Improving the science of healthcare delivery and informatics using modeling approaches

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.001Get rights and content

Abstract

The science of health care delivery and informatics is to be viewed as mutually connected disciplines and, therefore, the problems in both streams often occur concomitantly. For example, inefficiencies or ineffectiveness of Healthcare Information Technologies (HIT) quickly translates into poor healthcare delivery or vice versa. Research focusing on various decision making or decision support aspects of HIT and healthcare delivery is still sparse. We identify six key thematic areas that require significant attention from various researchers and stakeholder communities and emphasize on ways research in this space could further developed. We provide examples from the articles appearing in the special issue on healthcare modeling.

Introduction

Healthcare represents an important sector of any nation's economy. US Department of Health & Human Services reports that healthcare spending comprises about 17% of US Gross Domestic Product and projects that healthcare spending growth is expected to outpace the GDP growth [17]. However, our health care system is fragmented and currently designed to support billing rather than care coordination and continuity [7], [8]. A part of the reason is that healthcare delivery is complex and marred by low efficiencies, poor technology interfaces, communication gaps, and high costs. Complexity in care environments also results from team oriented clinical task management and decision making where interactions among several care providers and stakeholders such as patients, physicians, nurses, residents, fellows, insurance companies, and federal agencies are involved. Such interactions often require the streamlining of the flow of information, work, material, and patients through the use of well-designed technology. It is known that the use of well-designed technology and good decision making models result in improved safety, efficiency and reduced costs [9], while the use of ill-designed clinical systems, poor integration of workflow with systems and lack of clinical data utilization for decision models often translates into reduced efficiencies, increased medical errors, and poor decision making. These in turn can lead to numerous unintended consequences such as errors, slow adoption of technology, etc. [2], [6], [14].

Various methodological approaches can be applied to understand the problems associated with currently deployed systems and identifying mechanisms to improve them, or in some cases develop entirely new systems of decision models. We recognize that there is an ample need to utilize different methodological approaches that will make significant contributions toward a) identifying and developing decision models that can harness the power of big clinical data, b) understand and develop new or improved models of healthcare delivery from provider and patient-centric perspectives, and c) improve safety, quality and efficiency while curtailing costs. Based on the foundational reasoning philosophies, various scientific approaches that can be applied to vigorously pursue research under various healthcare themes may be grouped into three categories: data analytic modeling, simulation modeling, and behavioral modeling. These could be utilized either independently or as in multi-method approaches where a combination of two or more of these modeling approaches can lead to further insightful findings. Multi-method approaches often result in more insightful findings [12]. These approaches could be inductive (theory development), deductive (theory testing) or a combination of inductive and deductive approaches such as in simulation modeling [3].

We identify six key research areas within healthcare domain that we recognize as important streams for conducting further research and can have tremendous impact on improving the process of healthcare delivery and associated outcomes (Fig. 1). These research themes have overlapping components and ought to be viewed using systems approaches, i.e., it is important to recognize the interrelationships among two or more of these research themes. For example, various characteristics of HIT (Healthcare Information Technology), Computerized Physician Order Entry systems, Patient Portal and Clinical Decision Support Systems will have an impact on the clinical workflow and cognitive processing of care providers. The cognitive processing style of care providers, on the other hand, will influence how such systems are used in clinical environment.

Section snippets

Understanding electronic health records (EHR) and other HIT systems

As electronic health records and other HIT applications are adopted, several areas of study arise. Such studies may offer rich opportunities for improving healthcare delivery through developing a better understanding of EHR usage.

One important area to investigate is the adoption of EHR systems and implications of using such systems in different capacities for clinical decision making. Developing a better understanding of factors such as characteristics of clinical environment (e.g. emergency

Conclusion

The papers included in this special issue have attempted to address the six dimensions highlighted. Of course, health care decision modeling is a vibrant and critical current area of research. We are glad to have had the opportunity to learn from outstanding research that is under way worldwide and are pleased to share this special issue with you. We want to thank all the authors who submitted their work, and the referees who provided timely and constructive reviews. These reviews have improved

Ashish Gupta is an Associate Professor in the College of Business at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga and has visiting appointment in Biomedical Informatics department at Arizona State University. He has been a visiting Research Scientist at Mayo Clinic. He received his Ph.D. in Management Science and Information Systems from Oklahoma State University. He has published in several journals including Decision Support Systems, European Journal of Information Systems, Communications of AIS

References (24)

  • T.J. Bright et al.

    Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review

    Annals of Internal Medicine

    (2012)
  • A. Copetti et al.

    A decision-making mechanism for context inference in pervasive healthcare environments

    (2012)
  • Cited by (32)

    • Clustering temporal disease networks to assist clinical decision support systems in visual analytics of comorbidity progression

      2021, Decision Support Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      A CDSS refers to “any electronic system designed to aid directly in clinical decision making, in which characteristics of individual patients are used to generate patient-specific assessments or recommendations that are then presented to clinicians for consideration [8]”. The abundance and comprehensiveness of EHR data, in conjunction with recent advances in CDSS, has offered researchers and practitioners an ideal platform to mine actionable insights to improve clinical decision making for better healthcare outcomes [4,9,10]. Specific applications include test ordering [11], therapy management [12], improving care delivery and access [13,14], detecting and predicting health conditions [15,16], and medication evaluation [17], among others.

    • Health-tech startups in healthcare service delivery: A scoping review

      2021, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      As a result, emergency cases were reduced among the patients equipped with adequate technology to deliver services in a time-bound frame. Consequently, these IT-enabled services enriched daily healthcare (Gupta and Sharda, 2013). IT-enabled e-care services are generally represented by different taxonomies like telemedicine, telehealth, e-health, and m-health (Bashshur et al., 2011).

    • Longitudinal healthcare analytics for disease management: Empirical demonstration for low back pain

      2020, Decision Support Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      As another implication, modeling the expected disease progression can also keep patients informed. This could allow them to adjust their disease self-management according to the most likely course of the disease [29]. For patients with low back pain, they can, for instance, perform specific exercises for pain self-management [25].

    • PARS, a system combining semantic technologies with multiple criteria decision aiding for supporting antibiotic prescriptions

      2019, Journal of Biomedical Informatics
      Citation Excerpt :

      We applied our approach on a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS), called PARS, that combines different prescription knowledge sources for recommendation. According to Gupta and Sharda [52], while there are many CDSS for administrative decision making and clinical task management, those that “improve the efficiency of specific clinical functionalities such as drug management …are lacking”. The combination of MCDA with ontologies can facilitate the work of physicians by providing a list (sorted) of antibiotics, that have been evaluated based on their suitability for a given patient and disease.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Ashish Gupta is an Associate Professor in the College of Business at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga and has visiting appointment in Biomedical Informatics department at Arizona State University. He has been a visiting Research Scientist at Mayo Clinic. He received his Ph.D. in Management Science and Information Systems from Oklahoma State University. He has published in several journals including Decision Support Systems, European Journal of Information Systems, Communications of AIS, Information Systems Frontiers, etc. He serves on the editorial boards of journals such IJDSST and IJITSA, and is guest editing special issue of Decision Support Systems on healthcare modeling. He serves on NIH and PICORI review panels and has chaired numerous conferences such as Symposium on Healthcare Advancement in Research & Practice (SHARP)-1.0, 2.0, EMOAS 2011 (London). Ashish is current President of MidwestAIS (2012–2013). His interests include critical care, EHR, patient portals, simulation, virtual world in health, clinical informatics and healthcare delivery.

    Ramesh Sharda is the Director of the Institute for Research in Information Systems (IRIS), ConocoPhillips Chair of Management of Technology, and a Regents Professor of Management Science and Information Systems in the Spears School of Business at Oklahoma State University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His research has been published in major journals in management science and information systems including Management Science, Information Systems Research, Decision Support Systems, Interfaces, INFORMS Journal on Computing, Computers and Operations Research, and many others. He serves on the editorial boards of journals such as the INFORMS Journal on Computing, Decision Support Systems (Area Editor), Information Systems Frontiers, and OR/MS Today. His research interests are in decision support systems, especially neural network applications, and technologies for managing information overload. His team's work on forecasting box office revenue of movies has received a lot of press. Defense Ammunitions Center, NSF, the US Department of Education, Marketing Science Institute, and other organizations have funded his research. Ramesh is also a cofounder of a company that produces virtual trade fairs, iTradeFair.com.

    View full text