Production, Manufacturing and LogisticsThe electric location routing problem with time windows and partial recharging
Introduction
High effort is necessary in the transportation sector to tackle challenges of climate change and limited availability of fossil energy sources as well as air quality concerns caused by increasing urbanization. The European Union (EU) is aiming at a reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG)-emissions by 20% until 2020 and by 40% until 2030 relative to 1990 (European Comission, 2014). This is a challenge for the transportation sector, which contributes with 20% to total GHG-emissions (European Environment Agency, 2014b). Additionally, quality of air within urban areas (NOx, fine dust) is becoming an important topic with increasing urbanization (European Environment Agency, 2014a), and there is even a discussion on a ban of internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) in urban areas of Europe (European Comission, 2011). Electric vehicles help to tackle these challenges. Accordingly, planning approaches for electro-mobility have recently become popular for researchers as well as practitioners. First pilot projects on electric logistic fleets have been started by UPS and DHL (DPDHL, UPS).
Electric commercial vehicles (ECVs) have several advantages over ICEVs. First, ECVs are one of the cleanest means of transportation in urban areas and mega cities, since they have zero tank-to-wheel (i.e. local) emissions. Even a zero well-to-wheel emission balance can be obtained if electricity is generated by renewable energy sources. A significant noise reduction results as well. Furthermore, ECVs are able to contribute to increase the share of renewable energy sources that can be handled by the electrical grid, since ECVs could serve as small decentralized energy storages and thus balance the fluctuating renewable energy supply. Additionally, ECVs contribute to intentions to become independent of fluctuating oil prices and politically unstable countries. Concluding, ECVs are a great opportunity that will play a major role within a sustainable mobility of the future.
However, two major challenges have to be solved to realize electric mobility concepts in real world applications. On the one hand, routing decisions for ECVs have to take the limited driving range of ECVs as well as necessary charging times into consideration. On the other hand, necessary charging infrastructure is still lacking. This means that there is a chicken and egg dilemma as ECVs cannot be used without infrastructure, while infrastructure is only built if a certain number of ECVs is already on the roads. Furthermore, these two aspects are interdependent, because routing decisions for vehicles with limited driving range might depend on available charging infrastructure, while siting decisions for charging infrastructure will be based on the charging demand that is estimated based on driving patterns and driving range.
With regard to costs, ECVs could become an important mean of transportation, since they have lower operational costs compared to conventionally fueled trucks. This holds especially for ECVs in vehicle fleets, since advantages in operational costs are the higher the more the vehicle is utilized. However, higher acquisition costs for vehicles and infrastructure occur. Thus, competitiveness of ECVs depends heavily on the relation between operational costs and acquisition costs as Davis and Figliozzi (2013) point out. While ECVs are currently not yet competitive, this ratio might shift in the near future if penalty charges for emissions have to be paid (e.g., an excess emission premium of 95€ per subsequent gCO2/km that exceeds a treshold of 95 gCO2/km (valid from 2021 on) is levied, cf. EC, 2012), or if emission certificates are released for the transportation sector (cf. Kieckhäfer et al., 2015).
Since the market penetration of ECVs is still low and only sparse charging infrastructure exists, there are currently high potentials if charging station siting and vehicle routing are considered simultaneously. While the entire potential of these advantages cannot be utilized if siting and routing decisions are taken by different players (e.g. governments decide on siting infrastructure and private persons decide on routes), operators of electric logistics fleets currently decide on both aspects simultaneously. Thus, the present situation holds unique options for fleet operators. However, it will not be sufficient to focus on the minimization of the total distance. Instead, fleet operators also have to take the minimization of the number of charging stations sited as well as the minimization of the total number of ECVs used or the complete life cycle costs into account. Thus, simultaneous siting and routing decisions are necessary, since the number of vehicles needed is directly influenced by the number and position of charging stations sited and vice versa.
Besides the simultaneous routing and siting decision, realistic recharging options as well as additional restrictions for logistic fleets have to be taken into consideration. State of the art vehicle routing problems (VRPs) consider customer demands, vehicle freight capacities, customer time windows and service times. In realistic applications of ECVs, it might not only be possible to recharge at special charging stations on the route, but also at customer sites as this offers several advantages. For instance, overall time needed for service and recharging of vehicles is minimized if vehicles that serve the customer can use service time for recharging. Moreover, charging stations at customer sites benefit from the existing electrical grid infrastructure and are less likely to be destroyed by vandalism. By even allowing vehicles that do not serve a certain customer to use a charging station at the customer’s site, the number of charging stations can be decreased while the utilization of this costly infrastructure can be increased. Additionally, partial recharges have to be considered in realistic applications, since this enables vehicles to recharge only as much energy as the vehicle needs to finish its next trip. Thus, additional time windows of customers might become feasible, since waiting time due to unnecessary recharging at previous nodes is reduced. From a practical point of view, it might be profitable to recharge the vehicle’s battery only as much as necessary if the missing energy can be recharged at lower electricity prices overnight at the depot (cf. Felipe, Ortuño, Righini, & Tirado, 2014).
Recent literature has so far been focusing on selected aspects of the described planning problem. Research has been done on siting charging station infrastructure for different fields of application. Furthermore, additional constraints have been added to existing VRPs to extend these models for electric vehicles. A first approach on modeling simultaneous routing and siting decisions has been presented by Yang and Sun (2015) focusing on battery swapping stations (BSSs). However, three important aspects are still missing. First, time window constraints are not considered. Second, the model is not applicable for charging stations, because recharging time is not considered. Third, the range of recharging options is not covered.
Thus, the aim of our paper is to develop a model that takes simultaneous routing and siting decisions as well as the whole range of recharging options into consideration. In addition, state of the art constraints for logistics fleets (time windows, capacity constraints, customer demand) are taken into account. Besides the frequently used objective of minimizing the overall traveled distance, we also present other objectives: we minimize the number of vehicles used for a given number of charging stations as well as the number of charging stations sited for a given number of vehicles. In addition, we obtain a weighted sum of vehicles used and charging stations sited as a third objective, and total costs as a fourth objective. Results for all objectives are presented and compared using existing test instances. Furthermore, the benefit of an integrated routing and siting decision model is pointed out.
Our paper is structured as follows: in Section 2 an overview of related research streams and literature is given. In Section 3 the electric location routing problem with time windows and partial recharging (ELRP-TWPR) is introduced and explained in detail. Section 4, describes the experimental design. Results for the proposed model regarding the different objective functions are presented in Section 5. A comparison with vehicle routing problem (VRP) approaches highlights the benefit of simultaneous siting and routing decisions. Section 6 concludes this paper with a short summary and an outlook on future research.
Section snippets
Literature review
The problem formulation shown in this paper is related to various kinds of research streams. This section gives a detailed overview of related research streams focusing on electric commercial vehicle (ECV) specific optimization models, whereas only short overviews including useful references for further studies are given as far as broader research is concerned.
Single aspects of our planning problem can be found in four different research streams (see Table 1). The first stream focuses on energy
The electric location routing problem with time windows and partial recharging
In this section the ELRP-TWPR is introduced. Besides a basic model formulation, several objective functions that are applicable for different planning tasks are presented. In addition, related models are derived in order to allow for a comparison of results for simultaneous routing and siting decisions with results of routing only decisions. Also, a comparison of results for partial recharging with results for full recharging is carried out. The notation stated below remains equal for any of
Design of experiments
In this section, the design of the experiments that are conducted in Section 5 is described. We design experiments to show the benefit of our strengthened model formulation (Section 4.1), the benefit of partial recharging and simultaneous siting (Section 4.2) and the impact of the different objective functions (Section 4.3).
We conduct experiments on the instances presented by Schneider et al. (2014), which expand Solomon’s instances (cf. Solomon, 1987) by additional vertices for charging
Results
In this section, results are shown for the strengthened model formulation within Section 5.1, the benefit of partial recharging and simultaneous siting is analyzed within Section 5.2, and results for the different objective functions are discussed in Section 5.3.
Results have been generated based on the following framework: Each model is implemented using Gurobi 6.0.5 within a Python 2.7.8 environment and Ubuntu 15.04 LTS on a workstation with 16 gigabytes RAM and an Intel i7-4790 processor. The
Conclusion
In this paper, the ELRP-TWPR is presented as a novel approach for strategic planning of electric logistics fleets. Compared to existing approaches, this model adds simultaneous siting decisions for charging infrastructure as well as additional charging options to the EVRP-TW. Furthermore, time windows and capacity constraints are taken into consideration. In addition, recharging at customer sites as well as partial recharging is allowed. Results are discussed for different objective functions
References (60)
- et al.
Electric vehicle routing problem with industry constraints: Trends and insights for future research
Transportation Research Procedia
(2014) - et al.
The shortest path problem revisited: Optimal routing for electric vehicles
KI 2010: Advances in artificial intelligence
(2010) - et al.
Siting public electric vehicle charging stations in Beijing using big-data informed travel patterns of the taxi fleet
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
(2014) - et al.
A {MIP} model for locating slow-charging stations for electric vehicles in urban areas accounting for driver tours
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review
(2015) - et al.
The recharging vehicle routing problem
- et al.
A methodology to evaluate the competitiveness of electric delivery trucks
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review
(2013) - DPDHL (2014). Electric vehicles in inner city distribution traffic. URL:...
- et al.
A survey of the standard location-routing problem. Working paper LPIS-03/2014
(2014) - EC (2012). Regulation of the European parliament and the council amending regulation (EC) No 443/2009 to define the...
- et al.
Adaptive variable neighborhood search for the battery swap station location-routing problem with capacitated electric vehicles. Working paper LPIS-01/2015
(2015)
The shortest route problem with constraints
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications
Prospects for regulating the CO2 emissions from passenger cars within the European union after 2023
Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht
Location of alternative-fuel stations using the flow-refueling location model and dispersion of candidate sites on arcs
Networks and Spatial Economics
Modeling lithium ion battery degradation in electric vehicles
Proceedings of 2010 IEEE conference on Innovative technologies for an efficient and reliable electricity supply (CITRES)
Efficient energy-optimal routing for electric vehicles
Proceedings of the twenty-fifth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence
The electric vehicle-routing problem with time windows and recharging stations
Transportation Science
Combinatorial optimization for electric vehicles management
Proceedings of international conference on renewable energies and power quality
A model for location of capacitated alternative-fuel stations
Geographical Analysis
Locating passenger vehicle refueling stations
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review
Battery swap station location-routing problem with capacitated electric vehicles
Computers & Operations Research
Minimum cost path problem for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review
Electric vehicle charging stations allocation model
ROADEF-15ème congrès annuel de la Société française de recherche opérationnelle et d’aide à la décision
A variable neighborhood search branching for the electric vehicle routing problem with time windows
Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics
An arc cover-path-cover formulation and strategic analysis of alternative-fuel station locations
European Journal of Operational Research
Locating electric vehicle charging stations: A parking-based assignment method for seattle, washington
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Operations Research for green logistics – An overview of aspects, issues, contributions and challenges
European Journal of Operational Research
Exact algorithms for electric vehicle-routing problems with time windows
Operations Research
Cited by (241)
An exact algorithm for maximum electric vehicle flow coverage problem with heterogeneous chargers, nonlinear charging time and route deviations
2024, European Journal of Operational ResearchA novel collaborative electric vehicle routing problem with multiple prioritized time windows and time-dependent hybrid recharging
2024, Expert Systems with ApplicationsAn effective matheuristic approach for solving the electric traveling salesperson problem with time windows and battery degradation
2024, Engineering Applications of Artificial IntelligenceAdaptive robust electric vehicle routing under energy consumption uncertainty
2024, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging TechnologiesA branch-cut-and-price algorithm for the time-dependent electric vehicle routing problem with time windows
2024, European Journal of Operational Research