Prediction of the transition temperature of bent-core liquid crystals using fuzzy “digital thermometer” model based on artificial neural networks

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2018.03.009Get rights and content

Abstract

A dataset containing transition temperature values for 243 bent-core liquid crystal (LC) compounds was used to develop quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) models using only 2D molecular descriptors and general regression neural network (GRNN). Beside a standard analogue GRNN model, another GRNN model with fuzzy digital response was created with the aim to estimate the prediction error for each compound. Two approaches for the selection of most relevant subset of descriptors, namely the partial mutual information (PMI) and self-organizing maps combined with chi square ranking, were also compared. The best results were obtained using analogue GRNN model based on PMI selected subset (R2=0.91), with the mean absolute error (MAE) lower in comparison with previously published corresponding QSPR models. The digital PMI-GRNN model enabled distinction between high and low accurate predictions, i.e. ones with absolute error higher than mean absolute error (MAE) and others with absolute error MAE, with the accuracy of 81%.

Introduction

Quantitative structure–property/activity relationship (QSPR/QSAR) models for the prediction of physical properties and biological activities of organic compounds from their molecular structures have been a focus of great attention for a long time (Mu et al., 2007). In recent years, artificial neural networks (ANNs) have opened a new avenue for developing empirical models useful for predicting the performance of the process outside the experimental domain (Olea, 2007). A literature review indicate that QSPR modeling based on ANNs has grown dramatically, suggesting the importance of applications of ANN in molecular modeling (Katritzky et al., 2010). ANNs are useful tools in QSPR studies because a given structure–property relationship is often nonlinear (Yao et al., 2004).

The QSPR models are very important in the field of liquid crystals, since small structural modifications of liquid crystal (LC) molecules can drastically influence their transition temperature. Therefore, the design of molecular structure with desired LC phase temperature, based only on empirical rules, is a very complex task. The QSPR methodology has been successfully applied to predict various physical and chemical properties of LCs Al-Fahemi (2014), Antanasijević et al. (2016a), Gong et al. (2008), Johnson and Jurs (1999), which possess unique physicochemical properties and have wide application in a variety of fields Bahadur (1994), Vicari (2016). Nowadays, bent-core LCs are the most attractive type of these materials due to their promising applications Eremin and Jákli (2013), Takezoe and Takanishi (2006), and their transition temperatures have been the subject of recent QSPR studies Antanasijević et al. (2016b), Antanasijević et al. (2016c). In those studies, the QSPR models with good predictive ability (R2 0.90) based on decision trees, multivariate adaptive regression splines and group method of data handling (GMDH-type) neural network have been proposed for the prediction of five-ring bent-core LCs transition temperatures.

In this study, the transition temperature of bent-core LCs was predicted using general regression neural network (GRNN) with the aim to develop a more accurate model that will allow the estimation of prediction error for each compound. For this purpose, the ANN model with digital output neurons, previously proposed for the transition temperatures of smectic LC compounds by Schroder et al. (1996), has been adapted using fuzzy logic. Since a large number of molecular descriptors can be calculated for each compound, two model-free methods that can take into account both linear and nonlinear relationships, namely the partial mutual information (PMI) and self-organizing maps (SOM) combined with chi square ranking, were applied prior to the model development for the selection of the most relevant subset.

Section snippets

LC dataset

In this study, a dataset (see Table S1 in the supplemental material of the paper (Antanasijević et al., 2016c) that contains the transition temperature values for 243 bent-core LC compounds was utilized for the development and testing of models. This dataset consisted of structurally diverse five-ring aromatic compounds with the transition temperature values in the range from 352.15 to 458.15 K. The same subset of 36 compounds was used for model testing, in order to allow direct comparison with

Performance of models

In the case of FSL-SOM approach, the lowest size SOM output map that had “empty” map unit(s) was 5 × 5, and the initial pool of 360 2D descriptor was separated into 18 groups (see Table S1. in Supplementary material). After the chi square based ranking was performed, the 18 most significant descriptors were determined (Table 1). The descriptors selected by the PMI method are also given in Table 1, while the short description of descriptors selected by the both approaches is provided in Table 2.

Conclusion

The results reported in this study indicate that ANN model with fuzzy digital output neurons can be successfully used for the simulation of bent-core liquid crystal (LC) compounds physical properties, i.e. transition temperatures, and for the estimation of related prediction error.

The best results (R2=0.91 and MAE  =  4.81 K) were obtained using standard GRNN model with the 2D descriptors subset determined by PMI-based (partial mutual information) method. Although

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Project Nos. 172007 and 172013).

References (32)

  • Al-FahemiJ.H.

    QSPR study on nematic transition temperatures of thermotropic liquid crystals based on DFT-calculated descriptors

    Liq. Cryst.

    (2014)
  • AntanasijevićJ. et al.

    A QSPR study on the liquid crystallinity of five-ring bent-core molecules using decision trees, MARS and artificial neural networks

    RSC Adv.

    (2016)
  • AntanasijevićD. et al.

    A GMDH-type neural network with multi-filter feature selection for the prediction of transition temperatures of bent-core liquid crystals

    RSC Adv.

    (2016)
  • AntanasijevićJ. et al.

    Prediction of clearing temperatures of bent-core liquid crystals using decision trees and multivariate adaptive regression splines

    Liq. Cryst.

    (2016)
  • AntanasijevićD.Z. et al.

    Forecasting human exposure to PM10 at the national level using an artificial neural network approach

    J. Chemom.

    (2013)
  • BahadurB.

    Liquid Crystals —Applications and Uses

    (1994)
  • Cited by (5)

    • An optimal washout filter for motion platform using neural network and fuzzy logic

      2022, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Baklouti et al. (2018) introduced a type-2 FNN for better approximation of a complex system with better dealing with uncertainty. Antanasijević et al. (2018) predicted the transition temperature of bent-core liquid crystals using FLC and general regression NN. Bas et al. (2018) proposed a time series FLC using NN to specify the membership function for higher accurate estimation of the system.

    • Decision-making in tunneling using artificial intelligence tools

      2020, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Mahmoodzadeh and Zare, (2016), have proposed an innovative methodology to predict expected ground conditions, construction time and costs in road tunnels, which is an integration of the ground predictions tool based on Markov process, and the time and cost variance analysis based on Monte-Carlo (MC) simulation. In more recent researches, different machine learning techniques such as Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machines (SVM) and the Gaussian Process (GP) have been applied in different engineering problems (Huang et al., 2018; Talaat et al., 2018; Silva et al., 2017; Silva and Bastos-Filho, 2018; Ribeiro et al., 2019; Antanasijević et al., 2018; Fazai et al., 2019; Azizsoltani and Sadeghi, 2018; Liu et al., 2018; Yagiz et al., 2009). For example, optimization of geotechnical problems (Chou and Thedia, 2016; Galende-Hernández et al., 2018), project control forecasting (Wauters and Vanhoucke, 2014), construction management (Cheng and Wu, 2009), construction injury prediction (Tixier et al., 2016), slope collapse prediction (Cheng et al., 2012), prediction of TBM operating parameters (Gao et al., 2019), landslide displacement (Grelle and Guadagno, 2012; Rohmer and Foerster, 2011), surrounding rock deformation (Feng et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2012) pipe failure rate (Tabesh et al., 2009; Shirzad et al., 2014), shallow sliding failure prediction (He et al., 2018), ground surface settlement (Noorian-Bidgoli et al., 2016), determination of earth pressure (Goh et al., 2018), risk assessment and cost estimation (Sun et al., 2018), forecasting the rock fragmentation (Gao et al., 2018), rock slope stability analyses (Li et al., 2016) and other engineering problems.

    View full text