Interfaces with Other Disciplines
Optimum advertising policy over time for subscriber service innovations in the presence of service cost learning and customers’ disadoption

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.12.010Get rights and content

Abstract

On the theoretical side, this paper characterizes qualitatively optimal advertising policy for new subscriber services. A monopolistic market is analyzed first for which customers’ disadoption, discounting of future profits streams and a service cost learning curve are allowed. After characterizing the optimal policy for a general diffusion model, the results pertaining to a specific diffusion model for which advertising affects the coefficient of innovation that incorporates the disadoption rate are reported. The results of the theoretical research show that the advertising policy of the service firm in the presence of customers’ disadoption could be very different from the same when disadoption is ignored.

On the empirical side, four alternative diffusion models are estimated and their predictive powers using a one-step-ahead forecasting procedure compared. The diffusion data analyzed are related to the Canadian cable TV industry. Empirical research findings suggest that the specific diffusion model considered above is not only of theoretical appeal but also of major empirical relevance.

The analytical findings of the study are documented in six theoretical propositions for which proofs are provided in a separate Appendix. The results of a related numerical experiment together with the analytical findings pertaining to the competitive role of advertising are included. Managerial implications of the study together with directions for future research are also discussed.

Introduction

In the early 1900’s, less than one third of the labor force in the United States was employed by the services sector. By 1950, the service industry employed almost half of the workforce. With the introduction of new services over the past three decades, including cable TV, cell phones, Internet, online banking, satellite radio, health clubs, etc., the services sector in the US now employs most of the workforce. Approximately, 80% of the US gross domestic product comes from the services sector which continues to grow considerably faster than the goods sector (US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2003, Zeithaml and Bitner, 2003).

Despite the growing role of the services sector and the declining role of the manufacturing sector in Western societies (Metters and Marucheck, 2007), published research on the diffusion of new subscriber consumer services innovations remains scant relative to the literature on new consumer durable (product) innovations (see Mahajan et al., 2000, Meade and Islam, 2006 for further details). The importance of studying subscriber consumer services becomes self-evident in light of the fact that, at present, almost every US household is involved in one way or another, in these services. The current study is applicable to services innovations that consumers adopt and purchase via a periodic subscription fee.

The modeling of diffusion of services provides unique challenges as stated by Libai et al. (2009a, p.163):

“A considerable influence on the market growth of a new service is customer attrition. Beginning with the initial stages of penetration into a market, there are customers who leave the service: they switch to competitors or, alternatively, leave the category. In this sense, the growth of a new service is similar to a leaking bucket – there is an inward flow of adopters and a concurrent outward flow of customers who leave.”

Several researchers model the diffusion of services such as online banking, cell phone, and landline phone service, in the same manner as the diffusion of durable goods (Hogan et al., 2003, Krishnan et al., 2000, Jain et al., 1991). The extant research focuses on consumer churn occurring when a competitor acquires an exiting customer. However, customers can also disadopt and leave the service category altogether (Hogan et al., 2003) as illustrated in previous research (Reichheld and Schefter, 2000, Meuter et al., 2005). Thus, attrition consists of both churning and disadopting customers and the attrition rate is the sum of the churn plus disadoption rate (Libai et al., 2009a).

The inherent differences between goods and services provide a motivation for this study. Basic differences between services and goods are attributed to the assertion that services are usually highly intangible (cannot be seen, handled, smelled, etc.), heterogeneous (customized making its mass production difficult), perishable and are produced and consumed simultaneously (lack of transportability) (Zeithaml and Bitner, 2003). The differences between goods and services led Rust and Chung (2006, p.575) in their review article on service and relationships to advocate the use of optimal control theory as a viable tool to optimally manage the dynamic relationship with customers.

While optimal control theory has been applied within the context of diffusion of service innovations in a monopoly by a few researchers (e.g. Fruchter and Rao, 2001, Mesak and Darrat, 2002), none of them considered the effect of disadoption (termination of service subscription) on the optimal advertising policy of the firm. Recent studies show that customer attrition, for which disadoption is a significant component, can have a considerable effect on growing markets (Hogan et al., 2003, Gupta et al., 2004, Libai et al., 2009a). The study reported here contributes in part by investigating the impact of customers’ disadoption on the optimal advertising policy of new subscriber services.

This paper demonstrates that the advertising policy of the firm changes with consideration of customers’ disadoption and is very different from the policy when one ignores disadoption. The modeling effort employed in this study considers the learning cost curve and the discount rate. More specifically, the model incorporates the key marketing variable of advertising into the diffusion model of services articulated by Libai et al. (2009a) and thus it explicitly considers the consumer disadoption rate. The related measure of performance that takes into account the cost learning curve is optimized afterwards using optimal control theory. Subscriber services for which advertising is a main source of revenue instead of being an instrument for generating subscriptions such as newspapers, magazines and contemporary electronic media (Internet websites) are beyond the scope of the present study. Kumar and Sethi (2009) provide a recent review of this particular literature.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. The Section 2 provides a related background. The Section 3 outlines a general dynamic diffusion model for new subscriber service innovations, formulates the problem and presents the solution method. The Section 4 characterizes the optimal advertising policy. The last section summarizes and concludes the paper. To improve exposition, derivation of key formulas and proofs of all propositions are relegated to a separate Appendix. To adhere to space limitations, an empirical analysis aiming at estimating and choosing among alternative proposed diffusion models, the results of a numerical experiment and the findings of an analytical analysis pertaining to the competitive role of advertising together with other issues are made available on-line.

Section snippets

Background

Notable examples of diffusion models for subscriber services innovations that do not incorporate marketing variables include Dodds (1973) who presents an early diffusion model of cable TV services, and Kim et al. (1995) who model the diffusion of cell phone services. Rai et al. (1998) study the diffusion of Internet services and more recently, Libai et al., 2009a, Libai et al., 2009b present an updated model of cell phone, cable TV and online banking services.

Some subscriber services studies

General model formulation and solution method

Let us consider adoptions of a new subscriber service in a monopolistic market. A firm manipulates advertising expenditure Ut (assumed to be bounded from above) at each time t over a fixed planning period T, 0  t  T. The monopoly assumption may seem reasonable in situations in which the firm enjoys a patent protection, a proprietary technology, a dominant market share, or involves contracted services that lock consumers into extended contracts with exorbitant switching costs. A general diffusion

Optimal advertising policy for new subscriber services

This section starts first by analyzing the situation of the general diffusion model (1) followed by an analysis related to specific diffusion models for subscriber services.

Discussion

The models analytically and empirically investigated in this study represent, to the authors’ knowledge, an initial attempt at characterizing and validating the optimal advertising policy of a new subscriber service provider over time. The approach to modeling diffusion of a new subscriber service considers demand dynamics, learning curve and discounting that are managerially relevant. Demand dynamics are reflected in the differential equation of the diffusion model through incorporating

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to Professor Robert Graham Dyson, EJOR Editor, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

References (64)

  • T. Boone et al.

    Learning and knowledge depreciation in professional services

    Management Science

    (2008)
  • S. Chambers et al.

    Experience curves in services: Macro and micro level approaches

    International Journal of Operations and Production Management

    (2000)
  • P.J. Danaher

    Optimal pricing of new subscription services: Analysis of a marketing experiment

    Management Science

    (2002)
  • P.J. Danaher et al.

    Marketing mix variables and the diffusion of successive generation of a technological innovation

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (2001)
  • E. Darr et al.

    The acquisition, transfer and depreciation of knowledge in service organization: Productivity in franchises

    Management Science

    (1995)
  • A. Dhebar et al.

    Optimal dynamic pricing for expanding networks

    Marketing Science

    (1985)
  • A. Dhebar et al.

    Dynamic nonlinear pricing in networks with interdependent demand

    Operations Research

    (1986)
  • E. Dockner et al.

    Optimal advertising policies for diffusion models of new product innovation in monopolistic situations

    Management Science

    (1988)
  • E. Dockner et al.

    Optimal pricing strategies for new products in dynamic oligopolies

    Marketing Science

    (1988)
  • E. Dockner et al.

    New product advertising in dynamic oligopolies

    Zeitschrift fur Operations Research

    (1992)
  • W. Dodds

    An application of the Bass model in long-term new product forecasting

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (1973)
  • G.E. Fruchter et al.

    Optimal membership fee and usage price over time for a network service

    Journal of Service Research

    (2001)
  • H. Gatignon et al.

    A propositional inventory for new diffusion research

    Journal of Consumer Research

    (1985)
  • S. Gupta et al.

    Valuing customers

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (2004)
  • J.E. Hogan et al.

    What is the real value of a lost customer?

    Journal of Service Research

    (2003)
  • D. Horsky et al.

    Dynamic advertising strategies of competing durable good producers

    Marketing Science

    (1988)
  • D. Horsky et al.

    Advertising and the diffusion of new products

    Marketing Science

    (1983)
  • D.C. Jain et al.

    Innovation diffusion in the presence of supply restrictions

    Marketing Science

    (1991)
  • D.C. Jain et al.

    Pricing patterns of cellular phones and phone calls

    Management Science

    (1999)
  • S. Kalish

    A new product adoption model with price, advertising and uncertainty

    Management Science

    (1985)
  • T.V. Krishnan et al.

    Impact of a late entrant on the diffusion of a new product/service

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (2000)
  • B. Libai et al.

    The diffusion of services

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (2009)
  • Cited by (16)

    • Optimal dynamic marketing-mix policies for frequently purchased products and services versus consumer durable goods: A generalized analytic approach

      2020, European Journal of Operational Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Monopolistic pricing models include Fruchter and Rao (2001), Mesak and Darrat (2002), Schlereth, Skiera and Wolk (2011) and Fruchter and Sigué (2013). Monopolistic advertising models include Sasieni (1971), Sethi (1973, 1975), Hahn and Hyun (1991), Feinberg (2001), and Mesak, Bari, Babin, Birou and Jurkus (2011). An example of monopolistic model that includes both price and advertising is Avagyan, Esteban-Bravo and Vidal-Sanz (2014).

    • Licensing radical product innovations to speed up the diffusion

      2014, European Journal of Operational Research
    • Alternative supply chain production-sales policies for new product diffusion: An agent-based modeling and simulation approach

      2012, European Journal of Operational Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Marketing and pricing strategies for new innovations were explored using optimal control theory (Kamrad et al., 2005). Empirical research determined the effect of interaction on product diffusion and adoption (Emmanouilides and Davies, 2007) and the effect of advertising on subscriber service adoption (Mesak et al., 2011). The majority of innovation diffusion models are based on the classical Bass model (Bass, 1969).

    • Quantification of number of adopters: a study to showcase products-sold and products-in-use

      2023, International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management
    • Innovation diffusion model based on advertising expenditure with change-point

      2023, International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +1 770 730 0033; fax: +1 770 730 0596.

    2

    Tel.: +1 318 257 4012; fax: +1 318 257 4253.

    3

    Tel.: +1 318 257 2646; fax: +1 318 257 4253.

    4

    Tel.: +1 318 257 2112; fax: +1 318 257 4253.

    View full text