Elsevier

Decision Support Systems

Volume 54, Issue 2, January 2013, Pages 986-996
Decision Support Systems

Information quality, trust, and risk perceptions in electronic data exchanges

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.024Get rights and content

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of information quality, trust and risk perceptions on the expected transaction performance of inter-organizational data exchanges and on the user intent to continue using the exchange. This study provides empirical evidence on the distinctive influences of information quality on competence-trust, goodwill-trust, exchange-risk and relationship-risk and how these different dimensions influence the intent to use inter-organizational data exchanges. As the performance of a data exchange may vary according to degree of successful completion of a specific transaction on the spot, this study also examines the extent to which expected transaction performance affects the model relationships. A survey is conducted to collect data from 221 business professionals. The study's hypothesized relationships are in general supported by the data and the resulting structural model proved to adequately represent the construct relationships. While these findings contribute to information system design theory, they also benefit professionals by providing insights as to how organizations can deal with the different types of uncertainties related to participating in electronic data exchanges. In addition, these findings help demonstrate the importance of interventions in the design of electronic data exchanges and the benefits expected by enhancing information quality in those settings.

Highlights

► Influence of information quality on the intent to use inter-organizational exchanges ► Evidence on how information quality affects trust and risk in I-O exchanges ► We examine mechanisms of competence-trust and goodwill-trust. ► We examine mechanisms of performance-risk and exchange-risk in data exchanges. ► We examine mediation influence of transaction performance, novel in the model.

Introduction

Modern inter-organizational (I-O) partnerships employ electronic data exchange systems to facilitate collaboration and supply-chain performance. The various types of business relationships require different types of electronic data exchanges ranging from standard web-based ordering systems to proprietary systems. The benefits of these systems can range from efficient automated processes in ordering systems and cost-effective transactions, to strategic benefits of collaborative planning [44], [52].

Electronic data exchanges present risks because they require sharing information with the partner [30] and the exchange of information may be subject to a fear of opportunism by the other [5], [73]. Data exchanges also require one to cooperate and to trust that the partner will do likewise [8], [34]. For the customer firm to use the vendor's exchange system assumes they can rely on both the system and its vendor. The exchange system should thus possess desirable features that ensure transaction performance and reinforce use continuance behavior.

Lack of control over an exchange partner increases uncertainty and the need to devise strategies to manage risk. Past research has argued that the evolution from traditional electronic data interchanges (EDI) to open electronic commerce I-O exchanges demonstrates the need for real time controls [35, p. 47–49]. Research in risk management (e.g., [37], [68], [69]) also proposes a risk model in electronic I-O exchanges which addresses issues of risk at the technical/system, business process, and application/user levels. The present study examines the design of electronic inter-organizational (I-O) systems in an exchange context and the information sharing that occurs in the use of these exchanges. Past studies examined the extent to which integrated information sharing in an I-O exchange enables data standardization, and provides the link necessary to integrate the technical system, business process, and application/user architectural layers over an organization's electronic supply chain [26], [28], [31]. While the extent of integration in information sharing is an important determinant of supply chain performance (e.g., [57]), concerns over the quality of information exchanged can potentially influence the perceived trustworthiness attributed to the exchange partner, the assessed effectiveness of the data exchange to effectively carry out transactions, and a user's overall intent to continue using an electronic data exchange.

A number of significant research studies have been conducted on what makes data exchanges successful (e.g., [30], [34], [52], [72]). Several studies have been done from the economics viewpoint, finding that electronic data exchanges provide lower coordination costs, higher exchange quality, reduced inventory costs, and enhanced strategic and operational benefits [5], [45], [52]. Other studies have examined the broader phenomenon of inter-organizational relationships — IORs (e.g., [29], [34]). Data exchange relationships form a subset of IORs and their benefits seem to be mainly due to enhanced information sharing in the relationship [2], [40], [57]. Gulati and Gargiulo [29] suggest that positive cues are needed initially both to overcome “information hurdles” and to help strengthen the exchange relationship. Positive cues like special site features help exchange users feel right about the exchange even when uncertainty about it is high.

Information quality (IQ) is one such cue. IQ means beliefs about the favorability of the characteristics of the exchange information and reflects the user evaluation of information sharing in data exchanges [53], [67]. Previous research has examined how information quality of an exchange influences trust and risk perceptions and how such perceptions influence the intent to adopt a specific exchange. Trust and risk have been emphasized to play decisive roles in economic exchanges [16] and to affect the success of inter-organizational exchanges [30]. The complexity of social and economic exchanges has led to the distinction between various types of trust and risk [15], [60]. This paper aims at exploring whether information quality has distinctive influences on two types of trust (competence-trust and goodwill-trust) and two types of risk (exchange-risk and relationship-risk) and how these different types of trust and risk influence the intent for continued use of IOS exchanges. As the performance of a data exchange relies on the successful completion of a specific transaction on the spot, the paper also examines the extent to which transaction performance affects the model relationships.

We believe answering these questions has the potential to benefit data exchange research and practice in significant ways. First, exchanges are very prevalent in professional practice, and what makes them successful is important. Second, studying how information quality exerts its effects on outcome variables by analyzing its distinctive influences on competence-trust and goodwill-trust can influence successful information system design. Previous research has showed that interorganizational relationships can be characterized with specific types of trust [32]. This study contributes to enhancing our knowledge about the precise influences of information quality on the specific types of trust helps to (1) determine the characteristics of information systems that are needed for successful performance in different contexts of interorganizational relationships, (2) establish how information quality can be employed to deal with performance-risk and exchange-risk, and (3) ascertain whether information quality can be utilized to attain the required balance between trust and risk for enhanced transaction performance.

Section snippets

Theoretical background

Organizations value information quality as they are confronted with increasing uncertainty, market volatility and dynamic customer demands. Decision makers value timely information on market developments, reliable information on customer preferences and accurate information on the latest trends. High information quality gives the system user confidence in the exchange vendor because having quality information suggests that exchange information is reliable, correct, adequate, complete,

Construct measurement

The items used to measure the constructs came from a number of sources (see Table 1). The study used the reflective information quality scale from Nicolaou and McKnight [53]. The items included the currency, accuracy, relevance, completeness and reliability aspects of the data exchange. We adopted items measuring competence-trust and goodwill-trust from McKnight et al. [49]. We tried to capture more nuance and therefore we complemented them with items from Sengun and Wasti [62].

Results

Structural equation modeling (SEM) is used for data analysis as it allows validating the entire model in a single and systematic comprehensive analysis. This is realized by using LISREL for modeling the relationships among multiple related equations simultaneously [23]. LISREL consists of two parts: the measurement model and the structural equation model. The measurement model identifies the relations between the observed measures, i.e. items, and their underlying latent constructs. The

Discussion

This study builds on existing studies on the effects of IQ on system adoption and system success and contributes to IS theory in two ways. First, we have succeeded in providing empirical evidence on distinctive roles of two types of trust and two types of risk. These distinctions are beneficial in explaining how organizations can use IQ to utilize informal forms of cooperation with the objective of enhancing participation in electronic exchanges. We provide empirical evidence that IQ has

Limitations

This study has two main limitations due to the experimental setting. Firstly, the generalizability of findings is limited to the domain of automated interorganizational data exchanges. Because the exchange is automated, users cannot conduct any interpersonal interaction, e.g. face to face discussions or via a chat context. Future research can expand the domain by conducting case studies or surveys on real-world exchanges. Such exchanges can utilize more advanced and rich communication features.

Conclusion

Overall, the framework presented in this study produced two main findings regarding the influences of information quality on intent to use electronic exchanges. First, the study was able to investigate the distinctive mediating roles of two types of trust and two types of risk. This study extends prior research by providing empirical evidence to illustrate the different influences of IQ on each type. Second, the study illustrates the complex influences of trust and risk by utilizing the

Andreas I. Nicolaou is the Owens-Illinois Endowed Professor at the College of Business, Bowling Green State University, USA, and the Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. He serves as editor of IJAIS since 2010. He earned his Ph.D. from Southern Illinois University-Carbondale, and his baccalaureate from the Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece. He adopts both a quantitative as well as qualitative focus in his research as he examines

References (76)

  • L. Asveld et al.

    The Ethics of Technological Risk

    (2009)
  • P. Attewell et al.

    Survey and other methodologies applied to IT impact research: experiences from a comparative study of business computing

  • J.Y. Bakos et al.

    Information technology, incentives and the optimal number of suppliers

    Journal of Management Information Systems

    (1993)
  • M. Bensaou

    Interorganizational cooperation: the role of information technology — an empirical comparison of U.S. and Japanese supplier relations

    Information Systems Research

    (June 1997)
  • M. Bensaou et al.

    Configurations of interorganizational relationships: a comparison between U.S. and Japanese automakers

    Management Science

    (September 1995)
  • P. Blau

    Exchange and Power in Social Life

    (1964)
  • M.V. Bovee, Information Quality: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Validation, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of...
  • J.L. Bradach et al.

    Price, authority, and trust: from ideal types to plural forms

    Annual Review of Sociology

    (1989)
  • J. Brownlie et al.

    Leaps of faith and MMR: an empirical study

    Sociology

    (2005)
  • T.A. Carte et al.

    In pursuit of moderation: nine common errors and their solutions

    MIS Quarterly

    (2003)
  • D.L. Coffman et al.

    Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models

    Multivariate Behavioral Research

    (2005)
  • T.K. Das et al.

    Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances

    Academic Management Review

    (1998)
  • T.K. Das et al.

    Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: an integrated framework

    Organization Studies

    (2001)
  • T.K. Das et al.

    Relational risk and its personal correlates in strategic alliances

    Journal Of Business And Psychology

    (2001)
  • C. Dellarocas

    Building Trust On-Line; the Design of Reliable Reputation Reporting Mechanisms for Online Trading Communities

    (2001)
  • W.H. DeLone et al.

    The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update

    Journal of Management Information Systems

    (2003)
  • K.T. Dirks et al.

    The role of trust in organizational settings

    Organization Science

    (2001)
  • J.H. Dyer et al.

    The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage

    Academy of Management Review

    (1998)
  • M. Fishbein et al.

    Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research

    (1975)
  • D. Gefen et al.

    Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model

    MIS Quarterly

    (March 2003)
  • D.W. Gerbing et al.

    An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment

    Journal Of Marketing Research

    (1988)
  • J. Goo et al.

    The role of service level agreements in relational management of information technology outsourcing: an empirical study

    MIS Quarterly

    (2009)
  • D.L. Goodhue

    Task-technology fit and individual performance

    MIS Quarterly

    (June 1995)
  • D.L. Goodhue

    Understanding user evaluations of information systems

    Management Science

    (December 1995)
  • D.L. Goodhue et al.

    The impact of data integration on the costs and benefits of information systems

    MIS Quarterly

    (1992)
  • R. Gulati et al.

    Where do interorganizational networks come from?

    American Journal of Sociology

    (1999)
  • P. Hart et al.

    Power and trust: critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange

    Organization Science

    (1997)
  • W. Hasselbring

    Information system integration

    Communications of the ACM

    (June 2000)
  • Cited by (105)

    • Trust as a second-order construct: Investigating the relationship between consumers and virtual agents

      2022, Telematics and Informatics
      Citation Excerpt :

      To assess perceived enjoyment, three items were adopted from Sohn and Kwon (2020). For consumer’s intent to continue use of VAs, three items from Nicolaou, Ibrahim, and van Heck (2013) were adopted. All the items used a 5-point Likert scale (1: strongly disagree, 5: strongly agree) and were modified to fit with the context of VAs.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Andreas I. Nicolaou is the Owens-Illinois Endowed Professor at the College of Business, Bowling Green State University, USA, and the Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. He serves as editor of IJAIS since 2010. He earned his Ph.D. from Southern Illinois University-Carbondale, and his baccalaureate from the Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece. He adopts both a quantitative as well as qualitative focus in his research as he examines relational issues in inter-organizational exchanges and management control, and issues on the use of integrated information systems and their relations to the information environment of business organizations. He has published over 50 research articles, and his work has appeared in such journals as Contemporary Accounting Research, Information Systems Research, Journal of Management Information Systems, Journal of Information Systems, Electronic Markets, Information Technology & People, and European Accounting Review, among others. He is also the author of two books. He can be reached at [email protected].

    Mohammed Ibrahim received the M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in Information Management from CentER, Center of Economic Research, at Tilburg University. He became an assistant professor at the Rotterdam School of Management in 2006 before assuming his current position as an architect of SOA-enabled enterprise systems in 2009. His current work and research interests focus on service-oriented architecture, interorganizational systems, trust and social psychology. He can be reached at [email protected].

    Eric van Heck holds the Chair of Information Management and Markets at Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, where he is conducting research and is teaching on the strategic and operational use of information technologies for companies and markets. He was ERIM's Director of Doctoral Education (2007–2009), a Visiting Professor at the Helsinki School of Economics (2002–2005) and the Ludwig-Maximilians University in Munich (Summer 2006), and a Visiting Scholar at MIT Sloan School of Management (Summer 2009). He can be reached at [email protected].

    1

    Tel.: + 1 419 372 2932.

    2

    Tel.: + 31 10 4082032.

    View full text