Qualitative modelling of a multi-step process: The case of French breadmaking
Introduction
The knowledge linked to the explanation and the achievement of manufacturing through industrial processes is mostly tacit and not stated explicitly. This is all the more significant in the case of agricultural products and food processing, an industry field where empiricism and recipe rules have been used for a long time. The expression of this knowledge requires a scientific analysis of the implied processes, by formalizing the result of this analysis, as well as a collection of the knowledge of the various actors involved. This collection focuses on the people (craftsmen, industrial) having a practical implication in the processes and also with the scientists of the research groups which study them. Scientific knowledge is distinct from the know-how. A scientific knowledge deals with phenomena that, starting from a cause, give an expected result; in this case, the cause, the result and the law that links them, are known. Conversely, in the case of know-how, only the repeatability of the result, given by a cause, is seeked, but the phenomena that relate them are not fully taken into account; only the cause and the result are ascertained. A common formalization of both concepts would allow to design a complete knowledge basis of the industrial process concerned. Such a knowledge basis would be the testimony of the actual practice and the starting point for future investigations.
In the present work, we deal with agricultural product processes, a field in which cognitive approaches of computer modelling are just emergent (Liao, 2005, Bimbenet et al, 2007). In these processes, the technology is based on material sources (ingredients, consumables and equipments), a context, the time and a technical pathway made of linked actions, to be executed. Contrary to many manufacturing industrial fields, raw materials are not constant, and products often change and the technical control of processes is still approximate. This great complexity has impaired the application of a qualitative physics approach, up to now (Shawn & Menon, 1990).
The knowledge used is generally granular and based on rules from know-how and profane knowledge. In this context, different kinds of variables are employed: measurements, observations, words… Representing and modelling of such complex systems require a systemic approach including a definition of an homogeneous calculus and operating space in order to simulate experts reasoning. Qualitative representing and reasoning, from qualitative physics (Hayes, 1979), makes it possible to study formally these systems. A methodology based on a space of quantities including seven symbolic elements (Guerrin, 1995) has been developed. In this frame, the cognitive operations have been defined to describe the reasoning of human experts in agricultural products processing (Ndiaye, Péron, & Fleurat-Lessard, 1998).
Here, we will focus on linear processes made of one of several operating steps. Cheese ripening is an example of a single step process (Perrot et al., 2004), whereas French breadmaking is representative of a multi-step process since it includes different operations of modifications of ingredients from dough mixing to baking. The aim of this work is to apply this methodology to this process (breadmaking) in order to extend the modelling of complex systems with knowledge basis. This process gathers all the challenges of linear processes of agricultural products: different kinds of modifications (biochemical, chemical and physical) take place at various structural levels in batch on the same product. Moreover, the features of the ingredients, and each step, may generate defects of the dough and bread. The notion of defect is a relative one, which means non-adequacy to sensory and/or economical target properties.
Section snippets
Quantities space (Q)
The French breadmaking process includes the following operations: mixing ingredients into a dough, dough rising, dough shaping, dough scoring and baking. The outputs of the processing operations are characterized through the dough and bread condition as state variables (dough stickiness, colour, etc.).
The state variables are influenced by the control parameters of the processing operations, the control variables. Every state and control variable takes a value qualified as being insufficient,
Definition of the French breadmaking problem
Bread results from a succession of operations that might look simple: mixing, fermentation, shaping and baking. These processing operations are unit processes linked up as steps of a breadmaking process.
From a physio-chemical point of view (Bloksma, 1990), the successive stages bring an initially dispersed granular medium (flour) that becomes hydrated once being mixed, to a viscoelastic macroscopically homogeneous mass (dough). Dough is structured by a network of gluten containing suspended
Results and discussion
With the transformation of the decision tables into qualitative functions, we note that in the current knowledge of the dough mixing domain in French breadmaking, none of the eight state variables is influenced by the four control variables (Fig. 7). We observe that (i) linear speed difference between the bowl and the mixing arm (LS) influences only the smoothing velocity (SV) although it is associated in the decision tables collected systematically with the dough overheating (ΔT); (ii) the
Conclusion
This work aimed at building up a qualitative model of a multi-step food process, with special emphasis on breadmaking. Each output of one step was taken as the input of the next one, and was considered as state variable of bread dough, or baked bread, whereas every step was governed by control variables. So, the state variables of one step were influenced by input and control variables. Modelling the whole process could then be reduced to the modelling of the different steps in the same space
Acknowledgements
This work has been developed in the frame of the scientific project “AsCoPain” supported by department CEPIA (processing and characterization of agricultural products). The authors appreciate Hubert Chiron (INRA-BIA)’s most valuable contribution for his expertise in breadmaking.
References (26)
- et al.
Advances in research in food process engineering as presented at ICEF9
Journal of Food Engineering
(2007) - et al.
Experimental and numerical simulation of dough mixing in filled geometries
Journal of Food Engineering
(2003) - et al.
A qualitative physics based on confluences
Artificial Intelligence
(1984) Qualitative reasoning about an ecological process: interpretation in hydroecology
Ecological Modelling
(1991)- et al.
Decision support system design using the operator skill to control cheese ripening –Application of the fuzzy symbolic approach
Journal of Food Engineering
(2004) Problems of interval-based qualitative reasoning
A theory of interactions: Unifying qualitative and quantitative algebraic reasoning
Artificial Intelligence
(1991)Dough structure, dough rheology and baking quality
Cereal Foods World
(1990)- Dormoy, J.-L. (1988). Controlling qualitative resolution. In Proceedings of the seventh national conference on...
- Guerrin, F. (1995). Dualistic algebra for qualitative analysis. In Qualitative reasoning workshop (pp. 64–73)....