Outsourcing or capacity expansions: Application of activity-based costing model on joint products decisions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2006.01.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Because of capacity constraints, the companies who produce joint products have to assess the desirability of further processing joint products beyond the split-off point. Especially in a situation in which market demands exceed the company's production capacity. In order to satisfy customer's orders and maximize total profits, these companies must study the feasibility of expanding capacity or outsourcing the production of parts. The aim of this paper is to develop an ABC joint products decision model which incorporates capacity expansions and outsourcing features, by using a mathematical programming approach. With the model presented in this paper, we can evaluate the comparative benefits of expanding the various kinds of capacity and outsourcing simultaneously. By applying this model, the companies who produce joint products can derive an optimal decision about further processing, capacity expansions or outsourcing.

Introduction

Many companies, such as petroleum refiners, lumber mills, meat packers or flour mills, produce a multitude of products in their manufacturing processes. Joint products are produced simultaneously by common process or series of processes. All costs incurred before the split-off point of joint products are referred to as joint costs, and costs incurred for further processing and disposal are referred to as separable costs. Due to capacity constraints, when joint products can either be sold at the split-off point or after further separate processing, the companies who produce joint products have to assess the desirability of further processing of joint products beyond the split-off point. Especially in a situation in which market demands exceed the company's production capacity. In order to satisfy customer's orders and maximize total profits, the feasible way for these companies includes capacity expansions or outsourcing part of the products. Such decisions involve resource allocation and require accurate analysis of relevant costs associated with each option.

Efficient firms allocate their own resources to those activities within the value chain for which they enjoy a comparative advantage over competitors [1]. Other activities not enjoying such advantages are increasingly outsourced to external suppliers. Outsourcing is expected to involve production cost savings relative to internal production because outside suppliers benefit from economies of scale, smoother production schedules and centralization of expertise [2], [3]. Based on a survey of more than 1200 companies, Deavers [4] identified the top five reasons for outsourcing as: to improve company focus, access to world-class capabilities, acceleration of benefits from reengineering, sharing of risk and freeing of resources for other purposes. De Kok [5] considers outsourcing as a measure to allocate capacity. The additional capacity needs are not postponed but are instead outsourced. Thus, in the situation that market demands exceed current capacity, outsourcing may be a good way to obtain the advantages of cost saving and share the risk.

In recent years, because of dissatisfaction with the distortions created by traditional costing systems [6], activity-based costing (ABC) has become a popular cost management technique both with accounting academics and in business practice. Many managers now use ABC to guide decisions and establish priorities. The ABC model is composed of both the cost assignment view and the process view with activities as the intersection of these two views [7]. The cost assignment view provides information about resources, activities, and cost objects. The process view provides financial and non-financial information about cost drivers and performance measures for each activity or process. Relying on ABCs analysis of how products consume resources, it models the causal relationship between products and resources used in their production. This enables ABC to provide an understanding of how costs are driven by the demands for activities within a process, and more accurate product cost information for evaluating the profitability of the firm's product lines [8].

The purpose of this paper is to develop an ABC joint products decision model incorporating capacity expansions and outsourcing features by using a mathematical programming approach, in order to lead to an optimal joint products further processing, capacity expansions or outsourcing decision. The remainder of this paper is organized into five sections. Sections 2 and 3 will detail the literature about the concepts of ABC and outsourcing. We develop our ABC model for joint products decision in Section 4. A numerical example is used to demonstrate how to apply the model in Section 5. Finally we present our conclusions in Section 6.

Section snippets

Concept of ABC

ABC techniques developed in practice and reported by Cooper and Kaplan [6] are seen as accurately assigning overhead costs to products. The detailed cost assignment view of ABC is shown in Fig. 1 [7], [9]. ABC assumes that cost objects (e.g., products, product lines, processes, customers, channels, markets, etc.) create the need for activities, and activities create the need for resources. Accordingly, ABC uses a two-stage procedure to assign resource costs to cost objects. In the first stage,

Outsourcing

Outsourcing is used to describe all subcontracting relationships between firms, and the hiring of workers in non-traditional jobs [22]. In practice, outsourcing is not only a “pure” make-or-buy decision, but also involves a switch from internal production to external procurement. For existing firms, outsourcing is always a de-integration decision, in which prior commitments to internal production should be ignored [3]. The strategic objective of outsourcing decision-makers should be to minimize

ABC joint products decision model with capacity expansions or outsourcing

Jaedicke [26] applied a linear programming (LP) technique to a cost-volume-profit (CVP) model, called “product mix” model in many management accounting or LP texts, which could aid management in determining the optimal product mix, maximizing total profit under some limits (constraints) to production or sales in the case of multi-product companies. In recent years, some authors have utilized various mathematical programming approaches to conduct the product-mix decision analysis under ABC [27],

Numerical example

In this section, we present a numerical example to illustrate the concepts described in the previous section. First, we obtain the optimal joint products decision under current capacity. Then, we consider the capacity expansions. Finally, we analyze the optimal joint products decision with capacity expansions or outsourcing.

Assume that the production function of Company X is such that one unit of material input processed in process 0 will yield one unit of product P1 and one unit of product P2.

Conclusion

In recent years, outsourcing has become an important strategy for many business organizations. For a successful outsourcing decision, the advantage of cost savings is an important consideration. Thus, the decision about outsourcing requires an accurate analysis of relevant costs. Application of the ABC model to joint products to trace resource costs to processes can improve the accuracy of product (processes) cost data derived from the traditional volume-based or unit-based costing systems. One

References (36)

  • Chalos P. Costing, control, and strategic analysis in outsourcing decisions, Journal of Cost Management Winter 1995;...
  • K.L. Deavers

    Outsourcing: a corporate competitiveness strategy, not a search for low wages

    Journal of Labor Research

    (1997)
  • R. Cooper et al.

    How cost accounting distorts product costs

    Management Accounting

    (1998)
  • Turney PBB. Common cents: the ABC performance breakthrough, how to succeed with activity-based costing. Cost...
  • R. Cooper et al.

    From ABC to ABM: does activity-based management automatically follow from an activity-based costing project?

    Management Accounting

    (1992)
  • D.A. Carlson et al.

    Activity-based total quality management at American express

    Journal of Cost Management

    (1993)
  • Tsai W-H, Hsu J-L. Activity-based costing: a case study on a Taiwanese hot-spring country inn's cost calculations....
  • J. Antos

    Activity-based management for service, not-for-profit, and governmental organizations

    Journal of Cost Management

    (1992)
  • Cited by (48)

    • Investigating the impact of sustainability in the production of aeronautical subscale components

      2018, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      The main advantage of ABC in contrast to alternative accounting systems is that it can allocate the overhead costs of a company in proportion to an activity's direct costs (Langmaak et al., 2013). To this end, a significant amount of companies have adopted this method for product costing in both manufacturing and business applications, (Alexopoulos et al., 2016a,b; Curran et al., 2004; Pantelakis et al., 2009; Pantelakis and Baxevani, 2002; Spedding and Sun, 1999; Tapeinos et al., 2012; Tsai and Lai, 2007), including the manufacturing of joint products (Tsai, 1996). The wide range of applications is the outcome of the benefits resulting from the use of the method.

    • Laser beam welded structures for a regional aircraft: Weight, cost and carbon footprint savings

      2016, Journal of Manufacturing Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      This method was also reported by [14] against the traditional cost allocation structures. ABC method is being used for product costing in both manufacturing (including the manufacturing system for joint products) and business applications [11,15–17]. ABC method is designed and implemented on the premise that cost objects (e.g. products, product lines, processes, customers, channels, markets, etc.), consume activities, activities consume resources and resources consume costs, as it can been seen in Fig. 1 [11,18].

    • A product-mix decision model using green manufacturing technologies under activity-based costing

      2013, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      There are four key benefits to the ABC system: (1) accurate identification of product cost, especially overhead; (2) more precise information about value-added and non-value-added costs by the identification of cost drivers; (3) direct allotment of costs to products or processes that consume resources; and (4) identification of non-value-adding costs (Kaplan, 1989; Canada et al., 1996; Hilton, 2005). Various surveys have also indicated that the ABC approach has been used to analyze different kinds of management decisions, including: pricing, quoting, product-mix and joint products decisions (Tsai and Lai, 2007; Kee, 2007, 2008), outsourcing decisions (Kee, 1998; Tsai and Lai, 2007; Tsai et al., 2007), quality improvement (Tsai, 1998), design and development (Qian and Ben-Arieh, 2008), financial and physical flows analysis (Comelli et al., 2008) and environmental management, among others (Tsai et al., 2007; Tsai and Hung, 2009a, 2009b; Silva and Amaral, 2009). The ABC uses a two-stage procedure to assign resource costs to cost objects (Turney, 1991; Tsai, 2010).

    • Impact of industry competition on contract manufacturing: An empirical study of U.S. manufacturers

      2012, International Journal of Production Economics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The use of contract manufacturing can help pharmaceutical firms level their own manufacturing capacity while avoiding a capacity crunch resulting from unanticipated high production demands (Langer, 2009). Tsai and Lai (2007) also indicated that in a situation where market demand exceeded the firm's production capacity, contracting out some of the manufacturing processes became a key option to reduce the capacity shortage. Thus;

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text