Conjoint analysis for luxury brand outlet malls in Korea with consideration of customer lifetime value

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.004Get rights and content

Abstract

As Asian economies have grown rapidly, Asia has become a new leading market of the luxury goods industry. This paper used conjoint analysis (CA) for the optimal design of a luxury brand outlet mall to maximize the customer lifetime value (CLV). This approach complements a simple CA by considering CLV. The proposed approach is then applied to designing a suburban luxury brand outlet mall in Korea, a new concept to Korea. The results indicate that the optimal design for the outlet mall is the medieval European-style mall, with the linkage to Natural Tourism, which consists of the restaurants with delicious food and the stores with similar ratio between masstige and luxury brands.

Introduction

As the economy of Asian countries has grown rapidly, the market of luxury goods in Asia has also developed. Although Asian countries earn less per capita than developed countries in North America and Europe, this economic development has given more potential buying power to the Asian market. Recently, the Asian luxury goods market represents up to 45% of the world’s luxury goods market (Lee & Kim, 2003). Japan has already become an important market for the luxury item industry with Hong Kong and Korea following the trend. This economic growth also made various distribution channels possible in Asia allowing major distribution companies to introduce suburban luxury brand outlet malls in Asia. Luxury brand outlet malls began in the USA and Japan 10 years ago and have a large demand potential in Asia.

To successfully establish the market for new luxury brand outlet malls in Asia, it is essential to understand the customers’ preferences. Regardless of the specific tools and methods used to develop successful outlet malls, customer orientation is a prerequisite (Lengnick-Hall, 1996). There are two methods to discover customer needs, passive and active. The passive method simply classifies the existing customers. Alternatively, the active method finds customers who over their lifetime can be profitable for companies. By searching and sorting out valuable customers into different groups based on their potential lifetime profits, developers can better meet different needs and expectations (Day, 2003). Consequently, to the ability to evaluate the lifetime value of customers is important.

The main purpose of this study is to design a luxury brand outlet mall for the Asian market using a conjoint analysis (CA) in consideration of the customer lifetime value (CLV).

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows; Section 2 reviews previous studies regarding the luxury brand industry, shopping malls and the related research methodology for CA and CLV. In Section 3, a CA is conducted to design a luxury brand outlet mall in Korea. In Section 4, the CA results are enhanced with the CLV. In Section 5, the market share of a designed luxury brand outlet mall in a competitive environment using choice simulation is predicted. Section 6 concludes this paper and suggests future research directions.

Section snippets

Conjoint analysis and shopping mall design

Currently, shopping malls are operating in an increasingly competitive environment (LeHew & Fairhurst, 2000). Competition is strong due to the shopping center development boom that began in previous decades and continues today (Fickes, 1998).

In order to find ways to stay ahead of the competition, many prior studies have applied CA and CLV separately. CA has been used extensively by marketing researchers for understanding consumers’ preferences (Green & Srinivasan, 1978) and is a method for

Empirical study

In this empirical study, two methodologies are combined (CA and CLV) to design a successful luxury brand outlet mall in Korea based on the purchasing power of potential customers over their lifetime.

Computing potential purchasing power using CLV

Most CLV models stem from the basic equation defined as follows:CLV=i=1nRi-Ci(1+d)iwhere i is the period of cash flow from customer transactions, Ri is the revenue from the customer in period i, Ci is the total cost in period i, d is discount rate, and n is the total period of the expected life of the customer.

This basic model has been modified to meet our objectives. In this study, the customers are classified by their nationalities, and the potential purchasing power of each customer group

Choice simulation

Choice simulation is a method in which the market share among competitors can be predicted allowing companies to draw an optimal combination of attributes for a product (or service). That is, the technique that promises to deliver better decision-making insights for managers is choice-based conjoint analysis (Gates, McDaniel, & Braunsberger, 2000), the combination of CA and choice simulation. Although the utilities allow an understanding of the customers’ preferences, a combination with the

Conclusion

The CA is a popular method used to analyze customer utility before a new product or service is placed on the market. To develop a successful design for a luxury brand outlet mall, CA is applied with CLV.

The result of CLV shows that the purchasing power of the domestic customer is the highest (85%) follow by the Japanese (7%), Chinese (5%), and European and North American (3%). From CA, both the importance of each attribute and its preference level in luxury brand outlet malls are discovered.

References (36)

  • F.R. Dwyer et al.

    Business marketing

    (2002)
  • M.A. Eastlake et al.

    Retail-tainment: Factors impacting cross-shopping in regional malls

    Journal of Shopping Center Research

    (1998)
  • Ibrahim Faishal et al.

    Determinants of entertaining shopping experiences and their link to consumer behavior: Case studies of shopping centres in Singapore

    Journal of Retail and Leisure Property

    (2002)
  • M. Fickes

    Expanding the limits of the regional mall

    Shopping Center World

    (1998)
  • P.E. Green et al.

    Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook

    Journal of Consumer Research

    (1978)
  • S. Gupta et al.

    Valuing customers

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (2004)
  • Johnson, R., & Orme, B. (2003). Getting the most out of CBC. Sawtooth Software Technical Papers, retrieved 14 August...
  • T. Kinley et al.

    Tourist-destination shopping centers: An importance–performance analysis of attributes

    Journal of Shopping Center Research

    (2003)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Design guidelines for the Dashilar, Beijing open green space redevelopment project

      2014, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening
      Citation Excerpt :

      Conjoint analysis methods help designers determine the requirements and preferences of residents in order to build development blueprints. Conjoint analysis is typically used among marketing researchers to investigate customer preferences (Kim et al., 2009a,b; Song et al., 2009; Mok et al., 2010; Jeon et al., 2010; Sohn and Ju, 2010; Min et al., 2011; Sohn and Lee, 2012; Castel et al., 2013). This method is useful to realistically and quantitatively estimate and examine the attribute trade-offs that are made by consumers regarding any given product.

    • Contributing clarity by examining brand luxury in the fashion market

      2012, Journal of Business Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Much of the previous research attempts to uncover tenets of luxury brands (Atwal & Williams, 2009; Berthon et al., 2009; Fionda & Moore, 2009; Keller, 2009; Nueno & Quelch, 1998; Truong, McColl, & Kitchen, 2009; Tynan et al., 2010; Wetlaufer, 2004). Some research seeks to identify motivations for purchasing luxury goods (Husic & Cicic, 2009; Kim, Kim, & Sohn, 2009; Park, Rabolt, & Sook, 2008; Prendergast & Wong, 2003) or fashion (Sung & Jeon, 2009). Other researchers tend to focus on luxury brand development (Christodoulides et al., 2009; Moore & Birtwistle, 2004; Nobbs, Birtwistle, & Fiorito, 2008; Silverstein, Fiske, & Butman, 2005; Truong, Simmons, McColl, & Kitchen, 2008; Vigneron & Johnson, 2004), purchase (Park et al., 2008), parental influence (Prendergast & Wong, 2003), protection (Clarke & Owens, 2000; Elsmore, 2000; Juggessur & Cohen, 2009; McDonald & Roberts, 1990; Phau & Min, 2009), the Internet (Nyeck, 2004; Okonkwo, 2009; Sung & Jeon, 2009) and brand extensions (Chen & Liu, 2004; Dias & Ryals, 2002; Glynn & Brodie, 1998; Hagtvedt & Patrick, 2009).

    • Mining shopping behavior in the Taiwan luxury products market

      2012, Expert Systems with Applications
      Citation Excerpt :

      In recent years, accompanying the continued growth of the Asian economy has been the rapid expansion of the luxury products industry in that region. As the Asian luxury products market represents almost half of the global luxury products market, the concerns about the luxury products industry has become widespread (Kim et al., 2009). Annual luxury products consumption has reached $2.7 billion dollars in Taiwan, ranking the country among the top five in the Asian region in this respect (Smith, 2009).

    • Conjoint analysis for improving the e-book reader in the Korean market

      2011, Expert Systems with Applications
      Citation Excerpt :

      The result is a detailed picture of how customers make decisions that can be used to build market models to predict market share in new market conditions and test the impact of product or service changes on the market to see where and how we can gain the greatest improvements over our competitors. Not surprisingly, conjoint analysis has become a key tool in building and developing not only market strategies, but also strategies for other areas (Jeon, Kim, & Sohn, 2009; Kim, Kim, & Sohn, 2009; Kim, Son, & Sohn, 2009; Mok, Sohn, & Ju, 2009; Sohn & Ju, 2010; Song, Jang, & Sohn, 2008). Before performing conjoint analysis, reasonable attributes and the level of each attribute should be set.

    • Assessing preferences for mega shopping centres: A conjoint measurement approach

      2011, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
      Citation Excerpt :

      Conjoint preference or choice models (Louviere et al., 2000) have been applied many times in the context of retailing. For example, Oppewal et al. (1997) developed a conjoint choice model to measure the effects of shopping centre size and marketing mix on customers' choice behaviour; Oppewal and Timmermans (1999) applied a stated preference model to measure the effect of physical aspects of shopping centres on consumer perceptions; Borgers et al. (2006) used a stated choice model to assess the impact of a peripheral retail centres on existing shopping centres in a Dutch city; and Kim et al. (2009) used conjoint analysis to design a novel suburban luxury brand outlet mall in South Korea. This article is structured as follows.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text