Relative controllability of semilinear delay differential systems with linear parts defined by permutable matrices☆
Introduction
Controllability issues for the classical linear/semilinear time-independent differential controlled systems in finite/infinite dimensional spaces have been addressed well. However, it will achieve a much more complicated situation for the same issues for time-independent delay differential controlled systems, even for linear differential system with pure delay with one input. In fact, in contrast with the theory of classical linear differential controlled systems, when driving these delay systems to rest, one is required not only to control the value of the state at the final time but also the memory accumulated with an after effect having that the initial functional condition introduces. In addition, the representation of solution is not easy to be characterized without knowing the fundamental matrix of a homogeneous delay differential system. As a result, various classes of control methods for delay differential systems are considered and different variants of controllability are developed in the past decades. Fortunately, in the past decade, there is a rapid development on representation of solution, which leads to results on asymptotic stability, finite-time stability and control problems for one/two order linear continuous/discrete delay systems. For more details, one can refer to [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21] and reference therein.
We would like to focus on some meaningful contributions for controllability of problems for one order linear delay continuous/discrete systems. Recently, Khusainov and Shuklin [3] initially develop the classical ideas to seeking the fundamental matrix of and introduce a notation of so called delayed exponential matrix (see Definition 2.1) to obtain a Kalman criterion to examine relative controllability in linear differential system with pure delay of the form where is continuous differentiable on t1 > 0, b is a constant vector, is an input and is a given function. System (1) is called relatively controllable, if for an arbitrary φ, the terminal state with finite t1 > 0, there exists a control u*(t) such that has a solution x(t, u*) ≔ x*(t) satisfying and .
For system (1) with the end time (), to be relative controllable iff (see [3, Theorem 4]) and the control function can be selected by virtue of delayed exponential matrix (see Definition 2.1) of the formula where the symbol ⊤ denotes the transpose of the matrix and and the vector is pre-fixed.
Meanwhile, Diblík et al. [8], [9] transfer this idea to represent the solution of discrete delayed system by constructing discrete delayed exponential matrix and study controllability of linear discrete pure delay systems with constant coefficients and one control function [10], [11]. Moreover, Pospíšil et al. [22] extend the study of controllability to linear discrete pure delay systems with constant coefficients and multiple control functions and derive representation of solution in a form of a matrix polynomial using the Z-transform [23] to a system of nonhomogeneous linear difference equations with any finite number of constant delays and linear parts given by pairwise permutable matrices. Various criterions of relative controllability for linear discrete pure delay systems are presented and the associated control functions are also constructed.
A much more complicated situation occurs if we deal with relative controllability of the following semilinear delay differential systems with linear parts defined by pairwise permutable matrices: where and . The state x( · ) takes values from and the control function u( · ) takes value from .
Concerning relative controllability of system (3), we would like to address the difficulties as follows:
- (i)
The formula of solution of system (3) is much more complicated since the representation of solution involving a more complicated delayed matrix exponential .
- (ii)
Since the both linear parts A and B are appeared, it is debatable whether we can establish the similar Kalman criterion since the Cayley formula for delayed matrix exponential is not an easy task.
Except using Kalman criterion to to judge whether linear controlled system is controllable, Grammian matrix criterion is also an alternative method, which has been widely used to deal with linear controlled systems. The controllability problem for the following linear differential systems with control is known to be solved iff the Grammian matrix of the form is non-singular.
Now we revisit relative controllability of system (1). By checking the proof of [3, Theorem 4] via the control function (2), one can directly conclude that a sufficient condition for system (1) is relatively controllable when the following Grammian type matrix is non-singular. This implies that it is possible to adopt Grammian type matrix method to address relative controllability of system (3) although it is not easy to verify the necessity.
The main contributions are stated as follows:
- (i)
Concerning on linear delay differential controlled system, instead of seeking Kalman type criterion, we introduce a notion of delay Grammian matrix and display the relationship between non-singular property of delay Grammian matrix between relative controllability linear delay controlled system. Meanwhile, we also give an algorithm for constructing a control.
- (ii)
Except for a criterion of relative controllability for linear delay differential controlled system we construct a suitable control function for semilinear delay differential controlled system and adopt the framework of fixed point methods to derive relative controllability via Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem as well.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we give some necessary notations, concepts and lemmas. In Section 3, we firstly investigate relative controllability of linear delay controlled differential system and give a delay Grammian matrix criterion. Secondly, we turn relative controllability of semilinear delay controlled differential system into a fixed point problem, which admit us to utilize Krasnoselskii’s fixed point to check our main theorem. Two numerical examples are given in final section to demonstrate the application of our main results.
Section snippets
Preliminary
Let be the n-dimensional Euclid space with the vector norm ‖ · ‖ and be the n × n matrix space with real value elements. Denote by the Banach space of vector-value continuous functions from endowed with the norm for a norm ‖ · ‖ on . Let X, Y be two Banach spaces, Lb(X, Y) denotes the space of all bounded linear operators from X to Y. Next, Lp(J, Y) denotes the Banach space of functions f: J → Y which are Bochner integrable normed by for
Main results
In this section, we investigate relative controllability of system (3).
Case 1. f(t, x(t)) ≡ 0, t ∈ J, i.e., system (3) reduces to the following linear delay controlled system with linear parts defined by pairwise permutable matrices
Next, we introduce a notation of a delay Grammian matrix, an extension of the classical Grammian matrix for linear differential systems, as follows:
Now we
Numerical examples
Firstly, we give some reasonable explanations for systems (3) from the point of view of practical application. We also note that relative controllability for linear systems of neutral differential equations with a delay is studied in [29] and an example of competing biological systems is used to illustrated the theoretically results.
For instance, in a combustion chamber or reactor, we consider the change process of pressure. Based on our knowledge, the movement process of pressure not only
Conclusions
The purpose of this contribution is to develop a controllability method for linear and semilinear delay controlled systems with linear parts defined by permutable matrices. In order to achieve this purpose, a representation of solutions is used with the help of a delayed matrix exponential. Such an approach leads to new criterions for the relative controllability of our issues by constructing delay Grammian matrix and applying fixed point method, respectively.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the referees for their careful reading of the manuscript and valuable comments. We thank the help from the editor too.
References (30)
- et al.
Stability and the nonexistence of blowing-up solutions of nonlinear delay systems with linear parts defined by permutable matrices
Nonlinear Anal.
(2011) - et al.
Sufficient conditions for the asymptotic stability of nonlinear multidelay differential equations with linear parts defined by pairwise permutable matrices
Nonlinear Anal.
(2012) - et al.
Exponential stability of linear discrete systems with constant coefficients and single delay
Appl. Math. Lett.
(2016) - et al.
Representation of solutions of discrete delayed system with commutative matrices
J. Math. Anal. Appl.
(2006) - et al.
Fredholm’s boundary-value problems for differential systems with a single delay
Nonlinear Anal.
(2010) - et al.
Finite time stability of fractional delay differential equations
Appl. Math. Lett.
(2017) Representation of solutions of delayed difference equations with linear parts given by pairwise permutable matrices via z-transform
Appl. Math. Comput.
(2017)- et al.
Linear autonomous time-delay system with permutation matrices solving
Stud. Univ. Žilina
(2003) - et al.
Representation of a solution of the cauchy problem for an oscillating system with pure delay
Nonlinear Oscil.
(2008) - et al.
Relative controllability in systems with pure delay
Int. J. Appl. Math.
(2005)
Representation of a solution of the cauchy problem for an oscillating system with two delays and permutable matrices
Ukr. Math. J.
Representation of solutions of linear discrete systems with constant coefficients and pure delay
Adv. Difference Equ.
Controllability of linear discrete systems with constant coefficients and pure delay
SIAM J. Control Optim.
On the new control functions for linear discrete delay systems
SIAM J. Control Optim.
Discrete matrix delayed exponential for two delays and its property
Adv. Differ. Equ.
Cited by (39)
Relatively exact controllability for higher-order fractional stochastic delay differential equations
2023, Information SciencesRelatively exact controllability for fractional stochastic delay differential equations of order κ∈(1,2]
2023, Chaos, Solitons and FractalsExistence, stability and controllability of piecewise impulsive dynamic systems on arbitrary time domain
2023, Applied Mathematical ModellingCitation Excerpt :It has numerous applications in engineering and sciences, for instance, in filter design, optimal control, pole assignment problem, biological networks and safety checking [1–3]. In consequence, over the last few years, many authors studied the controllability results for various types of linear and nonlinear systems [4–8], and the cited references therein. On the other hand, there are many real-world systems and natural processes such as bursting rhythmic models in pathology, biological neural networks, and evolutionary processes, where the state of the systems has some abrupt changes.
On a study for the neutral Caputo fractional multi-delayed differential equations with noncommutative coefficient matrices
2022, Chaos, Solitons and FractalsControllability of stochastic nonlinear oscillating delay systems driven by the Rosenblatt distribution
2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: MathematicsOn the Averaging Principle of Caputo Type Neutral Fractional Stochastic Differential Equations
2024, Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems
- ☆
J.R.W. is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11661016), Training Object of High Level and Innovative Talents of Guizhou Province ((2016)4006), Unite Foundation of Guizhou Province ([2015]7640) and Graduate Course of Guizhou University (ZDKC[2015]003). M.F. is supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract no. APVV-14-0378 and by the Slovak Grant Agency VEGA Nos. 2/0153/16 and 1/0078/17.