An overview of the digital forensic investigation infrastructure of India

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2012.02.002Get rights and content

Abstract

The Mumbai terror attacks of 2008 demonstrated that India needs to become more prepared to respond to digital intelligence and also to more effectively conduct post-incident investigations. This paper explores the digital forensic investigation infrastructure of India and in particular explores the judicial statutes, police/law enforcement structures and academic structures. The paper concludes to find that whilst there is a state of advancement and progression in terms of establishing guidelines for digital forensic investigation, these guidelines do not seem to carry the same status as the NIST or ACPO guidelines in the UK and US respectively, there is scope for further international collaboration on the investigation of borderless cyber crimes, there are opportunities for private firms to provide independent investigative and training services to the law enforcement agencies. Furthermore, there is an opportunity for academia in the US/UK to develop collaborative links with HE (Higher Education) institutes in India to develop and strengthen the digital forensic investigation discipline.

Introduction

Digital Forensic Investigation has become a recognised professional and academic discipline in a number of developed countries such as the United Kingdom and the USA, wherein there are a number of HE (Higher Education) courses available at both Undergraduate and Postgraduate level, there exist also a steadily increasing number of professional employment opportunities in this area. At the point of writing, more than 60 Universities in the UK offer an Undergraduate digital forensic investigation degree course (UCAS, 2011) and more than 15 offer a taught Postgraduate degree relating to this subject (Find a masters, 2010, UK Pass, 2010).

Further to this, there exists in the UK and US a reasonably well defined and accepted professional infrastructure that supports the investigation of cyber crime within the national police/secret forces and also the private sector. There is also clear and specific legislation that deals with computer misuse and there exist nationally accepted professional guidelines governing the manner in which digital evidence is processed and presented. The combination of government legislation, appropriate investigative guidelines and investigative structures, and higher education degree courses and professional training opportunities are referred to in this study as the digital forensic investigative infrastructure.

The Mumbai terror attacks of 2008 demonstrated that India and other emerging markets are in their infancy in terms of developing such digital forensic investigative infrastructures. Following the attack, a number of questions were raised regarding India’s preparedness and ability to respond efficiently and effectively to such attacks (Chandran, 2008) furthermore it was suggested that the Mumbai police may have ignored important digital intelligence from the US which warned of a potential attack (Robertson, 2008).

The subsequent investigation highlighted the role of digital devices in the planning and perpetration of the attacks and pointed to particular digital evidence that proved to be important in a dossier produced by the Indian Government relating to the attacks which involved the investigation of a satellite phone, Direct Inward Dialing [DID] facilities and GPS equipment and also the tracing of emails/IP addresses (Federation of American Scientists, 2008).

Whilst this particular incident raised heightened awareness of the use of digital devices in the planning of such attacks in India, a number of incidents had previously raised concern (Acharya, 2008). Indian Internet sites (including government web pages and the web site of an atomic research facility) had been attacked by Pakistani hacker groups for many years (Keegan, 2002). During the Mumbai train bombings of 2006, terrorists used advanced techniques including IP address masking and proxy services to conceal their communications and activities. India is emerging as a highly competent outsourcing destination with an economy that is predicted to overtake China and an outsourced software industry estimated to be worth $12 billion. India’s digital forensics investigative infrastructure is in its infancy and the issues described herein have raised heightened concern about the need for more cyber forensics and cyber security professionals to preserve India’s national critical IT infrastructure against operational sabotage and reputational damage.

This study explores the digital forensic investigative infrastructure in India and in particular investigates the judicial, law enforcement and academic structures. The study will be of value to both academia and industry, the former in light of fast developing changes to the HE sector which are encouraging UK academia to build and strengthen research and collaborative links with overseas markets such as India, and the latter because of the opportunities to develop stronger partnerships in the fight against borderless cyber crime.

There is little or no academic research available that has previously analysed and investigated these digital forensic investigative infrastructures. In this research we have analysed government/professional web sites and appropriate associated documentation in order to understand the current provision. There is no central authority in India governing the academic provision of the HE sector, course details are therefore only available through personal enquiry or internet research.

We begin in Section 2 by outlining the fundamental legislative acts that govern the prosecution of cyber crime. The investigative guidelines – often pertinent to the successful prosecution under such legislation are explored in Section 3. In Section 4 we proceed to explore the law enforcement structure and in Section 5 we conclude by outlining the opportunities for study and research at both undergraduate and postgraduate level and also the opportunities available for independent and professional training.

Section snippets

Legislation

The introduction of the Information Technology Act (ITA) 2000 led by the then Ministry of Information Technology (MIT – later Ministry of Communications and Information Technology – MCIT) served to give legal recognition to digital signatures and electronic records and also to categorise specific new cyber offences as criminal acts. These new offences were detailed under Sections 66 (hacking – defined as the altering of electronic information in some way) and 67 (publishing of obscene material

Guidelines

Whilst the statutes provide a broad basis for the recognition and prosecution of cyber crime, there is less consistent guidance in terms of evidence management procedure particularly in the context of cyber crime. The ACPO and NIST principles constitute the national computer investigation guidelines for the UK and USA respectively, there is no equivalent in India.

Section 80 of the ITA and Sections 154–176 Code of Criminal Procedure (1973) specify the process in terms of powers of the police to

Police Organisation

The issue of guidelines leads adequately to a discussion of the law enforcement infrastructure of India. The Indian police system is split into a two tiered system which is organised into a central government authority and state based police authorities. The central authority includes two armed paramilitary forces – the Central Reserve Police Force (which undertakes a counter insurgency role and will occasionally assist state police in keeping law and order) and the National Security Guard (a

Education and training

The higher education sector in India is comparatively complex in comparison with the UK and US. The University Grants Commission (UGC) was established by the Government of India under the University Grants Commission Act 1956 and is charged with controlling and maintaining academic standards throughout the many types of university and governing the authority to confer degrees (University Grants Commission, 2007). Recognised institutions can be categorised as follows:

  • Central universities. Those

Conclusions

The 2008 amendment to the Information Technology Act further recognises cyber related crimes and is less restrictive in terms of the effective investigation of those crimes, it also makes provision for each state to develop their own procedures in respect to the investigation of cyber crime, at the same time, specific guidelines are used by certain law enforcement agencies, whilst this disparity in approach seems not to have been a specific problem it certainly raises scope for concern in terms

References (42)

  • S. Acharya

    Cyber terrorism-the dark side of the web world

    (2008)
  • Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham

    Campuses and Programmes (M.Tech, PG Diploma & MCA) [Online]

    (2010)
  • Asian School of Cyber Laws

    Courses in Cyber Law [Online]

    (2011)
  • BRIP

    Brace Radical Information Security PVT.Ltd. [Online]

    (2009)
  • CBI Academy

    CBI Academy – Training Courses [Online]

    (2010)
  • CBI

    CBI Crime Manual 2005 [Online]

    (2005)
  • CBI

    Central Bureau of Investigation – About us [Online]

    (2007)
  • CERT-IN

    Indian Computer Emergency Response Team [Online]

    (2011)
  • R. Chandran

    Mumbai attacks show up India's technology shortcomings

    (2008)
  • Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative

    Police Organization in India [Online]

    (2009)
  • Cyber Laws Consulting Centre

    Cyber Laws Consulting Centre [Online]

    (2008)
  • Department of Secondary and Higher Education

    Higher Education in India [Online]

    (2011)
  • D.V. Duyn

    Statement before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs [Online]

    (2009)
  • EC-Council

    Information Security Training: Ethical Hacking and Countermeasures/Penetration Testing [online]

    (2011)
  • Federation of American Scientists

    Mumbai Terrorist Attacks [Online]

    (2008)
  • Find a masters

    Find a Masters [Online]

    (2010)
  • ForensicsGuru

    Forensics Guru – investigative ingenuity [Online]

    (2010)
  • Government of India

    The Information Technology Act 2000 [Online]

    (2000)
  • Government of India

    The Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 [Online]

    (2009)
  • S. Hilley

    News

    Digital Investigation

    (2006)
  • IFS India

    IFS India – Intense Forensic Science Services India LLP [Online]

    (2009)
  • Cited by (2)

    • An overview of the digital forensic investigation infrastructure of Ghana

      2020, Forensic Science International: Synergy
      Citation Excerpt :

      These include agencies responsible for the investigation of cybercrimes as well as national bodies responsible for prosecuting offenders of cyber and computer crimes. Without a clear national strategy and supervisory bodies, efforts in different agencies and departments become conflicted thereby preventing effective harmonization of digital forensic investigation processes [50]. The organisational infrastructures are discussed based on the existence of institutions involved in digital forensic investigation and prosecution at the national level.

    • The Impact of India's Cyber Security Law and Cyber Forensic on Building Techno-Centric Smartcity IoT Environment

      2021, Proceedings - IEEE 2021 International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems, ICCCIS 2021
    View full text