Towards online planning for open-air engineering processes
Introduction
Nowadays, operations of open-air engineering processes such as open-pit mining, road construction and agriculture farming are mostly carried out with high-tech mobile equipment. This equipment mainly includes self-propelled work vehicles such as excavators, dump trucks, asphalt layers, road graders, etc. which are designed to carry out specific tasks of the processes. Open-air engineering processes are capital intensive and the operating costs of the work vehicles account for a major proportion of the total process cost. Over the last few years, substantial advancement in the technological development of the work vehicles can be observed. Besides mechanical improvements, an increasing interest is directed in optimising the productivity of the work vehicles through proper planning and execution of their operations (see, e.g. [1], [2], [12]).
Planning for open-air engineering processes involves resource allocation and scheduling decisions, aiming to optimise one or more performance objectives (e.g. minimising completion time, bottleneck utilisation, minimising energy consumption, etc.). In an open-air engineering process, the work vehicles usually perform operations at geographically distributed locations (mine site, storage depot, etc.). The planning for coordinating their operations is necessary for successfully completing the overall process. Because of the open and distributed nature of open-air engineering processes, disturbances and variations are highly prevalent in their operating environments (see, e.g. Table 1). In practice, these processes are typically planned with various project planning methods like Programme Evaluation Review Technique (PERT) and Critical Path Method (CPM) [3], [21]. The plans are generated before the process starts, based on approximate resource performance and predicted operating conditions. Although these plans provide a good starting reference for execution, they are unable to provide the necessary guidance for continued execution of the processes, which are subject to uncertainties and variations. For effective execution, gaining visibility at runtime hence is imperative. Indeed, visibility of possible outcomes of planning choices and visibility of the solution space under the prevailing operating conditions lead to better-informed decision making.
Considering the above requirements, the primary objective of the paper is to present an approach for online planning, which enables to generate plans based on runtime information, monitor the execution and take necessary corrective action when required. As a secondary objective, this paper assesses tests and validates the PROSA reference architecture [4], [5] and the delegate multi-agent system or D-MAS [19] to realise the objectives of online planning.
The PROSA reference architecture provides a basis to design and develop a model-driven system, in which models are executable. The D-MAS provides a coordination pattern to use these executable models in order to virtually execute operations and generate short-term operational forecasts.
A prototype implementation of the online planning approach is carried out for open-pit mine planning. Tests scenarios are used in simulation mode to demonstrate enhanced process visibility, which assists in keeping the plans valid and effective throughout the process for changing conditions over time. The model-driven nature of the system makes it possible to apply this solution in a generic manner to other open-air engineering processes. In particular, these models – driving the system – mirror the operations and their interactions. This effectively encapsulates the specifics of the engineering processes and their environment, which renders the approach generic with respect to open-air application domains. This equally contributes to explaining why PROSA and D-MAS have been able to cope with the novel application area.
The remaining paper is organised as follows. Section 2 elaborates further on the characteristics and the planning requirements of open-air engineering processes. The research is situated within its context and relevant literature is considered in the same section. The online planning method is discussed in Section 3. In Section 4, the prototype implementation of the proposed planning system for open-pit mine planning is described and results are discussed. Finally, Section 5 concludes this paper.
Section snippets
Planning for open-air engineering processes
The intention of this section is to specify concerns and requirements for the planning of open-air engineering processes. Section 2.1 describes important characteristics of the processes that make the planning complex. In Section 2.2, a survey of general planning practices in the area of study is presented and their limitations are discussed. Finally, the focus of the research and its contributions are described in Section 2.3.
The online planning approach
This section introduces the online planning approach along with the baseline description of the PROSA reference architecture. Furthermore, the planning mechanism is described to reveal how the planning concerns of open-air engineering processes can be addressed through this approach.
Online planning for open-pit mining
The online planning approach is validated through its prototype implementation for open-pit mine planning. Section 4.1 provides a general introduction of the open-pit mining process and describes the mining scenario considered in this research. The implementation efforts are described in Section 4.2. In Section 4.3, the online planning mechanism is described for the open-pit mining process and finally the results are presented in Section 4.4.
Conclusions
Open-air engineering processes are subject to dynamic and uncertain operating conditions. Under such circumstances, the planning procedures relying on predetermined and predicted planning information are rendered insufficient. For effective planning and execution of these processes access to runtime information is important.
This paper presents an approach for developing an online planning system aiming to deliver visibility beyond the state of the art. The visibility includes track and trace
References (25)
- et al.
Reference architecture for holonic manufacturing systems: PROSA
Computers in Industry
(1998) - et al.
On the design of emergent systems: an investigation of integration and interoperability issues
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
(2003) - et al.
Planning in the next century (I)
Computers in Industry
(1997) - et al.
Holonic manufacturing execution system
CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology
(2005) Workability and machinery sizing for combine harvesting
Agricultural Engineering International: The CICR EJournal
(2003)- et al.
Infield logistics planning for crop-harvesting operations
Engineering Optimization
(2009) - Q. Hu, W. Wei, Short-term production scheduling for open-pit mines by PERT networks with resource constraints. Mine...
- J. Wyns, Reference architecture for holonic manufacturing systems: the key to support evolution and reconfiguration,...
- et al.
A review of combine sensors for precision farming
Precision Agriculture
(2002) - P. Verstraete, Integrating existing scheduling techniques into the holonic manufacturing execution system, Ph.D....
Recent developments of mining machinery and the improvements of production
Cited by (4)
Perspective on holonic manufacturing systems: PROSA becomes ARTI
2020, Computers in IndustryHolonic Architecture for a Table Grape Production Management System
2021, Studies in Computational IntelligenceDesign of holonic manufacturing systems
2017, Journal of Machine EngineeringDesign for the unexpected: From holonic manufacturing systems towards a humane mechatronics society
2015, Design for the Unexpected: From Holonic Manufacturing Systems towards a Humane Mechatronics Society