Discrete OptimizationDual track and segmented single track bidirectional loop guidepath layout for AGV systems
Introduction
Automated guided vehicle (AGV) systems have been implemented in a large variety of industries such as aerospace, automotive, chemical, electronics, food and beverage, plastic, and textile as well as in inter-modal container ports. AGV systems result in better production planning and control, safety, cost reduction, and flexibility according to the Material Handling Industry of America (MHIA, 1999). While the number of AGV systems implemented in the United States still lags significantly behind those in Europe and Asia, the last few years have seen a consistent growth. The number of new installed systems has grown from 43 in 1999 to 73 in 2002 (a 70% increase), and the number of new vehicles has increased from 222 to 386 (a 72% increase) during the same time period. This trend is based mainly on the increase in the efficiency as well as on the cost reductions in the installation and operations (MHIA, 2002). Unit load AGVs carrying a single load at-a-time are highly maneuverable and need a small portion of the shop floor for operation. They form the largest segment of the AGV industry (MHIA, 1999). Unit load AGVs have bidirectional movement capabilities and do not need to execute U turns.
One of the main tasks in designing an efficient and economically viable AGV system includes the concurrent determination of the vehicle guidepath tracks layout and the location of the pickup (P) and dropoff (D) stations, assuming a given block layout of the work-centers. The block layout of our example with work-centers along with the node identification numbers and edge lengths appears in Fig. 1a. The required material flow between pairs of work-centers during the planning horizon is shown in Fig. 1b. Because our material handling devices are unit load AGVs, the elements of the material flow matrix correspond to the required number of loaded trips from the P station of the work-center in the row to the D station of the work-center in the column.
The edges on the boundaries of the work-centers are potential elements for the vehicle’s guidepath in a general AGV system track layout. A general guidepath layout (a) occupies a substantial portion of the shop floor, (b) has many intersections which may reduce the average velocity of the vehicles due to frequent stops, and (c) requires complex vehicle dispatching, vehicle routing, and traffic control rules and algorithms. The operational complexities of the general guidepath layouts are reduced in loop-based guidepath layout covering at least one edge of each work-center.
A dual track bidirectional loop (DTBL), as illustrated in Fig. 2a, is composed of two single track unidirectional loops (STULs) with interconnections at the P and D stations. A single track bidirectional loop (STBL), as illustrated in Fig. 2b, has the advantage of requiring about half the foot print on the shop floor of the equivalent DTBL. A STBL with more than one vehicle is not operationally feasible since the vehicles may be blocked in face-to-face deadlocks. The requirements to avoid or resolve such vehicle deadlocks would add significant complexity to the vehicle dispatching and control system. A simpler method to avoid deadlocks is to partition the loop into non-overlapping segments, where each segment is served by a single vehicle (Sinriech et al., 1996). However, on a segmented STBL (SSTBL), as shown in Fig. 1c, a load in transportation from origin to destination may require one or more transshipments between the vehicles servicing adjacent segments.
We consider the problems of the concurrent design of (i) a dual track bidirectional loop, or (ii) a segmented single track bidirectional loop, both concurrent with the design of the P and D stations. It is assumed that the required number of loaded vehicle trips during the planning horizon are known. This is essentially a simplification of the real design problem, where the required numbers of trips are based on forecasting and are highly stochastic. Our methodology can be extended to stochastic design through the use of scenarios, albeit with a significant increase in problem size and computational cost. The same is true for extending the basic model to include time windows. The objective is to minimize the fleet size, i.e. the required number of vehicles to execute the material handling requests during the planning horizon. The cost of the fleet of the vehicles and the space occupied cost of the guidepath are the main determinants in the total cost of the system.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 reviews previous related research results. In Section 3, we first discuss the importance of incorporating empty vehicle trips in the objective function of the DTBL model, and then develop the optimization model for simultaneous design of the DTBL and P and D station locations. Computational results for the DTBL model are reported in Section 4. In Section 5, we first identify the difference between empty flow node balancing for a dual track loop with the empty flow edge balancing on a single track loop subject to segmentation. We then present a two-phase algorithm to design a SSTBL and report on the computational comparison of DTBL and SSTBL. Conclusions and the possible directions for future research follow in Section 6.
Section snippets
Literature review
Asef-Vaziri and Laporte (2005) review papers on loop-based facility planning and material handling. Johnson (2001) presents the state of research in empty vehicle considerations in AGV systems. We limit our discussion to the literature that are most closely related to the present study.
The main design problems in facility planning can be classified as:
- (I)
Block layout design problem.
- (II)
Guidepath track layout problem.
- (III)
Pickup and dropoff station location problem.
Although these three problems are closely
The dual track bidirectional loop model
Consider a fixed facility layout with a set of C work-centers, a set of E edges forming the boundaries of work-centers, and a set of N nodes corresponding to the edge intersections. In our example, , and . The edges are candidates to form the loop guidepath and each work-center requires at least one edge on the loop. The nodes are candidates for the station locations and each work-center requires a P and a D station which may but are not required to be collocated. Furthermore,
Computational analysis
Our numerical study is based on the layout of Fig. 6a which has 16 work-centers and the edge lengths are expressed in multiples of 40 ft. The material flow matrix of Fig. 6b shows the required number of loaded trips from the work-center in the row to the work-center in the column during an 18 minute cycle time. The product mix contains four products, where one unit load of each product is produced per cycle. Using this layout and material flow matrix as a seed, while incorporating the idea of
The segmented single track bidirectional loop model
Replacing a dual track with a single track bidirectional loop will release a portion of the shop floor. However, a STBL with more than one vehicle is not operationally feasible due to face-to-face deadlock of the vehicles. Therefore, it needs to be transformed into a SSTBL. Due to space savings, a SSTBL is always preferred to a DTBL if the required fleet size is the same for both configurations. However, if the fleet size of the SSTBL is larger, then a trade-off analysis is required to compare
Conclusion
In this study, we have developed integer programming models for the design of dual track and segmented single track bidirectional loops concurrent with the location of P and D stations. We have shown that for these topologies the empty vehicle trips required to balance the vehicle trips have substantial impact on the optimal design. Our models can be implemented in any physical setting where there is an important economical trade-off between space requirements for guidepath vs. fleet size of
Acknowledgements
Thanks are due to Sylvana Saudale for her contribution in computational experiments, and to Seyed Iravani and anonymous referees for their valuable comments. This work was partially supported by Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activity Award, California State University, Northridge. This support is gratefully acknowledged.
References (24)
- et al.
Loop based facility planning and material handling
European Journal of Operational Research
(2005) - et al.
A survey for the quadratic assignment problem
European Journal of Operational Research
(2007) A loop layout design problem for flexible manufacturing systems
International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems
(1989)- et al.
A loop material flow system design for automated guided vehicles
International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems
(2001) - Asef-Vaziri, A., Hall, N.G., George, R., forthcoming. The significance of deterministic empty vehicle trips in the...
- et al.
Decentralized control of automatic guided vehicles on a simple loop
IIE Transactions
(1989) - et al.
Tandem configurations for automated guided vehicle systems offer simplicity and flexibility
Industrial Engineering
(1989) - et al.
Tandem configurations for automated guided vehicle systems and the analysis of single-vehicle loops
IIE Transactions
(1991) - et al.
Solution of a large-scale traveling salesman problem
Operations Research
(1954) - et al.
Solving the facility layout problem with BLOCPLAN
(1990)
The use of non-simulation approaches in estimating vehicle requirements in automated guided vehicle based transportation system
Material Flow
A comprehensive model for the concurrent determination of aisle-based material handling systems
Cited by (23)
A sustainable and conflict-free operation of AGVs in a square topology
2018, Computers and Industrial EngineeringCitation Excerpt :Asef-Vaziri, Dessouky, and Sriskandarajah (2001) propose an integer programming formulation to design a loop material flow system. Asef-Vaziri and Goetschalckx (2008) present a method extended to the design of the location of the pick-up and drop-off stations. Asef-Vaziri, Hall, and George (2008) consider the problem of designing an optimal unidirectional loop.
Covering and connectivity constraints in loop-based formulation of material flow network design in facility layout
2018, European Journal of Operational ResearchCitation Excerpt :In FCFS dispatching and its variations (Al-Sultan & Bozer, 1998; Benjaafar, 2002; Goetschalckx & Palliyil, 1994; Johnson, 2001; Srinivasan, Bozer, & Cho, 1994) an empty vehicle is routed to the longest waiting load. In STDF dispatching (Asef-Vaziri & Goetschalckx, 2008; Asef-Vaziri et al., 2008; Asef-Vaziri & Laporte, 2009; Asef-Vaziri & Ortiz, 2008; Goetschalckx & Palliyil, 1994; Kouvelis & Kim, 1992; Malmborg & Shen, 1994; Maxwell & Muckstadt, 1982; Sun & Tchernev, 1996) an empty vehicle is dispatched to the closest waiting load. The FEFS dispatching (Bartholdi & Platzman, 1989) is specifically designed for loop flow systems, where an empty vehicle continually circulates along a unidirectional loop, looking for a load to pick up and deliver.
The Minimum Flow Cost Hamiltonian Cycle Problem: A comparison of formulations
2015, Discrete Applied MathematicsCitation Excerpt :The network must connect (not necessarily in a direct way) all stations pairs, and the objective is to minimize the total flow cost. For some examples and a review of advantages of a cycle topology in AGV systems, such as the easiness to handle vehicle conflicts and generating a simple network, we refer the reader to [4,5,31]. This paper makes two main contributions.
An exact and a simulated annealing algorithm for simultaneously determining flow path and the location of P/D stations in bidirectional path
2013, Journal of Manufacturing SystemsCitation Excerpt :Then, their model decides on the direction of arcs to minimize the total trip distances of loaded vehicles. Their efforts have been followed by a large portion of scholars and researchers with various assumptions made to facility layout problem [9–21]. The configuration of material handling for AGV consists of traditional/conventional system, unidirectional single loop, tandem configuration, bidirectional path and segmented flow topology.
An ant colony system for enhanced loop-based aisle-network design
2010, European Journal of Operational ResearchCitation Excerpt :It is essentially a lower bound for the actual number of trips in the operations phase which is highly stochastic. The STDF dispatching policy is a simple yet efficient policy that has been adopted by Malmborg and Shen (1994), Goetschalckx and Palliyil (1994), Sun and Tchernev (1996), Asef-Vaziri et al. (2007), Asef-Vaziri et al. (2008) and Asef-Vaziri and Goetschalckx (2008). Sharp and Liu (1990) develop an optimization model to reduce the number of alternatives and a simulation model to make the final decision when a shortcut and off-line spurs are added to an existing loop.
A simulation study of a bi-directional load-exchangeable automated guided vehicle system
2010, Computers and Industrial Engineering