionally, eleven half-structured interviews based on the critical incidents technique (CIT) were conducted to gain insights into the perspectives of professionals with expertise in digitalisation processes and digital competencies. Subsequently, researchers with different educational backgrounds clustered the results from both approaches and agreed on twenty-five dimensions that constitute digital competencies for white-collar workers with office jobs, encompassing a large variety of knowledge, skills, and abilities. The results of this research indicate that even though there is overlapping content, each perspective adds unique content to the concept of digital competencies at work. By creating a coherent and detailed framework and a definition, our research enhances the applicability of professional learning and development of digital competencies at work.

Introduction

Beyond the huge impact of the ongoing digitalisation in our society on our everyday life, new technologies also have a tremendous impact on the way we work (e.g., Murawski & Bick, 2017; Zaphiris & Ioannou, 2016). Devices and software programmes used in professional contexts are constantly renewed to be more efficient and to facilitate work. These changes call for increasing usage of digital information and communication technology (ICT) at work. Indeed the majority of employees today use digital ICT at work, as confirmed by 83% of the participants in a large representative German workforce sample (Arnold, Butschek, & Steffes, 2016). Most workplaces require at least basic digital competencies (Gallardo-Echenique, de Oliveira, Marques-Molias, & Esteve-Mon, 2015). Already in 2006, the European Parliament and the Council identified digital competence as one out of eight key competences for lifelong learning (Ferrari, 2012; van Laar, van Deursen, van Dijk, & de Haan, 2017). In detail, they defined competence as a combination of knowledge, skills and attitudes, and digital competence as “the confident and critical use of Information Society Technology for work, leisure and communication” (Søby, 2013, p. 135).

Therefore, employees have to engage in lifelong learning, and acquire new competencies to adapt to the constantly increasing demands of the fast-changing work environment (e.g., Ahmad, Karim, Din, & Albakri, 2013; Carnevale & Smith, 2013; Cascio & Montealegre, 2016). Indeed, there seems to be a gap between existing and needed digital competencies (DC) of the workforce (e.g., Ancarani & Di Mauro, 2018; Janssen et al., 2013). In the study of Arnold and colleagues (2016), over two-thirds of the interviewed workers indicated that they constantly needed to develop further their competencies at work because of technical innovations. Even though politics and employers are aware of this issue, scientific research focussing on the DC of workers is still scarce (Murawski & Bick, 2017).

The goal of this research is to foster the understanding and add essential knowledge about conceptualizations and theories of DC at work. Therefore, we provide an overview of existing definitions and frameworks with a focus on evaluating their potential applications at work in a literature review. Afterwards, we aim to address the science-practice gap in this field by developing essential dimensions of DC for white-collar workers that are not only based on the literature but also on insights of working practitioners.

Section snippets

Identification of relevant studies and search process

At first, we screened the literature for definitions and frameworks of DC to get an overview of the existing literature. In detail, we conducted a database search of PsycINFO, SocINDEX, Psyindex, and ERIC using keywords like digital competence, digital literacy, and ICT literacy. Only publications including the keywords in the publication title or abstract were selected. Then, we looked at the reference lists of the selected publications and added relevant publications. Additionally, given our

Development of a definition and relevant dimensions of DC at work

In this section, we aim to address the science-practice gap with regard to DC by combining qualitative and quantitative research methods and integrating the view of different stakeholders. First, we lay ground for a common understanding of DC at work among researchers, practitioners, and politicians by proposing a comprehensible definition of DC at work. Second, we develop a framework that includes a conclusive description of relevant dimensions of DC at work, which does not only refer to a

Conclusions

Our research provides important insights into the construct of DC at work by providing an overview of existing definitions and frameworks. A thorough analysis of the available literature revealed a lack of scientific research on DC of adults and a neglect of the work context. However, the large variety of terms and proposed frameworks shows the interest in DC in many different contexts such as education, politics, or media and communication. While acknowledging the important contributions that

Declaration of competing interest

None.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the master students in the seminar “Digital competencies at work” for conducting the interviews with the practitioners and for helping to cluster the answers. The authors also thank the practitioners who took the time to answer the interview questions patiently and enrich the research with their insights. Furthermore, we appreciate the help and feedback by the participants of the Hot-Topic Session “Digital competencies at the workplace” at the Summer School entitled “Reading

References (56)

  • D. Arnold et al.

    Digitalisierung am Arbeitsplatz: Bericht (FB 468)

    (2016)
  • D. Bawden

    Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts

    Journal of Documentation

    (2001)
  • B. Brečko et al.

    The digital competence framework for consumers (EUR 28133). Luxembourg

    (2016)
  • D.F. Caldwell et al.

    Measuring person-job fit with a profile-comparison process

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1990)
  • A. Calvani et al.

    Models and instruments for assessing digital competence at school

    Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society

    (2008)
  • M.A. Campion et al.

    Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling

    Personnel Psychology

    (2011)
  • A.P. Carnevale et al.

    Workplace basics: The skills employees need and employers want

    Human Resource Development International

    (2013)
  • S. Carretero et al.

    DigComp 2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use (EUR 28558). Luxembourg

    (2017)
  • A. Cartelli

    Frameworks for digital competence assessment: Proposals, instruments and evaluation

  • W.F. Cascio et al.

    How technology is changing work and organizations

    Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

    (2016)
  • H.-C. Chen et al.

    An integrative model of competency development, training design, assessment centre, and multi-rater assessment

    Advances in Developing Human Resources

    (2006)
  • Clarivate Analytics

    Journal citation reports

    (2018)
  • E.I. Desrosiers et al.

    Writing research articles: Update on the article review checklist

  • S. Elo et al.

    The qualitative content analysis process

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (2008)
  • Y. Eshet-Alkalai

    Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era

    Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia

    (2004)
  • A. Ferrari

    Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks (No. EUR 25351). Seville

    (2012)
  • A. Ferrari

    Digcomp: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe (No. Eur 26035). Seville

    (2013)
  • A. Ferrari et al.

    DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe

    Elearning Papers

    (2014)
  • Cited by (150)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text