Elsevier

Decision Support Systems

Volume 54, Issue 2, January 2013, Pages 1076-1084
Decision Support Systems

Managing supplier delivery reliability risk under limited information: Foundations for a human-in-the-loop DSS

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.033Get rights and content

Abstract

The potential impact of suppliers' delivery reliability issues in many industries requires a proper decision support system (DSS) that allows decision makers to analyze and reduce the delay's detrimental effects. Despite the relevance of the topic, companies are often confronted with the lack of historical, quantitative data and knowledge about a supplier's performance (i.e., when selecting a new supplier). In this paper, we address the problem of the scarcity of quantitative data by considering and extending the human-in-the-loop DSS concept, which accounts for an expert's knowledge and experience. In our concept, a human expert is involved in making and revising data provided by a computational model, with the aim of supporting companies in making decisions when dealing with unreliable suppliers, in order to minimize the costs related to external discontinuities. To deal with scant quantitative data, we developed a distribution-free model. Our findings positively support the distribution-free approach as an effective tool to be used when only a limited and perhaps unstructured base of data is available. The presented computational model aims at creating a solid foundation for developing a comprehensive human-in-the-loop decision support system.

Highlights

► We address the supply delay risk mitigation process. ► The decision maker deals with limited information about suppliers‘ performance. ► A distribution-free mathematical model addressing risk mitigation is presented. ► The mathematical model is framed into a human-in-the-loop DSS. ► The HIL-DSS complements numerical data with human expertise. ► Results provided show robustness against different scenarios of delay distribution.

Introduction

Recently, delivery reliability has shifted from an order winner to an order qualifier factor in many manufacturing and service industries [11], thanks to the wide diffusion and consolidation of operations paradigms, such as just-in-time and quick response distribution [7], [26]. In extended, complex, and highly collaborative supply chains, suppliers' delivery reliability – a specifically operational performance measure – is strongly affected by strategic and tactical decisions, such as selecting the “right” suppliers for conjoint design, development, manufacturing, and distribution. In fact, seeking the timeliness of all operations since the network design stage is of paramount importance when a large part of the production is outsourced. In this respect, suppliers are often perceived as a source of delay risk, affecting the company's delivery reliability either directly or indirectly [9], [27].

The potential impact of the suppliers' delivery reliability problems in many production industries requires a proper decision support system (DSS) to help in analyzing and reducing the delay's detrimental effects. Such a support system must be able to deal with highly complex environments, where both qualitative and quantitative elements play a substantial role.

Nonetheless, considering the quantitative perspective, companies are often confronted with the lack of historical, quantifiable data and information about a supplier's previous performance; thus, in today's volatile business environment decisions usually have to be based on incomplete or even non-existent information. Focusing on the delivery reliability dimension, for example, distributional information on the earlier delivery performance of a supplier may be limited or missing (i.e., in the case of a new supplier). Sometimes, such a lack of numerical data is compensated for by an educated guess of the mean and the variance of the data distribution. According to Moon and Yun [18], under these conditions the tendency is to use normal distribution in the computational models, even though such an assumption does not provide the best decision in cases when other probability distributions with the same mean and variance occur.

Furthermore, although DSS can assist decision makers in acquiring data, information, and knowledge regarding products, services, suppliers, and customers, not all of the possible factors behind an optimal decision can be algorithmically implemented, due to the complexity or the nature of the factors themselves. This aspect emphasizes the role and contribution of a human expert in integrating qualitative knowledge into the decision process.

Considering the relevance of the supplier's delivery reliability dimension and the scarcity of contributions to this topic, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the feasibility of an architecture for a DSS that supports decision makers in dealing with delivery delay risks when the available information about a supplier's performance is limited to the mean and the standard deviation (or their educated guess).

Specifically, we strive to address the following research questions:

  • How is it possible to mitigate the delay risk? How may computational models support the decision maker when no historical knowledge of the supplier's performance is available?

  • How can the computational model developed for delay risk mitigation be implemented within a DSS and integrated with qualitative information?

We see our contribution as a possible foundation for developing a human-in-the-loop decision support system (HIL-DSS), allowing quantitative data to be complemented with qualitative information provided by a human expert. In order to answer the proposed research questions, the remainder of the paper is organized in five sections: the next section explores the role of buffers in reducing delivery delays in manufacturing sectors. Then, we delineate the scenario in which we developed and tested the computational model. The computational results are discussed in the following section, along with an outline of the integration of qualitative information. Finally, we present our conclusions and recommendations for future research.

Section snippets

Background

The on-time delivery of products and services is still recognized as a key success factor for competition in many manufacturing and service firms [2], [6], [23]. Make-to-order (MTO) companies, in particular, are highly sensitive to potential problems that might influence delivery reliability performance, as discussed in the next section.

A proposal for a HIL-DSS architecture

Quantitative information about cost and delivery performance is important, but they represent only the structured portion of the total information required to make robust decisions. To deal with this aspect, it is our ultimate goal to design an architecture for a human-in-the-loop decision support system (HIL-DSS) aimed at assisting decision makers in dealing with delivery delay risks through an appropriately sized buffer, when little information about delivery performance is available, and

Scenario descriptions and model development

In this section, we define the scenarios and respective models that form the cornerstone of the DSS. Each model is meant to provide the basis (referred to as the preliminary decision in the proposed architecture) for human experts to evaluate the expected costs related to suppliers' delivery reliability performance, taking two main components into account:

  • the costs related to buffering the delay (i.e., to keep the inventory of incoming material, or to add slack to the production schedule); and

Results and discussion

We present and discuss some computational results comparing the distribution-free model against two of the most commonly used probability distributions: the normal distribution (which is the highest entropy distribution with given mean and standard deviation) and the uniform distribution (representing the case where the probability of occurrence of each delay is the same, thereby illustrating the most unpredictable situation).

In the following, we refer to three models: M1 (distribution-free),

Conclusions and future work

In order to deal with delivery delay risk mitigation in a context characterized by limited information, we developed two distinct computational models that form the algorithmic foundation for developing a new, or adapting an existing, DSS. However, besides this well-defined logic, there is still a need for human involvement in evaluating the results provided by the decision models and effectively taking actions by adjusting, for instance, inventory control or negotiation strategies with

Roberto Pinto is an Assistant Professor at the University of Bergamo. He graduated in Management Engineering from the Politecnico di Milano, and received his PhD in Design and Management of Integrated Production-Logistics Systems at the University of Brescia. He has published three books and more than 20 papers in international journals and conference proceedings. His current research interests focus on the logistics and supply chain management area, with specific activities devoted to the

References (28)

  • M. Caputo

    Uncertainty, flexibility and buffers in the management of the firm operating system

    Production Planning and Control

    (1996)
  • M.L. Cummings

    The need for command and control instant message adaptive interfaces: lessons learned from tactical Tomahawk human-in-the-loop simulations

    Cyberpsychology & Behavior

    (2004)
  • P. Frame

    Saturn to fine suppliers $500/minute for delays

    Automotive News

    (1992)
  • G. Gallego et al.

    The distribution free newsboy problem: review and extensions

    The Journal of the Operational Research Society

    (1993)
  • Cited by (0)

    Roberto Pinto is an Assistant Professor at the University of Bergamo. He graduated in Management Engineering from the Politecnico di Milano, and received his PhD in Design and Management of Integrated Production-Logistics Systems at the University of Brescia. He has published three books and more than 20 papers in international journals and conference proceedings. His current research interests focus on the logistics and supply chain management area, with specific activities devoted to the supply chain risk management field and supply chain performance and analytics.

    Tobias Mettler is a project manager at the Institute of Information Management at the University of St. Gallen where he is leading the Competence Center Health Network Engineering. His research interests are in the area of design science research, systems analysis, business models, and electronic healthcare. He is actively involved in several national and international research projects related to the transformation of the healthcare industry. He received his degree in Information and Technology Management and PhD in Management of the University of St. Gallen.

    Marco Taisch is a Full-Time Professor of Advanced Manufacturing Systems at Politecnico di Milano. He has been the Director of the Executive MBA and the full-time International MBA of the School of Management of Politecnico di Milano. His current research interests are in the area of operations and supply chain management, with particular focus on design and management of intelligent production systems, sustainable and energy-efficient manufacturing and industrial services. He has published four books and more than 115 papers in international journals and conference proceedings. He took part in national and international funded projects. He is a member of the IEEE Engineering Management Society, IEEE Man, Systems and Cybernetics Society and senior member of the IIE Institute of Industrial Engineers. He chairs the IFIP Working Group 5.7 on Advances in Production Management Systems since 2007.

    View full text