Elsevier

Discrete Mathematics

Volume 308, Issue 16, 28 August 2008, Pages 3491-3507
Discrete Mathematics

Bounds on total domination in claw-free cubic graphs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2007.07.007Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set, denoted by TDS, of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S (other than itself). The minimum cardinality of a TDS of G is the total domination number of G, denoted by γt(G). If G does not contain K1,3 as an induced subgraph, then G is said to be claw-free. It is shown in [D. Archdeacon, J. Ellis-Monaghan, D. Fischer, D. Froncek, P.C.B. Lam, S. Seager, B. Wei, R. Yuster, Some remarks on domination, J. Graph Theory 46 (2004) 207–210.] that if G is a graph of order n with minimum degree at least three, then γt(G)n/2. Two infinite families of connected cubic graphs with total domination number one-half their orders are constructed in [O. Favaron, M.A. Henning, C.M. Mynhardt, J. Puech, Total domination in graphs with minimum degree three, J. Graph Theory 34(1) (2000) 9–19.] which shows that this bound of n/2 is sharp. However, every graph in these two families, except for K4 and a cubic graph of order eight, contains a claw. It is therefore a natural question to ask whether this upper bound of n/2 can be improved if we restrict G to be a connected cubic claw-free graph of order at least 10. In this paper, we answer this question in the affirmative. We prove that if G is a connected claw-free cubic graph of order n10, then γt(G)5n/11.

MSC

05C69

Keywords

Bounds
Claw-free cubic graphs
Total domination

Cited by (0)

Research supported in part by the South African National Research Foundation and the University of KwaZulu-Natal.

1

This paper was started while the author was visiting the Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique (LRI) at the Université de Paris-Sud in July 2002.