A new view toward vertex decomposable graphs☆
Introduction
As we know, vertex decomposable graphs are an important class of algebraic graphs, since vertex decomposable graphs are shellable, and well-covered shellable graphs are Cohen-Macaulay. It is known that chordal graphs form an important class of vertex decomposable graphs, this is characterized by R. Woodroofe in [14]. D. Cook and N. Nagel give a method to construct Cohen-Macaulay graphs in [2], actually, they construct a class of vertex decomposable graphs, called clique-whiskered graphs. In [6], T. Hibi et al. prove that Cameron-Walker graphs are vertex decomposable, and hence they are sequentially Cohen-Macaulay. Recently, Liu and Wu prove that Boolean graphs are well-covered and vertex decomposable in [8], which shows that Boolean graphs are a new class of Cohen-Macaulay graphs.
Recall that a simplicial complex (abbreviated as complex) Δ on a vertex set V is a finite subset of , such that and implies . The set A is called a face if , and called a facet if A is a maximal face with respect to inclusion. The set of facets of Δ is denoted by . The dimension of a face A, denoted by , is . The dimension of a complex Δ, denoted by , is the maximum dimension of its faces. The complex Δ is called pure if all the facets of Δ have the same dimension; otherwise, it is called nonpure. For a vertex , the link and the deletion of x in Δ is defined by
A simplicial complex Δ is vertex decomposable if either Δ is a simplex (a complex with only one facet), or there exists a vertex x of Δ such that
(1) and are vertex decomposable, and
(2) Each facet of is not a facet of .
A vertex x satisfying conditions (1) and (2) is called a shedding vertex of Δ. If x only satisfies condition (2), then it is called a weak shedding vertex.
A simplicial complex Δ is called shellable if there exists a linear order on its facet set such that for each pair , there exists a , such that and . Correspondingly, if we require further that , then Δ is called strongly shellable. Note that on pure complexes, there are the following deductive relationships:
pure vertex decomposability ⟹ pure shellability ⟹ Cohen-Macaulayness.
For other concepts and results about simplicial complex, please refer to [5].
Let G be a simple graph. Denote by and its vertex set and edge set respectively. A subset T of is called an independent set if each pair of vertices in T are nonadjacent in G. An independent set is called maximal if it is maximal with respect to inclusion. A graph is well-covered if all maximal independent sets have the same cardinality.
A simplicial complex Δ is called the independence complex of a graph G, denoted by , if the facet set consists of all maximal independent sets of the graph G. It is clear that is pure if and only if G is well-covered. For a graph G, it is said to be vertex decomposable (shellable, respectively), if its independence complex is vertex decomposable (shellable, respectively). Now assume further G has vertex set with edge set , and let be the polynomial ring with n variables over a field K. Recall that the edge ideal associated to G is defined to be the ideal of R, and it is well known that is identical with the Stanley-Reisner ideal of the simplicial complex . The edge ideal of a graph was introduced and the Cohen-Macaulay property of the edge ideal was studied by Villarreal, see [13] for details.
This paper is organized as follows: In chapter 2, we introduce a view to see vertex decomposability of a graph by closed neighbourhoods. Then, hereditary vertex decomposable graphs are characterized in chapter 3. Making use of the view about closed neighbourhood, a class of vertex decomposable graphs which are called core vertex decomposable graphs are introduced in chapter 4. Finally, in chapter 5, a class of well-covered vertex decomposable graphs, which are actually clique-whiskered graphs, are restudied.
Section snippets
Vertex decomposability characterized by closed neighbourhoods
Let G be a simple graph. For each vertex a in G, its neighbourhood in G, denoted by , consists of all vertices which are adjacent to a in G, i.e., . The closed neighbourhood of a in G is defined by . In order to distinguish neighbourhoods from closed neighbourhoods, in this paper, neighbourhoods are called open neighbourhoods. Sometimes we use (, respectively) to denote the open (closed, respectively) neighbourhood of a in G to emphasize the basic
Hereditary vertex decomposable graphs
Hereditary shellable simplicial complexes were studied in [4]. In this paper, we focus on the study on graphs. Recall that a simple graph G is hereditary shellable, if every induced subgraph of G is shellable. Similarly, one can define hereditary vertex decomposable graphs and hereditary sequentially Cohen-Macaulay graphs.
Definition 3.1 Let G be a simple graph. If every induced subgraph of G is vertex decomposable (sequentially Cohen-Macaulay, respectively), then G is called a hereditary vertex decomposable
A class of vertex decomposable graphs
Definition 4.1 Let G be a simple graph. If the subgraph of G induced by is hereditary vertex decomposable, then G is called a core vertex decomposable graph.
Theorem 4.2 If G is a core vertex decomposable graph, then G is vertex decomposable.
Proof We will prove the result by induction on . If , then the result is clear. Assume that the result holds for . In the following, consider the case while . If , then G is vertex decomposable since the subgraph induced by is vertex
A class of well-covered vertex decomposable graphs
Proposition 5.1 Let G be a simple graph. If G is well-covered, then the subgraph of G induced by is also well-covered.
Proof Let be the subgraph of G induced by . If is not well-covered, then we can find two maximal independent sets A and B in , with . Since G is well-covered, so A is not a maximal independent set in G. Hence there exists , such that is an independent set. If , then is an independent set in , which contradicts with the fact that A is a maximal
Declaration of Competing Interest
This paper does not have any conflicts to disclose.
References (14)
- et al.
The graphs with maximum induced matching and maximum matching the same size
Discrete Math.
(2005) - et al.
Obstructions to shellability, partitionability, and sequential Cohen-Macaulayness
J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A
(2011) - et al.
Algebraic study on Cameron-Walker graphs
J. Algebra
(2015) - et al.
Cohen-Macaulay graphs and face vectors of flag complexes
SIAM J. Discrete Math.
(2012) - et al.
Sequentially Cohen-Macaulay edge ideals
Proc. Am. Math. Soc.
(2007) - et al.
Monomial Ideals
(2011) - et al.
Blow-up lemma
Combinatorica
(1997)
Cited by (3)
- ☆
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11961017, 11971338), the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No. 19ZR1424100), the Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 119MS002), and the Young Talents' Science and Technology Innovation Project of Hainan Association for Science and Technology (Grant No. QCXM201806).