Production, Manufacturing and Logistics
The relationships among virtual enterprise, information technology, and business performance in agile manufacturing: An industry perspective

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.02.074Get rights and content

Abstract

Agile Manufacturing (AM) is a manufacturing paradigm that focuses on smaller scale, modular production facilities, and agile operations capable of dealing with turbulent and changing environments. From several enablers of AM, Virtual Enterprise (VE) and Information Technology (IT) were chosen. This empirical study explored the impact of the alignment between VE and IT on business performance in an AM setting for five different industries. Extensive data collection strategy and several tests were used to establish the reliability and validity of the data collected. Extensive analyses of the data using Structural Equation Modeling were performed for five hypotheses across five different industries. The results indicate that both VE and IT had positive influences on business performance for all industries. It was also established that the alignment between VE and IT had a positive impact on business performance for all industries. Further, it was shown that the impact of the alignment between VE and IT on business performance was more significant than the impact of VE and IT on business performance individually for all industries. The statistical analyses and results showed that there were no significant differences among the industries surveyed. At the bivariate level of analysis, some minor differences for one industry were highlighted. In conclusion, the assessment of the results along with future research directions is provided.

Introduction

Global competition has brought about changes that are characterized by product proliferation with shorter and uncertain life cycles, innovative process technologies, and customers who simultaneously demand quick response, lower costs, and greater customization. Companies must cope effectively with continuous and unexpected changes in order to become competitive. The ability to respond quickly and effectively (time-based competition) and to satisfy customer needs has become a defining characteristic of competitiveness for many manufacturing companies.

Mass production, despite improvements made by just-in-time and lean production strategies, is essentially a system favoring large-scale and hierarchical corporate structures. Agile Manufacturing (AM) is an emerging manufacturing paradigm, which considers agility a key concept necessary to survive against competitors under an unexpectedly turbulent and changing environment. The AM suggests that smaller scale, modular production facilities, and cooperation between enterprises would be the principal pattern of competitiveness for the next generation (Goldman et al., 1995, Sahin, 2000).

Several enablers of AM were identified conceptually in the AM literature (Sharp et al., 1999, Gunasekaran, 1999, Yusuf et al., 1999, Sharifi and Zhang, 2000, Sharifi and Zhang, 2001). According to Sharp et al. (1999), AM enablers include core competencies, Virtual Enterprise (VE), rapid prototyping, concurrent engineering, multi-skilled and flexible people, continuous improvement, team working, change and risk management, Information Technology (IT), and empowering. Based on an extensive literature review, Gunasekaran (1999) proposed a research framework for the design of agile manufacturing systems that included four dimensions: strategies, technology, people, and systems. Gunasekaran (1999) argued that VE is one of the key strategies needed to achieve agility in manufacturing. He further stated that “agile-enabling technologies such as Internet, multimedia, EDI, electronic commerce … need to be suitably incorporated within the scope of VE in order to achieve agility in manufacturing (Gunasekaran, 1999, pp. 100–101).” Yusuf et al. (1999) attempted to identify the drivers of AM. They claimed that the core drivers of AM include VE, core competence management, capability for reconfiguration, and knowledge-driven enterprise. They further pinpointed the fact that IT (i.e. EDI) plays a major role in VE. Technological capabilities, especially IT, were also viewed by other AM researchers as major agility drivers (Sharifi and Zhang, 2000, Sharifi and Zhang, 2001). Other AM literature also recognized the relationship between IT and VE (Martinez et al., 2001, Khalil and Wang, 2002). According to Martinez et al. (2001), VE is supported by the extensive use of information and communication technologies. Khalil and Wang (2002) argued that advanced IT has made it possible to manage the complexity of a VE environment more efficiently and effectively. This study focuses on two of the AM enablers, namely, VE and IT. The VE and IT seem to represent the common thread and consensus of many works as the most relevant enablers of the AM. This study further explores the relationship between VE and IT and their alignment on a firm’s business performance in an agile manufacturing environment.

Section snippets

Review of literature

Why do we know so little about the impact of VE and IT on firms’ business performance within the context of AM in the literature? To provide answer for this question, the definitions, basic information, and review of literature for AM, VE, and IT are presented next.

Research framework and hypotheses formulation

This study extends the conceptual model of AM proposed by (Sharp et al., 1999) by addressing the issue of alignment between VE and IT and the impact of this alignment on business performance at the AM industry level. Fig. 1 presents the proposed conceptual model.

There are three basic constructs in the model VE, IT, and business performance. The relationships among the constructs are shown by five hypotheses formulated as follows:

  • H1. The use of information technology positively supports the

Research methodology and design

This study uses a two-part research design in order to increase the reliability and validity of the data collected. Part one involved constructing a questionnaire. This process included reviewing and analyzing previous and current literature, developing the framework in Section 3, and conducting interviews with key employees of several AM companies. Based on all of these, a series of questions addressing the key variables of the study were developed at the AM industry level. A pilot study was

Assessment of measurement quality

Several tests were performed to establish reliability and validity of the data collected. These tests proved the reliability and validity of the instrument and the data in this study. The details of these analyses, which were performed by LISREL, are presented in three sections in Appendix B.

Evaluation of research hypotheses

Based on the framework presented in Fig. 1, Fig. 2, two sets of analyses (based on LISREL) at the construct and bivariate level were performed for all hypotheses. The results of hypothesis testings at the construct level are summarized in Table 8.

Table 8 showed the cross-industry comparative path analyses at the construct level for all five industries. All t-values were significant at 0.05 level. This indicated that all hypotheses were verified at the construct level for all five different

Conclusions, assessment, managerial implications, and future research directions

This paper has explored the link between IT and VE and the impact of this link on business performance within the context of AM research. Most of the studies in AM were conceptual in nature and lacked empirical evidence to support their proposed models and conclusions. This research not only provides a conceptual framework to systematically explore the relationship between AM and business performance, but also provides empirical evidence and detailed statistical analysis for the relationships

References (73)

  • M.T. Martinez et al.

    Virtual enterprise—Organisation, evolution and control

    International Journal of Production Economics

    (2001)
  • S.W. O’Leary-Kelly et al.

    The empirical assessment of construct validity

    Journal of Operations Management

    (1998)
  • H. Sharifi et al.

    A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organizations: An introduction

    International Journal of Production Economics

    (1999)
  • J.M. Sharp et al.

    Working towards agile manufacturing in the UK industry

    International Journal of Production Economics

    (1999)
  • P.T. Ward et al.

    Manufacturing strategy in context: Environment, competitive strategy and manufacturing strategy

    Journal of Operations Management

    (2000)
  • Y.Y. Yusuf et al.

    Agile manufacturing: The drivers, concepts and attributes

    International Journal of Production Economics

    (1999)
  • H.B. Asher

    Causal Modeling

    (1983)
  • K.A. Bollen

    Structural Equations with Latent Variables

    (1989)
  • S. Brown et al.

    The manufacturing strategy-capabilities links in mass customization and agile manufacturing: An exploratory study

    International Journal of Operations and Production Management

    (2003)
  • J. Browne et al.

    Extended and virtual enterprises—Similarities and differences

    International Journal of Agile Management Systems

    (1999)
  • J. Burn et al.

    Communicating for advantage in the virtual organization

    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

    (1999)
  • Q. Cao et al.

    Enhancing business performance in an electronic commerce environment: An empirical study

    International Journal of Production Research

    (2004)
  • Y.E. Chan et al.

    Assessing realized information systems strategy

    Journal of Strategic Information Systems

    (1998)
  • Y.E. Chan et al.

    Business strategic orientation, information systems strategic orientation, and strategic alignment

    Information Systems Research

    (1997)
  • R. Chellappa et al.

    Intranets: Looking beyond internal corporate web servers

  • I.J. Chen

    Planning for ERP systems: Analysis and future trend

    Business Process Management Journal

    (2001)
  • P.M. Christie et al.

    Virtual corporations: Recipe for success

    Industrial Management

    (1998)
  • G.A. Churchill

    A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (1979)
  • S.G. Cohen et al.

    Collaboration in the virtual organization

    Journal of Organizational Behavior

    (1999)
  • D.R. Cooper et al.

    Business Research Methods

    (1998)
  • A.E. Coronado et al.

    Defining a framework for information systems requirements for agile manufacturing

    International Journal of Production Economics

    (2002)
  • D. Davis

    Business Research for Decision Making

    (1995)
  • G.G. Dess et al.

    Industry effects and strategic management research

    Journal of Management

    (1990)
  • R. DeVor et al.

    Agile manufacturing research: Accomplishments and opportunities

    IIE Transactions

    (1997)
  • R. Drazin et al.

    Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1985)
  • W.M. Fitzpatrick et al.

    Virtual venturing and entry barriers: Redefining the strategic landscape

    S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal

    (2001)
  • Cited by (81)

    • Real-time information sharing, customer orientation, and the exploration of intra-service industry differences: Malaysia as an emerging market

      2021, Technological Forecasting and Social Change
      Citation Excerpt :

      To become competitive, companies must deal effectively with the continuous and unexpected changes brought about by modern technologies. The ability to swiftly and effectively satisfy customer needs (time-based competition) has thus become a defining characteristic of competitiveness (Dowlatshahi and Cao, 2006). Seib et al. (2009) explained that service firms are more cloud-adaptive and data-insensitive than manufacturing ones.

    • Manufacturing practices and servitization: The role of mass customization and product innovation capabilities

      2020, International Journal of Production Economics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Customization and innovation have been identified as important drivers of servitization (Sousa and da Silveira, 2019; Kowalkowski et al., 2017). Additionally, prior studies have linked manufacturing practices with the implementation of servitization (Dowlatshahi and Cao, 2006; Resta et al., 2015). Although existing literature has argued that the implementation of servitization requires manufacturers to develop capabilities (Baines et al., 2009; Gebauer et al., 2005; Kowalkowski et al., 2017; Sousa and da Silveira, 2017; Opresnik and Taisch, 2015), there is limited empirical evidence on the joint effects of manufacturing practices and capabilities on the implementation of servitization.

    • Information technology for competitive advantage within logistics and supply chains: A review

      2017, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Finally, Gligor and Holcomb (2012a) empirically established the link between supply chain agility and firm performance. The majority of articles on agility focused on the manufacturing sector (e.g. Dowlatshahi and Cao, 2006; Paulraj and Chen, 2007; Gligor and Holcomb, 2012a; Gligor et al., 2015), with the exception of Chakravarty et al. (2013) whose study was in B2B electronic marketplaces and aimed at understanding how IT competencies shape organizational agility and firm performance. Furthermore, the articles used mostly quantitative methods (e.g. Cao and Dowlatshahi, 2005; Paulraj and Chen, 2007; Vickery et al., 2010; Gligor et al., 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text