Optimized Bayes variational regularization prior for 3D PET images

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.05.004Get rights and content

Abstract

A new prior for variational Maximum a Posteriori regularization is proposed to be used in a 3D One-Step-Late (OSL) reconstruction algorithm accounting also for the Point Spread Function (PSF) of the PET system.

The new regularization prior strongly smoothes background regions, while preserving transitions. A detectability index is proposed to optimize the prior.

The new algorithm has been compared with different reconstruction algorithms such as 3D-OSEM + PSF, 3D-OSEM + PSF + post-filtering and 3D-OSL with a Gauss-Total Variation (GTV) prior.

The proposed regularization allows controlling noise, while maintaining good signal recovery; compared to the other algorithms it demonstrates a very good compromise between an improved quantitation and good image quality.

Introduction

Positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (CT) imaging systems have been greatly improved in the last few years both from the hardware and software point of view.

For example, all the physical effects limiting the spatial resolution of PET can be taken into account by a “global” Point Spread Function (PSF), as representative of the system response, which – if implemented in an iterative reconstruction algorithm – allows taking into account the system resolution loss and recovering it [1], [2], [3], [4].

Unfortunately, a common effect of iterative reconstruction techniques is the increase of noise as iterations proceed, due to the ill-posed nature of the reconstruction problem [5]. On the other hand, a high number of iterations are usually needed to recover a substantial percentage of the signal, especially when implementing PSF modelling [6]. A post-filtering applied to the image can limit noisy patterns, but it usually causes a loss of spatial resolution and a reduction in the quantification accuracy, which should obviously be avoided, particularly if a strategy of spatial resolution recovery is employed. Regularization techniques, instead, could help in controlling noise amplification during the reconstruction process (and, thus, they allow increasing the number of iterations), provided that the regularization method is able to preserve the spatial resolution as much as possible.

Many different regularization strategies have been proposed (see e.g. [7] for a review). The most widely used ones introduce a spatial interaction between voxels in the image – often by using Markov random field models – and thus associate, to the image, a global energy function whose value is based on local potentials evaluated on some subsets of the whole image. The effects of the regularization process depend on the characteristics of the local potential employed, which ideally should provide a smoothing behaviour inside each region and preserve the transitions between adjacent regions.

Among the different strategies to define the energy function, the variational approach [8], [9] allows taking into account not only the mean activity in the considered districts of the image, but also their rapidity of variation between adjacent regions by employing the gradients in the image.

Many different penalty functions have been proposed [10]. The most used Bayesian regularization strategy is based on the Gaussian prior, which smoothes all the gradient intensities with equal relative strength, resulting in a strong smoothing effect.

On the other hand, a commonly used prior for edge preservation is the Total Variation (TV) [11], which is able to maintain mainly unchanged the transitions between different regions in the image, but tends to produce staircasing effects in regions gradually changing in space.

A modification of the Gaussian prior is the Huber prior [12] or, equivalently in the variational framework, the Gauss-Total Variation (GTV) prior [10], which introduces a parameter to discriminate between different regularization behaviours to be applied respectively to background regions – Gaussian (GR) component – for noise suppression and signal regions–Total Variation component – for edge preservation.

Another promising strategy is represented by the generalized Gaussian or p-Gaussian prior (PR), as proposed in [13]: this regularization scheme has the capability of strongly smoothing background regions, while maintaining higher detail in signal regions.

In this work a new variational regularization prior has been proposed by modifying the p-Gaussian prior to reduce the resolution loss introduced by it. The prior has been implemented in a 3D Ordered Subsets Expectation Maximization (OSEM) reconstruction algorithm accounting for the PSF in the image space and validated, on phantom data and clinical images, by comparing it with OSEM + PSF images, post-filtered OSEM + PSF images and the images obtained with the Gauss-Total Variation prior. Moreover, since the presented regularization priors depend on different parameters, an optimization strategy (based on the qualitative and quantitative content of the images) has also been proposed and employed to compare the priors at their best performance.

Section snippets

Bayesian regularization and variational approach

Most iterative algorithms seek the image λ maximizing the so-called likelihood function, i.e. the probability p(yλ) of obtaining the recorded projections y given image λ. Since all images are in principle equally probable, due to the ill-posed nature of the reconstruction problem the process often converges to a noisy image, with the noise level increasing at each iteration. To reduce this effect, it is possible to favour a certain class of images by using Bayes’ theorem and introducing an a

Validation of the D index

In Fig. 3A a set of representative D curves, obtained for the 10 mm sphere, as a function of the iteration number, for different reconstruction algorithms are shown. As it can be seen, in some conditions a range of maximum values for D (Dmax) can be individuated, indicating the superiority in terms of lesion detectability of a specific iteration range, while in other conditions D has a plateau, indicating a wide range of iterations with similar characteristics.

The validity of the D value as

Discussion

Positron Emission Tomography has attracted increasing interest thanks to its capability of detecting metabolic information and performing in vivo bio-imaging. Unfortunately, compared to the most common anatomical/morphological diagnostic techniques (CT or magnetic resonance), it is also characterized by poor spatial resolution, which reduces the quantitative accuracy and the image quality. To overcome this limitation, the physical effects leading to the spatial resolution loss may be accounted

Conclusions

The proposed prior represents a good compromise between noise control and preservation of spatial resolution and quantitative accuracy. The proposed strategy to set the regularization parameters appears to be useful in determining the optimal parameters for a specific clinical protocol.

References (24)

  • S.L. Keeling

    Total Variation based convex filters for medical imaging

    Appl Math Comput

    (2003)
  • A. Le Pogam et al.

    Denoising of PET images by combining wavelets and curvelets for improved preservation of resolution and quantitation

    Med Image Anal

    (2013)
  • V. Panin et al.

    Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements

    IEEE Trans Med Imag

    (2006)
  • F. Sureau et al.

    Impact of image-space resolution modeling for studies with the High-Resolution Research Tomograph

    J Nucl Med

    (2008)
  • A. Alessio et al.

    Application and evaluation of a measured spatially variant system model of PET image reconstruction

    IEEE Trans Med Imag

    (2010)
  • E. Rapisarda et al.

    Image-based point spread function implementation in a fully 3D OSEM reconstruction algorithm for PET

    Phys Med Biol

    (2010)
  • C.R. Vogel

    Computational methods for inverse problems

    SIAM

    (2002)
  • K. Thielemans et al.

    Impact of PSF modeling on the convergence rate and edge behavior of em images in PET

    Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec IEEE

    (2010)
  • J. Qi et al.

    Iterative reconstruction techniques in emission computed tomography

    Phys Med Biol

    (2006)
  • G. Aubert et al.

    A variational method in image recovery

    J Numer Anal

    (1997)
  • O. Scherzer et al.

    Variational Methods in Imaging

    (2009)
  • N. Dey et al.

    3D Microscopy Deconvolution using Richardson-Lucy Algorithm with Total Variation Regularization

    (2004)
  • Cited by (7)

    • A Variational Bayesian inference method for parametric imaging of PET data

      2017, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      An alternative is the Variational Bayesian (VB) method (Chappell et al., 2009), which is a fully Bayesian approach that uses an analytical approximation to simplify the calculation of the posterior distribution; this approximation is numerically tractable for both linear and nonlinear systems, including linear, time-invariant compartmental models. Whilst VB has previously been applied in the PET field for reconstruction and segmentation (Rapisarda et al., 2014; Xia et al., 2011), it has never been applied for kinetic modelling. In the current study, VB is adapted and applied for quantitative parametric mapping of PET data.

    • System models for PET statistical iterative reconstruction: A review

      2016, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
      Citation Excerpt :

      A usual approach to overcome this drawback is either design some kind of practical stopping rule [44–46] or to smooth the images with kernels [47,48] filters [49] or wavelet based methods [50]. As for solutions integrated in the reconstruction algorithm, the maximum a posteriori (MAP) methods [51–54] offer a very convenient way of reinforcing desirable properties in the reconstructed image by incorporating a priori information (priors) that models the distribution of activity and noise in the data. The regularizing influence of the prior controls the variance of the reconstruction, and hence the MAP methods do not exhibit the instabilities at higher iterations encountered using MLEM [55].

    • An update on technical and methodological aspects for cardiac PET applications

      2016, Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +39 0226435175; fax: +39 0226415202.

    2

    Tel.: +39 0226435175; fax: +39 0226415202.

    3

    Tel.: +39 0226432793; fax: +39 0226415202.

    4

    Tel.: +39 0226433887; fax: +39 0226415202.

    View full text