Elsevier

Displays

Volume 29, Issue 2, March 2008, Pages 70-80
Displays

A 25-year retrospective review of visual complaints and illusions associated with a monocular helmet-mounted display

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2007.09.011Get rights and content

Abstract

In the early 1980s the U.S. Army fielded the first integrated helmet-mounted display (HMD) for use in the AH-64 Apache helicopter. To reduce head-supported weight and minimize center-of-mass offsets, a monocular optical design was selected. Although early design concerns of binocular rivalry and the Pulfrich phenomenon never materialized, user surveys have documented persistent reports of visual complaints and illusions in peacetime training flights. However, a recent evaluation conducted under battle conditions in Operation Iraqi Freedom found statistically lower reports of complaints and illusions. While these reported problems are short-term, questions have been raised regarding potential long-term physiological effects resulting from long-term use of this monocular display. A 10-year longitudinal study, currently underway in the U.K., has been implemented to definitively answer the question of whether long-term exposure produces any degradation in binocular visual function.

Introduction

In the 1970s, the U.S. Army decided to build a modern attack helicopter (designated as the AH-64 Apache) (Fig. 1) to replace its aging fleet of AH-1 Cobra helicopters, which had been in service since the early 1960s. The AH-64 Apache was designed to provide enhanced nocturnal capability through the use of a nose-mounted, forward-looking infrared (FLIR) sensor that provides a thermal image of the outside world to the pilot. This imagery is presented to the pilot via a head-up helmet-mounted display (HMD).

Due to engineering technology limitations of the era, the HMD was constructed to present pilotage imagery only to one eye, the right eye. This monocular design was driven by the paramount need to minimize head-supported weight and any shift in center-of-mass (CM). This monocular presentation to the human visual system, which is binocular in nature, raised concerns among vision scientists involved in the early design. While these particular concerns never manifested themselves, a host of visual complaints and illusions have plagued AH-64 pilots ever since the fielding of this aircraft in the early 1980s.

In this paper, the 25-year history of the visual issues associated with the monocular design of the AH-64 HMD are reviewed and discussed. These problems were predicted by early designers, have been documented in performance surveys conducted over nearly 25 years of fielding, and potentially may have long-term physiological effects on binocular vision.

Section snippets

The Integrated Helmet and Display Sighting System (IHADSS)

Integral to the flight operation of the AH-64 Apache is the monocular HMD system, known as the Integrated Helmet and Display Sighting System (IHADSS). Along with various electronic components, the IHADSS includes a helmet referred to as the Integrated Helmet Unit (IHU) (Fig. 2). The purpose of the IHU is twofold. First, and primary, is its role in providing the pilot with basic impact and noise protection. In addition, it serves as a platform for the display system, consisting of a miniature,

Monocular display’s visual issues

While the 1970s selection of a monocular design for the IHADSS was dictated by head-supported weight and CM concerns, monocular HMDs actually offer certain advantages, e.g., smaller packaging, lower cost, and the ability to have one eye free for viewing both inside and outside the cockpit. Their smaller packaging permits them to be placed closer to the head, resulting in less occlusion of the pilot’s look around vision [15]. However, monocular designs also present disadvantages, which include

Reported visual complaints and illusions

With the potential for the multitude of visual phenomena discussed above to be present when flying with the IHADSS, it would not be unexpected for the AH-64 pilot community to report visual complaints if provided the opportunity.

In fact, immediately following the initial fielding of the AH-64A (and the IHADSS), numerous anecdotal reports of various physical and psychological/sensory problems surfaced. By the end of the first decade of fielding, numerous user surveys had documented increased

Battlefield performance

All of the studies discussed above were conducted in relatively benign environments (e.g., training and non-combat missions). There have been concerns that the severity and frequency of the problems reported under such peacetime conditions would increase dramatically under the increased stress of an operational combat environment. In 2003, Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) provided the opportunity to investigate these concerns.

Accordingly, a new survey study was conducted in northern Iraq over a

Longitudinal study

In this paper, a number of well-documented user surveys have been presented in which various visual complaints (e.g., visual fatigue, rivalry, eyestrain, etc.) and illusions consistently have been reported. There is evidence that some of these problems can be alleviated with proper training [2] and that most are less common with accumulated experience in the AH-64 aircraft [8]. The most recent study [13] found that these problems were not exacerbated by combat conditions. However, the visual

The role of HMDs in accidents

With the frequency of visual complaints and illusions reported in over 25 years of surveys, it would be reasonable to ask the question whether there may be some correlation between AH-64 accidents and the use of the IHADSS HMD (in combination with the FLIR pilotage sensor).

The investigation of such a possible role was the primary objective of a study by Rash et al. [23].

The data analyzed in the study were obtained from a search of the U.S. Army Risk Management Information System (RMIS) database

Summary

In the early 1980s, the U.S. Army fielded the first integrated HMD for use in the AH-64 helicopter. To reduce head-supported weight and minimize center-of-mass offsets, a monocular optical design was selected. Immediately following fielding, user surveys began to document reports of visual complaints and illusions. Follow-up surveys conducted over the next quarter century continued to document visual symptoms and complaints. Fortunately, a recent evaluation conducted under battle conditions in

References (27)

  • A. Beaten

    Left Side, Right Side: A Review of Laterality Research

    (1985)
  • I. Behar, R.W. Wiley, R.R. Levine, C.E. Rash, D.J. Walsh, R.L.S. Cornum, Visual survey of Apache aviators (VISAA). Fort...
  • P.O. Bishop

    Binocular vision

  • C.T. Bennett, S.G. Hart, PNVS-related problems: pilots reflections on visually coupled systems, 1976–1987, Working...
  • M. Conticelli, S. Fujiwara, Visuo-motor reaction time under differential binocular adaptation. Atti Della Foundizone,...
  • B. Crider

    A battery of tests for the dominant eye

    J. Gen. Psychol.

    (1944)
  • J.S. Crowley, Cerebral laterality and handedness in pilots: Performance and selection implications, USAFSAM-TP-88-11,...
  • J.S. Crowley, Human factors of night vision devices: Anecdotes from the field concerning visual illusions and other...
  • S.J. Durnford, J.S. Crowley, N.R. Rosado, J. Harper, S. DeRoche, Spatial disorientation: A survey of U.S. Army...
  • S. Hale, D. Piccione, Pilot performance assessment of the AH-64 helmet display unit. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S....
  • L.J. Hettinger, G.E. Riccio, Visually-induced motion sickness in virtual environments. Presence, 1(3) (1992)...
  • K.L. Hiatt, M.G. Braithwaite, J.S. Crowley, C.E. Rash, C. van de Pol, D.J. Ranchino, W.K. Statz, A.J. Eke, The effect...
  • K.L. Hiatt, C.E. Rash, E.S. Harris, W.H. McGilberry, Apache aviator visual experiences with the IHADSS helmet-mounted...
  • Cited by (12)

    • Aviation displays: Design for automation and new display formats

      2022, Human Factors in Aviation and Aerospace, Third Edition
    • Luminance contrast and the visual span during visual target localization

      2013, Displays
      Citation Excerpt :

      One such device is the Integrated Helmet and Display Sight System (IHADSS). The system is monocular (video imagery to the right eye only), and is used by AH-64 attack helicopter aviators (see [24]). Another device is the Aviator’s Night Vision Imaging System (ANVIS).

    • E€ects of a monocular laser-based head-mounted display on human night vision

      2019, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
    • Flight testing a head worn display the challenges of introducing novel avionic equipment in civil aircraft

      2019, 50th Annual International Symposium of the Society of Flight Test Engineers, SFTE 2019
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text