Short communication
Using different multimodel ensemble approaches to simulate soil moisture in a forest site with six traditional pedotransfer functions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.03.016Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Different multimodel ensemble approaches were used to simulate soil moisture contents.

  • The simple model average method always had worse performance than the best single model.

  • The performance of the superensemble approach was better than that of the best single model.

Abstract

Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) have routinely been used to estimate the soil hydraulic properties (SHPs) from easily measurable soil properties, such as particle-size distribution, organic matter content and bulk density. However, different PTFs often yielded different prediction results. In order to deal with the PTF selection problem, this study used multimodel ensemble approaches to simulate forest soil moisture based on the modelling results of different PTFs. A total of 300 days of observed soil moisture data at four depths (10-, 20-, 40- and 60-cm) were adopted to calibrate the Richards equation and obtain the SHPs by using the inverse option in HYDRUS-1D. Six published PTFs were selected to predict the SHPs, which were used to predict soil moisture temporal variations at these four different depths. Two multimodel ensemble methods, including the simple model average (SMA) and the multiple linear regression (MLR)-based superensemble, were used in this study. Under different selections of training periods (i.e. 50, 100 and 150 days), performances of these multimodel ensemble approaches were compared with those of the best single PTF model. The SMA always had worse performance than the best single model. However, the performances of the superensemble approach were better than those of the best single model, and even comparable to those of the calibrated soil water flow model. Results show that given the relatively long training period (>50 days), it is worthwhile to consider the superensemble method to simulate soil moisture contents in forestland.

Introduction

The forest hydrological research plays a critical role in the alternative land-use practices (e.g. restoring farmlands to forests) and the management of forests (Aranda et al., 2012). Mathematical simulation models have often been applied to hydrological processes in forest soils (Nosetto et al., 2012). Simulations of the soil moisture dynamics need soil hydraulic properties (SHPs) (i.e. soil water retention characteristics and saturated hydraulic conductivity). However, SHPs are often unavailable for large scale modelling since they are hard to be measured or calibrated with good spatial resolution. Therefore, pedotransfer functions (PTFs) have been adopted to predict SHPs from more easily measurable soil properties, such as particle-size distribution, organic matter content and bulk density (Rawls and Brakensiek, 1985). During the past thirty years, the multiple linear regression (MLR) (Saxton et al., 1986) and artificial neural networks (ANN) (Schaap et al., 1998) were routinely used to develop the PTFs from large datasets in different regions. Evaluation of PTFs is not only to compare the measured and estimated SHPs, but also to test the application of the predicted SHPs in simulating soil moisture content in the unsaturated zone. Many studies have investigated different PTFs in soil water simulation at various scales (Chirico et al., 2010, Cichota et al., 2013). Although PTFs can be well used to simulate soil water variations, the empirical nature of the MLR and ANN techniques virtually introduces the uncertainties since these PTFs were used outside of the datasets they developed. Therefore, it is still difficult to select the best PTF to estimate SHPs for site-specific water flow simulation.

A few years ago, the multimodel ensemble forecasting has been demonstrated to deal with the uncertainties in PTF selection (Guber et al., 2009). The idea of combining predictions from multiple independent models was first introduced by Bates and Granger (1969). Basic form of multimodel prediction is the simple model average (SMA) that always assigns equal weight on all the candidate models (Ajami et al., 2006). The superensemble is an improved multimodel prediction approach that combines different model forecasts during the training period using MLR (Krishnamurti et al., 2000). Many studies have found that superensemble had significantly better performance than the best single model and SMA (Krishnamurti et al., 2000, Guber et al., 2009). To our knowledge, however, few studies used the superensemble method for multimodel simulation of soil moisture content in forestland. The objectives of this study are (i) to evaluate the utilization of six traditional PTFs to predict SHPs for soil water simulation in a forest site; (ii) to compare the performances of the multimodel ensemble approaches (i.e. SMA and superensemble) with those of the best single model.

Section snippets

Study area and experimental design

This study was conducted in Xishan District, Wuxi City, which is located in Taihu Lake basin, China. The experimental site was located in a broad-leaved forest with an area of approximately 10 ha. The soil was classified as a Luvisol (FAO/ISRIC/ISSS, 1998) or an Udalf (Soil Survey Staff, 1999). Because the landscape of this site is generally flat, the movement of soil water is mainly dominated by vertical water fluxes (recharge and discharge) through soil profiles. The groundwater levels are

Calibration of soil water flow model

Fig. 1 shows the variations of the mean soil moisture content within the top 60-cm soil profile and the computed weekly ET0. As can be seen, the daily soil moisture dynamics changed with the rainfall distribution. In general, the weekly ET0 decreased significantly from Weeks 1–24, and then increased significantly from Weeks 24–43. Observed and simulated soil moisture contents at four profile depths in the forest site by using the inverse option in HYDRUS-1D are shown in Fig. 2. The NSE values

Discussion and conclusion

As depicted in Fig. 2, the topsoil moisture contents exhibited more variations than the subsoil moisture contents. This is related to the fact that the topsoil moisture contents are directly influenced by the precipitation and evapotranspiration, while the subsoil moisture contents are mainly influenced by the topsoil moisture contents. It is also noteworthy that the 60-cm depth was found to have the lower accuracy than the other three depths. This may be attributed to the “unit hydraulic

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41030745), Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation (No. BK2012502), Key “135” Project of Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. NIGLAS2012135005) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2013M540470).

References (28)

  • A.K. Guber et al.

    Multimodel simulation of water flow in a field soil using pedotransfer functions

    Vadose Zone J.

    (2009)
  • H.V. Gupta et al.

    Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration

    J. Hydrol. Eng.

    (1999)
  • G.H. Hargreaves et al.

    Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature

    Appl. Eng. Agric.

    (1985)
  • T.N. Krishnamurti et al.

    Improving tropical precipitation forecasts from a multianalysis superensemble

    J. Clim.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text